Are there any new exotic number systems being worked on? It fascinates meList of non standard numbers:Transfinite numbers: Numbers that are greater than any natural number.Ordinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the order type of well-ordered sets.Cardinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the cardinalities of sets.Infinitesimals: These are smaller than any positive real number, but are nonetheless greater than zero. These were used in the initial development of calculus, and are used in synthetic differential geometry.Hyperreal numbers: The numbers used in non-standard analysis. These include infinite and infinitesimal numbers which possess certain properties of the real numbers.Surreal numbers: A number system that includes the hyperreal numbers as well as the ordinals.Fuzzy numbers: A generalization of the real numbers, in which each element is a connected set of possible values with weights.
>>16260413About half of your question is a topic of set theory, the other half is answered in a course on algebra.
>>16260413anything past the natural numbers is schizophrenia.
>>16260413Yesterday this guy popped up in my yt feed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._D._W._Anderson
P-adics are by far the most interesting.
>>16260684natural numbers are "infinite" which is an absurdity and a schizophrenic delusion
>>16260413Did you make the picture? I'd like to request that you include the constructible and the computable numbers.
>>16262409>natural numbers are "infinite" You can't name one natural number that is infinite let alone multiple natural numbers that are infinite.
>>16260684>>16262409>>16262558https://4chan.org/rules#global>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/:>Troll posts
>>16262563I see you are clearly unable to name a natural number that is infinite, so I accept your concession.
>>16262570Stop trolling.
>>16262572Stop answering a question that necessitates a natural number with words that clearly have nothing to do with natural numbers.
>>16262583Your trolling is futile. You are wasting time.
>>16262584The only thing you can do is waste time to cover up the fact that you will never be able to name an infinite natural number.
>>16262596Your troll attempt failed. Accept it. Move on.
>>16262598You are the troll who is still answering number questions with words since you know there is no natural number that is infinite and no way to actually provide an infinite natural number as your answer.
>>16262602You are trolling nobody but yourself.
>>16262605You still can't point out a single natural number that is infinite and have to use whiny words to cope with being wrong.
>>16262606Your trolling is too repetitive.
>>16260413I invented my own
>>16262607>>>/lit/Since you obviously don't understand how math works and will never mathematically prove your point, go whine on the board made for midwit wordcels like yourself.
>>16262611Its underpins box math and is the true basis for set theory[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty \circlearrowleft 0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\{\}\} = 1[/math]
>>16262607>Unable to answer a simple math question over and over despite claiming he knows the answer over and over.>Durr you repetitive.
>>16262619
>>16262612>>16262620Samefagging doesn't save your failed troll.
>>16262630Responding with more irrelevant words still isn't a proper response to a simple math question >>>/lit/.
>>16262633Here are some numbers for your trolling: 0/10.
>>162626430, you mean like the exact same number of infinite natural numbers you have successfully been able to identify?
>>16262645Repeat yourself again, troll.
>>16262646Keep answering math questions with poorly constructed prose, tard.
>>16260413Elliptical numbers, complex would be a subset of those.
>>16262651I don't get it. Can you explain again?
>>16262654Obviously you don't get it or you wouldn't keep giving poorly constructed sentences where simple numerical answers are necessitated.
>>16262672Maybe post it another dozen times, troll?
>>16262674Maybe finally admit you can't name any natural number that is infinite, so I don't have to keep pointing out you are wrong and can't answer to your own claim about an infinite natural number.
>>16262676You will infinitely reply to me with your same lame troll shit.
>>16262677Not even possible the way threads are designed to expire over time, dipshit, but good job continuing your trend of always being wrong about everything.
>>16262679Don't ever stop replying. You do want to troll me really hard, don't you?
>>16262682No, I know getting corrected triggers your ODD, but I just want you to quit constantly being wrong about everything.
>>16262692Learn some math, troll.
>>16262693No, u, dipshit who can only answer math question with retarded prose.
>>16262694You don't know math, troll.
>>16262698>>>/lit/
>>16262701>>>/b/
>>16262709I will as soon as you can use math to show that there is a natural number that is infinite instead of using words to cope with the fact you were wrong.
>>16262713Still trolling, huh?
>>16262721Still can't actually prove your claims with math and have to type seething sentences of uninteresting text instead, huh?
>>16262731Your trolling failed. Time to give up.
>>16262745You still aren't doing math, you are still seething about being wrong and being wholly incapable of proving your point using math.
>>16262748I don't even read your replies anymore, you failed troll.
>>16262751Why would you when you know you are going to fail at the task and your best option is to just be snarky and pretend like you aren't a failure at basic math?
>>16262764Time to learn basic math, troll.
>>16260413Are there no other transcendental irrationals? What the fuck does a tranny number even mean? Just non-computable? But Pi seems very computableHelp my cute adorable little head understand
>>16263800Transcendental (over a particular field) means that it is not a root of a polynomial (with coefficients in that field). Commonly, that field is taken to mean the rational numbers.
>>16262409>natural numbers are "infinite"wrong
>>16263829Retard
>>16262765Yes that is what I have been telling you, its time for you to learn basic math, so you quit trying to answer math questions with snark and poorly constructed sentences that contain no math whatsoever.
>>16263883Retard
>>16263886>t. the retard who still can't name a single infinite natural number, despite screeching about it for days
>>16263888You WILL reply endlessly.
>>16263890Only because you will never be able to actually mathematically prove your point and will just post rambling nonsense that is easily refutable instead.
>>16263888For every natural number, I generate an infinite number of natural numbers, such that there exists an infinite number of natural numbers that hold an infinite number of natural numbers>checkmate atheists
>>16263892Dance for me, slave
>>16263895Keep using retarded words instead of math since you will always be a slave to semantics and will never understand basic math. >>>/lit/
>>16263893>inb4 you say I can't generate an infinite amount of natural numbers for each natural number...In that case, I simply negate all the axioms and formalisms that lead to such a statement being true.>numbers aren't even real>cries in logic
>>16263902You crave the insults, don't you, moron?
>>16263906>t. the wordcel dipshit who is addicted to being insulted for being wholly unable to provide a single math proof of his retarded obviously false claims
>>16263800There's an uncountably infinite # of transcendentals, but only a countably infinite # of names we can assign, so practically all of them are unknowable. The liouville numbers are definitely computable though
>>16263907Didn't read.
>>16263910Why would you when you know it definitely proves you wrong and you can't possibly refute it with actual math, so its much better to just bury your head in the sand and pretend like you aren't always wrong about everything?
>>16263913Your stupid
>>16263914kek words are your only refuse since you have 0 math ability, yet you're still too retarded to know when to use your vs you're, maybe you shouldn't even go to >>>/lit/ and just need to go back
>>16263916Keep trolling, dummy
>>16263919I might start trolling when you post a single math equation to prove your claim and make me look as retarded as you have looked this entire thread, until then I am just holding you to your claims while you trololololol and seethe about being retarded and wholly unable to prove your claims.
>>16263919>>16263926And watch as you prove once again you are too retarded for math and have to cope and seethe with more retarded words and not a single math equation.
>>16263926Very low IQ post
>>16263928Try harder, troll
>>16263933I don't need to, I perfectly predicted how your retardation would express itself >>16263928 and how you still can't do math because you are too busy mashing words together poorly to think and compute for yourself.
>>16263931There is no reason to label your posts, everyone knows by now and your retarded brain definitely can't provide more insight than onlookers can gleam for themselves.
>>16263936You WILL reply
>>16263938Dedicate your time to me
>>16263941You WILL prove once again you are too retarded for math and have to cope and seethe with more retarded words and not a single math equation.
>>16263943Its better than you dedicating your time to being incorrect about everything all the time.
>>16263944I'm your girlfriend now
>>16263945Humiliation ritual
>>16263948>>16263950Ah, you have a subservient humiliation fetish, no wonder you like being repeatedly proven wrong while talking about yourself on social media.
>>16263953Projecting
>>16263960You brought those things up, submitting to me as my gf and humiliating yourself ritualistically, I am just interpreting your words since you can only seem to use poorly constructed semantics and never any actual math.
>>16263969Didn't read. You will reply regardless.
>>16263971As predicted>>16263944
>>16263977Endless reply loop
>>16263979Yes that is how being wrong works, you will be wrong forever and someone else will eventually be here with the truth to correct you.
>>16263982Continue
>>16263987Yes you will continue to be wrong until you actually learn math and post mathematical proofs.
>>16263987>>16263989But feel free to post more poorly constructed semantics that prove you don't understand basic math.
>>16263989Projecting
>>16263991Le troll face
>>16263992Good job proving how wrong you can be and how little understanding you have of the words you use.>>16263993Le still not able to understand basic math or post a single math proof face.
>>16263995Go on
>>16263998Ok, here is some math for you to consider since you have yet to post anything math related:The odds of you ever posting a single math proof to back up your claims (0.00%) multiplied by the amount of times you have been correct in this thread (0) equals 0.00% * 0 = 0.
>>16263999You failed. Try again.
>>16264003While I knew you were too stupid for middle school or higher math, I never would have guessed you were also too stupid to understand that 0*0=0.
>>16264008You WILL reply
>>16264011You WILL never post anything related to math because it is far beyond your abilities.
>>16264011Yet, you WILL seethe and cry with more vague semantics about the fact that you will never be able to prove your claims with basic math.
>>16264020Say it again
>>16264022Dance for me
>>16264029Its still true, so why not.
>>16264032You are the one dancing for me since the closer we get to 300 posts, the closer we get to page 10 and the closer we get to proving that this exchange can't possibly be endless as you keep falsely claims, so all we are doing is getting close and closer to definitely proving you are wrong about everything.
>>16264040Need more repetition.
>>16264042You are wrong.
>>16264044Ok, you haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
>>16264046You just have to dance for me a couple hundred more times and find out the hard way you are wrong and there is no way to make this exchange endless.
>>16264048Say it again.
>>16264049You will never be free
>>16264050Ok, you haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
>>16264051You will never name an infinite natural number and you will never be in an endless 4chan thread.
>>16264052What?
>>16264054You will never stop replying
>>16264056Now try to prove it with math instead of saying nonsense over and over.
>>16264055You haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
>>16264059False
>>16264061Why?
>>16264064Correct, your "proof" is false because you don't know how math works.
>>16264065I am guessing because you are inherently stupid to the point you can't figure out basic kindergarten math, but it could be some kind of brain damage or genetic problem you picked up along the way.
>>16264068How?
>>16264070Why?
>>16264074see>>16264070
>>16264076It makes the most logical sense and your brain damage can be mathematically described in relation to the shear number of times you are wrong in a single thread.
>>16264078Wrong
>>16264079Projecting
>>16264085see>>16263999>>16264003You think 0*0=0 is a failing equation because you don't understand basic math.
>>16264087Yes I am making a statistical projection about how your brain damage influences all your answers to primarily be wrong.
>>16264093False
>>16264096You are wrong.
>>16264100Nope that post definitely exists for anyone to see, you are getting worse and worse at denying reality as time goes on.
>>16264104Dumb and wrong
>>16264101Only because I probably am still underestimating the total detrimental effects of your brain damage and how it hurts your ability to coherently process reality and do basic logic like kindergarten tier math.
>>16264109Projecting
>>16264106Nope its definitely correct because the posts definitely exist and have their own serial numbers I can still refer to >>16263999 >>16264003.
>>16264110Yes I am projecting how your brain damage affects your ability to process reality, you just aren't able to screen the projections because of said brain damage and your poor grasp of language.
>>16264111You are butthurt
>>16264114You WILL reply
>>16264120Yes, lies being force fed by retarded liars is painful to deal with.
>>16264125Keep seething
>>16264122You WILL remain brain damaged while bumping this thread to the limit with retarded nonsense since you can't do math.
>>16264127As long as you keep lying, I will complain about it.
>>16264128Stupid and wrong
>>16264129Autism
>>16264130Why did you tl;dr my summary of you without getting it down to a single monosyllabic grunt as you tend to do?
>>16264132>You have the mental disorder that makes people more likely to be logical and correct about math.You really dunked on me there, retard.
>>16264136Retard
>>16264137I'm right, your wrong
>>16264142There are those grunt we have come to expect.
>>16264144You are about halfway to finding out how wrong you are when this "endless" thread reaches its limit and goes to the end of the line to die.
>>16264147Reply
>>16264149You have no brain
>>16264153damage.Correct, I have no brain damage.You on the other hand, don't understand how math or threads work due to your significant brain damage.
>>16264150Ok
>>16264150But we need more so you can be proven wrong faster.
>>16264150If that is ok with you which it is since you clearly don't understand cause and effect very well.
