It isnt. The statement is false. 3 is neither a factor of 6 nor 6k+-1
>>16143545It is wrong. The factors of 6 is 1, 2, 3, 6 and 1 and 6 are not prime.
>>16143549It's obviously implied to be prime factors. The prime factors of 6 are 2 and 3.
>>16143545>>16143546>>16143549Monthly reminder that this is a spambot thread that is created once every month. Now it started copy-pasting the answers from previous exact same threads.
>>16143562schizo
>>16143546>What is 2*3?>What is 6/2?
>>16143546>3 is neither a factor of 6
>>16143545>>16143546>>16143549>>16143552>>16143566>>16143945>>16144029Samefag
>>16143549It doesn't say all factors of 6 are prime, learn to read you stupid piece of shit.
>>16144033
>>16143545Its not.
>>16143545bro listen up yo math is cool
By the way I'm trans idk if that matters
You think that shit's weird.All primes are either:a. 5k±1b. 5k±2c. 5k±3
>>16143545What kind of mental illness is this? I genuinely have no idea why someone would be doing it.>https://warosu.org/sci/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=&search_subject=why+is+this+true
All primes are either:a. 10k±1b. 10k±3
>>16145813He's (You) farming.(You) wouldn't get it.
>>1614354529 is prime29 isnt a factor of 629 is not 6k+1 for integer k
>>16147231
>>16143546>all primes are either factor of 6>6 quarks>6 leptonsthere are mathematical patterns to fundamental laws we just dont know them yet
>>16143562Go back to your containment board, incel.
all primes are either a factor of 11±k
