how come everyone didn't disappear in cloud of blue steam in 1989?
We must be extremely lucky thenGod I hate environment "scientists" more than anyone else. They're pretty much commies in disguise
>>16171092OH NOOO SOMEONE WAS WRONG
Didn't a top climate "scientist" say that we'd all die by 2023 or sum
>>16171092Dr. Ehrlich lmao
>>16171285they dont call them watermelons for nothing (green on the outside, red on the inside)
>>16171303they've been screeching those same lies since forever
>>16171291They're always wrong
Okay, let's get this out of the way:>no "real" scientist ever said that>if they did, they were probably funded by oil companies to spread FUD>the New York Times and the Guardian aren't reliable scientific sources (they just report on scientific publications, but let's leave out that part)>everyone agrees, you're not allowed to disagree>no, global warming/cooling/climate change cannot be falsified, stop asking
>>16171989>>no "real" scientist ever said thatMy favourite example of the "no true scotsman"
>>16171285Early in the pandemic we were told if we did everything right and got extremely lucky, only 10% of the population would die. It's not only the environmental studies crowd who play the luck game.
>>16171092>how come everyone didn't disappear in cloud of blue steam in 1989?Without the rest of the article, we cannot fairly comment as to what exactly he was referring to or meant by that, but you can pay if you want to read the whole article, curious one:https://www.nytimes.com/1969/08/10/archives/foe-of-pollution-sees-lack-of-time-asserts-environmental-ills.html
>>16171430without that original report, we cannot verify the bullshit claims in your bullshit image.
>>16171092soience is the modern day religious schizos shilling end of the world lies
>>16174191Yep, even more evidence that soientism is an insane religion
>>16175029being wrong isn't being insane, it's just being wrong
>>16175076if you think the world is coming to an end you are insane
>>16171092>how come everyone didn't disappear in cloud of blue steam in 1989?They did, and then the universe was reborn all at once. Proof: I was born in 1989.
>>16172040>Early in the pandemic we were told if we did everything right and got extremely lucky, only 10% of the population would die.were they wrong? did more than 10% of the population die?
>>16176189>coming to an endWhat does that mean exactly?
>>16176216ask the blue steam
Because humanity already went extinct in 1975 when the world population reached the unsustainable number of 4 heckin billion.
>>16171430This could still become true. Things from Siberia could certainly land in Britain, and bring about some very nasty weather.
>>16171092They did. You're obviously too young to remember.
>>16171092cue the environmentalists claiming that no papers said this would happen so it doesn't count
>>16171092Everyone took the blue steam vax
>>16177741redpill me on the blue steam vax
>>16178864its vaporware
>>16176775>>16173065why are scientists so terrible at predicting the future?
>>16176215>were they wrongyes
New astroturf thread?
>>16180400
>>16171092Why would the steam be blue?
>>16178864>>16179459lol
how low iq do you have to be to fall for doomsday scenario theories? has science ever measured this?
>>16171285
>>16171980this, scientists are astonishingly bad at predicting the future, the average tea leaves reader or horoscope expert is unironically much better
>>16185771They wouldn't be always wrong if they weren't intentionally shilling harmful lies. If they were just running on random chance they would be correct occasionally
