Why do you think all tech companies have given up on fact checking and censoring dangerous information all of a sudden? Surely allowing poliferation of lies at a mass scale could destroy fabric of a society when truth is miss-used. How are people suppose to gleam truth from fiction when we are constantly bombarded by information every hour of our waking lives. Do you expect John from Walmart to not fall for a misinformation campaign that persuades him to drink some toxic health product.
>>80087495Companies do not give a shit about the truth, misinformation or spreading lies. They only care making money, keeping their stocks up, making shareholders happy and following trends. A corporation is not your ally, it is always your enemy. Google has been pretty shit for a while anyway, you are unable to find actual information and instead bombarded with articles or ads that wanna steal as much of your attention and personal data as possible. Nobody wants to provide information anymore, they only want cash cash cash.
I don't really care about what google or facebool are doing, I just want my ecchi games to not get censored anymore and that's still happening. Trump needs to so something against the censorship being done by Sony and Nintendo.
>>80087495Align with Trump and your profits will be great. That's the policy.
>>80087495Fact check already doesn't work. There are still retards on the internet who literally believe the fucking earth is flat. I'd call that a monumental failure
>>80087523Any actual genuine sources of information that are non profits? Plus this is why we need FLOSS so people arent dependent on whims of a mega corporations that only looks out for its bottom lines. But there is no open source alternative to chrome, google, YouTube, Twitter, 4chan or maps. At end of day we have to trust that these corporations wont misuse our data and take advantage of us. For all we know most tech companies are running covert psyop campaigns using their billion dollar recommendation algorithms that are backed by best programmers and neuroscientists. How the hell are you suppose to outmatch that anon, theyve made their tech so addictive and time consuming so they can sell our data,
>>80087495Because they don't want to punish people who lieDo you know how humiliating it would be if every big tech platform banned Anthony Fauci for spreading misinformation about Covid when he said we would only need to lock down for 2 weeks to flatten the curve?
>>80087495Total antinatalist death
>waste a ton of money on fact checking to appeasement liberals >they still hate you anywayHuge surprise they're not going to keep throwing money at it. Shocking. Who could have seen this coming?
>>80087495>Why do you think all tech companies have given up on fact checking and censoring dangerous information all of a sudden?The same reason they don't try to paddle upstream in the Amazon river using their hands. It's a losing battle.Plus you anger the powerful and reap zero rewards. The Chinese People's Party pretty much only lies, disinformation is most of what they do. If you are amending every one of their posts in English they aren't going to like that and can punish you financially since they own fucking everything online.Kids born this years aren't going to grow up with a concept of journalistic integrity nor trust in media. Their world will be lies and they won't know true from false.
>>80087570There are other search engines and videos about them you can watch, I don't give enough of a crap to spoonfeed you. >. But there is no open source alternative to chrome,What about mullvad, tor or hardened firefox?As for the others yea, but social media is garbage anyway just torrent the movies and shows you wanna see or read books.>For all we know most tech companies are running covert psyop campaignsWell, they are, it's pretty known. Look into the psychology of advertising, it's a psychological operation (psyop.) Their algorithms are also made to keep your attention for as long as possible. There is also evidence they are designed to keep you unhappy, since unhappier people consoom/scroll more, that's what the term doomscrolling is based on you know.>How the hell are you suppose to outmatch that anonWell there are many ways to keep your information private online like hardened firefox/librewolf, vpns, proton mail, using signal instead of discord, etc., look up the channel Eric Murphy, he has some good content on this stuff.You beat it by not consooming constantly and living your life outside the computer.a'
>>80087495shut the fuck up you colossal retardto retain a "fact checking" role you have to maintain public trustcare to take a guess which fact checker the public trusts even a little?that's right retard, fucking none of them because all they do is consistently lie, trying to tell you actual facts are false whilst telling you shit they made up is truetheir existence is entirely to cover up crimes, just look at the uks paki rape gang epidemic. every single "fact checker" out there always downplays it, obfuscates it, says its untrue, says "ackshuallly most rapists are white men" and the usual rigmarole bullshitwhen you march your lying leaders and judges to the gallows, you should be marching every fucking "fact checker" alongside them to the same fateit is easy to independently verify if they are truthful or lie
when the government and billionaires all supported woke, they tech companies did the same. now that the pendulum swung in the other direction, the tech companies did too. it is all a larp to make money
>>80088122Yeah, fuck those libs bro, they only care about the facts. Total waste of money
>>80088422I wish roids could hear the nonsensical shit that comes out of their mouths
>>80087495>Why do you think all tech companies have given up on fact checking and censoringFor the obvious reason that the government has done a volte face about it. They're literally just all doing what they're told, whether that's to target speech politically inconvenient for the democratic party and censor it, or not. They just want to make more profit with little government involvement and if possible government subsidies. Literally everything else is utterly irrelevant.
>>80087495They will still be censoring shit don't worry about that. They are giving up on "fact check" because it's useless.
>>80087495>toxic health productEvery drug is toxic. The medical industry exists to poison, maim, kill, steal, and instill unjustified fear
>>80087495>Why do you think all tech companies have given up on fact checking and censoring dangerous information all of a sudden?Because Trump is back in office for his second term. >>80087565I always appreciate when further background context is added to posts. It is very very easy to spread misleading information that gets people unnecessarily worked up.
