[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Analytic continuations can only be justified by adding more axioms. And this is why it is hard to prove Reimann hypothesis because we don't have enough axioms to prove it.

Change my mind.
>>
>>16259908
>just add an axiom that says the riemann hypothesis is true
>win 1e6 dollars
>>
>>16259908
Then create your own axioms instead of whining like a bitch Mr. 200+ iq chink
>>
>>16259908
>>16259912
>>16259920
Are these summer posters or is this just how /sci/ is now?
>>
>>16259941
winter wasn't that much better



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.