[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Given the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, is it really possible to create particle/antiparticle pairings that exist for extremely short periods of time before annihilating? Does this really mean that empty space is really empty?
>>
No
>>
>>16263137
Anon your rambling jargon that means absolute dog shit.

Start reading physics history start with Poincaré. Then work Your way up. Galeio may be interesting too. Newton is my favorite.

Mostly anything is better then the bullshit your spewing
>>
>>16263137
No. This goes against Noether's theorem. Energy must be conserved because there's temporal symmetry. Heisenberg's principle would violate that, therefore it does not apply
>>
>>16263609
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle certainly applies for energy and time which are conjugate variables just as momentum and position are. This is apparent for anyone who's tried to make ultrashort laser pulses, as these will have a broad energy spectrum by necessity.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.