It's understandable if a bigger male calls you a manlet, but it doesn't make sense when a woman does. A shorter man is still able to btfo a taller woman; an untrained 5'11" woman will lose to a male that is 5'6" in unarmed conflict. What is the point then, since it's usually a negative connotation? It doesn't make sense
the fact you care enough to type this post makes you more of a manlet than height ever would. Nobody cares
>>80000605The connotation isn't about if she can beat you it's an observation based if other men would beat you it isn't that hard to understand. I think it's a retarded thing to say but if you thought for 3 seconds about what you said you mind have understood
>>80000628Like I said, I don't care because I know I can physically dominate the majority of women, even the taller ones. So why would a woman ever use the term manlet let as an insult? It's just one insult that doesn't make sense. Plenty of insults make sense in their own context, man let never does.
>>80000635>other men would beat youSo? Plenty of men will lose to each other, even if they are equal heights. Weapons don't care about height also (women can use them too).
>>80000669>asks question>gets answerSo?kikenigger bait used to be believable...
>>80000672Women that use the term are retarded. Only males can use it
>>80000710If you understand why a man can be a manlet a woman can observe why to other men he is a manlet. It isn't that hard to understand. I think it's retarded for ant gender to use such a Reddit term but the fact you can't comprehend this basic thing is just genuinely dense
>>80000605I'm a short man with a tall boyfriend. I have him on a leash and he carries me around where ever I tell him to.
>>80000605Also 150 grains of lead going 1500 feet per second drops just about any human not drugged out the balls.
