>IQ 163 at the age of 12>always acted as a low IQ to avoid problems with midwits>now I'm 30 and my IQ is 110How did that happen? Is fake it till you make it the reason for that?
use it or you lose it, as the saying goes
>>16281773iq tests on children are not very accurate because children who develop at different rates can still end up plateauing to the same max by the time they reach adulthood. at 12 you may have been much smarter than the average 12 year old, but now you're only slightly smarter than the average 30 year old.
>>16281773IQ tests are not reliable on children.
>>16281773>Dyslexia diagnosed at 8>Could read alright, just couldn't spell for the life of me>like almost unironically retarded levels >Went to weekly support program for 4 years, sometimes reading for hours on end>now average spelling ability and great reading abilityIt's almost like the brain is a muscle, too. It withers if you don't use it. Do you even lift?
>>16281773the radiation your tv growing up melted your brain
>>16281782what a meme
>>16281773Industrial pollution and media propaganda
>>1628177310 points increase in iq as a kid basically means you are about a year ahead of your peers on mental development.An iq of 163 at 12 basically means you are about as smart as a senior in highscool, which really isn't all that smart in the grand scheme of things.
>>16281773How'd you end up with a 163 IQ at the age of 12 is what you should be asking us right about now.
