>Women select the best providersHow did such a mechanism begin to evolve when food was shared and hunter-gathering was a collective effort?
>>16259203>muh evolutionkys kike
>>16259203Let's cut this shit out. Women are parasites. We have the technology to make them obsolete. Literally nobody has to deal with their bullshit anymore.
>>16259344nice cope. We only have the tech to make most of the men obselete unlike women ugly manlet incel
>>16259349There's no cope. Women have proven they're a liability to civilization and the continuation of the species. It's been HER TURN for about two decades now and the entire world is in freefall. Enough is fucking enough. We have artificial wombs now. Women are on the way out.
>>16259244Evolution is true
>>16259352>We have artificial wombs nowno we don't. We don't even have good tech to freeze eggs unlike sperm. Women a=will always be valuable thx to the limited number of eggs they possess.
>>16259203>Women select the best providersIn what sense? In a nurturing way? They are more emotional being than males, in general, and they feel a stronger emotional bond with their offspring than men do. That much is seen in our closest relatives, gorillas, bonobos, and chimpanzees: the babies and younglings hangout with their mothers much more than with the fathers, and that too is what we observe in homo sapiens, in broad terms. It's not a universal rule though: in some animals types, it's the male who looks after the offspring, such as Emperor Penguins; it's the male who endures the winter of Antarctica with the baby on its feet while the female goes feeding in the ocean.Why is it so with primates though, why did things evolve that way, and not the other? I don't know that. Perhaps there was no specific reason, maybe it was just advantageous, evolutionarily speaking, for one of the parents to take on that role and, as luck would have it, it was the females in the case of primates.Unless, do you mean to imply that they are better foragers than men? That's a more dubious statement.
>>16259373Yeah we do. Buh-bye sweaty!
>>16259203>>Women select the best providers>How did such a mechanism begin to evolve when food was shared and hunter-gathering was a collective effort?proof that this was ever the case?
>>16259415That's the point. At least one of those commonly held beliefs is false. >>16259398>In what sense?Women tend to prefer wealthier men. I'm skeptical of appeals to evolution to explain this behavior.>In a nurturing way?Is there any evidence that animals indicate and select specifically for the ability to nurture offspring and if so, what might those indicators be?
>>16259203>Women select the best providersWomen select violent criminals for sex. The question of a provider doesn't arise in their view until they're thrice single mothers. And then they don't choose the best providers either but still insist the provider has to be at least 6' tall.
>>16259203perhaps it evolved in tandem with civilisation then?
>>16259203how are we determining that women select the best providers?
>>16259203women evolved to be submissive to rapiststhe uppity ones got killed
>>16259373>How did such a mechanism begin to evolve when food was shared and hunter-gathering was a collective effort?Reproduction was a collective effort too!>the limited number of eggs they possessOver 10,000 ... you means ability to get pregnancy.
>>16259203>How did such a mechanism begin to evolve when food was shared and hunter-gathering was a collective effort?Women can't hunt and gather as well while they are knocked up.
