What's the scientific reason why an obviously fraudulent research get published and was under suspicion for a decade but only recently get retracted?>duplicated image patches>811 citations btwlmao, their whole field is so fake and gay that possibly thousands of "experts" read this paper and none of them bother to check.
>>16136574https://www.removepaywall.com/https:/www.statnews.com/2024/04/18/dana-farber-retracts-studies-laurie-glimcher
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp1104
Remember when Kary Mullis nobel winner and inventor of PCR technology proved the journal system to be a fraudulent joke in the 1990s?
>>16136590sauce?
>>16136612Some interview he gave where he discussed it.Jesus, googling his name now the results have really gotten worse and more politicised
>>16136616this one?https://www.planksip.org/there-are-no-old-wise-men-at-the-top-making-sure-we-dont-do-something-really-dumb/
>>16136620>there-are-no-old-wise-men-at-the-top-making-sure-we-dont-do-something-really-dumb/not checked it but that's definitely the quote I remember him making about it.He submitted several papers that were wrong to see if they were published without challenge
>>16136630How can I become a paper challenger?
I remember the feminist paper where they took Mein Kampf and replaced jews with men then submitted it to a journal
>>16138197link
>>16136574>What's the scientific reason why an obviously fraudulent research get publishedThat happens constantly because of how flawlessly the peer review system works.
>>16138210https://www.timesofisrael.com/duped-academic-journal-publishes-rewrite-of-mein-kampf-as-feminist-manifesto/
>>16139738omg its real lmao
>>16139738If you publish a rewrite of mein kampf as a jewish manifesto you end up with The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
>>16136590imagine how much worse it is now than it was then
>>16143088Right, 1990s science was relatively ethical compared to how it is now
>>16144454the COVID panic showed how garbage these "sciences" are:https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/also, look at the most high profile retraction and notice that they all belong to "the science (TM)" that we should all entrust our health and future to: https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-most-highly-cited-retracted-papers/
>>16141770LOLIts funny because its true
>>16136574>thousands of "experts" read this paper and none of them bother to check.They didn't call it out as fraudulent because they didn't want their own fraudulence called out, which is the price they would have paid.
>>16146479Is this the power of peer review?
>>16147626Is it possible to learn this power?
>>16136574good question. why is all the climate junk science published?
>>16144454And that was the era when the Bogs got their PhDs
>>16148314Black soiyence man got his fraudulent PhD in the 1990s too
>>16149207in the 1980s he was a professional baseball player
>>16136590Wasn't entirely fair how he did it but he definitely wasn't wrong at all.
>>16136574Really makes you wonder how much other fraudulent research there is out there that hasn't yet been retracted.
>>16152779
>>16149207From Columbia University
>>16155238what a prestigious institution
>>16136574>>811 citations btwHow many of the papers citing the fraudulent research got retracted?
>>16157118none, for some reason soience considers papers which are based on fraudulent research and false premises to still somehow be valid.
>>16143088No need to imagine, we're living in it
