/mg/ talk mathformerly >>16187402
Fuck math
math will always be a gem
You can't even prove 3n+1 lolMath is a joke
Why make this one when the other is so far from the bump limit?
>>16234564He loves you
>>16234564Put a gem on my tongue will you
Rank the following majors at the bachelor's level from least-intensive (math wise) to most intensive:Aerospace, Electrical, Mechanical, Computer
>>16234726Electrical is the most math intensive, followed by either Mechanical or Aerospace (depending on the program). Computer engineering it really depends on how the bachelor's degree is focused. If it's very practical and hardware oriented there will probably be barely any math at all except for what is needed for basic circuits, digital integrated circuits and digital logic (and maybe some algorithms/TOC if you're at a good school). If it's more of a theoretical comp E program you might get a decent amount of abstract algebra for cyber security, coding theory that kind of thing.
Bumping to save this aryan thread
>>16235569I'm happy to claim Von Neumann, but you have to see early life.
>>16235571then check his final moments
I'm learning about functional calculus right now and this is honestly the coolest thing I've seen in a long time, plus you can troll mathlets by leaving multiplicative integrals on the blackboard.
I just finished Stewart's Calculus on my own, now time for linear algebra. Bought Friedberg, Insel and Spence's book. Comes in on Monday.
>>16236361>>16236739Don't bump this thread, retards, go here >>16187402
>>16236742You mean the one that's about to hit the bump limit?
>>16236876yeah, aboutas in, it hasn't yetOr do you abandon every thread a couple dozen posts early because, well, it'll hit the bump limit if you don't?
>>16236876It's about 30 posts away from the bump limit. On /sci/ that's like 2 weeks' worth of posts
>>16236876Bump limit is 320 posts. This thread OP is a fucking idiot or a troll.
how feasible is mental visualization of higher math ? how to have math based dreams when i am sleeping ?
>if, let, or supposenice rigurosity
>>16234484What if we are not looking at multiplication correctly.
>>16237017Get married and dream of financial subtraction
So I dropped out of my math masters 8 years ago because my love of alcohol superseded all else. I went down a dark spiral and wound up homeless, unemployed, etc and wound up in treatment and sober for 1 year now.Anyway, I'm back at uni taking a few 4th year math classes to prepare for applying for my masters again. Math just seems easier than ever before somehow. I'm doing way better in my classes, getting A- to A+ on any assignment or exam. I'm even getting above 100% in this summer class because the undergrad section of this class can do the grad section problems for bonus marks. I really wish I never wasted so much time being an alcoholic. It fucking sucks to be basically restarting at 34. I will be late 30s when I am finishing up my PhD. I always knew I had a talent for mathematics, but this shit is easy as fuck with minimal effort if I am sober. Granted, I have not taken any proof intensive courses yet though I plan to take topology next semester.Not sure what this post is for.
>>16237017>>16237026>>16237185>>16237186>>16237390Here retards: >>16187402
Are quaternions based
>>16237501Quaternions are based, but other Clifford algebras are even baseder. Split-complex numbers, dual numbers, split quaternions, biquaternions - they are so heckin geometric, it's just skibidi fanum tax.
>>16237499I posted in that one but nobody answered me >>16237052pls respond
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsy4bPJOGME