Were his overtly sexual psychological theories just schizo ramblings or was he right?
>>16385453He was lowkey spittin
>>16385453I think he was mostly on track with his theories, a good estimate for truth but he said everything in a really gross way and was a pretty untrustworthy person. Good theorist, bad practitioner
>>16385453It was all a projection of his degenerate jewish brain
>>16385585ah now that i read the early life section it all makes sense
>>16385453>jew>rightLMAO
>>16385453>just schizo ramblings or was he rightKind of both, but the more direct framing is to imagine what you'd get from a pseudoscientist born in the 1800s who had to figure out why people do weird things.It's a lot easier to start from a Darwinian perspective where humans are driven by survival and reproduction than to deal in depth with all the various factors of philosophy, religion, sociology, history, etc. Adler would be the contemporary counterpart who focused more on the humanistic side of psychology than all the instinctual stuff.
jung is more intredesting to (me)
>>16385453He was really full schizo. If he'd been a gender studies major and SSRIs had never been discovered, psychiatry might be a real /sci/ence.
>>16385453>schizo ramblings
>>16385453Some things he got right when it comes to the reasoning why abused people, aka the people who need psychiatric treatment the most, focus so much on genitalia and have unhealthy fixations towards their parents. For the average person it’s nonsense because they have a healthy mental balance
>>16385693He didnt get anything right. People who grow up in authoritarian households tend to love their parents more
>>16385743[citation needed]
>>16385453Anal and oral fixations are based in very traceable mannerisms in people. They were yet unprepared for 'fluidity in sexuality', which could have proven a better basis.
>>16385743If by “love” you mean “are meek, subservient and servile” then yes, you’d be correct. They otherwise put their parents in home the moment they are adults and have power over them as they get old and infirm>proofEmpirical evidence from real life experience
Freud is a jew who understood that after the atheist bourgeois revolutions, men and bourgeois women were sex and drug addicts just like him and since women dont work but love to gossip about sex, he figured he could have a little cult around him, composed of whores and bourgeois desperate to hear how sex addiction is the nature of the human psyche framed into a self made and self aggrandizing myth disguised as science to surf on the atheist hype of positivism lol.100 years later atheists still consider him their guru, since they are still lobotomized sex and drug addicts...
>>16385585>>16385615you will never have an ethnostate.
>>16385453He was talking about his own fucked up jewish psyche and overemphasizing the negatives.
>>16386854SAAAAAAR
>>16385453He's a jew, so he delighted in being infuriatingly and confusingly correct.
>>16385453I think the iceberg comparison was onto something but I suspect his personal beliefs and motives fueled his work.
>>16385453I am realizing his analysis of defense mechanisms was genius. Does some of psychoanalysis have real scientific method based backing? How do I separate the bullshit psychology from the stuff that could save my life?
>>16385775You were the parent or the child?
>>16385743Nah it has to do with structure. If punishment and reward coincide with the proper structure of higher social realities than the parents are seen as doing a good job. When punishment and reward are totally incongruent with that then they've created demented offspring who understandably dislike many things including their parents.
>>16385453Oedipus Complex is straight fire.>Grow up hating your dad, only to become just like him, end up marrying someone just like your loving mommy.
>>16385453I don't know I'm not sure he was 100% correct about everything I think alot of his ideas were more presumptive rather then empirical.Not to say he wasn't totally wrong but definitely not right ethier if I had a measuring device that could predict the accuracy of his work I'd say about 40% was correct
>>16385453Anatomy is destiny.
>>16388841I don't know I'm not sure anon was 100% correct about Freud I think alot of his ideas were more presumptive rather then empirical.Not to say he wasn't totally wrong but definitely not right ethier if I had a measuring device that could predict the accuracy of his work I'd say about 0% was correct
>>16385472His theory consists on "We have 3 souls". Complete nonsense. Pavlov contributed a lot fucking more to psychology with his "Neuron Activation" model than this hack.
>>16385775>Being a retarded american is empirical evidenceMy parents loved me and I am 100% loyal to them. My mother coddled me and I treat her as an equal rather than what she expects like a superior in a position of power. None of this has to do with freud bullshit. If you treat people well they will like you, whodathunkit?
>>16385743I love both my parents but one thing that would get me pissed about my father was any kind of perceived unfairness. Like, i would not accept any punishment or blame for something i didnt do. It was just a strong instinct of mine, otherwise i was happy at being the goodest son
>>16385453It's not one or the other.
>>16385453Freud's major problem was he only studied the mentally ill, without developing a baseline for comparison by studying healthy minds as well.
>>16385453The existence of sibling incest disproves Freud. If siblings compete with each other to fuck their parents, how does Freud explain it when the siblings fuck each other? The answer: he doesn't.
>>16391293Medicine is about merchain illness never about healthy life.Never cure, just find treatment for recurrent sold.
>>16385453He was just overly coked sodomite, who achieved being published and accepted.Sexuality is quite different nowadays, then back then, so it would say maybe it made sense, but no longer does.
>>16385585this
>>16385453he analyzed himself and uncovered his own degeneracy, then he projected his degeneracy onto decent white folkshttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bPcgoaZjsu8
>>16385453He was right and anyone who says otherwise is either can't introspect or are lying to themselves.
>>16385585this desu. everything human is psychological, even psychology
>>16385453>Implying schizo ramblings aren't right
>>16386854Humans don't need an ethnostate without constant demonic subversion, I'm pretty sure humans would be able to get along fine and reverse racism to levels of ethnic rivalry at the worst.
It resonates with people but religion resonates with people too. Ultimately it's unfalsifiable so I think it's nothing more than novelty
>>16385453look around and you'll see he was right but since his thoughts didn't follow the scientific method people don't check as much anymorejung was also a freak with schizo ramblings, but at least that one had something other than sex in his mind
