[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I discovered a proof of the formula for the length of an angle bisector in a triangle using the angle bisector theorem and the cosine rule, along with a whole lot of algebraic manipulation.
>>
No, you probably didn't.
>>
>>16262948
If you aren’t a black high schooler nobody gives a shit
>>
r/notinteresting
>>
>>16262948
Length is not dependent on angle.
>>
BC = a, AB = b, AC = c, AD = d

d = √(bc(b + c - a)(b + c + a))/(b + c)
>>
>>16263814
>Let triangle ABC be such that BC=AB+AC
your formula stinks ass faggot
>>
>>16263862
Rude.
>>
>>16264037
rude but not wrong



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.