[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (17 KB, 829x85)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
How on earth would you go about solving that integration? I have no idea how to approach it, since it doesn't seem to fit any of the usual formulae.
>>
>>16258219
Express cos(x) via Euler's identity in terms of exponentials. Integrating exponentials is trivial.
>>
>>16258219
double partial integration.
>>
>>16258219
Im(exp(1+i)x)
>>
>>16258219
put it in a computer and get an answer as accurate as i want
>>
>>16258219
You know how in integrals of cosx goes cosx, sinx, -cosx, etc. and how the derivatives of e^3x goes e^3x, 3e^3x, 9e^3x? Just integrate by parts twice, it's really basic.
You get S = [___] - 9S, which means S = 1/10[_____], which is the answer you got.
>>
>>16259299
this is isn't an uncommon thing to see btw
>>
>>16258219
This cannot be done. It would have to involve a Gaussian error function. Google Aquintology
>>
e3x[ eix + e-ix]/2
->
e(3+i)x/(2{3+i})+e(3-i)x/(2{3-i})

Now work imaginary numbers out of denominator



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.