[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Dark matter is solved when you realize galaxies are just spacetime swirling around a cosmic drain. Of course you see extra rotation and lensing when that whole region of spacetime is swirling.
>>
>>16386552
do you have a single fact to back that up?
>>
>>16386552
that actually sounds intuitive and feels right and I see it similarly.
the problem is that GRT doesnt offer that and works extremely well both on way bigger and way smaller scales.

I wonder if we are lumping several phenomena together without realizing it when it comes to dark matter.
and I wonder if there could be a counterpart to heisenberg for large dimensions and masses, a mass blur through motion.
>>
>>16386552
How about irregular galaxies?
>>
File: IMG_0779.jpg (49 KB, 306x450)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
Space and time is made up of petal sets.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.