Why doesn't real life work like this?
>>78270007because we're not cavemen
>>78270028what if we were cavemen
>>78270094I'm pretty sure cavemen didn't actually do this very often
>>78270007This is still the case in many central asian -stan countries
>>78270103and what are you basing that off of?
>>78270007>Noo boo you don't understand you stupid foid, we aren't evil rapist misogynistic monster predators, it's just your projection on us!!!! Go fuck a chad, I can't wait until he beat you until you're dead LMFAO!!!!men..........
>>78270007Because high level of stress during pregnancy and child rearing (eg. due to rape) results in less healthy children with higher anxiety level. Also aggressive rapey dads are less likely to stay or survive to care for the children so there will be less parental investment too.
>>78270108Well the burden of proof is on you to substantiate a claim but regardless. Most animals don't beat their prospective mates into submission, most mammals (and terrestrial animals to that point) are polygamous not monoganous, our closest relatives (chimps/bonobos) are highly polygamous, and highly intelligent cooperative species generally fair better when they use courtship instead of aggression for mating to maintain order.
>>78270108not sure how true this is but I've read that early humans lived in small bands of 50-200 people. so it might've been possible when one tribe/group encountered another one but not within the group cuz the local rapist would probably be exiled
>>78270154you want it, bitch! now bend over and arch that back so we can start our family.
the romans, on encountering the ancient celtic brits, (the druids and such) said their women were "communal." they said this as a bad thing btw, but i was like, sounds good to me. sharing is caring. pass that stacy this way (respectfully) i think there were some pacific islander cultures where they all fuck each other, moms help their sons jack off etc. civilization made sex a taboo thing. humans like bonobos probably evolved from a fuckfest and we might devolve back to it someday. hopefully soon. like, before friday.
>>78270094>>78270103Tribal society would have all the men band together to protect the tribe from violent outsiders
>>78270166>Most animals don't beat their prospective mates into submissionmaybe not, but the males keep females in line
>>78270192>the romans thought guaranteed fatherhood was badThe romans were extremely based
>>78270204>>the romans thought UNguaranteed fatherhood was badFuck I'm retarded
>>78270194dominant males also keep each other in line in species like that. Im not sure if humans ever had a harem type social structure before the rise of private property
>>78270192Are you sure it was a sexual thing you read and not just the tribal way of life?
>>78270007Why Robots think they would thrive in this scenario? Your last sight would be ungaChad boning the women while you bleed on the ground.
>>78270232Rise of property was the point when harems were a thing.https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
>>78270341>"Just a bit of male competition">dead
>>78270363Maybe Marx was right. Prehistoric egalitarianism fucking rocks.
>>78270394About time incels realized this
>>78270422Oh I'm not an incel, I'm a communist. I've always just disagreed with Marx on this point and I still do. Past societies were also hierarchical but based on strength and age rather than status and wealth.
