If women are allegedly anti-war wishing for men to die in them is a niche thing for terminally online women, then explain the white feather movement.>inb4 it was created my a manIt was staffed by women. Thousands of them. All willing volunteers.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather
>>80073606>ThousandsWowie zowie!
>>80073640>It's just a few radfems online, don't worry about it.>It's just a few thousand of them in real life.>It's just a few million, that's still a drop in the bucket bro.>It's actually all of them, so what? Man up and build thicker skin.
>>80073606>>80073640>>80073664pic related is me during WW3
iirc some women during the push for suffrage were opposed to having it, because they thought if they were given that right, they would then be subject to the draft. of course they got to have their cake and eat it too.
>>80073664-you didn't say millions -it wasn't millions anyway-it was thousands-and still no one cares >>80073681Cool Here's me in WW3 (I'm enjoying the tranquility of not being on a battlefield)
>>80073709>still no one caresWell I do. What now?>you didn't say millionsIndeed, but the goalpost started at this being a purely online phenomenon restricted to a few individuals. That's not how I see it and I think the mindset is a lot more prevalent even if it remains unspoken.
>>80073664I live in the country where this was taken and its unironically a normal talking point.We even had mps and college professor saying thay ugly men have to die and that we should reinstate the draft for ugly/subpar/extreme men.These are all feminists btw
>>80073736>Well I do. What now?Nobody else does >Indeed, but the goalpost started at this being a purely online phenomenon restricted to a few individuals. That's not how I see it and I think the mindset is a lot more prevalent even if it remains unspoken.Back then it was analogous to whatever was the equivalent to social media
>>80073738>We even had mps and college professor saying thay ugly men have to dieGive me some names to read up on, I'll compile whatever I can find.>>80073778>Nobody else doesHow do you know? You can only speak for yourself and you're still here anyway. You know what I think? I think you're scared of going down this rabbit hole.
>>80073606Women are NOT anti-war, and women can never be anti-war unless women start getting drafted. As it stands, women love war, and women are the primary profiteers of war.
>>80073837Alice coffin is a good example.
>>80073837Oh but 1,000 women speak for the billions of women total, gotcha
>>80073889They're the ones who weren't afraid to give voice to their feelings anyway.>>80073873Oof, that's one beast of a female. Anyone else?
>>80073889surveys that document societal trends usually have samples size in the thousands
>>80073914From the top of my mind i think marlene schiappa said something like that too. Former almost-minister.Her lifestory is very fun too, she married a provider who takes care of her kids and shit, she says that everyone must become like him then cheats and live with a tall, rich insurance ,basket bro who lives in nyNot even making that up
>>80073947Marlene Schiappa it is. Updated my journal. I will read everything that I can find
>>80073917Yep we got the le men die crowd followed by three billion nine hundred ninety-nine million nine hundred ninety-nine thousand women afraid to join the men die man bad crowd >>80073917Society is trending towards [the opposite of what you say] Source: I polled 1000 retards with downs syndrome
WW1 era people of both genders were for the most part batshit ultranationaliststhat said, I admire the men and women of the Zimmerwald Left who risked their lives to end the slaughter
>>80073962Its notallmenJust the ugly/subpar ones
>>80073962>Society is trending towardsWhere is it headed in your opinion? Concerning this subject of course
>>80073974they only hate nazis because they also held females accountable for shitty genes.
>>80073974theor anger would be better put if they militarized and kill off these types of women in masses
>>80075046violence serves their agenda, it's better to encourage their behavior and lifestyle and they will be culled from the gene pool within one or two generations
>>80075021they only hate nazis because the nazis lost
>>80073664Yes, now find me the officials that represent and advocate these talking points currently in office. Actually, find me some notable figure heads that have a plausible chance of getting any sort of power.
>>80075099>find me the officials that represent and advocate these talking points currently in officeIn an overt or a covert way?
Do you think 6ft5 blonde guys from landowning families got white feathers?
>>80075166Most likely not but there's no documentation on which demographics were specifically targeted
>>80073974Congratulations you have two screencaps and a video I assume you're going to publish a stoody now? With this mountain of evidence you've accumulated?
We are overpopulated. Mankind is experiencing an unnatural period of peace. You were meant to be cannonfodder that doesn't get to pass on their genes.
>>80076784> this mountain of evidenceAlready going jewish lawyer about it, huh? Guess you really do want us dead.
>>80076852If by jewish lawyer you mean I went to sleep and wake up to you still going on about how much you hate white women
>>80077037All you had to say was>no, I don't want you deadbut instead you went>actually, you don't have peer reviewed scientific evidence, you can only show me memes, personal opinions, pictures of protests and vibe checksIt's so friggin' over. It is.
>>80077110Ackchually it was in reference to the other guy last night talking about some survey or something. >you can only show me memes, personal opinions, pictures of protests and vibe checksBut even in this vein, congratulations, you have four >It's so friggin' over. It is.I think your thread is You had an idea and you wanted to promulgate on it but didn't anticipate resistance to it that would ultimately prove it wrong Once the thread expires it's like it never happened, chin up
>>80077196ACK-shually, I only had three. Someone else dropped the Rose Mead gemmy. What about cybergirlz? An instant classic if I ever saw one.
>>80077277>What about cybergirlz? An instant classic if I ever saw one.I think it would defeat your thread's original point to say that it's not a niche thing for terminally online women since that is precisely the group that was being satirized. If there was any attack against men from that video, it was aimed at trans-women i.e. men in dragIf you want online art that is explicitly anti-male, look for male feminists with Aspergers instead, that's pretty much their thing: >https://youtu.be/abZmFCs-ltY?si=2dXQBIuti8za_won>https://www.reddit.com/r/ProveTheIncelWrong/comments/yl8bad/so_you_think_you_have_me_figured_out/>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38T-51pVRRU
>>80078198>it was aimed at trans-womenDid you actually watch the video? Did you read the 4500 replies? The message is pretty much that men and trannies are the same and the world would be better off without them. At the end in the military camp, men(not trannies or their lolcows even) are depicted as a blob of biomass with random faces and the ending is an all female dream world.So come on, huh? Be for fucking real, just once.
>>80078256>Did you actually watch the video? Did you read the 4500 replies? The message is pretty much that men and trannies are the same and the world would be better off without themI think you might have slight tism To the extent it was aimed at men, it was men that were invading women's online spaces. I just rewatched the video to confirm this. I lol'd at the scene where the tranny is crying and waving at the bus taking them away, an envelope falls to him and he reads it and then runs after the bus like a looney tunes character. >At the end in the military camp, men(not trannies or their lolcows even) are depicted as a blob of biomass with random facesI'm like 90% sure they mean to depict every man they were targeting in the video. I mean, the military was just them playing pretend, and the drafts were all fake. >the ending is an all female dream world.You have tism. The ending depicted them retaking their online space. >Did you read the 4500 replies?Did you???They were all some form of "total woman victory" or dunking on trannies.
>>80078353>I mean, the military was just them playing pretend, and the drafts were all fake.Mmm. But men do get drafted and the video was made at the height of a war which involves men who are forced into military combat to die against their will.Should I make a funny little cartoon video about women getting make-believe drugged, make-believe raped and make-believe killed after to dispose of evidence? If I planted a little /r9k/ flag at the end of it, would that make it about my online space? How would it make you feel? Would you get the joke or would you succumb to the 'tism? And most importantly, how long would it stay up on newgrounds and youtube?I don't think women make jokes, I think women -to some degree- are compelled to be honest. It's their nature, they just have to share and a lot of people are just not willing to listen closely.
>>80078553>Mmm. But men do get drafted and the video was made at the height of a war which involves men who are forced into military combat to die against their will.I recall the video being English and set in America>Should I make a funny little cartoon video about women getting make-believe drugged, make-believe raped and make-believe killed after to dispose of evidence? If I planted a little /r9k/ flag at the end of it, would that make it about my online space?This would just be making cartoon fetish porn and there's a lot of that. It wouldn't really make sense to make it like an /r9k/ reclamation, it's just an extrapolation of your will to violence against women that you're suppressing. To actually make an analogous video, you'd need a situation in which women can be rounded up and killed, in as natural of a process outside of your online space as possible. For them it was gaming the US draft. For you, it will have to be something like wearing a fake lab coat, printing off and convincing the /r9k/ women they're pregnant with fake ultrasounds (since they're all non-virgins lol), and then giving them coathanger abortions and purposefully infecting them with some disease and killing them off. Have some shots of abusechad beating them to death and trannies roping too. Then if you showed all the men getting along on the internet after the foid menace was removed, it would actually be quite wholesome and would factually be a parody of cybergirls. Call it cyberboys or something. >I don't think women make jokes, I think women -to some degree- are compelled to be honest. It's their nature, they just have to share and a lot of people are just not willing to listen closely.They do copy jokes even if they don't make them originally, and hence they made such a video of low-quality artwork and admittedly lazy animation with their attempt at mimicking memes. >would you succumb to the 'tism?Your idea is very fucking autistic I agree
>>80078931>it would actually be quite wholesome Yeah but the thing is, I don't think it would be. I don't want to make that video. I could, but I wouldn't, not because I care about blowback, but because I don't want to make "jokes" of that gravity (sadistic remarks really) at the expense of people I share space with. Sadistic remarks from which I can then walk back and pretend I never meant them and in fact, it is the recipient that is not only wrong but actually EVIL.Who the fuck are you kidding, nigger? How much more insincere can you get?
>>80079022>Yeah but the thing is, I don't think it would be. I don't want to make that video. I could, but I wouldn't,I was amusing myself while writing it. It would be funny, but neither of us are going to make that video. You couldn't, because while those women are lazy and make bad art, you are lazier and will do nothing.>but because I don't want to make "jokes" of that gravity (sadistic remarks really) at the expense of people I share space with.Then you're just accepting their bullying? Men don't owe women who break up their spaces anything, and dunking on them is funny. Kill ethots. Behead ewhores. Roundhouse kick an /r9k/ orbiter discord into the trash can. Now set it to some kitschy music and make a flash style animation and reference man shit like marathon playing factorio and having schizoid /pol/ arguments that 300+ a thread >Sadistic remarks from which I can then walk back and pretend I never meant them and in fact, it is the recipient that is not only wrong but actually EVIL.Who the fuck are you kidding, nigger? How much more insincere can you get?The autism is so blinding that I find the point you're trying to make here quite opaque
>>80079101>quite opaqueIt's not opaque, it's crystal clear. You told me that I harbor thoughts about hurting women when even the idea makes me sick. Do you think some asshole would even care about any of this?>Then you're just accepting their bullying?What else can I do? I can complain, like I do now. That's pretty much my repertoire.
>>80079170>It's not opaque, it's crystal clear.As a non-autist this is where I have to stop you. It's not clear. Your last few words in that post made no fucking sense >You told me that I harbor thoughts about hurting women when even the idea makes me sick.Your idea of hurting women is for sexual gratification when this would not be a parody. Hence that was the impression you made. >What else can I do? I can complain, like I do now. That's pretty much my repertoire.So women are allowed to complain about trannies bothering them, but they are not allowed to joke about killing them off. I am allowed to complain about whoreposting and tranny feminists in /r9k/ but I am not allowed to joke about killing them off. Gotcha. Goodbye I have to go to the gym to play tennis with my friend, a woman, after I just joked about beheading /r9k/ foids. Toodles
>>80079340Okay, have a good time.
>>80073606Women probably shouldn't be able to make a big show of virtue signalling of being anti-war considering they benefit the most from it, Hillary was wrong. Women are not the primary victims of war. War occurs when there are excess males that can't contribute anything to civilization besides being violent. I thought this was known already.
who is the enemy?
Listen, we keep denying our feelings but women love men who are killers and dangerous, and they have a serious hive mind. Women instinctively will not try to be "free thinkers" and will strongly try to blend in with a crowd. It's why men climbed Everest while women stayed in the village. So white feather ops appeal to their nature of conformity, ousting others socially, and also shows their love of dangerous killer men and also their hatred of men.
>>80080227based white woman grinding trump votes just before the election>nuh uhhh whacha think you doing cracka ass hoe, dass gonna cost us the election bitch
