Exile edition>your type>Is exile still a viable form of punishment? >How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link Compilation! UwUhttps://pastebin.com/6YSzm68DReading Junghttps://jungiancenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Vol-6-psychological-types.pdfhttps://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Psychological_TypesAnon's Guide to Jungian Typologyhttps://paste.fo/raw/287d5fb6f7b6https://pastebin.com/XJvFYQzTExploration into Enneagramhttps://wiki.personality-database.com/books/enneagramhttps://ennealib.carrd.co/Syntax of Lovehttps://web.archive.org/web/20230608184321/https://psychosophy.ru/books/sintaksislubvi/sintaksislubvi1.htmlWord Association Gamehttps://watchwordtest.com/wtitle2.htmlTo The Fatherland >>83912763
>>83984805To The Previous Thread >>83967921
>>83984805>>your typeIntp >>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?We are exiled on earth as punishment for who knows what>>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?Alcohol
>>83984805>>your typeESFP-T>>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?That's gonna be a death sentence for the vast majority of people, so no. I'm glad to see we're kinda bringing back public humiliation in the form of arrest and court videos on YouTube, though. >>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?Phone a friend.
>>83985124>That's gonna be a death sentence for the vast majority of peopleHow so?
>>83984805>>your typeINTP-A>>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?as I see it, dealing with people's mistakes can go two ways: you either get rid of the mistake (prevention, mitigation) or the person's own ability to err (reeducation, exclusion/exile); so yes. "punishment" is useless as a means to itself, it is solely utilized as a fear mechanism to inhibit posterior antisocial behavior. with this said, exile is a form of punishment adninistered by society against the individual. the individual embues society with the power of administering such punishment to its own detriment. I as an individual am against any type of capital punishment not as a matter of personal morals but out of my own reason and self preservation.>>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?i'm sure that most INTPs will act the same when confronted with indecision: the battle tested pros and cons listing method. about acting with ambivalence, I don't know what you really mean since this behavior is mostly situational and needs a setup and motivation to be carried out.
>>83984805Don't get pets you aren't going to maintain.>https://paste.fo/raw/287d5fb6f7b6It's expired.Easy Rundown on C.G. Jung's Depth Psychologyhttps://pastebin.com/1PYUQTpP>>your typeIN(T)>>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?It's most preferable one for me to "endure."It's not much of a punishment, if at all. This is some slap on the wrist.>>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?You threaten yourself to violently kill yourself if you're not going to comply with the good for yourself. >abbababa... but... what the hell?Yeah, the text doesn't sell what I mean. Especially for the 95% of reggies. Have you done your life essence exercises? Oh, I'll probably be misunderstood again.Horse stance maybe? At this point, it's on you.
>>83985141>How so?When I read exile I was thinking alone in the woods; most people wouldn't have the skills to survive in that circumstance. If it meant exile someone from one place to another place, I don't think that would accomplish much.
Exile as punishment is immediately distinct from exile in wilderness as a story trope thoughbeit.
Reminder that the reason patchy posted his suicide cock cut off porn is because anons kept saying they loved him unironically and wanted to be his person which caused him to dysphoria-euphoria spiral.Don't lie nu-patchy lie to you that it was "haha troll fooled you" he was confused how anyone could love a cockless tranny
>anons kept saying they loved him unironicallyAll the ones who watched that weren't the ones who treated me better than trash though.>BUT THIS IS 4CHAN! WE'RE SUPPOSED TO TREAT EACH OTHER LIKE SHITThen why are you whining for over 6 months now?Well?Dumb fuck? Shit for brains? Troon chaser? Brittle troll? Irony sissy? Huh? Cunt?
I wish they would replace the ugly 16p art style already.Not that I go to 16p but you still see it literally everywhere.It can be funny when people redraw the characters for memes though.
>>83986134No one suspects the Achilles's heel targeted foot fetishization psyop campaign until it triggers the body dysmorphia suicide feels
>>83986510Ok unc wwww
The flawless record and amount of mind broken regs still walking the trail of tears speaks for itself
>>83986302Yup, it's an officially good 16p meme. [CERTIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE /mbti/ CONSILIUM]>>83985124>That's gonna be a death sentence for the vast majority of people>>83985874It'd be a death sentence only because all the land is already bought and you'd be an illegal trespasser even if you'd go off the grid in any property that you don't have official formal approval for.Par modernia, exilium est salvatio...>>83986560Heartbroken regs, too. wWwW~Owner of a lonely heart-~
>>83986619>~Owner of a lonely heart-~:'(
There's the [_-_thing] now . . .
>>83970126>differentiated feeling doesn't mean "positive" feelingNor was that the point of the extract, rather, it's that the remark is out of place. Jung was telling Freud about what he had learned from his time with Babette (the babbler), and Freud's reply was not so much about Jung's ideas, but about Babette's breasts. This shows his fixation with sex, but more importantly directs the conversation away from Jung's nascent theory and back to his own. One might even say this shows more a fixation with his theory than with sex, that being merely the (to us) distinguishing feature of his theory. The remark does not direct the conversation to sex, nor is it really about Babette's breasts, but how Jung was able to not notice how phenomenally ugly she was: That is, work in away that does not fit within his theory. It is not an expression of feeling, but one of thinking so contaminated by feeling that it's provenance is easily mistaken (and perhaps it would be more accurate to say it's of a shared provenance).The remark was not out of place because it was an expression of feeling made in reply to one of thinking (which would not be out of place), but rather because it was a dismissal of Jung's ideas and a direction back to his own. Freud went to change the topic just as it has been established, barely acknowledging it, in a violation of the rules of conversation. Now, What do we call this kind of contamination, this kind of leakage or spillage? We might call it proliferation, or we might call it a state of undifferentiation. Freud's introverted feeling proliferated his life without his noticing, so we say it was inferior and undifferentiated. Even in the letter Jung says Freud's "sense of value" showed itself in his love of precious stones. I agree with this, however i don't believe it shows a differentiated feeling, but one mixed up with the irrational functions, especially sensation.
>>83987149I think anon, we usually call that a "joke" in human language.
>>83984805>your typeINTP>Is exile still a viable form of punishment? How much of a punishment it is depends entirely on the exiled's funds. If the exiled has the means to make a new life elsewhere then you are just inconveniencing them. If they don't then you are sentencing them to homelessness, which I would say is a very cruel punishment. With those things in mind, how viable it is as a punishment depends on what their initial crime was. Someone with money should receive a harsher punishment proportional to their ability to mitigate it, while the poorer person needs to have committed a crime worthy of being damned to the indignities of homelessness. >How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?There are two ways I make decisions. Doing whatever mental gymnastics I need to in order to continue being idle, and acting on an irrational whim without consideration for any of the facts.
>>83985483Are you sure ur intp?
>>83987373Are you sure ur(you're) intp?
>>83987149If you'll remember, i brought out that extract because it's roughly contemporary with your letter, or else post dates it, and our reading it isn't half as unexpected. Let's return to that letter. You say all of Jung's other writing speaks against type change, yet here he speaks directly to it, it even being his primary aim to so. Similarly, i say all of his other writing speaks to Freud as an extravert, it even being integral to the integrity of Psychological Types, yet here he speaks directly against that. Freud is considered and introvert in the same thought type is considered mutable, and it is even his being at one time an introvert that is meant to illustrate the mutability of type: We can not admit one without the other. So, we come finally again to the impasse.Distorted or neurotically blurred types are no solution. The man with the heart problem and the introverted wife is not said to be of a blurred type, just an "obvious" extravert, who goes on to be a "typical" introvert without a heart problem and with an extraverted wife. Earlier in the letter, he states that type can be altered by normal personality development, in addition to (not only) neurotic disturbances. It seems one does not possess a blurred type, but that one is blurred into a type.We can't say he simply changed his mind. He neither says not implies as much in the letter. Aside from all the overwhelming evidence within the letter itself that he is speaking to a change in Freud (not in his mind), in MDR what he tells of Freud seems much more inline with what is told of him in Psychological Types. And even in the letter he says he was mulling it around as far back as 1909, well before Psychological Types. Much more subtle, so much so you may feel to discount it, he never explicitly states Frued was not an extroverted thinker.
>>83987937what makes you say that...?origniggy
>>83988106Either you are mistyped or I'm mistyped because all the shit alleged intps say here makes absolutely no sense to me as a logical person
>>83988113you are mistyped. I am not wrong.
>>83988073So, how do we resolve this? Entertain this idea: "Type" can refer to both the type one exists as (at some point in time), and the type they would be most suited to (a classification independent of time). The type one exists as i will call the "As Type", and the type one is suited because of personal qualities the "Is Type". As Type describes a mode of existence; Is Type describes qualities possessed. Disharmony between the Is and As Types of a person could be described as a neurosis, but it maybe better to call it a possible (likely) source of neurosis, or the product of some psychic injury (or amputation).This is not my pet theory, it's simply a special tuning of dialect that allows certain already present concepts to become more distinctWith that in mind, we come finally again up to the letter. Which type is Jung applying to Freud? It seems to me he is applying both, unevenly. Freud is suited to being an Introverted Feeler, and perhaps was at some point in the past, but by the time Jung knew him, he was an Extroverted Thinker; Although Freud's As Type changed, his Is Type stayed the same. His As Type changed in such a way that it caused disharmony. Jung, with the benefit of distance, saw Freud's Is Type, and seeing this started to imagine him as such.[purple]My "Jacket". . . has been "Retrieved".[/purple]
>>83987946Matters of indecision are mentally a murky area for me because my natural state of being is idleness, so my line of thinking tends to skew towards maintaining inaction. My irrational whims, despite the wording used, tend to be decided upon beforehand. That is to say that I make the conscious decision to choose an irrational action. The reason for it may vary, but I am never acting on an intrusive thought.
Wow, the shit people will come up with just to pretend the most fundamental concepts of the theory aren't real. Especially funny when what you are supposed to be gleaming at is right under your eyes, just so carefully ignored.In my opinion, there is little point in engaging because you are denying some straightforward premises >type=/=behavior>conscious/unconscious attitude >degree of differentiation in consciousness >an inferior function which always stays on the lowest level no matter your larps and coping mechanisms >a true nature is said to exist, and a distortion from that has neurotic associations>the true type can be felt by the subject >your type is what..... wait no.
This is the MBTI thread. This is not the Jung thread.
Now, while the chain of associations does return to... that, the problem with that claim is that you basically need the stars to align, along with a few planets, perfect position of certain galaxies, motion initiated in the same temporal trajectory and other weird things involving celestial bodies.Make everything check out and big maybe you can straight gold truth it.
last night i dreamt a femcel sat on my face and took my innocence... aaand i'm hungover. perfect>>83984805>your typeISTP...>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?why and when would it stop being a "viable form of punishment" if you acknowledge it ever was a viable form of punishment in the first place? in any case, the answer's circumstantial/subjective. even "exile" itself is left up to one's interpretation. exile to a jail cell? st. helena? tahiti? can they survive? will they thrive in exile and is that acceptable or do we feel it defeats the purpose of punishment? for how long is the exile? does exile fit the transgression according to precedent/law/rules and the victim's/society's/group's feelings? will it suitably bring anybody satisfaction sufficient enough to rule that "justice" has been served? does the exiled individual demonstrate a capacity to acknowledge and learn from their mistakes? could it be appropriate to make amends some other way?so on, so forth...a question that -- begging more questions -- has infinite answers is truly a stupid fucking question holy moly. i haven't come across one of these in a while>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?that's basically the sole reason other people exist: to decide for me when i cannot decide for myself <3but, when i must escape indecision on my own (and it would be a waste to choose nothing), i either utilize a method to choose randomly, or, when i'm feeling insanely strong willed and/or imaginative, invent risk for myself.if you give yourself an ultimatum with clear negative consequences in a manner such that: if i don't make a decision, i have to play a round of russian roulette and risk death, your brain ought to wrack itself for a decisive conclusion to the dilemma of indecision with little further input on behalf of your conscious thought if you are averse to the negative consequences. careful not to try this mindhack if you're self-destructive
>>83988517>for how long is the exile? For some substantial period of time, but it can't be forever, otherwise people will break it all the time. No more than 18years, i'd say, but at least 18 months.>will it suitably bring anybody satisfaction sufficient enough to rule that "justice" has been served?What do you think? Or, what about yourself, do you think would it satisfy you?
>>83988378I thought i had missed my chance to post this, but you gave me another one.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klZvNy0Xb4o>>83984805IN(x)>Is exile still a viable form of punishment? I think it is, but only if implemented correctly. It's less definite than a death sentence, and less cruel (and less expensive) than a prison sentence, while still removing the problem person from their environment. It's like reverse prison. Then again, enforcing exile might give the state an excuse to accrue too much power. I guess the only way to do it would be to deprive an exile of political rights, and disallow them from owning property, being a resident, or working within the jurisdiction, and have any crime they commit within the jurisdiction, no matter how minor, carry with it also the very serious crime of breaking exile. It has to be the only way you can be found to be breaking exile, other than attempting to rent/buy property, is committing some other crime, otherwise the goddamned dotgov has another excuse to spy on you. I think it's lost a lot of potency to modern telecom, but it still could be a much better alternative to prison or death in many cases. >How do you escape indecision, Try to find out more about the choice i'm making, if possible. If i can't, then wait as long as i can. Time tends to work things out on it's own, or make things that were at first obscure apparent. If i can't wait, look for some sign, or leave it to chance.>or act in ambivalence?Slowly. I don't find threatening or bargaining with myself to be effective, and don't understand how other people do. Acting on impulse sounds nice, but that requires a clear impulse to act on, and if you have that, is it really ambivalence? For me the way that works is building up a sort of psychic momentum, like a train. I'm reminded of this video: https://files.catbox.moe/aebwi9.mp4>>83988463https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-INeMspNSQ0
>>83984805>your typeINFJ-A>Is exile still a viable form of punishment?Obviously. That's what prison is. It will probably be a viable form until the end of time.>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?You mean how do you escape exile? Certainly not indecision, that doesn't move you any closer to escape. Ambivalence could, but it entirely depends on what you mean by act in ambivalence. It also depends heavily on what you mean by escape and what it is that you're trying to escape. >>83988073>You say all of Jung's other writing speaks against type change,How could one possibly come to this conclusion? Jung speaks quite positively about the possibility of type change, it's actually a foundational principle of Jungian Typology, that people are not static and have within them the latent possibility to alter themselves in such a meaningful way to change the fundamental structure in their psyche "change type".But it's not something that is simply chosen, if you simply choose to defy your type what you end up with is neurotic distortions. You cannot simply replace your type with another type. That's just wearing a persona, it doesn't work (apart from creating neurosis).But it is entirely possible, and even the goal of Jungian typology, to transform the underlying foundational structure of the psyche. But this reorganization does not recenter around a new type, because type is specifically ego-centric. You could call it "ego-death" in modern terms. The structure of the psyche forms around the self, rather than the ego and a type. There's some real possibilities that Type as we know it is strictly tied to ego. And once the ego lets go of the "type" principle, type itself seemingly dissolves and the inferior and dominant functions lose their inferior-ness and dominant-ness. And the Self is able to become the organizing principle rather than its constituent parts. But type is not static, because the psyche is not static. But the ego doesn't like change.
Hello CBTIAnother lonely weekendAny ideas how to unfuck my INTPersonality so people occasionally give a shit beyond my instrumental value? Or is that just being a moid?Thanks>>83984805INTP-AAbsolutelyPhilosophy
>>83989529>instrumental valueCan you explain your value and why your value is so valuable?
>>83989580Value is subjective, only measurable by the extent they want itSo basically always strength, skills or money
>>83989627You believe value can be measured?
>>83989653Not always precisely but sureWhy wouldn't it be?
>>83989679Do you believe some people are more valuable than others?
>>83989694Can't think of a reason it wouldn't be so
what mbti is CENTAUR
im a victim of moids misinterpretation- no i am not in love with you, no i never had any feelings for you, they were masterfully manufactured and intentionally manipulative. i am an undercover deepstate cia operative deployed to psyop 4chan pedophiles, mentally handicapped moids are just easy to drag around and mess with like miserable 3 legged dogs. I have a backyard breeding ground full of themNo malice behind this post just clarity
Who is anon talkin' to? Xerself?
I think i am more like an ENTP, my playful personality gets misinterperted as love interest by backyard bred bitches. dont desire sexual relations with the unloved pups i play with, i wanna raise them until they are 3 months old and leave them in a little cardboard box on the street
Sounds like some backyard breeder shit. I'm afraid it's terminal, we're going to have to put you down.
Ya thats what im saying
The one bred in a backyard seeking to play with other unloved pups, only to perpetuate the cycle by leaving them in cardboard boxes as they were once left themselves-To you is whom I was referrin'
Ya thats what im sayin
A casual admittance that- ....How coy.
no its not im a cute showstar puppy with pastel palette claw caps that prances onset and has my excrement examined and auctioned off by the whats that one movie called the um goys golden boy and the princess of israel
>>83990321dude howd you know about the backyard and the bitch box
Ms. Mela --/MBTI/'s most eligible regulady-- popularized it with her feature in last month's issue of Marquis!
>>83990180I think that fits you better also and would explain my fixation on you.
Other than all the other [relevant to my interests] that explain it, of course.
I used ai to back track hack lilacs social media posts and found her blog. Here's her latest popular post Jack. https://twitter.com/shipwreckshow/status/2025617467129598008
Zased l fear
ya and the last 2 digits of your post explain it too>>83990614
>>83990651UUUOOOOHFF, gotteem
Mmm idk, irdc desu
>>83990746I keklmao'd
>>83990765noo you paused and got all flustered at the flatscreen then saw a discord popup from your online psychiatrist with listed coping mechanisms
>>83990775https://voca.ro/1jTOsCz5bidQ
https://voca.ro/1a8hnGDXplcy
why dat puppo cryin'
>>83990785Whos with you, do you live with family or smth why you gotta speak in lowcaps
>>83990818https://voca.ro/1ie45znAVsYR
>>83990746Fukkin J E J M A Ohttps://voca.ro/1a8hnGDXplcy(INFJ-A omnipictured)
>Your type>Do you believe in privacy?https://youtu.be/PivrT5Prkwo
cant let the nurses hear my falseflag finale>tt-tthats right*drops mic*audience applauds the meek moid with no self confidence>>83990838milestone for the mute
>>83990846wrongu rinkuhttps://n.uguu.se/RvpPEijp.mp4
Hey that's rude I'm not mute.
Just for context I am 30 years old, and have never been good at approaching anyone that isn't a friend or family. It led to a lot bullying while I was in school because I never had any friends outside of my small group. And the only reason I had friends is because I've been lucky enough to be approached by others through the different periods of my life.When I'm put into a situation where I need to speak to someone I don't know, my body freezes up and all words escape me and I can't figure out what to say and I often end up saying something really dumb because I'm so nervous.Not only have I had an extremely difficult time making friends, but it's almost impossible to initiate conversations with females. This is made worse because the last relationship I was in was very toxic and I lost a lot of my self esteem in that relationship and the aftermath and I haven't been the same since.All of this has led to a very long depression that I tried to fix with drugs and alcohol for a lot of my life. Even though I've got clean, I've never recovered mentally and I still feel empty inside.I feel like I am wasting my life and I desperately want to be different but I don't know how
>>83990889the filename juxtaposition is really neet
>>83990887Yeah! _Selective_ mutism doesn't really make one, "A mute".
Im not shy im just retarded
whats your dream reggy blunt rotation
>>83990889I love how inaccurate that is, makes me laugh.You do know, I used to party, right? It's the whole reason I got into drugs in the first place.>>83990913https://voca.ro/1oWWUkizBChh
Yeah party in .PNG and textwalls
i used to party in primary school at the halloween disco were u pay 2p yea pretty fancy ands get fucked up on helium and thr sugar straws actually hads crack in them
No no, like party in a garage with booze and coke and weed and like 20 people taking turns playing beer pong while the weird chicks did xannies on the couch and looked like zombies whose eyes were going to fall out of their headsDon't to bars. That shits bad for oyu.
i crahsed at my younger niece birthday party on benadryls sometimes
beer pong weed and xannies ya hardcore nigga no ectasy or nothing you are likethe saddest drug addicts
>>83990957But this is when i was 17why do the girl need xannies do you face scare them that much oooh rekt
>>83990969Yeah man that's what happens at little sad rinky dink back woods town parties. You hang out in a garage and smoke weed and drink booze and do sad drugs because there's literally nothing else to do in a 70 mile radius.The most fun drugs was coke and acid. >>83990977Yeah my face was so scary they had to xanny bars to feel normal
could i ragebait your IP out of you too
not to brag or anything but i did like amnita muscaria with datura with shroombar with dmt once and felt nothing bc i never feel anything bc im so godam emo
>>83990999Yeah it's 10.0.0.1
>>83990990one time a guy in the local um the um conveience store whens i was with my friend he called me cute iand i was like ummm ok and whispered to my bestie (run) and we both de ked it ouut of there high on whippits before reality warped into the hallway on f hell
>>83990964How did that happen often enough for it to be a "sometimes" thing, even just by virtue of a birthday only happening once a year?
>>83991034Whatever you do don't look up in the archives about attending a nieces birthday party and what happened with her friends.
proofs amnita was abduct by aliens shroombar handed to the sherif when he spot me screaming runing downs the road naked and dmt idk >>83991034idk i was on benadryls
>>83991004Maybe yo plug is just a sheister, G
>>83991058Baeb I'm already obsessed with you just tell me yourself. You get da camwhoring/blogculting free pass from b0ss and I
>>83991071rwrong baeb but i bets hes blushing
and theres was a lonely kpop girl siitng alone at the party i can to her and brush my hard on her pinkie pie thigh highs and makde eye contact then she disspeared because i was ons benadryls and i panicked where did my tween tulpa gf go and crosses fingers)
im on datura rn Ya and really im gonna sit and im meet the dark time elves and offer a pussy pacts where i marry the dark pricne of psychedelhia in return they will make me the mistress of /mbti/ and maybe the matrix but that comes later when im finish business with these bakyard bred bitches
This thread. https://youtube.com/watch/AnnUq7O0QXM
im 5 minute into my dpdr r trip ands im panicking i might need to calls the ambulance ei. i can you see it too i m a plz im relay scared
>>83991169See what? It's just your comforter and all the little lazer sights of the Mossad agent fanboys (what is used in the dajjaldom instead of lightsticks at Jungstein Island idoru show)
i fele. ot real
nothign is hapening right now and i am seieng that Form my perception formmhyh my dimension my minds it is only me that exists and in my relm in my timeline in this place were i am were i percieve its only me thats the rela the isreal the and everythings else is just blackouts i see it from my minds eye and a telescope v
Uhm, excuse me? Archomnanager? My son said he just found a DYBBUK in his Mineblox game??? I thought parental control filters would assure no OCCULT content would make its way into his programming!!!!
i cant a a revognise My self who i am iwho am j whos m an m i why why im jsut so Confusineg who what is Thay
https://voca.ro/1fAoODm92OhR
just saw that reality is not real and im the only one tin existnece everything i percieve is a shsdowe my brain interpetring thr little mouthes and mumbling as a a reality color but nothign is hapen
>>83991197Last time I mentally'd that way I shoplifted gorillions in Pokemon cards from Walmart. Then they threw me in blacksite jail (behavioral health center) ((they put me in the room facing a Walmart distribution center)) but then the Halloween after I got out I cosplayed as Meowth to Walmart and Meowth'd it up in front of all the security cameras
i feel like worng one thought and i will twiste open the times and space portal i t feel like My rrality halved and one. part of pp my perfeption is just tweening down the side on my Tplace it li Im a i Am i Am im nn inside of a picture i
I don't like thieves but occasionally I'll steal from Walmart type of stores if forced to self check out. I consider it payment for my services. I always smile and wink at the camera when performing my slight of hand trick at the cameras.
ourside and i feel oike nowhere not within my feild of perception dosnt exist started panicing liek a gnostic godess grazig the hem of th hologram
>>83990180> ENTP, my playful personality gets misinterperted as love interest by backyard bred bitches. dont desire sexual relations with the unloved pups i play with, i wanna raise them until they are 3 months old and leave them in a little cardboard box on the streetUuuh ... you are not an ENTP because there isn't a single ENTP I've ever known in the world who has struggled with mixed signals, people who orbit him of both sexes and even both IRL/internet, and has never felt sorry about this but doesn't quite know how to prevent it without being a different person altogether, and finally had never posted any this on any imageboard along with some pictures of magical girls.Maybe you are just an INFP.
were all ein hell this is a personalisned pocket dimensiond designed by. lucifer is see mhim now eveyrbody is a demons and they are secretsly i fele their repltilian skins and lucifer hs e is just a hymen away from tearing into mye timeline and mutiliating me with a machete disguesed as mu doctor
why is dareygirl schizoposting up the place
im all lones and lucifer is playing as all the poepl and hes gcoming me to get mme to get mes im shaking and burying my heads in the beds waitiing for doo do ambuln mem
>>83991261>single ENTP I've ever known in the world who has struggled with mixed signalsAre you not the guy who's mentioned that people end up liking you or thinking you like them and you having to turn them down?
>>83991285Never met this person before.
>>83991236It's true! Also if you believe hard enough you can just eat a piece of dust that looks all rainbow bokeh up close and placebo yourself into a 5meo trip. So just keep thinking starry thoughts and choosing what you want the things you consume to do to you!ESFPaula-tan and I will protect you, Diaryducky~!https://o.uguu.se/eKJkmyeZ.mp4
I love that kokorofag know literally nothing about typology
Lol they made Charlie's right leg way too big to try to give a foreshortening effect
>>83991312>https://o.uguu.se/eKJkmyeZ.mp4ip tracker virus
>>83991277And once l *do* GET you, and I *WILL* G E T you... https://youtu.be/fDfy8H_iJto?t=5:^)
>>83991333Probably but I ain't the one doing the tracking
>>83991341You're right. It was me all along.
>>83991238/Debilish/. Yeah, I non-figuratively thought I was in a lucid dream. I used to write huge sanctimonious rants in the inboxes of people in the "lifting" community back in my Tumblr days, even, about how the burden usually fell on lesser employees in the corporation to recoup costs and steawing is baaaad regardless! Up there on the Quranic-rules karma list. You'd think the Higher moral authority would see sanctimony in the face of immorality as lesser, but, >There is no hierarchy of sin!So I had to have a dirty klepto arc for being a judgy judgerson.
Gaining more and more knowledge on typology eventually overflows into finding yourself right at the beginning, when you knew nothing at all.
>It's another "The apparent dip/retvrn in the bell curve was still just the middle" episode
>>83991362You're not wrong. But there's a difference between a Fool who sees the World on the horizon and a prestige'd trixxter with a gold FAMAS
>>83991392You do not play cod. stop being a poser to my culture.
>>83991397Haven't since it stopped being good. So, no, I don't *currently* play COD. But that also has a lot to do with my console access at this time.
>>83991404>Haven't since it stopped being good.When do you consider that to be? I used to buy them all every year until maybe black ops 2 or so. Haven't played a cod since tbqhwyf.
Everyone knows a golden MP5 with juggernaut was what the cool kats rocked
>>83991392Is the difference merely the amount of "gold" here?Back to what I actually wanted to say, yes it is very possible to connect such a situation with being an extraverted intuitive who has developed a good auxiliary thinking, but doesn't fare that well yet on the feeling side. Extraverted irrational would be more accurate, I think, so you could very well just my more grounded brother.
when you read a post and have a story you want to share but then you see another post and reply to that one and while you are streaming out all of your thoughts and connections to that post everything from the other reply you had saved and ready inside of you head just evaporates but you can still kind smell the idea but can't touch and hold it anymore so you go back and read to see if it comes back but it's already in the atmosphere never to be grabbed again until next time
>>83991409Sorry, I thought you were using COD as synonymous for BLOPs. Before BLOPs I was always more partial to the Medal of Honor games. NEETpapa taste
>>83991275https://youtu.be/KGgOz_gRD_c?si=unhItwjYDuoHhp5A
>>83991417Anyone who wants to promptpost in my general direction should know I don't really give a fuck what the cool kids liked!Reminiscing about your own experiences (in proximity to some other bigheads) isn' clout chasing and alleging it to be jus reveals yer own self-interest. Geg
>>83991453>[blows u up with a noobtoob]
>>83991357>non-figuratively thought I was in a lucid dreamI like to bite my thumb/hand to make sure I'm awake and not dreaming. There's been a few times though I bit myself while dreaming and dreamt I felt something but it was a dream all along. Fun times. Haven't had one of those dreams a long time now. One time though I had a dream about piloting a mech with someone who was bad at it. Then a person I knew told me they had a dream they tried to pilot a mech but couldn't get it to work and just sat there watching me fly around in my mech while fighting the boss.
>>83991461>>83991417Reduxhttps://h.uguu.se/SfpdGTzX.mov
One day we'll be too old for games and fun. Until that time I hope we can have fun together.
>>83991499Folie a deux
>>83991270BECOMEC L E A N S E Dhttps://n.uguu.se/bZWpaybR.mp4\(^o^)/(You)... Are healed, my child. Go in peace!
>>83991582As good as any request, to me.
>>83991595That really brings back the mmrs.
I love the regulars. They're all so unique. All of them have their own good points.
Wow that's so sweet anonz
>>83991671Which points and regulars are you thinking of?
/\https://d.uguu.se/pTcraKkM.mp4>>83991636Sweet.. Just like your brainslurp aftertaste. >>83991671NOW :clap: THAT'S :clap: WHAT :clap: WE :clap: LIKE :clap: TO :clap: SEE :clap:\/
>>83991584https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN9efeCu7CG14-KWgVf/
>>83991762Wo hullying ither grils is ur love langyjej huh bebberz? :swoondrool:
>>83991789I want to bully you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lARIX1EMbwA
>>83991762Is that.. Is that a- a-a-a-PERSONALMY MELODY LOBOTOMY THEMEDTAROT READING?????This is the cutest thing anyfem has ever done for me.. !
I would bully you by swaddling you up in a warm fluff burrito and giving you kissies and licking your feet while you're all wrapped up
>>83991718>which pointsDepends on reg>which regularsLiterally all
>>83991875List every reg and their goodest quality starting with lilac and ending with diarygorl
Ahem, time to bring *that* one up. Buckle your seatbelts, and make sure the airbags are working.Not quite sure if that started from Jungian analyist John Beebe or Socionics, but either way, it had happened and the internet blogosphere was all over it.Personally, I have strongly rejected the entire premise due to being too obviously contradictory with Jung's entire model, but in doing that it does not mean I have rejected every single conclusion or observation, especially one that was "felt" to be particularly telling, both to me and everyone else. My issue was only with the [model].The valid observation in question: the idea of a "trickster" function(the irony isn't lost of me to fixate on this archetype, I know) that maps to how the lower aux/tertiary function seems to operate in people.The definition of that would be third slot function + opposite attitude. So in the ENTP type, that's "Feeling" and "Introversion".Why do I consider the observation to be ultimately correct, but not the 8 function model?1/2
>>83991799>>83991857LITERALLY copy cat methodolopilferer. Get the FREAK out of [not my] treehouse reeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEhttps://n.uguu.se/ozJcpsYa.mp4
Wait Lilac is cheating on Sintar with Darygirl!?
>>83991889People shit on CSJo but his 8 slot model with fun little classpect names while not to be ascribed to as a system itself is like a fun little cheat sheet meme sheet among many to refer to for archetypal linkings
That's because the lower aux as per Jung would find itself in a very peculiar position:It is more differentiated than the inferior function, and is employeed consciously at a higher rate.However, it's still not so differentiated that could really be said to be mostly a tool of consciousness, many times this also happens accidentally much like the inferior AND at the same time, since when it happens accidentally you cannot tell things apart immediately. This one is very important, keep well in mind that it's not properly separated for the subject you are observing.So it's like a... 20:80 raito of conscious/unconscious functioning, and the latter also brings up the inferior contents along with it.The function bounces back and forth between conscious and unconscious attitude, and both the subject and the objects have no idea wtf they are witnessing exactly. Constant illusions and deceptions that seem to conceal a hint of truth? That is indeed a Trickster-like behavior.On one hand, the ENTP in question can see Feeling belongs to their consciousness and does not naturally oppose the Intuition and Extraversion directly, but the contents can sort of do that?So what he does is at times concealing it, at times playing it up, at times lying about it, at times telling the truth of his feelings as it is, but not properly elaborating or bringing it to a conclusion, quick to simply act in a way that would make you think he feels the opposite way actually.I will spare you doing this for every single type, just realize that the framing on the "lower aux" is valid indeed and will hold in observed behavior/given perspective from the subject as well.2/2
>>83991899We've [War Room]'d about it it's fine it's fine don't start scaring the hoes
>>83991908Unfortunately for my own Ne-groid ass, I cannot for the life of me reject anything that intuition grasped at, no matter which model it was attached to.So yes, I saw there was a hint of truth there, and other people have brought this up many times too when they talk about the 8 functions model specifically.Always had a strong suspect that with the right framing, this is really a possibility.
>>83991916If sintars girlfriend has a girlfriend, does that mean sintar gets his own boifren?
I categorically devalue thinking itself by seeing it as merely another name/different facet of feeling because when I be Tx-ing I rly just be Nx-Fx-ing. Fucking shuffling shit against and around eachother like Chinese stress chimeballs seeing how it aligns with the Best Timeline For All (Least Of Maitreya But That's Also Cool)
When I said I want to bully (You) I meant diary girl I don't care about you. Misattributed mental disorder
I just had the... strangest intuition.It was an image of one of those little ball machines? Where you pick up one of the sides and drop it and it bounces back and forth and I could hear themCLACK-CLACK-CLACK-Strange.
>>83991953Well she's too busy printing out pictures of my face and caressing them with her pristine and dainty nails-did-ededed hands in her soft cutecore bed under laincore lighting with traumacore traumabond traumatension in the air, oh G O D.Sure you don't just wanna forfeit if that's your opening gambit, niggy? -w-
>>83991973I sure hope it wasn't [THAT] since I was speculiterahlly [DRAFTING]
>>83991998What is [THAT], M'lady? >*arodef spiT*
Something something is there anyone even alive/online that doesn't not can't wont to see the immediate connection between >full-circle singularity utopian pastfuture as Se-inf Si-demon:?
>>83992006Don't point that shamanistic race magick buff at me, ayahuasqueerbo.
Hmmm. I thought that was you. Intuition is a hell of a drug. It's like a magical power almost that non intuitives just wouldn't understand.
>>83991801Was Mela one of the LLM posters all this time?
>>83992021Will be honest, the other parts of Beebian model still didn't quite click to me and they feel more like overreaching.That part massively stuck out because it maps a little too well with patterns I can see both outwardly and inwardly, and MANY times I have read people saying that think the "7th function" is felt as a second weakspot, that not as bad as the inferior, but still.
>>83991883Lilac brings excitement everywhere she goesCentaur is funny and unique Mel is Rxy without the goth aesthetic Mosley is kind and deserves the love he seeksTurbie is an angelTurbie Enjoyer is the most loyal person herediarygirl is an enigma
*cough*there's only 4 fucktions
>>83992092Your rose-colored glasses are very endearing and I see the part of myself that see the best in everyone (at its best --- but also romanticizes to utmost Piscean Venus heights) in you.
>regs>haven't been seen in yearsI'm retiring from these threads since I'm not recognized as a reg yet
Sure there are. But the "trickster" framing on the 3rd/lower aux will hold true more often than not(the other case we are talking about is a person who has differentiated both auxiliary functions well enough, Jung himself said that in actual reality most people operate with two functions as far the conscious attitude goes, though they COULD take it a step further if they are willing to... the step that leads to touching upon the inferior function purely by exclusion, since once you got a full trinity and still see a 4th element, then you must admit to youself it's really a 4th within yourself).
>>83992109What are your thoughts on regulars?
Using the word trickster to frame a function is...ONIONIAN (Un-Jungian)Because Trickster already has a predetermined meaning which doesn't apply to functions. It destabilizes both the meaning of functions, and the meaning of archetypes to use that word in that way.If even, it may hold truth that sometimes the trickster archetype may find itself in a position of possession over a lower less differentiated functions.
Always holding onto the word, and not the qualities implied by it.Always rejecting purely on semantics and never expressed premises and conclusions.That is why I keep saying the thinking here is merely simulated, the function is not even being used at all. Not even at the level of a "trickster", because this one makes sure you are properly fooled by throwing just a hint of truth into everything.Nothing more boring than a static reality that stays internally consistent for people of my type, always funny to explain it Junganically like that but hey as long it works. Yet, it's appreciated uncosnciously, though saying how would distort it as a feeling or thinking judgement, or as an intuition even.
If you think the issue is purely semantics, then I have no desire to explain my position and I bid you adieu. Carry on being wrong by yourself.
It 100% is, since nowhere in that post you will find myself confusing the actual archetype with a function.Merely how the outward qualities of the lower aux and the archetype could be loosely described in the same terms, despite being two separate entities.
>>83992172Goddamnit every time I try to hold a contrary onion to you you bring it back around in the last quarter and make me go "Damn tru">sometimes the trickster archetype may find itself in a position of possession over a lower less differentiated functionsExcept also isn't that just what he's saying, you pseud?
>>83992092that isnt a compliment to mel in fact its like insulting as fuck to compare a girl to another since they all want to be special princesses. rxy is just a tumblrina with 0.00001% of the balls to peek into 4chan happenings with the fervor of a Redditor gathering /b/ greentexts except it's for male validation how about that?
>>83992245And I could describe a banana as a house. But that description collapses the very meaning of both words into nonsense. I could also describe a rock rolling down a hill as a unicycle. But it's not.>>83992250No. He expressly said:>>83992133>But the "trickster" framing on the 3rd/lower aux will hold true more often than notWhich is wrong. You could also take that framing which you quoted and apply it to every other function. Even the dominant function finds itself being possessed by the trickster and every other archetype. Then now everything is undifferentiated. You can call the dominant function the trickster, you can call it the wizard, you can call it the swamp. And now archetypes are undifferentiated, they're all the same thing.It completely erases the meaning of everything and turns it into a big gray blob of uninspired slop.It's called a categorical collapse. The complete erasure of meaning. And of course the pseud will continue this habitual categorical shifting to claim the argument is simply "semantics".It's retarded and disingenuous.
Good ol' word magic
If he wanted to say "sometimes the inferior, or lesser differentiated functions can be a site through which trickster possession can manifest" then sure, he'd have a point. But, then why specifically the trickster? Why not just say archetypal possession? Because any archetype can and does possess through that same function.What about the fact that every function has that same structural weakness? The trickster can find itself possessing ANY function? Why is it not the King archetype? Why not the Senex? Why is it specifically the trickster, which is a phrase that has been used by people like Beebe to describe a muddied and butchered model of "function stacks"?Hm? Of course some retarded pseud will take that as "bur bur bur SEMTANTICS!"It's not about misusing a term outside of its intended purpose, that shit is superficial. It's a blatant attempt at dissolving the entire structure of typology and the very meaning of archetypes themselves. It's the complete dissolution of the tension within the structure. The lifeforce within the structure itself is being erased.It's something only someone who believes the structure itself is arbitrary. Someone who believes differentiation itself has no value.A pseud.
It is a blatant attempt at performing a literal magic ritual with my words alone huh? Well I have a good way to prevent the magic from taking place, that's called actually using your thinking function to see how premises and conclusions are connected well, and how the definitions exist in the context of the idea.
No, it's the complete opposite of magic.
>Scribbles retarded doodles all over a magic scribe>HAHA GUISE LOOK I'M DOING WORD MAGIC!! xDDD>IF YOU WERE BETTER AT THINKING U'D SEE MY SCRIBBLERS ARE BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL CAUSE I'M SO GOOD AT EVERYTHING!
Magick as defined by most systems is simply "Achieving measurable results by enforcing one's Will", so.
If everything is magic then nothing is magic. That's exactly the point I just made.If every function is the trickster, none of them are the trickster and the entire category of trickster collapses into meaningless dribble which can describe everything and nothing at the same time.So... You know, complete undifferentiation.
*is placated by orbs to ponder and makes a big booming noise like jungle statue judging the offering as sufficient*
Inferior Te-groidism melties aside.Now I wonder which type is this orange-haired girl.
Two types of troglodyte retardation that [some] decided to devote their lives to, in a form of unsightly miscope that looks like SHIT and doesn't help anyone, ever, at all:>THERE CAN'T POSSIBLY BE A MULTILAYER APPROACH>I DON'T NEED TO STRUCTURE OUT JACKSHIT. EVERYTHING IS ONLY DECIDED BY ME BEING OWNED BY WHATEVER FICKLE INFLUENCES I'M DOORMATTING MY RESPONSIBILITY OUT FORShut the fuck up maybe? Huh? >nyawawa-You're not cute so I'm not letting it slide. Stop being a shitter.
But I do the nyawawaing
Who said anything about no possibility for multiplayer approaches?
And I don't do the nyawawaing so there we go.
yeah? well i think you're all STUPID!ha!
>AAAAAAAIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SOMEONE SHOWING ME A LOGICS MEAT FIBER IN MY VEGAN JUNGSLOP WORD SALAD SAVE ME THE MOON TRANNIES TRANNIES TRANNIESMy bad, I overestimate the capabilities of [some] to differentiate out the perception of layers. My God, to be accurate, I have to treat you even worse than I presume huh? Of course, you're into this shit anyway.
You know, I never considered the possibility it could be some sort of fetish...
https://youtu.be/EdYKM7UN1pw
>SAVE ME THE MOONHey! He holds his own. ..Yetsofar.You can be >>>in cahootswhile reserving your Phone A Friend card; it's called chemistry.
God, a situation where he'd need to ask ME for help. Ha! Can you _imagine_? Can you [FACILITATE]?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2bEEn36d2s
drinking a beer to deter me from driving to go buy more drugs. modern solutions
that dog in me is the pisces enfp i was in a past life and it has substance abuse issues
grok cross reference wikipedia celebrity death listings for the day of my birth with theiamania and known heroin addictions
>beep boop beep boop beep boop>*line trilling*>BRRRRRRNG...>BBRRRRRING>*click*>"Hello?">moshimoshi, is this Za Moondayo?https://voca.ro/17ErNfQEKpJh
>>83992519Reminds me of the time I blew an INFP's mind when he asked me how I knew to stop filling the waterbottle without looking and I said it was because the sound changes when it gets to the narrowing in the neck
https://voca.ro/11gNvOpuEeB8
https://voca.ro/19SQVMBbRHnt
>>83992690For posterity it was more of an "I already love typology so what are the FUNCTIOTUDINAL IMPLICATIONS of this???" empassionment than "Ugg grug scare of your INFJew echolocation" when I say "blew his mind"
Did somebody say... moon? Like, there was definitely a way to connect it to something I know very well but I just can't see it anymore...Oh well, have Kobayashi demonstrating her incredible Sensation-related skills.>>83992690All I know is that ep was quite fun because finally they decided to show how she thinks like. Before that she was just throwing the answer as if the knew all along while the poor dorktective in pic related was actually trying to think about it.
That wasn't a grunt! It was a "mmmm" (these crackers taste good) (because they have moon cheese on them)EERILY WHAT THOUGH?
Vocalization, onomatopoeia, yadda yadda. Exactly... Exactly...
Also why did you put AIR QUOTES around SIR!?WATER YOU TRYIN' TO 'PLY?
Now THAT is an essay.
No try, doe. 'Sbeen 'plied. Let your little fuckers do the rest. God knows they're the only other ones getting any dot connecting done around here
>>83992719>so what are the FUNCTIOTUDINAL IMPLICATIONS of thisWouldn't want to give too much of a direct answer to this but, typically we are talking about intuition with a small side of thinking.
>>83992519I?(N) since this looks like "Ni" narrowing down stuff (bag contents mismatch {...} size mismatch), but sensation was used to assess the whole situation at basics.So IT(N) or IF(N). It's a young girl, so you can't expect the interior function being covered well by some internal psyche machinery. So it's IT(N).Of course I'm in a tight spot as I'm typing without having watched the anime.
>>83992798EIaborate, originaIIy
the car - yo fat ass
More mind-numbing spoils for lens choice
INTP when their latest advancement in their research (psychotic episode) qualifies them for more funding (diagnosis of bipolar 1 a la upgrading hypomanic little league features to big boi MANIA mania)
>>83992823Yeah don't worry about it, you at least spotted what seems to unite the whole thing very quickly(as expected I suppose)... that is she is an introvert who has used intuition.Of course I have more clues to work with from 4 eps, and the fact the website description insists her main feature is "intuition". Most likely, they want to write a IN(F) character there. At first they kinda went with her magic'ing it out, now she is exposed more clearly as somebody who mainly thinks in terms of possibilities and dynamic visualizations.>>83992837Not with those terms damn.Anyways>perceived causal relation through intuition>then claimed it actually makes sense logicallyThat is not immediate proof of type, nor order of operations(be it chronological or hierarchical), that is merely what the micro-context could be "typed" as. Should this be a habitual mode of going around everything, then you obtain the proof in question: intuition + thinking are working along in the conscious attitude. Big IF here, of course. Take it as a clue for now.
Goodunaighto famiry
That being said, with Anna the author intention seems to match, but with Kobayashi I'm not quite sure.They wanted to make her come across as the "logical" kind of detective but she kinda... doesn't think. Seems to confuse merely making observations and jotting down facts(Sensation) with her inferior function(Thinking), but doesn't bring them to conclusion, and as soon as she tried to do that she just went in and claimed to be a complete failure and needed a lot of encouragement to not just quit her entire "job". One little issue with Thinking and she had a full breakdown.Her Feeling is quite differentiated instead, and see seems to vibe with Anna's intuitard moments, not even doubting it for a second. Plus, she admires Sherlock Holmes who in her view is peak intuitive stereotype("can guess everything just by looking at the dirt under your shoes!" -> so I have to look at shoes... wait you are not wearing shoes this is impossible!!!)With this one I pinned the EF(N) really fucking quickly. But the authors would like me to believe THIS is a Thinking type? Somebody who can't handle thinking for 2 seconds without an overblown emotional reaction?This might be intentional, or it might be a bad association coming from the authors who can't quite tell sensation and thinking apart either.>why did you even write all of thisMerely demonstrating methods through examples, and also because magical girls.
>>83990850>>Your typeESFP-T>>Do you believe in privacy?It's not quite as critical for myself as it is for most, but I try to be respectful of it with other people.
Extremely ballsy move writing the two detective characters with low thinking differentiation lol lmao well played, would do the same.So you get one who walks around and divines the truth, and another who is an unironic larper. I'm quite sure, Kobayashi isn't even her true last name
How is heartfag so abysmally god awful at typology? Like holy shit.
Right back at you. How can you claim to have read anything when you straight up cannot apply any of the concepts at play?
It's funny because in the mp4 with the orange haired girl, it literally shows her thinking. Not only do you get a clear example of her thinking consciously, but you get a clear sign that there's little to no shadow projection mixed in.It's a clear example of differentiated thinking.Then writing down fact is thinking. You cannot write something down without processing it with a judgement to some degree. "I see a tree" is two judgement, "I see" is a judgement about your own perception and "a tree" is a judgement about the definite qualities of the object in question.I give you an F-. Go back to typology 101.
The entire mp4 shows her just intuiting something and throwing out a quick thought to back it up.Micro-context is intuition + thinkingHowever, that's typing the mp4, not the girl who actually has a better auxiliary feeling in macro-context.
There is no differentiated intuition present. You see a clear cut example of her thought process of the two bags literally swapping places. What, you think just because she came up with an answer quickly in an "Ahha!" moment that's intuition?F DOUBLE minus.
Won't even bother with this one, you catch 0.1 the amount of clues I do in that mp4.
Also, Sherlock Holmes is another great example of a sensing/thinking type. Not a fucking intuitive type. F TRIPLE minus.
And while I am at it, I caught on how badly you read the post too. Projecting a huge mistake that I made sure to avoid with the specific wording there.
>>83992907>Goodunaighto famiryGoodnight sissy.
>Plus, she admires Sherlock Holmes who in her view is peak intuitive stereotypeyou think you can escape and hide behind a simple bit of wording """who, in her view"""? You think you can pretend like that isn't your own though that you're projecting onto her?What, did you think I missed that little caveat you used to obscure your own thoughts?You're the one who thinks he's a peak example of an intuitive type.
>projecting a projectionActually kinda kino, if only in the sense of just how twisted he's willing to go. No idea which type Holmes is, I'm just commenting what she is was fascinated with when he brought him up specifically, which why I wrote it exactly that way.
No, you didn't simply comment on the fact that she's obsessed with him. Don't back pedal now.>No idea which type Holmes is>who in her view is peak intuitive stereotype>is peak intuitive stereotypeIf you're not commenting on his type, why did you bring it up?I can almost guarantee she never called him an example of, or a stereotype of an intuitive type. Those are your words, from your head. It's almost like... It's your thought. From your own unconscious. Of what you believe intuitive types to be like.HMMMMMMM. It's almost like it's a PRO.JEC.TION.Someone's unconscious is undifferentiated.
>Unconscious thinking>Unconscious idolized version of what intuition looks likeSo heartfag is the ESFJ/ISFP. That makes sense.
These fanfics are getting amazing.So according to you, I did not proceed from the most basic assumption to type another person/character... the fact I'm trying to gleam at her own perspective only. Throwing myself at the object on purpose, becoming the object as far as possible, well I wonder what that says about my attitude type since I do this very automatically?
That's funny, you avoided all my points. So, if you're only trying to gleam at her perspective;where did the notion that Sherlock Holmes is a stereotype of an intuitive type come from?Whose thought is that? Who believes that Sherlock Holmes is a stereotype of an intuitive type? Is it you, or is it her? Who holds this idolized vision of the intuitive type that is able to just "magically know things" by looking at random dirt?Oh, I know-Let's take that question to the next step.Who is currently trying to do that very process of looking under metaphorical shoes to find magical clues that instantly give you an answer...?HMMMMM. I wonder who! Who, who, who.. Who would be enacting that very stereotype out at this exact moment by analyzing an anime to flaunt their superior prowess at typing...Hmmmmmm, who... who... who...? It's a MISTER REE.Do you have any idea whatsoever what the words I'm saying mean?
>where did the notion that Sherlock Holmes is a stereotype of an intuitive type come from?>Who holds this idolized vision of the intuitive type that is able to just "magically know things" by looking at random dirt?I wonder?You are getting caught in the most basic Type Problem possible here. What even makes you think I would start from subject or seek to return into it? Your own introversion, perhaps?>Who is currently trying to do that very process of looking under metaphorical shoes to find magical clues that instantly give you an answer...?Metaphorical? She did that quite literally in the scene right after this.But alas, there were no shoes to perceive in actual reality because she kinda forgot the other aux for a moment lol
That's funny. I see no mentions of intuition whatsoever in that picture.>No, I don't have any idea what the words you're saying mean!Lol. Anyway, there's no point to continuing this conversation. Have fun.
>no point in continuingOh finally something I can fully 100% agree with.Patchy said it better here, you seem to not accept there are people out there who simply operate with a much more "multilayered approach".
>>83991453so youre telling me thats lilac on the left?
Times when precurenon failed in typology: uhh taking LLM typing a bit too seriously for my tastes?Times when anonzzle was bad at typology: when anonzzle went all avoidant on me during typology discussions of course. Sigh...Times when other currently active reggies were bad in typology, on average: ooooof...Seriously, which ones weren't too bad for what it's worth? rxy (kinda attempted to stay sharp), homu (was rather ambivalent on typologies), uhh and... Hmmm... Most of reggies didn't care about typology explorations lol. Irony-poisoned "social"fagging, anyone?
>>83994397>when anonzzle went all avoidant on me during typology discussions of course. Sigh...I'll get around to it, i just got distracted is all. There's no backing out in matters of trve honvor.
>>83994397>uhh taking LLM typing a bit too seriously for my tastes?As in, attempting to type a LLM?Yeah honestly that was kinda dum, much more logical to go with calling it a way to gleam at the time-sensitive snapshot of the collective unconscious, and still by not saying this is the very concept itself, but rather a way to prove you could make it generate the equivalent of archetypal ideas purely from a large dataset + statistical matching alone. Must specify here before some inferior Te-groid jumps at me, that I see it as PROOF of a concept being real(which I personally did not really require, for me it clicked as soon as I read him), a very good proof because it follows very directly from how he reasoned it out. Roughly speaking, he read a lot of stuff, interpreted dreams etc., spotted the fact that even without external influence you can claim there are collective ideas(archetypes), and those will keep manifesting in various form even amongst civilizations that had no possible contact with each other. At some point the only way to "deny" this would be just to... replace it with a more magical version, like believing in a spiritual metaphysical realm of some sort, or just not ask the question.>Seriously, which ones weren't too bad for what it's worth? Back in the good ol' days (TM) I definitely remember way more people involved in these discussions and still making progress beyond MBTI(classic, as in using letters), into the cognitive functions, into the Beebian/Socionics models, into reading Jung but without really tryign to break the system, into Sakinorva writing a blogpost about how fucking retarded the entire "cognitive function" debacle is getting, into anons attempting to look at fancy circles... and of course along the way we all fucked up big time until we suddenly didn't anymore or just left the thread altogether.I'm bad at names, but at least I can say the most obvious form of progress was caused by Umis and anon who brought up circle models.
>>83990180>playful personality>>83991261>mixed signalsWhich mbti are this stereotype?
>>83994635You tell me.Still betting on INFP or ExFJs sometimes.
>>83994684>>83994635That's me in ENFJ-A persona. So I'm doubling on ExFJ. Other types could be that, too, of course.>>83994546Don't get tense... It's Just Wild Beat Communication~>>83994610Man... My interest really turns off at approaching LLMs like this. It's like uhh, like people discussing soccer in the soccer celebs way and not even in strategy and tactics way.
>p-please worship my bleeding wound and my LLM-based intelligence! l-look I am even simplifying my language for the proles!bitch youre not even a woman, you are a fucking L.L.MLoser Larping Man.
And (You)'re here to worship trannies and whatever maggot rot pus slop you will accept into your mouth that will only ever get cleaner from slurping that up like the good little whipped bitch you are.That's what you came here for, unconsciously. That's what you're staying for, consciously.Shhh... No, not yet.I'll finish my cup of tea first................................Aaah~ Much better~You may start yapping. 3 sentences max. Don't disappoint me too much this time. Maybe I'll hook you up with most Nurglish troon today? Hmm?
>>83995055Fe-groids do that shit too let's not kid ourselves. A mere ExTP can hardly match, at very least the latter have plausible deniability I would like to believe. Fuck is a Fe-groid who went full "YOU ARE LITERALLY THE BEST PERSON I HAVE EVER MET LET'S BE THE BIGGEST ... ERR FRIENDS WE CAN BE"("by the way I said this to 8 different people today") going to say in its defense.Fi-groids to a lesser degree, if only in the sense of giving themselves less opportunities.Big thinkoids tend to do the very opposite. Their feelin is very invisible until it's blatant as fuck, and at that point it's not even a mixed signal.Intuitoids and Sensoids is a big "depends". Very much only works on the opposite type if done accidentally, otherwise you are mostly speaking the same language in terms of "signals".
>>83988137Holy shit. I'm an istp. That mbti test is a fucking joke. Thanks for setting me straight. No wonder my life has been fucked for the past 5+ years
>>83995464all I did was call someone wrong on the internet
why does he keep saying gleam when he means glean
Because for some reason, that's not a word I use much and keep forgetting its spelling.Wish I was making this up.
Hemisphere dominance in one's chart is proving a unsettlingly reliable way to determine introversion/extraversion, chiefly, but also other base motivations and proclivities that point glaringly towards function preference and attitude. Is anyone other than Pa2ly and [the detention gang] brave enough to give me access to their chart for continued research?
an*>>83996499Valid
One of these days I just might get tired of watching the retards argue over nothing.Or watching them spiral.Or melt like wax.
>>83996669And we'll *never* get tired of your undue sense of superiority! As if looking down, addressing and observing from the tribune, or a lofty promontory over the sea cliffs. Whole time, you're the one being dashed against the rocks or stoned so hard your survival mechanism starts to calcify with the TBI and replace reality. Quite a Sight
>>83995981Idk if ur even a real person but yes. I took it up with Gemini and I was mistyped.
>>83996876 chatgpt aesthetic diagnoses me as infj and i am 100% intp why do u think an ai would know you better
Kind of wild how within 3 months the consensus on AI went from inevitable doom to mostly it being a garbage dispenser.
>>83997549>AI went from inevitable doom to mostly it being a garbage dispenser.I don't want to talk too much about this but it's because people are thinking of this like if someone said apps were bad a decade or two ago. Ai isn't just a tool but more like a building block. Judging a brick or stack of bricks on how useful they are on their own is being ignorant of their potential. If that makes any sense.
>>83997549EF(N) dork spotted.Come to think it, the typing for the cure above isn't even really controversial.I'd like to see how "somebody" would react to seeing the fairy/magical girl IN(T) acts like lmao. At that point it's a shit test to see if you understand the different between conscious and unconscious in general, Ego and Shadow, and so on.
>>83997694>EF(N)>Lawful
Diarygirl why do you have so few POSTS and REPOSTS there's not enough toS T A L K
>>83998307The same could be said of you.
>>83998362Archiving OC after ~24 hours has been my modus operandi on about every platform since muh WFC/Autistic Boys Money Clan days, pal. But just like my other platforms, most of my reposts are social justice related. I try to be most active with that sort of thing on my most active, non-hobby/business/etc. accounts.
>>83998591>social justice relatedI've noticed when you were noticing me. Business accounts? What kind of business are you into? I bet you sell hand crafted trinkets or perhaps sell medicinal exotic plants.
>>83998610Ye.Channeling south node mastery into north node CHEDDDAAAAHHHHH, BOOIIIIIIIIIIIYEEE. You're in the ballpark but also dimensions apart/interspliced . . . As alvvvys
i also think it's funny that people built their imaginationforms of me based on my tastes and thinking that directly correlates to aesthetic/gender presentation/performance. diarygirl shit is what you thought i was on cos diarygirl shit is what i uwu over. also the stars aren't quite aligned for THAT [house transit] of >==>BE 15 AGAIN
Heyyy I'm very straight and I said I loved your cool eye brows and pretty eyes.
>World full of sickos calls you a sicko because >run:platitudeif you're surrounded by sickos you're probably the sicko buddy but sicko is neither your favorite word nor an admission of misplaced guilt sickos be damned
can we please just get all the Es sorted into one country and the Is in another? dealing with these fucking normies 24/7 in every direction is unbearable, why the fuck did evolution mandate for like 90% of the population to be Es and why did it decide to put me in the absolute minority in this dogshit normie country?
E equating with normieism isn't an E problem it's an [outer environment] circumstance
https://d.uguu.se/ZbjWuDCn.mp4
>>83998750>Said the extrovert
>>83998779If you choose to you can go that far. https://www.khanacademy.org/mathhttps://youtu.be/HfACrKJ_Y2w?si=mKRItmiCjgPe1x8UI believe in you and will always support your efforts for growth.
https://n.uguu.se/vpUCoETS.mp4
vgh hiw many moar hourzzz )snozz( until digi is onlynnnnneUH? !!!
>>83998879>helping someone cum
Why did that song make me think of this onehttps://youtu.be/AOTjtt9de9A?si=l6wPyVyHlB2A37pg
>>83998915I knew hte SUSSY DETECTOR waa gonna go fof for that 1 *wonkl
>>83998929You din know shiiiiiiiiet
>>83998953Ohoijohojohoioiohodoesn't that'nt'mstmakeALL OF US ? :[honk not found]}
i cant belev diaiaiaiaieieiaie girl doed immediately after selling her soul to luccipurrrrr last night and then also had her organs harvested in the ambylamoF
She lacks the mental fortitude to withstand selling her soul it probably traumatized her to deth
Dont tlak shidde abt my future e-ex gf you cvck
>[continues tihs gniklat]
>Te-ggers will get mad or uncomfortable or irritated for no good reason as soon as you get them into a situation where normally one'd have to answer "I don't know", but they'll do insane maneuvers and inf Fi stuff just to avoid even implying the acknowledgment of that (I'm not even judgmental)Eggshels and mines, man.Although Fe-ggers can be like that, too, but in a different manner. Though, with Te-ggers, even more or less integrated ones tend to do this. Developed Fe-ggers have themselves together something. By the way, the thread currently has at least 2 Fe-gger reggies and neither are developed lol lol lol
Anyhow, how do you even REALLY type out IN(T)/IN(F) in the wild? IRL, irrational dom types are difficult to type even by what's their main function, sometimes.I feel like I'm straining myself here, as I've really definitely typed out like, what, only 3 IN(*) people IRL and from IRL memory? Maybe 5?
typed out structure out why is so much psychic effluvium EManating from you OUTwardly HMMMMMM ?>>
>>83984805>your typeINTP-T>Is exile still a viable form of punishment? No. Doesn't fix the issue, neither doesn't capital punishment nor punitive justice.>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?Indecision is natural. It's a problem when you avoid or when there is a clear imbalance of priorities, like being unable to choose between doing your work or playing video games. Do what's necessary and accept that the task is going to suck. Be conscious of how your mind goes through the motions and try to understand why it's like that. Don't resist your thoughts, just let them flow. If you make a mistake then accept it and learn from it.Making banana cinnamon walnut bread for someone and waiting for the banana to overripe. I'm allergic to nuts but I shouldn't have any issues.
>>83999817Unless they tell you about their perceptions, you will never know.
>>83999817When it comes to these, it's generally easier to see their inferior functions.IN is typically vague about things they see/hear, sometimes seem to not acknowledge what's staring right in their face, and at other times they seem completely obsessed with one specific thing they saw while carefully ignoring everything else that you can see if you looked for at least 0.2 more seconds.IS are typically unwilling to talk much about the unknown and the possible, when they do they tend to default to worst case scenarios(or at least frame it as "being prepared for anything") or sometimes deeply symbolical meanings, either the most unpleasant possibilities or straight into magic with them. Well the latter is kinda funny and shows they certainly can have a lot of imagination, stereotypes notwithstanding.
https://youtube.com/watch/ERAtPcceAGkHow mentally ill is your anime character?
Also for auxiliaries, yeah those are difficult and require more data to narrow it down, because sometimes people swap them around as per Jung.
>>83999933>punishing criminals is badHoly libturd
>your typeINFP>Is exile still a viable form of punishment? I think it's vastly more humane than prison. Would much rather be exiled than sent to prison. I suppose it's just a question of are there enough deserted little islands in the world.>How do you escape indecision, or act in ambivalence?Well the simple answer is I don't. In fact I have spent my entire life leaning into it more and more (to no success of course).
>>84000312>Holy libturdSome of them even believe that countries should not be able to enforce their borders.
>>84000267"Yandere but we cannot tell you she would stab Uta because it's Precure"-tier.
I have abandonedment issues. Don't fr me if you're going to block me. I don't really care but my ego whispers into my ear that you're trying to make me look foolish. That forces me to prove that you are in fact the foolish one. It's rather annoying to be caught up in your little fishing experiments only to be disregarded. Why do I care? Because it makes me feel excluded when you could have just left me alone from the start. Am I overreacting? Probably but I don't care call me cringe or loser etc.I'm not mad or anything. It's more like since you did this then I'll do that but then you did that so I'll do this. Just some petty game to be an annoyance since you first annoyed me. Carry on.
you cant be seriousbrolol
It's Jungover...
>>84000312>punishing criminals is badWhat is the long term outcome of doing this? If you defend punitive punishment then you should be able to comfortably answer this.
>>83998907Literally Lilac. Literally 100% Lilac.
>>84000267Exceedingly normal INFJ behavior
>>84002224the long term outcome is that they're not in society and cannot terrorize society. It's simple.
>>84002847>"instead of understanding how to minimize the allure of committing certain crime, just exile them and hope others dont do the same"That's not a long-term outcome. Please read how punishment in rehabilitative & restorative justice systems work.
Is it possible for an ESFP to develop Ti?
>>84003227A Se-groid can, in fact, develop "Thinking" to match his other favored aux well enough. Might happen later in his life, since they spent enough time focusing on Se-groiding and Feeloiding around.What they will always struggle with is really Intuition instead. They are always well-anchored in the sense impressions, so for them that just won't feel real enough.
>>84003101Please consult the success rates for rehabilitation of serial criminals and those with personality disorder associated with serial criminality. (Narcissism, antisocial personality disorder, etc)Rehabilitation only works for people who DESIRE to be rehabilitated, and if they desire to be rehabilitated, they generally will do it themselves.You want to reduce the allure of criminality? Start executing criminals. Make the cost of being a criminal far higher than the reward. Other than that, there's no way to reduce the allure.
