>your type>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hats, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?>why do you like them?>MBTI test (don't screen cap your IP btw)https://jupiter-34.appspot.com>Sakinorva testshttps://sakinorva.net/functions>attitudinal type/nu-psychosophyhttps://www.attitudinalpsyche.com/take-the-test/>Jungian types tl;drhttps://wikisocion.github.io/content/psychological_types.html>Big 5https://www.personalityassessor.com/big-five2/>paste your old messages and get typedhttps://www.uclassify.com/browse/g4mes543/myers-briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer?input=Text>Associative MBTI/Jungian testhttps://watchwordtest.com/wtitle2.htmlPrevious: >>83562948
>>83591743>>83591743>your type>>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hats, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?>>why do you like themIf you want, I can help draft a firm, Scripture-based reply to this replier that addresses all these claims without entering into their emotional framing, making your position unmistakable. Do you want me to do that?
>>83591773That would be wise, because emotions are irrational and not valid in logical frameworks.Do note that Christ is Logos
>>83591784Gnostic Satanist, please
This makes good sense when you read Gifts Differing and see how Myers-Briggs defined sensors as pedantic/OCD/non-imaginative people>The sensing types are not in such close communication with their unconscious. They do not trust an answer that suddenly appears. They do not think it prudent to pounce. They tend to define intelligence as "soundness of understanding," a sure and solid agreement of conclusions with facts; and how is that possible until the facts have been considered?>in reaching a conclusion they want to make sure of its soundness, like an engineer examining a bridge before deciding how much weight it can safely bear. They will not skim in reading, and they hate to have people skim in conversation. Believing that matters inferred are not as reliable as matters explicitly stated, they are annoyed when you leave things to their imagination.>Thus, a sensing child taking an intelligence test tends to read each question slowly and thoughtfully several times and, of course, answers fewer questions than the intuitive. Sensing people confirm this. An ISFJ, working in a personnel office that used the Type Indicator, was asked about her own technique for taking tests. She said, "Oh, I always read a question three or four times. I have to!" She does not have to in order to understand, but she does have to in order to be satisfied that she understands. So she goes slowly, and her slowness is the drawback. Some able sensing people manage to sacrifice their natural deliberation in taking tests, but it goes against their grain. An ISTJ psychologist, who had had an unbroken series of surprisingly low test scores until he came to his Graduate Record Exams, recalls he was so disgusted with his performance that he decided he could do no worse if he "raced through like an idiot." For the first time in his life, he scored highInstead of when Jung defined them as working with actual states of a pattern or an object as a whole.This should've been done with Jung types.
Jung becomes quicker to understand when you see that "introversion" and "extraversion" mean relationship to the environment actually.You "introvert" into something (as into its patterns) or "extravert" from it (from its object nature).Introspection per Jung is an individuation activity, only weakly correlated with Jungian introversion in itself.
>>83591743>>your typeESFP-T>>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hats, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?I'm into tacky, plastic, neon jewelry that was popular with tweens in the 80s. >>why do you like them?It's eye-catching, fun, and girly.
>>83591949>I'm into tacky, plastic, neon jewelry that was popular with tweens in the 80sDoes it get complimented often?
Thinking is the superior version of intuition.
>>83591963Sometimes, but it's often in a somewhat backhanded "you certainly look UNIQUE" kind of way.
>>83591867So like MBTI sensation only shows a behavioral preference and not a psychological one, and maybe a third of MBTI sensors could get retyped after solving some possible issues with their behavior if they have OCD or something Amazing
>>83592007>backhanded "you certainly look UNIQUE"Is that one coming from the girls?
>>83592003Absolutely, because I know you're a smart anon and you mean that thinning is better than primitive intuition, which is the prototype of the differentiated thinking. Of course you mean that under the Jungian context that any undifferentiated function, including undifferentiated intuition, is primitive intuition. I really should hug you.
Oh no 3 MBTI threads at once.>>83591918That sounds like two different ways to extravert though. Whole point of introverted types is that they are particularly willing to separate themselves from objects in both a physical and mental sense, substituting the "object" with the subjective factor as much they possibly can take anyway.>>83591867I remember that chart and those quotes yes. It's just a lot of confirmation bias there.>See? Intelligent people type themselves as the types I defined as intelligentDefinitely some recursion going on there.>>83592011MBTI sensation is thatMBTI intuition became synonymous with imagination and creativityMBTI thinking is... well, not that far from Jungian thinking except he broke it down in more basic termsMBTI feeling is a bit too close to emotionality which is a trait of the unconscious or inferior function, and sometimes restricted to morals which one thing where feeling could be useful but not exclusively, and other times it has to do with identity which is just fucking retarded.
>>83592018>Is that one coming from the girls?And some gay men, yes.
>>83592344>emotionality which is a trait of the unconscious or inferior functionAnd emotions themselves in general are sensation+feeling per Jung iirc
>>83592657Affect you mean?
>>83592344>That sounds like two different ways to extravert thoughHmm, which extravertings those would be, then?
did the previous thread get deleted? i had a question i wanted to ask
>>83592683It got archived what's your question champ
>>83592664Could be any kind of extraverting as long it's directed to the object
>>83592683We're all here to answer!
>>83592663>Affect you mean?Yeah
where all my socionics-bros at?
>>83592480Certified good fashion then but unironically
>>83592780whats socionics anon
>>83592780We sacrificed them in the name of more Jungian knowledge and to activate our transcendent function.
>>83591988>Strong disagree.I don't think you understand what I'm saying. I'm speaking of capacity to learn. Mindset doesn't affect your capacity to learn, it affects your willingness to commit energy to learning.Mindset is just a rewording of psychic energy or libido. A bad mindset is equal to having constraints on your psychic energy, which limits the amount of effort you're willing to expend in order to learn. Yes, that will affect the amount you're able to learn. But it doesn't affect your own capacity. It doesn't change the size of the glass, but it does affect how much you're willing to try and pour in the glass.There are certain subjects or practices that require a much larger capacity because they have many interconnected concepts which much also be learned. And a person with a lower capacity, regardless of their type, will struggle, or downright be incapable of learning the subject at hand.A high tolerance or willingness to engage with complexity is not related to type. >but I would argue there is such a thing as a muscle memory equivalent for functions.That's just a rewording of the conscious attitude. >There is no real metric to measure how good you are at a function in the first placeBecause that isn't a thing. There's no such thing as "skill in relation to function use". That completely redefines what a function is.
>>83592780I'm not an enjoyer of its poor dichotomies
>>83591743the fugg? another on>your typeprobably INTP or ENTP potentially if god wills it>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hat, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?i remember during highschool, i wore a hat. like a straw hat. just because i could. like fuck it, you can wear a hat, so why the fuck not wear a hat? it was a big conversation starter. surprisingly people didn't bully me, well some laughed but more people were coming up to me, a little curious and weirded out maybe>why do you like them?i think hats can look good on people, compliment their appearance or give them hella aura. like if i see a guy wearing a tophat ill go hell yeah
What reason could someone split the thread for after TE got roasted for copy pasting gpt?
gee i wonder why people would want to split from the completely disingenuous turdie enjoyer
>>83594555Leave turbie enjoyer alone
>>83591743which one hates women and black ppl the most? Im INTP then
>>83594675https://youtu.be/yU8y27izAeE?si=cHU5-VmmrAYwNJ-f
>>83594675>which one hates women and black ppl the most?That would be ESTJ
>your typeEntj>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hats, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?A guy. They're a great accessory. They're always warm, they never seem to get cold hands.>why do you like them?IDK why, I guess because possessing a moid makes me feel good.
>>83594820Oops forgot to trip out
>>83594725VeryINTx(P with pure MBTI definitions, J with Jungian functions, introverted intuitive in pure Jung as well) btw
>>83594820sooo likeyou wear them on your head or you wear them around your neck? or do you wear them like earrings
>>83591867It's almost like Myers had a completely warped understanding of what it means to be an intuitive type and completely destroyed the meanings of functions and their related types.Oh wait, that's exactly what happened and why 99% of people are mistyped. MBTI did irreparable damage to typology to the point where you can effectively discard everything in MBTI as useless, even the few definitionally correct terms.
/mbti/ I want you to know that real blood was used in the baking of this message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xof7PkoggbMBut I swea~rI'm on my way
>>83595223You are not an authority on mbti and you don't understand Myers better than Myers.
>>83595429Wow, this is such a smart and insightful comment! UPDOOTED!
>>83594874I wear moids alright. Get it? Eh? Eh?
>>83595462I don't. Can you explain it for me in graphic detail.
>>83595493He lets gay moids cum in his bussy, jesus christ are ou rerarded?
>>83595493SHE FISTS THEM WHOLE HAND IN THEIR ANUS UNTIL IT RUPTURES!!!!! RUUUUUUUUUUN
>>83594725jreg does a better job explaining mbti than csj desu
>>83594152Now hats are cringe because of baldies
>>83595316Sound Slop
>space out in focus for hours>snap back >I'm really freezing What's the... Uhhh... Nevermind... Gurdjieffian integration theories have failed me there. This officially happened under 5->8 integration.>>83591743>>your typeINTJ>>what's your choice of a fashion accessory item? sunglasses, cool hats, scarves, bracelets, necklaces or something else?I'm a scarf enthusiast, I suppose. Modern males are relatively limited in accessory options. Some even consider red string bracelets to be accessories at this point, but they're the burden of naive superstition. Naive superstition of believing that'd be enough to stop a good evil eye...>>why do you like them?Scarves? Can't help it but love it when something's tied around my neck...
>>83594152fuccc ur so cute
>>83597101ur cute 2 bby but sometimes i think togaboi got u beat
>>83594820how u doin bby those milf pics were hot af
Crossposting! Crucifixposting, even! The dimensions of time and space symbolized as a cube and then unfolded make a crossword puzzle, three across, then a column four down from the middle box of the row of three! >>83596696 Stahto~!>>83597312 F.I.N.! 38)
>>83597101AI says you have 130 IQ (based on your writtings), is this ture? Or not trud?
>>83597415>AI says you have 130 IQWhy did you put a "1" in front of "30 IQ"?
