>vaccines ended polio epidemics-ACK
>>16291955sauce of that image, please
>>16291971>Errrr do you have a sauce for that>Sauce me up senpai>Can you give me a citation pleaseGo back.
>making up data
>>16292032The just started calling DDT poisonings by a different name after (((the vaccine))) cured """"""polio"""""""
>>16292444Do you have independent research that would prove that 1. these DDT flare-ups happened and that 2. we're dealing with the same thing that occurred in the '50s? Otherwise, it seems to be quite far-fetched since your argument could allow for any possibility.
>>16292444What's the new name?
>>16291955>Poliomyelitis has existed for thousands of years, with depictions of the disease in ancient art.[1] The disease was first recognized as a distinct condition by the English physician Michael Underwood in 1789,[1][7] and the virus that causes it was first identified in 1909 by the Austrian immunologist Karl Landsteinerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio
spurious correlation much?
>>16291955mandate vaccines so we have less brain damaged retards like OP
>>16292932>correlation doesn't equal causation unless the correlation appeals to my emotionally driven confirmation bias
>>16294211lolthey really do think thats how it is tho
>>16295451Thats because confirmation bias is an emotional process, people who are too emotionally immature to be able to think rationally will always mistake their confirmation bias for rational thought, they're too stupid not to do so. The IQ people will always behave stupidly, dumb things are dumb
>>16296575>people who are too emotionally immature to be able to think rationally will always mistake their confirmation bias for rational thoughtunfortunate
>>16294211There's contingential correlation when two things correlate but cannot be logically connected. Then, there are a lot of "random" correlations where one could very well have something to do with the other.
