https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH4AOtXzNM4
launch is in more than 9 hours
>>16162460/sci/borg reporting in
keep the cringe star trek fantasy play in the cringe star trek fantasy play thread>>16160366
>>16162530You're nothing special, you do this every time there's a launch.
Place your betsWhat will the outcome be?Scrub?Failure to reach intended orbit?Hatch blows out?Crash into ISS with no survivors?
>>16162553>Scrub?If there's any problem with the launch this one is the most likely. For all the problems B*eing has the divisions of its business are largely compartmentalized, so what's happening over in space is separate from aviation.
>>16162469>launch is in more than 9 hoursNo. T-4 hrs now
>>16162577Do not watch some scam youtube channels
BREAKING NEWSDoor fell off - launch postponed
Bump, launch in almost 30 bings
>>16162992>10:34 pm EDT (02:34 UTC) Launch.it's in 4 and half hours for fucks sake
>>16162993>May 6, 6:30 pm EDT (22:30 UTC) Launch coverage begins.>May 6, 10:34 pm EDT (02:34 UTC) Launch.
/csm/ reporting in.mods make a sticky already!
T-3 hours
>>16163120>redditsawman
>>16162635For a second you got me...
it's over
SCRUBBED
>>16163234Anon...https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/06/world/nasa-space-launch-boeing-starliner-scn/index.html
>>16163257>>16163299fucking lol
>>16163299>because of an issue with a valve on the Atlas V rocketThe funny thing about this are the comments complaining about Boeing, when its the ULA booster that's the problem
>>16163357ULA is half Boeing
New attempt in 3 dayshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gml290-pLQBoeingbros, we are gonna make it.
>>16163898>Boeingbros>using plural for a single person
>>16163898>3 daysLooks like it was a fairly minor problem in that case.
>>16164454>fairly minor problemI wouldn't trust any Boeing "minor problem"
reminder>The first crewed test flight test was initially planned to occur in 2017
>>16163898>Boeingbrosthat's pure copium
kek
