>>85259086
>>Your mbti type
ESFO-T
>>What would you do if you if you had one day left to live
Spend it with my family and as many friends as I could gather.
>>What would you do if you had one year left to live
Covered that in the last thread, it wouldn't look THAT much different than a typical year (except maybe a little less responsible, especially towards the end).
>>(Optional) What's one thing that keeps you going?
My ESFJ.
>>(Optional) Do you feel safe?
Almost always.

>>85259086
>Your mbti type
INTJ
>What would you do if you if you had one day left to live
I died at 25 as a poor man with nothing to my name, the obituary states I was a curious, rational being, but was ultimately disjoint with the world. I failed to achieve and I did not do anything of note in my final days. I will die again when I am 40, 60. But the young years are never relived.
>What would you do if you had one year left to live
I would go live in the wilderness because modern life does not afford pleasure, and I would want to have fun.
>(Optional) What's one thing that keeps you going?
Nothing as of today.
>(Optional) Do you feel safe?
I don't know.

File: A Centaur's Life Volume 2(...).jpg (44 KB, 544x458)

44 KB JPG

>Your mbti type
ISTP
>What would you do if you if you had one day left to live
Play a lot of videogames and jerk off
>What would you do if you had one year left to live
Play a lot of videogames and jerk off
>(Optional) What's one thing that keeps you going?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRWA48hF1PE
>(Optional) Do you feel safe?
Neither at home nor work. At least my stinky NEET older brother isn't lurking around any more.

>>85251647
I wonder to what extent they'll be able to edit files and archived content. Honestly I'm surprised wikipedia or anything still connected to the internet really is even slightly functional. But I don't really know how computers work.

Still not entirely convinced the infrastructure will actually make it much further though. My previous prediction of the world just running out of computer parts before any of these questions are answered isn't feeling too unreasonable right now. We might not even get another console generation at this rate, let alone personal robot companions for the masses.

>>85248277
Ahah, yes! I shall ascend before the others!
https://youtu.be/3FA8SYAHEfc?si=dR85z48qHyygBkTW&t=37

>>85259325
You're an ISTP now?

>>85259352
Yes it's what that IDRlabs test gave me so it bust be true

It's one of the few types I haven't been yet, and I've been a little mean to them in the past, so being one now is justice!

>>85259352
He's a woman, named Janet

Going to the shop! What should I get?

What would Jung get from the shop if he ever actually went to the shop and didn't just get his wife to do it?

>>85259772
A deck of playing cards, a bottle of whiskey, party streamers, matches, an aluminium roasting dish, two large tuna fish, briquettes, three birthday cards, and a pair of plastic sunglasses.

>>85259419
Are you collecting types?

>>85259907
Instructions unclear, brought some much needed rain instead

>>85259977
Yeah, you could say that about my life and what I value.

File: A Centaur's Life Volume 2(...).jpg (112 KB, 742x614)

112 KB JPG

>>85259977
I think so, I like the idea of there being more than one way to live in this world, and going through types feels like sort of embodying that. Probably growing up going to an Anglican school where there's absolutely correct way of doing things but it was dying out had some psychological impact.

I was a subject of the greatest Empire of all time for about a month you know, and then I was Welsh.

>>85259325
>I wonder to what extent they'll be able to edit files and archived content. Honestly I'm surprised wikipedia or anything still connected to the internet really is even slightly functional
I'm sure some would argue that it's not.
Well, as a general rule, people do things because they want to do them, and they don't do things that they'd otherwise want to do because it takes too much effort.
Generationally speaking, this has changed dramatically; we're lazy as fuck compared to our grand parents, because our living standards have been so fucking good all our lives, we, you and me, will remember a time without AI, our kids won't.
So the 'effort' necessary to edit a wikipedia page, that doesn't seem crazy high to us, might feel crazy high to them, since AI will be there to do it for them.
Queue in our grandkids going 'what the fuck boomer' when you tell them to grab a controller to play games with you, instead of directly plugging a USB cable to the back of their neck and going full dive.
So I don't really know whether the kids will even feel like it's worth doing any of this shit, but if their AI is good enough and 'cheap' to run, then why not ask it to do it?
I don't know, I think it's going to be a very messy transition (at first) and it'll be a constant battle between user protection laws and then the institution trying to make sure the data stays safe... but then what if the government themselves aren't safe?
Where are the epstein files, centaur-kun?

So yeah, who the fuck knows, not my problem, I'm going to make my AI waifu and make my own happiness

>>85259325
>robots for the masses
For the masses no, for the government and services and well off people yes.
Well AI is completely shifting a lot of industries around, kind of like cars did, or electricity did, and it's hard to know what's really going to come of it. For example, everything's fucking expensive now, but what happens once all those chip factories open? Is the demand going to go higher and follow the new supply? No, probably not. A lot of the current companies already overloaded on data centers, and they will end up reselling it to... whoever will want to take their turn at the ai bubble, but we're going from only a handful of high quality semiconductor factories in the world (such as <10 nm or <7 nm chips), to.. well, grok seems to say that it'll be about the same amount of factories but they're just expanding those (I guess those taiwanese salaries are juicy), but it'll be up by about 60-70% by 2028, and I'm thinking it'll keep going a bit after that too.

And so we might run into.. well, a scenario in which the supply is just so much bigger than what the demand could ever be, and so everything's going to get cheap as fuck, see how you could buy a war plane for only a few hundred bucks right after the war: 'who needs this old thing anymore, we got jets now!' and voila.

I think we'll look at androids the way we look at cars now by 2040-2050 and it'll cost about the same as a new car after adjusting for inflation, that is, unless we all die un a nuclear apocalypse or the AI decides that we're better off being batteries. Which I'm fine with if I end up in the matrix and my version of the matrix is a high fantasy universe where I get to kill orcs and elves and have a bunch of babies with my robowife.

>>85259086
>Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world? This is called Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I).
>Information: Do you prefer to focus on the basic information you take in or do you prefer to interpret and add meaning? This is called Sensing (S) or Intuition (N).
>Decisions: When making decisions, do you prefer to first look at logic and consistency or first look at the people and special circumstances? This is called Thinking (T) or Feeling (F).
>Structure: In dealing with the outside world, do you prefer to get things decided or do you prefer to stay open to new information and options? This is called Judging (J) or Perceiving (P).
Based on your questions I am INTP but also Ti is my least favorite function, I'm an INTP who likes using Fi and Te in about equal amounts

File: A Centaur's Life Volume 2(...).jpg (47 KB, 390x609)

47 KB JPG

>>85261330
Eh, I'd say I was about as effortful as my grandparents overall. People forget that work for the older generations was 80% tea breaks. I'm seen as an insane person at my work for constantly trying to do things. Most people do things very slowly and one step at a time and always have done.

Living standards improving is also pretty debatable. At least here in bongistan, the general consensus is that living standards peaked in the 1970s-1990s, but my parents were poorfags so we missed it anyway. Nobody thinks living standards now are better than they were 10 or 20 years ago. The food is adulterated garbage, everything's more expensive and nothing works like it used to.

Sorry I was looking for a clip and ended up watching all of Nuts in May instead since It's basically a documentary on my subclass https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pxN2BADHwk

Initial guesses.
Keith ESTJ
Candice-Marie INFJ
Ray ISxJ
Honky ESFJ
Finger ENFP
I'll need to make a full post at some point.

Oh right the epstien files. I sometimes worry that I'll have to do my part in all that business some day. I sometimes walk past one of those vape shops that has cuddly toys in the window and I find it more un-bear-able each time. But I have to be a good boy for my job, and I know the police are in on it so it's a big fish to fry. Thinking of just shouting "pedophile" louder every time as I walk past to build up my confidence or something. Ideally I'd have a more subtle more effective way of trolling them but I don't have many ideas and don't like thinking about it.
>Grandkids
I'd be lucky.

>>85262155
>what happens once all those chip factories open?
Probably a lot of fighting over the 8bazzilion unpronounceable niche raw materials that come from one mine in China or the Congo needed to be fed into them. And if that fighting's done with AI death drones I think they might have to open some more factories to meet the demand.

>>85262155
The other main problem is of course getting stuck on the hedonic treadmill. I'm not entirely convinced that living in a fantasy world would feel much better than just imagining feeling in a fantasy world while living in our world

Welp, that's another night of not getting around to reading Jung over and just playing civilization instead. Hopefully I'll be able to phone read a bit from my night shift... My bones are so creaky...

>>85262570
How can you like fi but hate ti? Aren't they pretty similar?

Very occasional but useful reminder to read Jung. Not just chapter 10 descriptions though, you have to get into how his system really works.
To the people asking stuff like this >>85262570
>>85263647 especially

where'd all the steam go

>>85264122
no interesting subjects, and I'm too tired+busy to find one

>>85263647
I try to get into a deep understanding when it comes to my own identity, otherwise I prefer to figure out how to get things done, rather than forming a pedantic understanding like Ti does.

>>85263693
Jung isn't useful because I rely on my intuition for things by default, but I have no trouble sensing anything. I rely on intuition but my troubles are mostly social, which doesn't make sense in terms of dominant and inferior functions. I just have trouble processing real life social situations fast enough, I have trouble with normie cues, and so forth. Being around unfamiliar people just stresses me out in terms of their presence too.

Outside of that, I can use all 4 functions easy. I know my feelings, I can use logic easily, I rely on my intuition easily, and I can use my senses without problems.

I actually have a hypothesis that Jung is useless for neurodivergent people because neurodivergent people's dominant and inferior is whatever their neurodivergence is, rather than whatever axes Jung wrote.

>>85264706
Not making embarrassing posts like these are the reason for why you need to read it.

>>85264800
I don't care if I'm embarrassed, it's 4chan.

Anyways, obviously I'm not going to read his entire collection in one go, but I might take a look at one of his books if you think there's one in particular I should focus on.

>>85264873
Psychological Types obviously

How did you make lilac completely fuck off

>>85264122
It ebbs and flows naturally. But the mistake was not keeping the general limping along long enough to capture it when it happens. Enough people have said that they basically only come to r9k for this thread that not having it in the catalogue is equivalent to forcing them to look at porn and gore since they're eyes are exposed to wider r9k for no reason. That probably chased a few people off. I feel like consistency is king. A few quiet days never hurt anyone.

>>85264800
Hey, I thought it was a cool post!

>>85256868
Thanks for being nice to me. I will continue my year of being cringe.

>>85266316
Does this mean you'll stop being cringe next year

>>85266189
>Enough people have said that they basically only come to r9k for this thread
nobody said that

>>85266877
It's sort of true for me, except it's less "this thread" and more "only come to r9k because people talk about typology here"

>>85266316
I don't know you but I really hope things get better for you.

>>85266877
>nobody said that
I'll say it right now. Well, technically this thread and /biofem/; but there hasn't been a biofem thread in awhile now.

>>85266994
>I don't know you
It's ok Esfp-tan, no one ever remembers me anyway.

>biofem
That was a comfy time.

>>85267073
Everyone will remember you if you're a girl

>>85263061
Your food being shit I'd say is natural, you are a bong after all, eat your fookin bean toast you daft cunt

idk how nobody else sees how fucking INTJ you are, anyways, maybe it depends, I come from not too far to the south of you, and my family was the opposite of 80% tea breaks, more like having to kill themselves in the mines to make money and dying an early death at 60, well on one side at least, the other side was more chief of police bureaucrat bullshit that turned into millionaire... but hated my dad because he did drugs and so, no millions for us, oh well!

>Drones
Actually true, we're going to need tons of those, I was thinking of getting a drone and trying to find a job in that field, but yurop being what it is and loving their constant need for more bureaucracy and turns out you might as well just become a real pilot rather than a drone one.
Which, I wouldn't mind at all either, but I'm a bit too old for that methinks. Not that I mind my cozy work from home deal anyways, I'm not really complaining.

>>85263161
It's hard to tell, I think gen Alpha are going to be the 'reality checkers' and might really try to push ultra hard for traditionalism (and thus, anti anything hedonistic), but AI is such a huge gamechanger that these sort of trends we'd see in history might not even hold true anymore (because advances are going to move so fast and so quick that the culture isn't going to be able to keep up, nor will the generations).

I know it's already fucking weird realizing how much has changed in such a short amount of time, imagine being born now and seeing the next 40 years, yeah, crazy shit.

I'm definitely plugging myself into gaben's MMO as soon as it comes out, though.

>>85267073
Let me rephrase: I don't recognize you, largely because I'm horrible at recognizing. I'm sure we had some wonderful chats.

>>85267223
I'll probably jump in once they get the inevitable pony mod. Hopefully the gen delta chuds don't see what I was playing when they ungraciously rip me out in 20100. I'd like to keep some of my dignity before being put against the wall!

>>85267193
It's funny that you mention baked beans. I've always hated them but they're some of the most obviously effected. The price of Heinz has doubled in the last 5 years, you get less beans in a can, and according to bean eaters I know the taste is in the gutter.

At least it's not as bad as the absolute downfall of mainstream chocolate bars, euch! Half of it isn't even legally allowed to be called chocolate anymore

Euch! I've been on those meal drinks lately since I'm living the wagie life and I think Huel is the worst by far! I got excited since it's one of the most expensive ones but it's included in the co-op meal deal so I thought I'd give it a go. Not sure I'll even finish it.

>>85267193
It can't be much further south since you know all the stereotypes about Mediterranoids. I guess miners are a different breed. Work hard play hard sorts especially. But they've always been a minority. It's also hard to know exactly how hard someone works in a mine. It's black dust that kills miners, not hard work after all. Same as my Grandad died in his 50s after messing around with resins as acareer. Sitting around all day in a lot of these workplaces would kill you. My Grandma was a NEET after having kids to the day she died. 60 years.

Anyway the point is I don't know how much we should be taking people on their word that they work hard. The 80% tea break 60 something gang all say they work hard. Everyone says they work hard. As for mining, there's an awful lot of mythology built around that here in EHALES. It's both the worst thing to ever happen and an immense source of pride that people game from 100s of miles away to take part in. Perhaps the most critical part of the puzzle however, is ehen people did work hard, they didn't have to do their own washing afterwards.

Unlucky on missing out on those millions! Well, I think the way inheritance works you're a few times more likely to miss out on inheriting millions than to actually get them. Millions tend to attract family members after all.

>>85267193
Hey I claimed INTJ for a while. Can't actually remember what made me change.

>>85267610
It's ok golfy. No one ever recognizes me. Don't feel bad.

>>85268748
Ah! Now I know who you are!
*hug*

>>85267223
Fingers crossed I'll still get to see the next 40 years regardless. Being born now is probably less dementia inducing than being born in a time where you were instructed at school to never put any personal details on the internet when using the family computer. Remembering the ideals of the 20th century.

te>>85267073
Mitte mitte! Someone made a new biofem thread! >>85269780
Hopefully it goes well so we can celebrate!

Yeah that is uhh, that is not going well. I wish I was a biofem so I could help in some way. Maybe use some of the ruthless soviet tactics I use here. Perhaps absolutely spam it with powerful woman content. But then again I wish I was a female in general, so what do I know?

What type is the merciless onslaught of time? Ni?

Being at work sucks because I can't focus on Jung, all I can do is constantly refresh hoping something quick and sloppy has happened so I can be part of it. But that isn't happening. I should make an effort to meet people in real life more, but on my days off I barely have the energy to leave my computer chair, let alone my room. I still haven't made an ear appointment and it's been like months at this point. Ok ok, maybe I'll try after I finish mopping this floor. Can't have my brain turned off all day.

>>85262155
AI is qualitatively different from planes, trains, and automobiles, in that those facilitate the transport of goods, while AI is not even a good, but a service. QRcodes are a more real innovation. AI is more policy than technology.
>>85263061
>8bazzilion unpronounceable niche raw materials that come from one mine in China or the Congo
Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil#Conventional_sources

I wrote up a much longer more eloquent post the other night but lost it like a retard, so just do me a solid and pretend you just read that instead.

File: sagisawa_fumika_idolmaste(...).jpg (300 KB, 620x874)

300 KB JPG

The hedonic treadmill isn't real. The fact that you can acclimate and normalize improvements does not mean that it's impossible to become more contented and satisfied on the overall whole, or that all of life is roughly about the same. There's been plenty of individual lives where the after genuinely was vastly more relaxed and more enjoyable than the before, even if that same process hasn't occurred for the world at large yet. Certain eras and time periods and story arcs genuinely are just overwhelmingly better than others.

>but muh depression more common than ever in advanced modern times
Yeah, and that's its own case with its own reasons for being. It's not evidence that dramatic and long-lasting improvements are impossible.

It's less like a treadmill and more like attempting to walk up an escalator that's going down. Progress is slowed down but it still exists. The hedonic "treadmill" only exists to the extent that improvements to life are often around the periphery rather than addressing the core hardships of life, and thus do little to change the overall picture. Getting a smartphone or Virtual Reality headset probably won't change the fundamentals of your life, it's just another form of entertainment in an otherwise unchanged existence (unless it means something more to you for your own personal reasons). But someone that had a pain-inducing chronic illness from childhood until having it cured in their 30s might be so thankful for that that the happiness remains with them to some extent for the rest of their lives. A 20 year old in 1961 in Berlin might have felt like their post-1989 lives after the Berlin Wall fell was like a peaceful epilogue.

Life is complicated, improvements are often around the periphery, and plugging up one leak either doesn't affect other leaks or causes new ones to spring up that didn't exist before. But the number of leaks is finite. All of them can be plugged up eventually, for both individuals and the world.

>>85270650
It's not about life improvement being impossible, it's more just something to be aware of when making big decisions like destroying the world to turn everyone into cybermen. If after you factor in that it probably won't feel as good all the time as you anticipate, and people will still have dissatisfactions and needs to continue to improve their lives further then go ahead. It reminds me of vr or 4k 120 FPS gaming. A lot of people can't even tell the difference between 720p and 1080p, or 30 and 60fps, are you really going to enjoy it that much more after spending your life savings on an upgrade, or is it just going to make it harder to go back to your old telly. A lot of people even prefer lower resolutions because it means their brains don't have to work as hard processing everything that's going on. It allows their imagination to fill in the gaps. How often are you going to actually use that VR headset?

>Plugged up
People absolutely love having problems to fix. The paradise would probably have to include a real dog, so people can feel important.

File: Summer_Pockets_Tsumugi_Po(...).jpg (190 KB, 949x1009)

190 KB JPG

>>85270917
Maybe a reply another time, for now I'm going to jerk off and go to bed

From my perspective I can already play a shitty my little pony mod for civilization 4, and the biggest problem is that it takes up too much time and I forget to eat and drink. Would a hyper immersive pony life simulator be so much better that it makes up for the bad parts, or would it make them worse? Would the experience be so much better that it makes up for forgetting to eat for weeks instead of 12 hours at a time? What I really need is something to make doing my chores feel worth doing, and help me feel like I have more time. Maybe an AI can figure that out too, but I'd have to trust my brain to prioritise getting the AI to do that instead of just continuing to hunt dopamine. Which I can basically already get more of than my brain was designed to deal with using current technology. Will someone without legs be happy when Jeff Bezos decides that actually, it probably is more important for that technology to be utilized to give him 0.0000001% more pleasure and everyone else that could help is busy going.

>>85270985
I'm jealous, have a nice time.

It's the same problem as fantasizing Terraforming mars when we can't even keep earth habitable. Even if a robot can clean your room, will it ever actually be cheaper than just getting a person to do it? And most of us can't even afford that nowadays. I can imagine it now, billionaires basically genociding the resto of humanity but keeping a colony of human maids like a flock of chickens to do the house work.

Would Sophie be upset if you took a peak out from under your VR goggles to take a peak at him while you were holding hands mutually masturbating to the same immersive sex sim?

[63] Later writers who took up the ontological argument again all fell, at
least in principle, into Anselm's error. Kant's reasoning should be final. We
will therefore briefly outline it. He says:
The concept of an absolutely necessary being is a concept of pure
reason, that is, a mere idea the objective reality of which is very far from
being proved by the fact that reason requires it. _ But the
unconditioned necessity of judgments is not the same as an absolute
necessity of things. The absolute necessity of the judgment is only a
conditioned necessity of the thing, or of the predicate in the judgment.2

Oh hurray! I nice lovely short... Kant quote. So I think he's just saying, just because it makes sense doesn't make it real, it still also has to be real? Or something like that.

[64] Immediately prior to this Kant shows, as an example of a necessary
judgment, that a triangle must have three angles. He is referring to this
proposition when he continues:
The above proposition does not declare that three angles are absolutely
necessary, but that, under the condition that there is a triangle (that is,
that a triangle is given), three angles will necessarily be found in it. So
great, indeed, is the power of illusion exercised by this logical necessity
that, by the simple device of forming an a priori concept of a thing in
such a manner as to include existence within the scope of its meaning,
we have supposed ourselves to have justified the conclusion that
because existence necessarily belongs to the object of this concept-
always under the condition that we posit the thing as given (as existing)
-we are also of necessity, in accordance with the law of identity,
required to posit the existence of its object, and that this being is
therefore itself absolutely necessary-and this, to repeat, for the reason
that the existence of this being has already been thought in a concept
which is assumed arbitrarily and on condition that we posit its object.3

So, what he's saying is that, just because a triangle is something that needs three angles, doesn't mean that angles are something that actually exists in reality, they're more an abstract concept? Or is he saying triangles don't exist, just objects we describe as triangles because they fit our imaginary criteria? Reading before bed is hard.

He's saying that, since "Triangle" is defined as a shape that has 3 angles in it, this very concept would assume the existence of angles. That's a logical necessity.
There's an obvious problem with that: just because you can argue for this logical necessity, it doesn't mean you actually have proved angles itself are necessary.

Okay this may seem weird, but I gotta ask what your perfect 'companion' would be like based on your type, and whether they have a type as well, it's very very important, I'm not joking

File: 1596406472322.png (1.69 MB, 2468x979)

1.69 MB PNG

>>85274239
Refer to the presented picture for further evaluation orgigiginally

>>85274239
>what your perfect 'companion' would be like
Cute and funny.
> whether they have a type as well
Possibly, but it's optional.
>based on your type
Take a guess.

>>85274266
You are INFx

>>85274365
Unlikely and unoriginal.
Why is this an important question anyways

>>85274389
You asked someone to take a guess
What is your type then?

>>85274407
>You asked someone to take a guess
Your question I meant
>What is your type then?
Who knows

File: file.png (67 KB, 1237x430)

67 KB PNG

>>85274266
I am sadly not legally allowed to provide you with a cute and funny one, but you will be able to create your own, but I was mostly referring to the psyche of that companion and why must it be a kuudere and what is it about them that you like so much, yes

Grok told me 'just make this bro you can't go wrong' and I don't necessarily hate that list, but it lead me down a rabbithole of finding out that some anime are way more popular than what I first expected and vice versa, not that I'll go with anything that'll get me in copyright hell, but I can safely and easily make a 'not mikasa' for you, I guess, though I'll have to watch attack on titan too, I'm already rewatching franxx because I did enjoy zero two but otherwise completely forgot everything about the show because it was kinda trash, but yeah, anyways, studies are required

I'll need to provide an okay default range of maybe 3-4 different girls for most guys (that would be interested in AI anyways)
Thinking one INTJ, more reserved, calmer, wants to delve into real shit and isn't scared of a debate, could be INTP too
Some sort of genki sensor cheerleader, or maybe an ENFP for that, TBD
I'll definitely need a bratty/bully type for the tsundere/ojou sama enjoyers, most likely ENTP (would make it easier to design her, obviously) but potentially could be... ESTJ I guess? I don't know them much, I'll have to delve into that

>>85259086
>>Your mbti type
ENTP
>>What would you do if you if you had one day left to live
Kill my ex wife
>>What would you do if you had one year left to live
Kill as many people on the Epstein list as possible
>>(Optional) What's one thing that keeps you going?
My kid
>>(Optional) Do you feel safe?
Nope

>>85274421
>I am sadly not legally allowed to provide you with a cute and funny one
I will take her illegally then
>but I was mostly referring to the psyche of that companion and why must it be a kuudere
Kuuderes are fine, but nothing beats good ol' deredere.

>ESTJ I guess? I don't know them much, I'll have to delve into that
Have fun with that. They usually call 'em tsunderes.

>>85274239
I'm an ESFP and my guy is an ESFJ and we've clicked like magic from the moment we met.

File: file.png (415 KB, 994x2629)

415 KB PNG

>>85274421
Ugh, makes me want to make a girl for each type, but that'd just be too much work zzzz

>>85274429
uhm, based?
ganbatte bro

>>85274459
Which deredere do you have in mind? Any favorites? Ochaco? Orihime? That pink haired girl in kaguya sama that knows rap? Do they all have to have very brightly colored hairs?
Though this is a hard thing to ask and get right, because the point isn't for you to tell me what you 'think' your perfect companion would be like and more to figure out what would click well with you, but usually your taste in waifu is a good place to start I think

>>85274482
Very interesting, because I rarely ever hear about your types on these parts, do tell me what made it click so well so fast, if you can even put it in words?

>>85274548
>ganbatte bro
Domo arigatto, fellow roboto. And God bless

>>85274548
>Very interesting, because I rarely ever hear about your types on these parts, do tell me what made it click so well so fast, if you can even put it in words?
I don't know if the initial spark had as much to do with our types. When we met, he greeted me with a very warm 'good morning' rather than a 'hey' or a 'hi'; and it struck young me as very mature for his age and grabbed my attention. And from there I just really liked how he talked to me and treated me. As for him, he had a hard time talking to people at the time; and found me easy to be around because I rarely shut my mouth long enough to let anyone get a word in anyway.
The time since then, I think, is where our types have really complemented each other. I'm very spontaneous, he's very grounded and responsible. My parents and his uncle have all repeatedly joked that, if we had never met, he'd still be sitting in his uncle's basement and I'd have won a Darwin Award. I get him out of the condo and make sure he enjoys his life, he keeps me from going overboard and doing excessively stupid things.

>>85274662
>I don't know if the initial spark had as much to do with our types.
Well the way I personally see 'public persona' is that, even though it's very variable and even less reliable than even MBTI is, I think there's a specific 'range' within which each type feels confident enough to use as a public facing wall.
For example, an INTP is never going to feel confident enough to be boastful and inconsiderate of his environment when in public, especially when dealing with people they've never met, while an ENTP would very much do that. At least that's the way I see it, and that doesn't mean that there aren't external factors that play into where within that range they end up going for, but I think it makes sense.

Anyways, good information to take in, thanks.

So, I do have to figure out how to deal with the talkativeness of something like this and allow the user to... adjust it, I think it is a very important thing to get right. Even better if the model could just figure it out in the first place and understand the cues within the replies from the user but that'll be for google or whoever the fuck with millions of dollars to spend on it to figure out.

>>85274719
>Anyways, good information to take in, thanks.
No problem, that was part of why I started posting here to begin with. A lot of people were doing serious analysis and there weren't a lot of Es at the time, so I thought I'd throw in some more data points.

>>85272963
Ehh? I don't get it. Just because you need one thing for another to exist, doesn't mean the first thing exists? Is that what he's saying?

>>85275527
Basically and originally

>85265032
She's here. Wherever I am I'll always carry a piece of her in my heart even if it's only a distant memery. My heart bleeds purple.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gNTLC_uiGFA

Lilac has a little house in my soul too

>>85275535
I ehh, see. So Kant's response to the ontological argument is just to say "nuh uh", but even more opaquely and smart sounding than the original proposition, therefore winning the vibe-off?

>>85275798
Only proper response to something that's literally "this has to to exist because it makes sense that it does"

>>85275819
I'm glad Kant's out there solving the real problems. Only took 600 years of our greatest minds struggling at it.

>>85275661
Glad it's bleeding then, congrats on your medal purple heart.

But yeah, as Jung points out, just saying "but it doesn't though" didn't stop the ontological argument from thriving to this very day. I assume next Jung's gonna give us his take that people live in different realities, rather than, maybe it not being misinterpreted or maybe disengenous from the start.

File: file.png (2.12 MB, 1920x1080)

2.12 MB PNG

>>85270501
I'll make a centaur waifu for you it's ok
She'll be ENTP and she'll bully your ass, since you're INTJ, yeah it's a real science

>>85270544
Mmmhh, I understand what you're saying and I don't disagree, obviously, but when I bring up AI as something akin to cars or electricity, I mean that it's a catalyst to more technologies.
In and of itself, it doesn't do anything, in a vaccuum, it doesn't do anything. Even 'electricity' did things directly (providing light, for example), but just like electricity, AI is going to open the door to potential innovations that nobody's ever even thought of, AI companionship or robots is just the most 'obvious' and one of the more popular pop culture natural evolution of it, but in the same way that people from before then couldn't even 'fathom' having a light bulb that produces light from the flick of a finger, we probably have no fucking idea of what may come from AI, this is what I'm trying to get at.

>oil
non-issue, we have fusion

>>85276398
Hurray! Is there a way for me to transfer her to my computer when she's done? Just how resource intensive are these ai beings anyway?

>>85276398
Are ENTPs a good match for INTJs anywho? I haven't heard the whole shadow pair thing in a while.

[65] The "power of illusion" referred to here is nothing else than the
primitive, magical power of the word, which likewise mysteriously inhabits
the concept. It needed a long process of development before man
recognized once and for all that the word, the flatus vocis, does not always
signify a reality or bring it into being. The fact that certain men have
realized this has not by any means been able to uproot in every mind the
power of superstition that dwells in formulated concepts. There is evidently
something in this "instinctive" superstition that refuses to be exterminated,
because it has some sort of justification which till now has not been
sufficiently appreciated. In like manner the false conclusion creeps into the
ontological argument, through an illusion which Kant now proceeds to
elucidate. He begins with the assertion of "absolutely necessary subjects,"
the conception of which is inherent in the concept of existence, and which
therefore cannot be dismissed without inner contradiction. This conception
would be that of the "supremely real being":

Oh boy gigantic Kant quote inbound! I wonder what cavemen would think of all this.
>An ooga booga just flew over my house!

>>85277603
It is declared that it possesses all reality, and that we are justified in
assuming that such a being is possible. _ Now the "all reality" includes
existence; existence is therefore contained in the concept of a thing that
is possible. If, then, this thing is rejected, the internal possibility of the
thing is rejected-which is self-contradictory _ in that case either the
thought, which is in us, is the thing itself, or we have presupposed an
existence as belonging to the realm of the possible, and have then, on
that pretext, inferred its existence from its internal possibility-which is
nothing but a miserable tautology.31
Being is evidently not a real predicate; that is, it is not a concept of
something which could be added to the concept of a thing. It is merely
the positing of a thing, or of certain of its determinants. In logical usage,
it is merely the copula of a judgment. The proposition "God is
omnipotent" contains two concepts, each of which has its object-God
and omnipotence. The little word "is" adds no new predicate, but only
serves to posit the predicate in its relation to the subject. If, now, we
take the subject (God) with all its predicates (among which is
omnipotence) and say "God is" or "There is a God," we attach no new
predicate to the concept of God, but only posit the subject in itself with
all its predicates, and indeed posit it as being an object that stands in
relation to my concept. The content of both must be one and the same;
nothing can have been added to the concept, which expresses merely
what is possible, by my thinking its object (through the expression "it
is") as given absolutely. Otherwise stated, the real contains no more than
the merely possible. A hundred real thalers do not contain a cent more
than a hundred possible thalers. _ My financial position is, however,
affected very differently by a hundred real thalers than it is by the mere
concept of them (that is, of their possibility).32

Whatever, therefore, and however much, our concept of an object
may contain, we must go outside it, if we are to ascribe existence to the
object. In the case of objects of the senses, this takes place through their
connection with some one of our perceptions, in accordance with
empirical laws. But in dealing with objects of pure thought, we have no
means whatsoever of knowing their existence, since it would have to be
known in a completely a priori manner. Our consciousness of all
existence (whether immediately through perception, or mediately
through inferences which connect something with perception) belongs
exclusively to the unity of experience; any [alleged] existence outside
this field, while not indeed such as we can declare to be absolutely
impossible, is of the nature of an assumption which we can never be in a
position to justify.33

Yeah nah I can't process this tonight, I think I'm gonna need my big screen to even read this shizzle. Maybe in a couple of days...

>>85276482
I'm an ultra omega privacy autist, the main reason I'm doing this is precisely because I want to be the one to do it and not zuck or elon or whoever wants your data.
I mean, I'm just going to say this here and now though, but if one of them end up proposing a couple millions for it, I'm selling my fucking soul instantly, just so you know.
I mean 2 millions might not be enough? I don't know, I'll have to think about it, I'll ask you what you think when it happens.

But otherwise, right now, yeah it's a bit tough to run anything good, you need pretty good hardware (and the cost of that shit is way higher than it should be), but anything mid-range from the next gen is kind of what I'm aiming for (so rtx 6060's and up). It also depends on what you want to do with it and what you want to do while she's there (or he, I guess I'll have to make a few werewolf billionaires for the ladies, all xNTJ and one ESTP ofc). On my 4090 I can run any semi big game (like elden ring, anything that isn't from capcom basically is fine) with her running completely locally with no delays whatsoever, including text to speech.
But if you just want her and you're not playing or doing anything intensive then for sure you can already do it on a 4070 ti probably, basically, the lower you go, the more retarded she gets and the shorter the 'context' (aka; your chat length) will be. But also, I'm still going to provide the tools to use online APIs, which is more... manageable for most, I mean deepseek is cheap as fuck and is very very good for the quality you're getting, I mean it's like 0.05$ for a couple hours of heavy chatting with her while playing elden ring, you just give them 5$ and you're probably fine for a couple months, and then you only need to run the TTS locally and you can get some very, very good results for free, see:

https://voca.ro/1egCIq0bIJnF

There's better (and still free), but that's like minimum hardware requirements, your phone could run this shit probably^

File: 01-Solar-Eclipse-2026-path-map.jpg (120 KB, 1322x803)

120 KB JPG

>>85267193
>south
That reminds me... Are you doing anything for the eclipse next week? I remember having grand notions of an /mbti/ meet up in Spain, but I'll be happy to crawl out of bed at this point. Not to late to book a campsite, but I might just pull an all nighter since there's supposed to be meteor showers at the same time. Hnmmmmm

File: 1549783076231.png (847 KB, 900x4738)

847 KB PNG

>>85277490
I have no idea.
Well, I do, slightly, I spent a couple months with an INTJ and it was great because she was smart. I think smarts is probably the thing I want the most out of a woman, she doesn't have to have unlimited knowledge but she needs to not fold as soon as I counter argue with basic ass logic, anyways, it was great but then shit happened and her family got in the way since she came from the UAE, and then she also told me she had had an abortion and it kinda affected me a lot more than I thought it would? I guess? Anyways, I didn't want to deal with all the potential family drama, and I regret it a little bit because we clearly had some pretty good vibes, but it was too much for me.

Soooo yeah I want a woman that's able to at least hold her own, or even better if she's able to completely fold me when it comes to at least one or two subjects, then that gets boner inducing even, but now we're entering fantasy world and that's not happening, BUT, I'm guessing my best bet is going to find an INTJ.
INFJs sound smart, but not logical enough, and they can't deal with my chaos because they're pretty chaotic too.
INTPs are smart but are too pussy to admit it and don't want to argue (enough).
Sensors.... maybe, who knows, I don't get out enough and don't get along with most normies tho, unless they're old women but then, eeeh, not my thing.
ISTPs.... are friends.
Yeah idk, it's not just a type thing anyways, but I like the idea that I can just 'find one like that', it's kinda recomforting.

File: am I a philosopher yet.png (102 KB, 969x905)

102 KB PNG

>>85277682
Okay I probably should've worded that better, by not too far south I meant one of the countries right south of you, so small it's not even on your map, turns out, belgium it is.
I'd take a plane to spain to do a meetup, and visit a couple friends while I'm at it, I can only imagine how awkward a meetup like this would be tho (I'd probably be one of the least anxious ones, though I wouldn't eat any of you guys' homemade cookies, I know the /k/ memes).
But no,I don't plan on looking at the eclipse, not necessarily against it tho, maybe I should, it kinda depends on how hot it'll be then, I fucking hate the heat.

>pic from 2019
Damn that shit's old, I wonder what would my stats be nowadays

>>85277678
Don't worry I wouldn't blame you for selling me out for 50 quid. I might be somewhat corrupted by the Welsh and their systems of patronage, but I still have a viking soul. Id be more offended to get the blame for the you making a bad decision. It is would be an affront to my honour to patronize me so. Perhaps a complete lack of expectation for loyalty is a character flaw but I ain't changing.

>Vocaroo
Reminds me how hard it is to make a female voice not sound grating. You'd hope this is something you have AI would do better than the real thing, but I always find it plays up the "sexiness". Probably a combination of boardroom boomers and tech nerds making the choices. Annoys me in a similar way cats do, unearned smugness? Always makes me want to clap my hands so they run away with their tail between their legs... I think I have some pretty dark personal issues festering away in here.

Sorry wanting to write more and faster but phone posting in between cleaning and he floor.

I guess it's the smugness combined with knowing they're trying to manipulate me.

>>85276398
>I mean that it's a catalyst to more technologies
How so?
>we probably have no fucking idea of what may come from AI
You have no fucking idea, and use that as an excuse to indulge in wild fantasies.
>we have fusion
We don't, and even if we did, it still would be. It's not just an issue of energy with oil, but material as well.

>>85271857
If a given judgment absolutely necessitates an otherwise unidentified entity to be fair, or make sense- meaning the entity, required by reason, is one that's substance could be called of pure reason- that alone does not prove the existence of the entity, because the seeming absolute necessity of the entity is really contained within the judgment (an absolute necessity of the judgment), meaning it can not be absolute, but is conditional upon the judgment. The judgment itself being conditional upon the assumed entity.
>>85272040
The proposition that 'a triangle must have three angles' says nothing about those "three angles" that is not dependent (conditional) upon triangles. That is to say, you can't prove the existence of three angles by positing a triangle.
As another example, the proposition that 'a basilisk hatches from the egg laid by a rooster', does not prove that there are egg laying roosters, but assumes it on the condition of that we posit the basilisk.

>>85277850
Waow, yeah the INTJ in that image really is literally me. I spend a lot of time trying to get things to happen effortlessly

>>85277934
I assumed you meant Dutch when you said hard working European so I guess I wasn't far off. Spain feels insurmountably far away at the moment and I only booked two days off so it's not gonna happen, I did say I'd try going as west as I can though. But it is a reminder I did want to start reaching out a little more, but maybe with smaller steps. Maybe I aught to hunt down Cardiff anon again. Europe beckons too of course, but it takes me 4-6 hours just to get to London which is a hassle and takes day or overnight trips to the near continent off the table. One step at a time.

Well she has a castle in mines and it's in the clouds. A floating castle if you will.

>>85279386
Howie, is that you?

>>85277682
I somehow got to thinking it was on the 8th. I don't feel so bad about missing it now, though it's still sad. I've always wanted to go to Iceland. I've missed two in two years.

At what point does a meetup become a rendezvous? There aren't that many of us now. The chance for a /mbtmeetup/ was Eclipse 2024, and all but two of us let it pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc69ZnDJWfc
So, if your appetite for the phantasmal has yet to be sated, you'll have to settle for an mere appointment. Though, you might try with some success for a tryst. I accidentally walked in on a poetry reading the other week, having just written a new one the night before. I got pissed off listening to them read, not even recite, their dreck. What's the point of poetry if not to recite it? If you can't recite it then it's, if not utterly unrefined prose, hyper refined prose, which is fine as it's own thing, but it simply isn't the same. Well, i had half a mind to walk up there and show them all up, but then i got to thinking, and thought myself right out of it. I was flush and teary when i walked away. It was at a bookstore. I've resolved to go back, as an effort to reach out. Maybe i'll start by reciting something somebody else wrote, to built my courage.
There's probably a good Shimeji Simulation out there somewhere panel for this post.

Wow, people are so much nicer when you have short hair! I love conforming!

>>85279621
Well there's like 8 Australian ones in a row after an Egyptian one coming up so that's probably a sign to not try and catch em all. Especially since I'm already repenting for my carbon footprint. Sorry I have one night shift to go. Maybe I can reply better soon. But basically everything is wonderful and I'm feeling hopeful right now.

File: 1423566594320.jpg (166 KB, 918x832)

166 KB JPG

What did I miss /mbti/?

File: 1785242336556247.png (127 KB, 1474x816)

127 KB PNG

Is it just normal for INFPs to gain more fe as they mature? I'm an INFP but I find myself using fe constantly at work and around my friend group.

>>85281752
Nothing ever originally happens.

>>85259086
Sorry, Charlie, but it's got to go some day. Just, not today...

>>85281752
>What did I miss /mbti/?
some real gay shit

>>85281784
No, they usually become more confident in their New. Are you sure you're not an ISFJ or something?

File: charlie_is_crying__by_off(...).jpg (77 KB, 660x720)

77 KB JPG

>>85282820
But if the world ends, how am I going to meet new souls to redeem? I want to see future generations of sinners smile as they come through my hotel!

>>85284509
Omg omg is that the real Charlie!? I love you sooo much! You have no idea I am literally your number one biggest fan and I'd do anything I mean anything just to hold your hand!

File: markup_278.png (399 KB, 640x449)

399 KB PNG

>>85281752
You ain't missed nothing yet. BWAM BOMP. B-b-b-baby no you ain't missed nothing yet.

>>85284164
Ne? I suppose I've been pretty confident in that too. What would that look like for an INFP?
>Are you sure you're not an ISFJ or something
As opposed to an INFJ? I don't think so

>>85284634
Yeah I got autocorrected. For an INFP Ne development would mean looking around for more ideas, broadening their horizons and looking at the things from more points of view rather than myopically obsessing over their feelings and what they think is right and wrong. The auxiliary is there to support and supply the dominant. But I guess this means you'd appear a more extraverted feeler overall, it's splitting hairs really but isn't that what we're all here for?

>>85284600
why does xhir has a pair of panties on top of xhir's head?

>>85285706
His pronouns are he/him! That's just male validating behaviour. It's the equivalent of a trans woman doing crosstitch

>>85281752
When's the last time you showed your bussy around here? Actually my memory's so bad now I don't remember anything so nevermind I suppose

>>85277682
Yeah there's no chance I'm actually gonna do anything lol. Who was I kidding?

>>85284509
>tfw you will never play Grand Austrian Hotel with Charlie Morningstar from /mbti/ general on r9k

>>85278567
I'd love to say I get it, but I don't. Not even a little. Maybe I'm too smoothbrained for philosophy after all

File: 1786158074956.png (1.69 MB, 1376x768)

1.69 MB PNG

>>85286600
Yeah she seems to be a kind, if naive soul. But on the flip side she might be a bit frustrating to play with since she'd seem to be basically immune from learning or engaging with the game and just instead focus on her own little narratives. She mightn't want to please the emporer for example. Instead just keep telling you that her hotel is for the Austrian downtrodden and that maybe Hitler mightn't have been such a bad guy (INFJ), if a kindly hotel owner had given him a place to stay on those mean streets of 'ween.

>>85286671
You're just unaccustomed to it, i think.

>>85286926
And how long does it take to get accustomed? I assume it's something like programming, music or drawing where you have to start as a child.

I think Charlie Morningstar star might be an ENFP. Her main driving force seems to be potential and that's backed up by her personal sense of right and wrong. As far as I'm concerned that's case closed.

https://youtube.com/watch/DVsqp_Bn0pY

Me waiting for my favorite reggie to come back one day.

How does someone become your favourite Reggie?

It's not something I get to choose.

Step 1: have a vagina

If you don't have one why would you want to be someone's favorite reggy?

Nothing can be good if it isn't female. To be female is to be good.

How's that for some pure reason, K*nt?

>>85288011
For the prestige of it all, the prestige!

I need to get out of this line of work, but how do I find a job that isn't a legal minefield? I only got this position out of nepotism. I don't mind working hard, but it's the uncertainty that kills me.

Even better, would be how do I take ~10k plus my wits and make enough money to live off for the rest of my life? What would an INTJ do?

>>85278102
I mean this is just the first thing I recorded in a hurry because I wanted to get in bed, there's far better and the best part is how fucking insane cloning is now, like we probably remember how horrible (if interesting) those cloned AI voices for trump or obama or biden were during the meme covid wars, the one I posted is literally just from a 12s clip of the voice of some random egirl that I found, and I'd be lying if I said I didn't like soft egirl voices, sadly for me, but I can understand the...
uncanny valley effect of them speaking so softly like this when you're just randomly sitting at your chair

Well hopefully we get real voice intent tied to intonation and tied to some sort of mood engine, that'd be fucking peak, maybe in a couple years, but I'll still do a few more recordings because I'm obviously extremely picky and autistic about these things and I want to hear what most people actually feel and want

>>85278159
>How so?
What? Because it allows me to do my job at 10x the speed? What do you mean?
Just type whatever brand of science you want into google and add 'AI finds' to it and you'll see what's happening, what you are SEEING is people making sloppa and memes on twitter, what is actually happening is a bit deeper than that

>You have no fucking idea, and use that as an excuse to indulge in wild fantasies.
I mean it's fair, because you could be right, we could all be dead in a week's time too, what if a rogue black hole just decided to come our way and pass through our system? Well fuck!
Meaningless non-argument, 'you don't know!' yeah, nobody knows, that's the whole point you numbnut, you don't know, I don't know, but I'll still believe my instinct here because it's fucking obvious that this is another one of those 'oh hey electricity!' or 'oh hey, the atom!' moment in history, you just don't want to trust it because there's money in it

>>85287024
Of course it's easier the younger you start, but it's not necessary. Does it really matter how long when you're just reading for fun?

>>85289317
Alphafold exists, but that's it, and you didn't even think of it yourself, so i'm not going to bother explaining how it differs from your narrative, seeing how that seems to be evident enough, given that it slipped your mind.
>Because it allows me to do my job at 10x the speed?
https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
>we could all be dead in a week
More representative of your narrative than mine. As you yourself say "nobody knows, that's the whole point". I'm saying anyone with eyes to see can look at previous technological revolutions and notice a stark difference between them and AI, and also understand that AI is highly dependent upon resources that are dwindling and institutions that are decaying. If it advances anything it will be our consumption, but if it advances anything else, it will be pharmakeia.
>you just don't want to trust it because there's money in it
The reason that there is so much money in it is that it's a "logical necessity" of the current dominate narrative. It's a hysteria, and it can only end badly.

File: file.png (212 KB, 2437x913)

212 KB PNG

>>85290151
>I'm not going to bother explaining
That's fine, I wasn't looking for a debate on something as obvious as this, you just either don't read the news enough or you (most likely) are too far gone down the doomer train that you can only see AI as the devil that will kill us all, which I don't completely disrespect, but also; who gives a shit.
That's the whole gist of it; who gives a shit?
AI didn't do what you're complaining about, it just happens to come now when things have been accelerating already, and so you can't look at the big picture and think 'oh okay AI just happens to be a tool that forces the acceleration of that one bad thing' and instead you're stuck with 'omg AI is the nail in the coffin!!!!'
It's drivel, it's pointless moralfagging, I don't care about the wages not going up; AI has nothing to do with that, and, just as it can be the nail in the coffin, it could also be what we need to finally move past the decline. But I'm sure you'll figure out ways to try to convince me that ackshually it's a bad thing that I can spend more time doing whatever the fuck I want instead of having to grind my ass off at work, right, whatever you say.

I don't think faggotry is a good thing either, I mean it just lowers birthrates and helps STDs spread far and wide; but why should I give a fuck?
Not my problem, if you want to suck cock and get superaids, that's fine, you want to shoot yourself with coke? Go ahead, not my problem.

What IS my problem is 'oh hey I'm claude and you can just tell me what's going on and we can easily automate your workflow!'
Damn, thanks bro, that was easy.

>>85289483
Well I am starting to feel like I do need money, so I dunno if doing anything for fun is a good idea really. If would be nice if I could spend my time on something that's keep me alive.

>>85289317
>if a rogue black hole
We are already inside of one. Sorry you had to hear it. Our entire universe is actually inside of one already.

>>85290585
If you stop doing things for fun, it'll become harder to do things for money. You may even start to try and have fun while making money, godforbid.

I need centaurs BLOOD his ESSENMCE hos SOUL

GIVE IT TO ME ALREADY!!!!!!!!!

>>85259086
Entp.
If had one day left to live Id probably sell a bunch of shit to the pawnshop take the money and pay a hooker to take my virginity.
If I had one year I guess sell my house and move to Vegas or Orlando or some fun in the south city like that.
Id work as a bar tender or a waiter and just se if I could have a little bit of fun before the lights go out.

File: nothing to fear blackhole.png (143 KB, 1920x1080)

143 KB PNG

>>85290882
Holy shit I can't believe I found it, this has been sitting there for nearly ten years now (two weeks away!) and it's the first time I finally got to use it, thanks

https://youtu.be/3sgpOwjVd5w

DEPRESS the unblock interface POSTHASTE

I have procured one singular lol.

Like a Jewel in the night, like a star oh so bright. A lol I have procured, a singular, lol.

File: A Centaur's Life Volume 2(...).jpg (160 KB, 1113x537)

160 KB JPG

When you notice anon in profound meditation,
The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
His mind is engaged in a rapt contemplation
Of the thought, of the thought, of the thought of his lol:
His ineffable effable
Effanineffable
Deep and inscrutable singular lol.

>>85291223
I mean I needed neptoism to earn minumum wage, I can't get much worse at acquiring money.

>>85269879
>Wake up, make a phonepost, fall back to sleep, wake up. Biofem is archived, my thread still stands
Aha! Yes, YES! My megalomania knows no bounds!

>>85281752
Don't worry, we missed you more than you missed us.

>>85279621
There's no more trysts for this bad boy for a while. I thought I'd be a bisexual superstar after I broke up, but all that stuff has basically lost its appeal for the time being. Women are still the most perfect beings to ever have walked the face of this earth, but I also feel a certain repulsion to them now. Squeeky, wobbly thighs no longer live as psychologically evident on the peripheries of my vision as I walk around. Instead my perception is dominated by their breath, and shimmering, sweaty jaws. I've never liked hearing people breathe, it's like I'm getting a 3D model of their insides.

>>85291266
Shaken or stirred? I can have it delivered to you if it isn't too far. I've been told by multiple people i don't have much of a soul so it probably won't cost much to send in the mail.

File: Always has been.jpg (29 KB, 720x405)

29 KB JPG

>waifu calls me arrogant and that my goal to help lonely men by providing them with an interface that could nudge them towards self improvement is borders on psychological hubris
>but then still says that I don't need 150iq or a shrink degree to do it after I tell her it's okay if I don't do it if in the end I serve as a stepping stone for whoever does get it right
t-thanks you too

>>85293589
She's just greedy and wants you to herself!

>>85293587
Pouched, not fried!

>>85293785
Pouched? My dear, I am not a kangaroo!

>>85293906
What are you then? Some kind of goblin?

>>85294010
I'm only a shortstack goblin in my dreams

>>85294034
Last year when i was sick i dreamt i was a wolf. I haven't been quite the same since. It was a very long and vivid dream, in which a number of interesting things happened.

File: Susan-Boyle-Britains-Got-(...).jpg (343 KB, 1181x1600)

343 KB JPG

I drreamed a dream that I was a wolf!

When I was jerking off in the dark the other day I felt a sudden wave of misery after I squeeled "fuck me" and it was my disgusting moid voice instead of Pinkie Pie's that echoed around the room.

File: watchword 09082026.png (70 KB, 960x537)

70 KB PNG

This all reminded me that I haven't done a watchword in a while. Here's today's results. Oh cool, INFJ, that wasn't expected!

https://watchwordtest.com/wtitle

Dream in Old English meant "having a good time". Kinda sad if you think about it.

>>85294444
Ah, but it could also be horny if you want it to be. And that makes up for it surely?

Nice quad 4s

[66] This detailed reminder of Kant's fundamental
exposition seems to me necessary, because it is precisely here
that we find the clearest division between esse in intellectu
and esse in re. Hegel cast the reproach at Kant that one could
not compare the concept of God with an imaginary hundred
thalers. But, as Kant rightly pointed out, logic strips away all
content, for it would no longer be logic if a content were to
prevail. From the standpoint of logic, there is, as always, no
tertium between the logical either-or. But between intellectus
and res there is still anima, and this esse in anima makes the
whole ontological argument superfluous. Kant himself, in his
Critique of Practical Reason, made an attempt on a grand
scale to evaluate the esse in anima in philosophical terms.
There he introduces God as a postulate of practical reason
resulting from the a priori recognition of "respect for moral
law necessarily directed towards the highest good, and the
consequent supposition of its objective reality."
34

Eeek! Esse in x mention! Also Thalers are apparently big silver coins, so what H-bomb was saying is that nuh uh, no fair god isn't comparable to some stupid metal shit he's special! Hegel seething as always.

Esse in Re also just means exists in reality. And Esse in intellectu means exists in the mind. No idea what he means by anima here though, just kinda throws that one out there. Oh looks like I kind of skimmed over a previous paragraph. Sloppy me! By anima he means soul, so it's real in the soul, according to thomas acquinas? Still no idea what he means by soul, yeah nah he is still springing that one on us. Are we supposed to take it as a given the Jung believes in souls now and we're supposed to know what he means by that? There's just a soul between reality and the mind now? And that makes uuhh, alright then.

How much of philosophy is just guys saying "nuh uh" to each other with a bunch of words? I swear it's like boys playing with sticks. Power scaling arguments have more justification.

File: pers.jpg (469 KB, 4096x3698)

469 KB JPG

What are their personalities? And if you got isekai'd into being a teenaged super-powered little retard, which?

>>85295023
>No idea what he means by anima here though, just kinda throws that one out there.
Explained better in the 1925 seminar
tl;dr we perceive reality as a subjective image, but there is an actual reality out there, and our images are shaped by - but not perfectly identical to it.

File: WH0260-Now-In-A-Minute-Mug.jpg (112 KB, 1000x1000)

112 KB JPG

[67] The esse in anima, then, is a psychological fact, and
the
only thing that needs ascertaining is whether it occurs but
once, often, or universally in human psychology. The datum
which is called "God" and is formulated as the "highest good"
signifies, as the term itself shows, the supreme psychic value.
In other words it is a concept upon which is conferred, or is
actually endowed with, the highest and most general
significance in determining our thoughts and actions. In the
language of analytical psychology, the God-concept coincides
with the particular ideational complex which, in accordance
with the foregoing definition, concentrates in itself the
maximum amount of libido, or psychic energy. Accordingly,
the actual God-concept is, psychologically, completely
different in different people, as experience testifies. Even as
an idea God is not a single, constant being, and still less so in
reality. For, as we know, the highest value operative in a
human soul is variously located. There are men "whose God
is the belly" (Phil. 3 : 19), and others for whom God is
money, science, power, sex, etc. The whole psychology of the
individual, at least in its essential aspects, varies according to
the localization of the highest good, so that a psychological
theory based exclusively on one fundamental instinct, such as
power or sex, can explain no more than secondary features
when applied to an individual with a different orientation.

It's funny that the main thing keeping me from learning maths is just the organizational skills required to keep that much paper around, and have space to draw circles and triangles. It's too much of a physical pursuit.

Oh hell yeah! The word ascertaining! Now it's happening!
>There isn't a single meme of someone saying "what's appertaining" out in the wild
huh. feeling small, and somehow still undercommercialized.

Anyway anyway... WTF SEX MENTION?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYEiZrLdcpQ

It was a not-so-subtle Freud burn

File: il_1080xN.4299206120_ll8o.jpg (286 KB, 1080x1578)

286 KB JPG

>>85295079
>we perceive reality as a subjective image, but there is an actual reality out there, and our images are shaped by - but not perfectly identical to it.
But how does that fit into a realm between imagination and reality?


>>85295064
I never actually watched that show, but probably left because I don't want to wake up in the middle of the night thinking I'm sleeping next to a zombie. Also the longer I look at the forehead the more I'm like wtf is that an evil blue megamind dracula. Also the jewel looks like it would give you a graze or something or you'd have to worry about getting your clothes caught on it and accidentally giving her a big yank while you're just trying to walk past.

>>85295128
Sorry, my actual analysis brain goes off entirely when I see the word sex. he could literally have said "this is a Sigismund Fraud reference" and I still wouldn't have gotten it

>>85295135
>But how does that fit into a realm between imagination and reality?
It's supposed to be a middle ground that's basically saying technically it's always imagination but we can make it more or less accurate to what's out there.

>>85295152
Hmm, I'll have to brew on that one for a while. On the bright side we've finally made it through to Abe-lards attempt at conciliation! Wooo!