How do I attract a man who is sexually dominant if my personality outside of sexual fantasies is dominant? I only seem to attract submissive men who want me to bully them or kick them in the balls because I'm very bossy. Even on 4chan. But I don't want to open conversations with sexual fetishes that's weird. Tell me fellow losers
>>80048721you dont want to dom at all? being a switch is the best imomaybe if you want dom man start acting like a sub
>>80048721bro, just fapping, is easier and cheaper
>>80048733I just can't put those two things in my mind together. If I see a man in a sexually submissive way he can never perform the role of a dominant to me. I don't mean mild stuff like kissing feet or whatever, but actually being tied up with butt plug in or wearing girl panties or wanting to be degraded for his dick size or something.>maybe if you want dom man start acting like a subBut that would be me faking my whole persona.
>>80048721I see that a lot of young women want to be dominant in the streets but also want their bf to be dominant on the bed.It just doesn't work like that. Sexually dominant people usually are always dominant
What do you mean by sexually dominant anyways? Being more specific helpsMostly I find it's just people who are too ashamed to seek their own pleasure, but allow themselves to enjoy it if someone else takes controlfrankly, that shit is pathetic
>>80048799Someone who gets off on taking the lead, spanking you, whipping you, wants to put their hand around your neck and tie you up, that kind of stuff.>>80048795That's true probably for the most part
>>80048778>I just can't put those two things in my mind togetheryou have a tiny mind, i can do both roles just fine, both are fun, sex is supposed to be fun>But that would be me faking my whole persona.dont you want to be a sub? also you can just tell the dude that you would prefer him to be more dominant, but lets be real he would be disappointed (i would be, most girls are subs and they wont dare to switch)
>>80048811The way I see sex is almost entirely dedicated to making the other person feel good because I have no problems making myself feel good so why would I bother focusing on that?selfish doms make no sense to me
>>80048778most switch men are just into the woman initiating and controlling sometimes and maybe him being objectified a little, they don't necessarily want adrenaline-addict experiences like being flogged or whatever. they just want to experience some level of mutual possessiveness rather than it being entirely one-way, and they want you to be able to relate to the kinds of appetites he has in the dom role and experience sexual access to someone as a source of pleasure.weird shit you see in porn isn't indicative of what people want in relationships, it's just supposed to be eye-catching and let people try something out mentally so they can incorporate it into their sexual symbology.
Just imagine dominating a bossy woman in bed. Degrading her and turning her into a sex toy, especially after she though she could boss you around earlier.
>>80048721If you want to be dominated in the bed, you will be dominated outside the bed. You will let go of your grasp of the world. Your grasp will be on my cock when I'm rearranging your insides.
>>80049643It seems like most men hate it because they see it as: "I get bossed around in day to day life and then she also expects me to do the work outside of it"omfg
>>80049688bruh, what work? You just freely use her body for your own pleasure
>>80049688It is only normal to want to man the helm if you are dominant.To act performatively dominant in while at the bed only is weird and femoid wishful thinking
>>80048778>If I see a man in a sexually submissive way he can never perform the role of a dominant to meThe sooner everyone on earth realizes that all of existence is a shit test exactly like this, the better
>>80050533I clarified strongly submissive actions. Crying, kissing feet, gentleness, etc. are not that. But actually wanting a pink butt plug in your ass, wearing panties or getting spanked like a child ARE.
>>80048795I don't get how men could want that.. They would have all the downsides : He would have to work his ass off in bed for a false performance because it would mean nothing as she would not in fact follow his lead but be a bitch outside And he would have to work his ass off irl as he would not lead but be led. He would get tired of her trying to boss him on things of the masculine sphere (something serious, about practical stuff, about the public physical side of things, etc). A bitch that would not follow him, and still be passive and do nothing in bed.>>80048721I think it just means you have a bad personnality. Immature maybe, but you clearly got something wrong : You gave uo your femininity both in bed and irl, by not wanting to seduce him in bed and be proactive, and irl not wanting him to lead. Men are meant to lead, in the public sphere and irl even more. Then women can seduce them and can get a hold in their heart, but women do that by pleasing them and not by just being passive in bed. So in both case you are wrong.You want the cake and the money for it. You want to be a bossy bitch who doesn't respect and accept the lead of her man, but still want to get the special treatment in bed because it matches with your instinct. In fact you have to accept you're not an individual but are meant to be with someone else and thus accept his role as a man, then in bed he can demonstrate it and it can mean something actually, or you have to seduce him actively in bed so that he let's you have more power in the relationship in your own feminine way (he is still the man and still has the lead). You can't be both passive in bed and dominant irl.
>>80050704NTA but it exists my bf is very chill and sweet service oriented in our life but sadistic and assertive in bed
>>80050695crying is way more submissive than wearing a butt plug lol
>>80050748I don't think so personally. A butt plug is giving sissy faggot vibes. Crying is just emotional depth which is attractive in certain situations.
>>80050756oh I thought you meant crying during sex. anyway your dom can wear a buttplug if he wants to, it's his business.
>>80050742You can be "very chill and sweet service oriented" but still be the master : you have the lead, the last word or the control of the relationship. So she can be assertive, bossy, whatever, as long it doesn't displease you, doesn't hurt your leadership, the direction you want for things as a man. I don't see "very chill and sweet service oriented" as a contradiction to the masculine role and male dominance. You don't have to never listen to your woman or not be sweet,...Of course I don't want to say defective relationships don't exist, but that's an unfortunate scenario if the woman both want to not be controlled irl and to control and dominate you but want special false treatment in bed.
>>80050813he doesn't tho he does whatever i tell him to do and nods he even jokingly calls me master and says yes master~ or yes darling~ but he isn't a sub in bed at all to him its like payback time just saying it can work and it works well
>>80049643>she though she could boss you around earlier.Then she goes back to bossing me aroundAnd i have to pretend i see as anything other than a sex toyI like it as a fantasy, but it would probably ruin any relationship i got into
>>80048721act bratty, add a bit of brattiness to your dominance, make it obvious that you know you're cute/sexy or whatever
>>80048721You're literally like every other girl ever. There's no such thing as a sexually dominant female, unfortunately. Chad just doesn't want to fuck you and it's made your smelly beef curtains flap with angst. You're a fucking cunt, by the way, I can tell.
>>80048721fetlife>>80051288this, brattiness is a green light to take your ass to pound town>>80051317lmao go jerk off loser
>>80051332>A crumb of pussy, milady?
Post your discord. You're exactly what I'm looking for.
>>80051685sure it's urafukkenphaggit515069
>>80048721>Tell me fellow losersIt's simple, you don't.
>>80050885You telling your relationship works doesn't count for an unbiased testimony. You might also tell yourself that and he obeys you just as long as he's okay with that. >to him its like payback timeYes, it might be cope mechanism because he might indeed be a spineless faggot.
>>80050704Isn't the point of being sexually dominant is that you enjoy being in the active role? So if you are sexually Dom you wouldn't see it as work but a reward that you can throw her around in bed. Shouldn't it be especially rewarding if she was a bitch to you before, to be able to make her lose all pretense in the sight of you whipping out your cock?That's how I imagine this type of dynamic. All men have suppressed anger issues, and sex is an acceptable way to express them and wash the feeling off.
>>80052545paint the picture of how it would look in a real world situation where you were playing out the role of the dominant partner in a relationship over a guy, i cant picture it at all.i mean in a broad sense i cant picture it, where its just the expectation from the guy that his girlfriend is calling the shots, i can see scenarios where its not weird for either partner to be dominant in the moment if its for something important. ive had it in the past where a girlfriend has been insistent i wear one thing over another when going somewhere for example.like what if youre sitting at home with a guy and nobody can be fucked cooking so you both decide to order food, you have a headache and weird craving for sushi, he says 'lets share a pizza, i really want some pizza', are you going to turn around and tell him 'fk your pizza youre not having that tonight, we're ordering sushi' instead of just ordering both.i cant picture what it even means for you to be dominant
>>80052545>Isn't the point of being sexually dominant is that you enjoy being in the active role?Being dominant should mean having some kind of power, some kind of sexual dominance. It doesn't only mean to be active.>make her lose all pretenseThis expression of her reveaing the truth and losing all pretense means that it isn't only fake dominance in bed, but it means something in regards to irl too, because otherwise she doesn't "lose all pretense" but in fact build them at and during sex (and then loose it when she becomes a bitch again irl).How can one only be a "dom" in bed ? It would just be a pretense, a joke. It should mean something at least about your masculine dominance over her, it's a manifestation of something or not. The fact you can use it to vent, doesn't mean it can or should be the opposite of the irl where you are the little bitch.I mostly see that as masculine and feminine sphere : the dominant man manifest his masculine power, the proactive woman in bed manifest her seduction and feminine attribute and the qualities of her gender. But it cannot be completely fake. Men must have the lead or else their cope mechanism would not be enough, even if they do rape roleplay.>>80052757Being dominant is leading because you have the virtues/qualities/capacities, women can't be dominant outside of their feminine sphere, or they are illegitimate and bitchy.
>>80052757I am frequently dominant in bed. The reason it's not the same still though, men can't really be hurt or tamed by sex. So you can't really compare situations in the way it feels. Dominating women should feel pretty rewarding, because women lose themselves in good pounding, you can actually hurt and affect them with it. Still as a natural switch I just can't help but sometimes press my man down and choke him. It is enjoyable, not work. So I don't understand complains about work. Sex is play. You just do whatever you want and hope another side finds it acceptable and plays along.If you think that sex is work you are not attracted to the person, hormonally deficient or you just are not dominant sexually at all, don't have the streak. >>80053012A woman losing it at sex is not fake dominance, it in admittance of you being so good at it, she can't help but submit. I can't imagine this not feeling good, all men want to feel like sex gods. Dominance don't have to absolute as no person is good at everything all at once, all people have side where they need someone else to take over and guide them. Saying that sex is aktshually all about power is gay as fuck. Sex is a gift from God for two paired people to enjoy each other, it is meant to be fun and express first and foremost, love. You belong to each other not through any genuine power over, but because love (or in case of degenerates, horniness) compels you to own and submit. There is no force involved. Well look at my picture. Would you say it is submissive or dominant? I'd say it is both because even though the pose is submissive, he is framed as acting of selfish passion and is holding her leg down to do what he desires. But to OP, I wanna ask, have you ever actually been with a dominant man? It looks super hot sure, but irl it may feel completely different.
>>80053123You're a woman so you don't get male dominance. Masculine dominance is real and irl. Men have to dominate and simply do by the nature of things. If they dominate in bed, they have to dominate irl, and if they are less proactive in bed, they have to dominate irl though>she can't help but submitMeans nothing if it just means she get's dicked.>Oh I submit by getting pleasure ! >Saying that sex is aktshually all about power is gay as fuck. Never said that.>There is no force involved. The masculine recognize the value of the feminine and the feminine recognize the value of the masculine. The female cannot be both a bitch to her man and not recognize his leadership as a man, yet want him to manifest dominance in the sheets, it's schizophrenia, a fake manifestation of masculinity, if in fact the male cannot express himself irl. His sexuality is just recognized sexually, as a sex thing. It' reductive and absurd. If the female is dominant and the male express form of respects and desire, like in your pic, it has to manifest irl and not just in sex : it means something real for him, like respect for her, her femininity and her feminine sphere, her motherhood,... Women aren't meant to be dominant irl, and aren't meant to be passive/submissive in bed, it's the worst of all worlds. I observe that it's mostly women who contradict me, because they don't understand the need for male leadership and the need from them to proactively seduce and please their men, domesticating them through delicacy, charm, etc... the tools of female charm are clearly different and women can't dominate like men, the spheres are different, and men should lead and dominate.
>>80053217> Means nothing if it just means she get's dicked.>Oh I submit by getting pleasure !It means that she will stay loyal to you bruh. This is the biggest power a man can have over a woman as it cannot be ensured in any other way. Finances and intimidation don't stop women from cheating. Having mind-blowing sex with you does. This is why all men are obsessed with the idea of her thinking he is best at sex.It should be pretty instinctual so I don't get what you are ramblings here about. Social norms around specific behavior in genders vary from place to place so none of what you are talking about is inherit. Quite a lot of traditional cultures imply that a man has absolute sexual power over a woman, yet she owns his finances and is the boss of household, so she still dominates in some way and it is natural, because people just "dominate" there where their strengths lie. Feminity being associated with submission and masculinity with dominance are a modern meme. There are many archetypical forms of either that are not so. And even if it were, a human should seek to balance yin and yang inside them, ultramasculinity and ultrafeminity are both equally ridiculous.
>>80052545>that you enjoy being in the active role?If you enjoy being in the active role you probably won't be interested in a woman like her in the firstplace> All men have suppressed anger issuesIn my case it's too strong and too suppressedI could not easily bring myself to do itAnd once i do it would be hard to go back from that
>>80048848Hahahaha okay shut up and suck my dick then
>>80051317I chose to believe that this is a psyop and no one is actually this insufferable
>>80048721Unironically retards. Or autists to a lesser extent. They dont do well in society but in primal activities like sex and labor they got retard strength. They are also extremely loyal since they dont like change and will depend on you which can be seen as cute depending how patient you are
>>80048721>How do I attract a man who is sexually dominant if my personality outside of sexual fantasies is dominant?It has nothing to do with you being dominant. Dominant men are simply in high demand because the majority of the population wants to be coddled nowadays. I have dated countless women that told me how they pegged their ex's and even wondered if dominant men existed anymore until they met me. Feminism has done a good job of breaking the majority of men into thinking they are the lesser species. If you want to attract a dominant man, you'll just have to learn how to compete with all the other women struggling to do the same. Supply and demand sweetheart.
>>80048721there's a cock in my pants with your name on it OP
>>80054899>I have dated countless women that told me how they pegged their ex's and even wondered if dominant men existed anymore until they met me.Yeah this happened for sure
>>80056034>>80054899NTA not him (I'm OP) and I can't speak for that guys experience but I have definitely seen a lot posts online of other women being concerned or complaining that their boyfriends are submissive too. Like a "We are both subs. What now?" situation. And even in my own friends group I had this talk with a friend who told me her boyfriend was kinda vanilla and didn't want to try the stuff she suggested aka dominating her and then later she found femdom porn on his device.
>>80048721>step 1: buy a vibrator>step 2: go onto any AI chat websiteIt's that easy, no bullshit, no nothing. Because your sexual fantasies don't exist in the real world
>>80050704Anon, she has never consider another human being except as a means to an end. That's why her whining is about why isn't the earth catering to her whims and all men are not good enough unless they're both D and s at the same time.
>>80056211I wonder how much of it is men being more submissive and how much of it is modern women attracting the sort of man who puts up with their bullshit
>>80056725the most dominant man sexually I know is extremely sweet outside and eager to serve so i don't think someone needs to be a high t ultra red pill alpha male for that
>>80056034I'm not sure why you're surprised. Pegging has become mainstream over the past decade, it's always one of the first things women ask me if I'm into when the topic of sex comes up. That and feet. My comment was not a flex, but a statement to show that what OP is looking for is simply rare and in high demand. It would be the same as asking how to attract a rich man; Be better than the other women.>>80056211I dated a few findommes and it amazed me how many subs they had willing to pay for our dates or trips. I love women, but the last few waves of feminism has def had a toll on the self worth of the majority of men. I've only ever met a handful of men I would consider as dominant as me and every other man I've met was either very submissive or a glorified femboy on the verge of transitioning. I feel for you OP, the dating market is rough today for women. I think it will require women to be a lot more submissive for men to make the switch again.>>80056750>so i don't think someone needs to be a high t ultra red pill alpha male for thatDefinitely. You can tell easily by someone if they are capable of violence and choosing not to.
>>80048721You don't want a dominant man so you can be submissive. You want to break him. Eat shit, BPDemon.
>>80048721Im the inverse of you. Socially passive and timid but sexually domineering
It's just larping, get someone good at sex and that won't be an issue
>>80053123>men can't really be hurt or tamed by sexthey can though. it's harder, and maybe it's not what you want, but they totally can.
>>80057294>it's always one of the first things women ask me if I'm into when the topic of sex comes upyou must live in some weird shitlib enclave or something because that is so foreign to my experience. this too: >I've only ever met a handful of men I would consider as dominant as me and every other man I've met was either very submissive or a glorified femboy on the verge of transitioning
>>80058413right, well if you'd just said "there are almost no dominant LEFTIST men these days" then no one would've disagreed.
>>80048721>But I don't want to open conversations with sexual fetishes that's weird.a man being generally sexually dominant is not a sexual fetish; this is normal. a man wanting to be bullied or engage in Cock and Ball Torture (or cognitive behavioural therapy) is abnormal and fetishistic. or maybe i just (fortunately) live in the provincial backwoods and the prevailing Babylon culture hasn't reached us meth-enthusiast hill people yet as much.
>>80053438>>80053438>Feminity being associated with submission and masculinity with dominance are a modern meme.You're just a feminist cuck. Men have the leadership and women should follow them. Cultures can vary on accidents, nothing new.> a human should seek to balance yin and yangYou see, you talk about the difference of cultures, and then you post yet another example (for the whole chinese culture) of the unanimous symphony of all the cultures on how men and masculinity dominate by the nature of things (independantly of culture, as you see here, it is a cosmological/meta-cosmological thinking).Of course sexual passion and pleasure is a bound but there are others.>Finances and intimidation don't stop women from cheating.Yeah I doubt that. Not everything is about sex, and her admiration to you isn't only about sex, it's ridiculous. She admires you because you are masculine and the feminine is made to serve the masculine and follow his led. And love too isn't only about sex, and can also be purely non-sexual. Eve has been created for Adam and not the opposite (cf letters of saint Paul and saint Peter). So the nature of the feminine and the masculine aren't only about sex, and the complementarity isn't only about sex, thus the leadership of men. >Your picMost people who post this pic on the internet are retarded. One version of the puranic story says once she saw she stepped on her husband (pati = lord), she came back from her madness (because of the shock of disrespecting one's husband). Another version I red was about the fact Shiva protected the world from her crazy dance that would have destroyed the world otherwise : he is the substract that stops time (kali = time) to completely destroy the world.
>>80053438sounds attractive>>80059022sounds autistic
>>80058980sadism is a fetish
>>80059044>soundsso no actual criticism
>>80048721>>80048778and you don't think that when you want a guy to be rough with you he is having to put on a persona as well?Anyways people change over time and you need to quit acting like you have some "true self" you need to stay true to
>>80059068yes, sadism is a sexual deviancy or a fetish. i do not thinking being generally dominant in sexual situations at all requires sadism as a factor from either party. the male being generally sexually dominant is the normal way of things. the male choking and spitting on and inflicting undue amounts of pain for its own pleasure or whatever the fuck is not necessary for being sexually dominant, and one does not imply the other.
>>80053123Both partners should become one flesh so in a way you should both be dominating and submitting to each other>>80057423based can we go to the library together or something and tease each other over what books we read?
>>80057307lol this would be hawt tho
>>80058961Politics has nothing to do with your levels of assertiveness or dominance, so I'm not sure why you think that matters.
>>80059761OP seems to be into weirder more sadistic stuff
>>80059864>Politics has nothing to do with your levels of assertiveness or dominance
>>80059022You are referring to the story way too literally. Parvati is just an example of a woman not being submissive. Kali is the extreme of her rage against ignorance. But from the start she was the one to initiate and seek out Shiva, proving her worth not by charm but by a ascetisism so a power of will. She is an emanation of female POWER, an archetype of domination. Meanwhile Saraswati literally cursed her husband, creator of the universe, that he shall never be worshipped by anyone because he disrespected her once. Lakshmi is always mentioned first before Narayan in prayer, because Narayan may not care for you, but he will always go where Lakshmi goes, so "he follows". Now aside from specifics, basically every culture has archetypes of femininity that dominate in various way. Even in Chinese culture. Yin and yang originally just meant night and day and women are yin because they hold power over the realm of the moon, the rest, the mystique. In this sense it corresponds to an archetype of Hecates or Artemis both of whom are not submissive. It is really weird to associate yin with submission because it is supposed to be, in later, confucian terms, evil and chaotic, which submission is not, submission is a virtue. I was just referring to duality needing balance.
>>80060438>Meanwhile Saraswati literally cursed her husband, creator of the universe, that he shall never be worshipped by anyone because he disrespected her once. what a queen
>>80060503yeah it's almost like people have never heard of medusa before too i laugh at uneducated chuds with overly simplistic worldviews
>>80059022> Yeah I doubt that. Not everything is about sex, and her admiration to you isn't only about sex, it's ridiculous. She admires you because you are masculine and the feminine is made to serve the masculine and follow his led. And love too isn't only about sex, and can also be purely non-sexual.Is that how you cope with being a betacuck, kek?Women are controlled by pleasure and hedonism they don't give two fucks about your virtues.> One version of the puranic story says once she saw she stepped on her husband (pati = lord), she came back from her madness (because of the shock of disrespecting one's husband). Another version I red was about the fact Shiva protected the world from her crazy dance that would have destroyed the world otherwise : he is the substract that stops time (kali = time) to completely destroy the world.Weird asspull but OK. It is Kali's job to destroy the world so that it can born anew. The ones she is killing are degenerate demons and Shiva got hard to her being feral, pulling out his lingam and her "stepping on him" is a metaphor for mounting his cock, drawn in SFW way for temples of course. Hence why he is always looking delighted in this type of iconography.
>>80061096>by pleasure and hedonism they don't give two fucks about your virtues.Can I not be controlled by both? Amazing sex from a good man???
>>80048721Are you a man or a trans?
>>80060438>You are referring to the story way too literallyPrecisely not, I explained the symbolism of this puranic story (latter secondary writtings only indirectly inspired by the veda but not being part of them).>Parvati is just an example of a woman not being submissiveShiva is her lord, revisionist feminist pig>proving her worth not by charmDepends on the story>but by a ascetisism so a power of willShe is the devotee, he is the Lord, God, and she has to seduce him in order for union to occure, so yes exactly she is the inferior of the two elements becoming one. You said :>proving her worth she has indeed to prooves her worth, not Shiva, so it's quite litteral that Shiva is the master, and He is the one who judge and agrees, get seduced or not etc...>She is an emanation of female POWER, an archetype of dominationOut of pocket. She is the example of female fidelity.>Saraswati literally cursed her husbandNot in my version. Shiva is the one who cursed Brahma (and for a serious reason).>Lakshmi is always mentioned first before Narayan in prayer, because Narayan may not care for you, but he will always go where Lakshmi goes, so "he follows"Precisely because Narayan symbolise the supreme transcendantal aspect of the divine, while the feminine consort is again the immanence, the fertility of God, his energy ad extra, his providence ad extra, his caring for the world. The transcendant is still supreme, it just prooves my point. >Yin and yang originally just meant night and day and women are yin because they hold power over the realm of the moon, the rest, the mystique.Light and darkness, being and non-being, knowledge and ignorance, the sky and the earth (note that we again have an analogy of the couple transcendance/immanence). Of course you are completly ignorant of this basic. The Yin is duality (symbolized by a sectionned line and dual numbers) and the Yang is non-dual (plain line).
>>80061161NTA but "male written power fantasies pander to male power fantasies" WOW It's like some girl writing a story in 2025 now that men are below her and serve her because she's the Queen. Insane.
>>80061111Nothing wrong with that. Pretty sure men would like the same from women as well.
>>80060438>> It is really weird to associate yin with submission because it is supposed to be, in later, confucian terms, evil and chaotic, which submission is not, submission is a virtueThe chaos has to be tamed. It's the same idea in greek thought with the chaos and the forms. Yet it's passivity allows for the ordering action of the active (masculine thus) principle. The matrix receives the forms (the qualities). Submission to the good order of things is a virtue. No one said women submitting is evil, it's the order of things (order against which feminist rebel, being agents of chaos like the amazons linked with the eclipse of the sun by the moon, something extraordinary that brings darkness). >I was just referring to duality needing balance.Yes there needs the balance, by the order of things means an order of manifestation. Just like Eve is manifested from Adam, the goddesses are the energies of the gods, they are their power ad-extra. So Parvati isn't a manifestation of female power, but of the power of God, she's her power manifested; of course it means in the same way women manifest something about men, their own power, their vitality, virtues or vices.
>>80061236>>80061161Schizophrenic mental gymnastics, but there is no inherit implication that transendance is above immanence. That is exclusively male view of the world(women don't believe in that shit and don't care), because men are the ones who can't cope in healthy ways with the nature of the world. The reality is that everything you do is affected first by imminence, and only then by your ideology. And imminence is also valuable in itself, as it gives space to the new and gives things value. The search for transcendence is search for escape, an admission of defeat. Here in this world, your faggot ass WILL be dominated by women because it was woman in the first who decided you have the right to live. You are already owned by the earthly. Deal with it.
>>80061096>Is that how you cope with being a betacuck, kek?Is that how you cope with being an impersonal fucktoy replaced by another human dildo the next day ? >Women are controlled by pleasure and hedonism they don't give two fucks about your virtues.They do, but not to the same degree or with the same perspicacity. So they do in their own way. Men aren't just human dildoes (nor women) and women get more than sex from being with them. You really reduce things immensly like a real coomer.> It is Kali's job to destroy the world so that it can born anewKali is time, it's time's job to destroy everything. > Shiva got hard to her being feral, pulling out his lingam and her "stepping on him" Go tell that to a Brahman or a traditional vedic schoolar you coom-minded. (inb4 muh tantrism : go do human sacrifices in Bengal if you like Tantrism so much). By the way >stepping on him" is a metaphor for mounting his cockOh so the symbolism of these stories points towards sex ! So spiritual, so wise ! Don't you think it would make more sense that these stories have a metaphysical, or cosmological meaning, and not just "uh he has a boner, let's have sex". You point downward to your lower belly (your energy goes downward and outward), and I tell you about a spiritual higher truth symbolized. It's clearly not the same attitude. For the chaotic feminine to come out makes sense, the chaos finally destroys the evil itself and is a menace to the world, but God still preserves it by humbly supporting it by making a fondation of his own body. Of course it's not the vedas and it's a story that can be explained in a way in conformity with the vedic truth. So any gross interpretation of it doesn't have any value if it contradict the vedic tradition : (notably about marriage opposed to fornication (unrightfull sex like adultery, or sex outside of marriage or complete furry of passions, etc... the call to purity, and the submission of the wife to her husband (lord).
>>80061377i like youkek
>>80061195>male written power fantasies pander to male power fantasiesIf that's what you think all religions are I don't know what to tell you. I mentioned greeks, hinduism, taoism, christianity;Also btw we are discussing puranas, and the puranas are made for and red by women and children. So it's women and children's litterature, and not the primal masculine litterature. Only an uneducated feminist sectarian barbarian can dismiss all religions and major cultures just like that.>>80061377>there is no inherit implication that transendance is above immanenceThat's simply the definition of transcendance. And yes it is explained in hindu metaphysics : the Lord is far more than the world, and so are the possibilities unmanifested to the possibilities manifested. Transcendance is verticality, immanence is horizontal, the Sky is above the Earth (symbolism existing in the hindu tradition, the husband says that to his wife in marriage "I am the Sky and you are the Earth"). It all makes sense and isn't negative. If that triggers you, it's just that you are feminist and have a problem with feminity/masculinity. >imminence (two times) Yeah try again, maybe you dont even know about the word immanence. Anyway I will not spoonfeed everything to you. But simply put, the love of this world and it's contemplation (immanence) is indeed considered inferior to the more direct and true love of God and contemplation of God with and then even without quality. >You are already owned by the earthly.No one said the earthly doesn't exist and have no place. It's just called to spiritualization if it accepts it's place and let's the spirit transform it. And yes, ascetism is about learning detachment, or else you will just suffer. >your faggot ass WILL be dominated by women because it was woman in the first who decided you have the right to liveYeah, you're a triggered feminist.
>>80053123>>80053438nailed it, you're the only woman I've seen who understands this stuff or will admit to it
