[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (13 KB, 175x166)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
>Virtual electron-positron pairs, however, can also exist for minute durations (less than a Planck time), as dictated by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
Why are physicists so dishonest? Garbage like this would never fly in other disciplines.
>>
>>16296741
keep seething newton-fag
>>
>>16296741
>literally constantly big-banging
this is a problem because..?
>>
>>16296741
It wouldn’t, because it’s not the only way we’ve determined their existence. Vacuum fluctuations have been studied using QFT, which provides a far more detailed description of the virtual particles and their possible physical effects (black hole entropy, casimir effect, antimatter production, relation to special relativity mass-energy equivalence) than can be done using the uncertainty principle. The time-energy uncertainty principle is too broad and too vague to say anything definitive about virtual particles, but QFT gives the proper theory and experimental effects that any scientific theory needs



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.