[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1717483374948619.png (58 KB, 914x516)
58 KB
58 KB PNG
Why are men attempting to objectifying synthetic women?
>>
>>80064307
>offer men a solution
noooooooo!!!!!
>>
File: 1714425740842068.jpg (87 KB, 828x397)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>80064390
It's not a solution though? It's just going to worsen your loneliness. You'll be sorry.
>>
File: IMG_0350.jpg (1.21 MB, 828x1549)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>80064406
Robowaifus are bad
>>
>>80064307
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uE96qUlJ_4
>>
>>80064307
Because women are so trash that a piece of plastic without emotions somehow is better than them
>>
>>80064406
"ai girlfriends" aren't the same as sexbots you retard, you can't touch or fuck an ai chatbot. Get better bait dunmy
>>
>>80064307
>Solution to the threat of female independence
Uhh, what? Women literally would be more independent than ever, no more sex pests, no more "creeps", men would simply have their sexual needs met and we can stay out of each other's business
>>
>>80065313
Yet they cry about it like >>80064481 showed
The truth is that women can't accept men being happy without them. Videogames? Bad. Porn? Bad. Anime? Bad. Fishing? Bad. Football? Bad. Being a cuck that accepts everything? Good.
That has nothing to do with sex pests. Women love to say men are controlling yet the moment they're critiqued they lose their shit
>>
>>80064481
Why is nobody autistically keeping track of the developmemts in this field. Why is it always difficult to research.
>>
>>80064307
What the fuck is their problem? First they don't like men who they see as "creepy" for being introverted, then when those same men find a potential avenue of personal gratification, somehow thats also a problem to these people when it doesnt even involve them?
Itd be like complaining about a womans sex toys and expecting them not to feel irritated about it.
>>
>>80064307
>men are objectifying objects
>>
>>80064390
Synthetic women are not women, just like trans women are not real women. Synthetic women are objects, actually
>>
>>80065368
>Fishing? Bad.
Yes, because fish feel pain
>>
>a sex robot means a woman can't be independent

Hm?
>>
>>80065440
>Synthetic women are objects, actually
Biological women are objects, actually
>>
>>80065427
>What the fuck is their problem
Sexless losers drive up the price of pussy, even if they have no chance they'll still compete even if only passively, and women can use that to manipulate chads into trying harder or they'll be replaced by an incel, it doesn't actually have to happen just the possibility is enough. That's why women collect orbitors, not to fuck them but to make themselves seem more valuable.

It's basic supply and demand, and women want demand as high as possible, its also the reason they encourage other women to drop out of dating to sap supply.
>>
File: 1732002544176532.jpg (103 KB, 736x751)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>80064406
Just give me something warm to come home to that says nice things, at this point i dont give a fuck anymore.
>>
>>80064307
Does anyone even care anymore? feminism is over. In 20 years real women will all be sex slaves.
>>
>>80065427
They know itll mostly be unwanted men buying it, once the unwanted men opt out, ugly women and used up women wont have a meal ticket anymore
>>
>>80067663
i foid wrote this. somehow, many of you really actually want that, which is a little traumatizing
>>
>>80064307
feminists should be listed as domestic terrorists, their ideology literally destroyed western society and exterminated white people
>>
>>80064307
Whats this got to do with female independence?
>>
>>80065368
Those are all tradlarp conservatards who are paid to make this breeder propaganda.
>>
>>80065440
>tranny derangement syndrome
>noooo you can't have a synthetic woman because they're fake!! And... that's bad, ok???
Bye foid
>>
File: cosplay.jpg (207 KB, 1100x1468)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>80064307
>men objectify
meanwhile women:
>>
>>80065313
It's the same reason prostitution is illegal. It devalues the price of pussy (and the female attached to it). Women are independent now because laws are in place that artificially inflate their value.
>>
>>80067663
it's rope time whenever this happens
>>
>>80067945
Why do chuds have such a problem with this image? You need a person's consent to take a picture of them under any circumstances. That's the law. Just because a girl is walking around with pasties on her titties doesn't mean the law changed.

Girls are happy to give men a show, in fact they love it when guys stare at them. But when you take pictures, those pictures can end up on the internet where they eventually reach that girl's friends or family - people who she doesn't want to see her acting slutty. Suddenly, a girl being generous towards men has backfired on her. If men can't grasp the basic concept of consent, women are going to be less loose. And that's a damn shame.
>>
>>80068332
no you do not need a person's consent to photograph them in public places in the United States. if you live somewhere that it is illegal then your life doesn't matter.
>>
>>80064307
They are literal objects
Why am I not allowed to do this
>>
>>80068332
If you act like a slut then don't fear people treating you like a slut
>>
>>80068332
>You need a person's consent to take a picture of them under any circumstances
False. Use of a camera in public places is protected. No expectation of privacy in this scenario.
>>
>>80065112
It's basically the same thing in terms of harms.
>>
>>80065440
>the feminist reveals her final form
>>
File: 1734352977863912.jpg (212 KB, 750x1014)
212 KB
212 KB JPG
>>80064307
How does men not bothering women suddenly take away their rights?
>>80064406
>Eric Schmidt
People don't really understand he isn't a tech or business guy, he's a diplomat. He specifically was the hand chosen heir apparent for Kissenger and worked VERY closely with him.
Eric Schmidt is only looking at this from a reproduction standpoint. He doesn't care about happiness or Marraige rates, especially since he openly cheats on his wife.

It is insane to see so many people bend over backwards to protect women from any accountability in this.
I'm not saying men are perfect and the mainstream "manosphere" guys are trash, but the one thing all men can agree on is the majority of women are absolute trash and not worth committing to.
Women can't agree on men's problems other than "muh vibes"... and women still don't comprehend that is a metric that is entirely in their head



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.