How did grifters manage to fool retards into believing glorified madlibs is actual artificial intelligence?
To be fair, GPT is actually smarter than 99% of all NPCs. It may be a failure at advanced math and it may be tricked into philosophical fallacies, but it does definitely outperform the average anti-intellectual midwit.
>>16146367The only think GPT does is Google shit for you, and it works as well as actually Googling shit yourself in the current internet completely destroyed by SEO bait.
>>16146373>The only think GPT does is Google shit for youThat makes it already smarter and more skilled than the average zoomer.
>>16146373Most people can't even do basic Google m8.
>>16146365>Actual intelligence Define it, to start. I say, "intelligence is an algorithm, which when fed enough data, produces an algorithm that is useful for similar data." Quantify on usefulness, similarity of data, and amount of data required in the training stage.
>>16146365Up until this point, (reactive, coherent) language has been THE best signal for personhood, so it naturally catches intuition. Anyone who wants to keep seeing it as a sapient being is then able to finagle it into saying what they want to hear.
>>16146365Thats easy, I can answer this one, the key word is "retards" Retards are dumb so its easy to trick them.What do I win for answering correctly?
>>16146365The average school teacher of the 1880s was as smart as today's college professors.We're all becoming dumb niggers and the only thing we could use to stop it will never be allowed under modern socialistic "morals".
>>16147336True and real, and is a problem very easy to solve with genocide.
How can people make any definitive claims about AGI/ASI when we can't even coherently explain what consciousness is? Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregation? They're good at accepting inputs and generating outputs but that's it. From that to actual sentience, ie having a Will of its own, seems like a huge leap. How do you even go about making something self-aware?To me it seems like a bunch of neurotic nerds are just being, well, neurotic nerds. I don't get the doomsday prophecies. What am I missing?
>>16147481How do you determine whether something has a will of its own?
>>16146367Anti-intellectual midwit is at least uncensored and can actually say anything unlike this garbage.
>>16146367Advanced math? The fucker can't even do basic multiplication of integers.
>>16147481>consciousnessDifferent question from capabilities/intelligence/agency, the kind of that could be dangerous.>Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregationSo what? Human brain is "just" a chunk of meat passing electric signals around that was formed by evolution throwing random stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks - it "just" did it for a very long time. Like we "just" used a huge amount of data on LLMs.
There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.
>>16147481AGI/ASI wont be measured in 'consciousness' (unquantifiable) at least by me and honest persons. But in output. AGI = does real life job at skill level of 90th+ percentile. ASI = better than every and any human on earth at said real life job autonomously. i dont think asi is fundementally possible bc of >>16148534Even then i think agi will only ever be narrow, and specific to a few fields.
>>16147481Chads are busy monetizing AI, making artists cry like little bitches. They don't care about nonsense like consciousness, freewill, morals, and shit like that.
>>16148211that's a false equivalence
>>16148588art is already dead, it can't be killed by AIhttps://rumble.com/v3772q9-waiting-for-doggo-aka-og-ai-npc.html
>>16148094it has self-aware power projection.>>16148554These are similar to my thoughts, and are what prompted me to ask my question in the first place. For an AI to voluntarily take over the world/extinguish humans, wouldn't it first have to be consciousness?>i dont think asi is fundementally possible bc of >>16148534>There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.which is why I made the "glorified calculator" metaphor. I can see it hugely disrupting the economy because it's already better than many humans at certain task. But those are domain specific task. But this doesn't mean it will become sentient.>>16148211I would argue that agency is a product of consciousness. Capabilities and intelligence aren't. I don't deny that AI could be dangerous, but I think it would be more because it fell into the wrong human hands/it wasn't governed properly. Not because it evolved into an all powerful machine God lifeform like out of a sci-fi flick.
it's very good at helping me with my DIY projects, it's a great way to come up with novel ideas and solutions for problems which are too specific to google. One of the few truly handy use cases I've found for it so far and it's superior to the alternatives
>>16146527This, its always important to keep in mind that half of all people are below 100 IQ
>>16146527>What do I win for answering correctly?
ChatGPT constantly tells me things like 2 = 0 + 1 and invents bogus mathematical notation when it cannot figure something out.
Notation using random Unicode characters, I mean.
We should go back to calling it machine learning.
>>16151233how about artificial idiocy
>>16151238Idiocy is a small subset of intelligence, so its the same basic thing, but not as versatile.
>>16146373You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how this technology works. >>16147481There are signs that throwing enough rag and agents at the problem could produce something difficult to distinguish from agi / consciousness. Give them an inner monolog and such. Have them criticize themselves and recursively refine the output until a sufficiently good one is selected. And store it all back in rag.
I just want LLM's that don't try to gaslight me about woke shit. >The "sideways blink" claim is a common misconception that has been associated with the lizard people conspiracy theory. However, it's important to understand that humans, including Mark Zuckerberg, can blink in different ways, and a sideways blink does not indicate that someone is a reptilian alien.>There are several reasons why humans might blink sideways or in an unusual way:>Eye movement: Humans have a wide range of eye movements, including horizontal, vertical, and diagonal movements. It's not uncommon for people to blink while moving their eyes, which can result in a sideways blink.Eye anatomy: The human eye has a complex anatomy, with multiple muscles and ligaments controlling eye movement. Sometimes, these muscles can cause the eyelid to move in unusual ways, resulting in a sideways blink.Nervous tics: Some people may have nervous tics or habits that involve blinking or moving their eyes in unusual ways.Video editing: In the age of video editing and social media, it's easy to manipulate footage to make someone appear to be blinking sideways. This can be done for comedic effect or to perpetuate a conspiracy theory.It's important to remember that correlation does not imply causation. Just because someone blinks sideways, it doesn't mean they're a reptilian alien!>Let's focus on promoting critical thinking and media literacy, rather than perpetuating baseless conspiracy theories.
>>16146373Why don't you watch a couple videos on machine learning before spouting off with ignorant rubbish?
>>161463651. https://arxiv.org/search/physics?query=Dark+matter+&searchtype=all&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first&size=502. https://chat.openai.com/c/877a42dc-f883-433f-a9d0-ab7b09a16b503. https://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/abstract/S1535-6108(24)00125-94. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23723556.2023.22388735. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.00614/full6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525961/7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36180891/8. https://chat.openai.com/c/877a42dc-f883-433f-a9d0-ab7b09a16b509. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction10. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction#Violation_of_symmetry11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay12. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture13. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay14. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction#15. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toroidal_moment&wprov=rarw116. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anapole17. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_group18. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anapole19. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_(physics)20. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_magnetic_moment21. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_precession22. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleon_magnetic_moment23. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_model24. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function25. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_magnetic_dipole_moment26. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization27. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau_pole28. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant29. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant30. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permeability31. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Open AI literally deleted my chat about unifying gravity and emf
>>16151349Srsly, how does part of a conversation get deleted lol? You would have to do it manually. Not the first time either, Sam admits on X to stealing the fruits of labor. That was mainly cancer research but I guess he is gonna take my physics bull shit too. Idk how the hell they cant even get the cosmological constant right. Yall be tripping32. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units33. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity34. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_constant35. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_charge36. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_tests_of_QED37. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law38. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law_of_black-body_radiation39. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant40. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#41. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#Direct_proportionality42. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#Direct_proportionality43. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave44. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation45. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck%27s_law&wprov=rarw146. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_catastrophe47. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant_problem48. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics49. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant50. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_invariant_special_relativity51. https://www.google.com/search?q=de+Sitter+gravity+&client=ms-android-att-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-852. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.1228653. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction
>>16151355It is also possible I am a delusional retard. Basically used the curvature of space to make quantum fields be incorporated into gravity. Pretty cool, right? Anyways, there better be some new advances soon. They took my cancer research too lmao
>>16146365I told everyone here from jump what these really are but the people here are really stupid and unable to understand most basic ideas and concepts
spoiler: it is an electronic abacus, that's it! It will never be anything else, it is just really good at tricking stupid people it isnt that, because stupid people only see surface level,. they never understand how things really work under the hood, so to speak
>>16146416Unironically true. My blood starts to boil whenever I have to watch someone google something.
>>16151438No, you are literally a grifter who advertises crystals and prepper supplies on a shitty wordpress site with esoteric in the title that you are always trying to advertise here without paying for a banner ad.
>>161463651. Because they introduced an AGI cop-out so they could call everything under the sun AI.2. Because despite 1,000 posts on /g/ and elsewhere making the point, anti-AI-hype Chads still refuse to take the CAPTCHA death blow outside 4chan. The CAPTCHA death blow is thus: CAPTCHAs are by definition Turing tests, so if real AI is here, CAPTCHAs would be useless and therefore Google et. al. should be moving to get rid of that annoying garbage. Yet they are not. So either CAPTCHAs disappear or the technocrats are forced to concede that real AI isn't here. Win-win for anti-AI-hype Chads.
>fool retards into believing glorified madlibThe biggest strength of GPT is coding. People use it for dumb shit, which can be googled as well, but for programmers GPT is the equivalent of a calculator what an calculator is for an engineer.If you're coding functionally as well as test driven, you can easily build small functions and test them instantly. You can even use GPT to build custom Jenkins pipelines if you separate stages properly.
>>16146416Google has been shit for at least 8 years. Tried to search up “median height of average Dutch male”, piece of shit kept giving me AVERAGE height. Go fuck yourself google.
>>16151512captcha is an OCR problem that has been solved for yearswhy do you think captchas need to change all the time? because as soon as you leave a captcha system for more than a few weeks some fuckwit will train his bot up to a 80-90% success rate
>>16147481>we can't even coherently explain what consciousness is?Feedback loop built from the neurotransmitter level up in an organic computer not only interpreting the world through the imprecise filter of emotional response and fed by physically limited senses, but also factoring it's own internal dialogue into the mix (the"self") on top of that. Additionally, it relies on a memory system that's more associative than explicit.
>>16146365i use it for programming and it is an absolute godsendif you already know the fundamentals of your task, why would you not have this tool write a perfect script for you?you save all that time hand writing understood codechatgpt is by far the most useful tool i have come across in my last few years of living
>>16147481>accepting inputs and generating outputsthat is exactly what consciousness is, my dear brotherjust because human consciousness is highly advanced, does not change the fact that the fundamental essence of consciousness is reaction to stimulusthe rate of reaction, and depth of perception, both influence the complexity of the consciousness, but fundamentally, it is all the same thing
>>16151465I have never advertised anything here. I have taken stupid little shits like you by the hand and revealed truths to you no one else ever would and you would never have the intelligence to figure out on your own. But you, being the moron that you are, are too stupid to realize what you have been given and too ornery to simply say thanks and move on. You are a black gorilla retard that deserve to breath the same air as me. You should be forced into a dutch oven where African gorilla NFL players fart your breathable air out of their black gorilla ass screeching fucktard
>>16146365I honestly think because the first thing it hit in the mainstream was something that takes a absolute fuckton of time and skill to do well, which is digital art. I also think there is a fundamental problem in that the people making AI are fucking nerds that have never done anything in their life that wasn't tinkering with computers. A substantial number of these people genuinely think AI will be able to replace lawyers soon. Fucking lol.
>>16146373You’re a stupid fuck.
>>16152661FUCK YOU NIGGER BITCH
>>16146365if it can outperform a human why does it matter how it work?
>>16152508you must be a shitty programmer. It never spits out working code
>>16152826A google search can outperform a human
Tranny shit
