https://youtu.be/cBIvSGLkwJY?si=XQQw4BIksz8WUXkrIs modern physics just a cashgrabbing circlejerk?
>>16411692the reasons physics has failed is that it uses cult techniques to market itself to normies so that they become physicists. This is how physics propagates itself now. Sabine believes that physics is about inventing models to explain data. The only merit of a model is that it explains the data. But that's not how the physics cult gets people to become physicists. Instead of recognizing that physics is about data, they say that physics is about "reality." They believe that they are uncovering, through mystical arts, the true nature of reality. This is a delusion that expresses itself everywhere in the practice of physicists.
>>16411692Sabine is not only ugly but also retarded.
>>16411692Academic physics is the same schizo babble as physics on /sci/ lmao even.
>>16411692Her entire channel is a cash-grabbing circlejerk.
>>16411715doompill
>>16411715Well, when you can't make nuke tier breakthroughs anymore the only thing you can do is ask gibs to smash particles and spin tall tales.Who knows, at the current rate of stagnation in material science the next world shattering breakthrough might actually be something /x/ related.
>>16411718>Sabine is not only ugly butShe's literally average 8/10 woman. You should go outside once in a while because porn destroyed your brain
>>16411692I unsubscribed when she stopped talking about cool science info and only doomposted.
>>16411879This. Fucking retarded her pivot from a sober but quircky science channel to become a pseudo-rogue science crusader whatever channel.
>>16411692>Is modern physics just a cashgrabbing circlejerk?Yes, same as medicine, law, IT, politics etc.
>>16411692To answer your question, yes, it is. To address the video, holy fuck is she retarded. The minimal area in LQG is not actually some area in space that you can touch. It’s making the notions of length, area and volume into operators which have eigenvalues that are interpreted as “minimal”. I’ve only read a minimal introduction and even I know this. She’s like an undergraduate physics student complaining about the hydrogen atom energy levels not behaving as she expects.
>>16411882>pseudo-rogue science crusader whatever channelThey all turn into this cf. John Campbell
>>16411692Queen, I am yours to command!
>>16411692I can't take anyone who supports Elon seriously
>>16411875>Who knows, at the current rate of stagnation in material science the next world shattering breakthrough might actually be something /x/ related.Oh no, it's almost as if science and faith are the two sides of the same coin - trying to understand reality. Just like we are both body and mind, representing a duality. And artificially separating them leads to gravely erroneous conclusions. Where one fails, the other steps in and complements it, holistically.Who would've thought.>inb4 someone accuses me of being religious, I don't actually believe in anything, thus I'm in just as much of a prison everyone else
>>16411877>average>8/10
>>16411692Lubos was right about Sabine.
>>16411692At 3:25 "don't despayyrrr" I love her accent
>>16412076This is what a scientist looks like
>>16411877>She's literally average 8/10 woman.THIS. She is not porn attractive but she is NOT fat, symmetric body, good skin, full head of hair, no tattoos, all her teeth. Compared to other women she is an 8/10.
>>16412066>I can't take anyone who supports Elon seriouslyYour so edgy!I bet you only drink CHOCOLATE milk and tell all the other kids in the playground, that it is BETTER than White milk.
>>16413693Serious question, is there any psychological studies done on these type of reactions , like the trump derangement syndrome or the musk derangement syndrome that the f00t guy has?
>>16411715it's turned into back-of-the-napkin untestable fanfic.theoretical physicists wasting time/grants figuring out how many electrons can dance at the center of a black hole.
>>16411877>>16413686>NOOOOOOOO DON'T YOU DARE ATTACK MY HECKING PRECIOUS FEMALE WITH YOU MISOGY KNEES VIEWS SHE'S A CUTE AND VALID WOMAN
>>16411692imagine spending time voluntarily to listen a woman complaining
>>16411692>Our girlThere is a reason why this midwit site chooses Frau Hossenfelder as "their" girl . She is a similar dumb troll and academic bullshit believing ignoRant than (Y..).
>>16413941I was thinking about that the other day.I wonder if it's a new phenomenon that has something to do with modern media / social network stuff, or if it's been around for a long time. I can't recall any obvious cases from decades ago, but maybe I just wasn't paying attention when I was younger.
>>16413681Me on the bottom
>>16411692>gives you this look>"take off your pants, anon"
>>16411692Original GGG
>>16411875>when you can't make nuke tier breakthroughs anymorehow do you know you can't when you stopped trying
She's a grifter of mediocre talent and supermassive ego.
>>16411882The endgame of youtube as career is becoming a professional clown
>>16411692Did someone use AI to blend her face with Zach Braff's? Why?
>>16411882whores love the youtube money and the attention, it's cat nip to them
>>16415501No, anon, that's... how she really looks
her videos suck but she's based for attacking ideas that have just been jobs programs for phds
>>1641499620 years earlier? Maybe.50 year-old mothers aren't really my thing.
>>16411692>hyperliberal globalist trash>Our girllol, no
>>16415777You're not on /pol/ now, you're on /sci/
>>16415814and you're not on /lgbt/, faggot
>>16411692Not just physics. Academia in general. There are very few science outposts left in the world. >t. went through three universities doing grant farming and other types of lying and pol shit
>>16411715>Instead of recognizing that physics is about data, they say that physics is about "reality." They believe that they are uncovering, through mystical arts, the true nature of reality. This is a delusion that expresses itself everywhere in the practice of physicists.Cool It with The Anti-Semitic Remarks
>>16415702that pic of her is from 7-8 years ago. she's definitely too old now.
>>16411692Women are the reason physics is dying. When will they fucking realise this. Women cannot innovate without the help of a man. Men can innovate without the help of a woman. When will they realise this? WHEN?
>>16418028No, most physics courses are sausage fests. Trust me, their problems isn't to many women.
>>16418033Let me specify, white men.
>>16418063It’s mostly Jews and Asians, at least in America
>>16411769but is she wrong?
Imagine how much money it takes to land a Women on the moon.
>>16411692The fundamental issue here is that science was once inhabited mostly by people motivated to understand the nature of reality. Now its mostly inhabited by people motivated by having a career.This is result of the proliferation of Universities churning out a huge number of people who while mainly competent at a technical level, within a discipline, lack the critical thinking and creativity required to reach a genuine understanding of their subject and who probe deeper to advance it.. An anolgy would be a lawn mower mechanic who can fix and maintain a lawn mower, check the spark plug gap, change the oil, sharpen the blades, can even rebuild the engine, but doesn't understand why the lawn mower works in the first place and doesn't want to find out, and is therefore incapable of designing a better lawn mower. I am sure many of us came across these types in higher education. Educated morons. Now this wouldn't be so much of a problem except there are so many of them in science today, and they put their ego far ahead of any genuine interest in science, as result they shout down any criticism or questioning of what they learned with the passion of religious zealots. Its was hard enough for a single voice to be heard 200 years ago when modern science was still in its infancy, now that voice is drowned out by a thousand lawn mower mechanics flinging Ad Hominems and rushing to protect their egos.
>>16418327
>>16415777Wait how is she a globalist
>>16411877>8/10 womanThe GILF crowd
>>16415466Yeah but most other theoretical physicists have even less talent, a bigger ego and are grifting off grants instead of the public. So she is not that bad in comparison.I'd bet theoretical physicists score highest on the narcissism scale out of all scientists.
>>16411718how many cocks shoved up your arse did it take to push your brains out?
>>16411877No.>>16411692bitter femoid bitter that she's a dumb femoidI stopped watching when she showed that she doesn't even have a proper understanding of the most basic quantum principles and started shilling pilot-wave
Sabine starts to noootice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpQobaBCSYk&t=348sHow long till she comes out as a chud?
>>16418431>The GILF crowdThe fact that this has actually become a thing has finally put to rest the myth of "the wall" and confirmed, to the chagrin of incels everywhere, that women in general never stop being sexually attractive
>>16418605Lmao. I don't like to repeat myself but>>497823049>>497823680
>>16411877>>16418605This is the same faggot
>>16411692>"this is why physics is dying">it's actually a video about her interpersonal dramareally that's on me, I should have known better than to watch a video by a woman and expect anything less
>>16418490true, the only reason why someone would want to be a physicist is because he think he is smarter than everyone else.
>>16418637I *am* smarting than everyone else, especially every woman.
>>16418589Keep pretending you are smart, tardfucker.
>>16414927people weren't so connected when you were younger, or you just didn't notice. but yes, some people would have over the top reactions to public figures. typically most people weren't know outside of their social circle however.
>>16418403she's german.
>>16418637it sure as fuck isn't for the good company.
>>16411718well shes a materialist so yeah shes a retard but that also makes 90% of /sci/ and 99.9% of normies retarded also.
>>16418490The reason she isn't in academia is that she's not talented enough.
>>16420840YOUR LUCKY YOURE NOT DEAD
i just found out about her and I like her spunky german grandma vibes, though her video on free will was too fatalistic for me and downplays the role of willpower and determination in human achievement(even if these are "constructions" resulting from statistics and low level particles and brain structure, it's basically semantics to conclude "I did this" , "i was statistically programmed to conclude i did this", if the end result is functionally the same: the measurable results of exerting will power
>>16420897She shills the pilot-wave theory, which is a deterministic and materialist fringe alternative to quantum mechanics. She's too dumb to comprehend true randomness. Not her fault cuz she's a woman, but it's the fault of society letting a dumb woman have a voice in science.
>>16420897I'm not much of a philosophy enthusiast but it's really frustrating seeing overconfident pop-sci/phil people like her and Harris and Sapolsky talking the talk when it's obvious that they're just utterly uninformed about the relevant discussion that's been recorded for the last couple thousand years. JFC, causal determinism and its potential implications to free will have been given thought since time immemorial.
>>16422679Getting your grandfather's cock shoved up your ass really fucked up your head.
>>16413681>tfw u get mogged even by literal kidsovarida
>>16411692Welcome to Shprokkets!
>>16411692>Our girlbullshit, that's a man with a glasses
>>16423926And that's what makes her /ourgirl/.
>>16411692she speaks so slowly she must have some sort of disorder. i listen to the videos on 1.75x which makes her sound normal
>>16423989This. I bet Ben Shapiro has an IQ of 6 gorillion, him and his Jew jeans.
>>16424105rent free
>>16414990you need to be 18 to post here
>>16423926About half of all mans are girls.
>>16411877>8/10 in Germany
SHE'S 48!!! SHE LOOKS 60, WHAT THE FUCK IS IN THE GERMAN TAP WATER???
Yes unfortunately it's that time again, we need to talk about science
>>16427890She was on Gurmin Goo Girls, first episode.
NOOOOO MUH LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY MATHS! PLEASE I NEED TWO MORE COLLIDERS JUST TWO MORE WEEKS FOR A BREAKTHROUGH
>>16411877She looks like the EAT ZE BUGS guy, wtf are you talking about
>>16418605Does that apply to fat and musk fetishism as well?
>>16411692Only learned about her todayI can already tell she's a fucking failed academic grifter that gullible people suck up because she was taught how to talk about things without anyone, who also doesn't as much as she does, to question her.
>>16433589>I am taking a break from cleaning the toilets to wag my tiny dick around ( soon to be chopped off ).
>>16420897She also believes FTL travel is possible, for reasons she can't adequately explain.
>>16433649FTL travel belief is a shit test for a physicist>it is something that our best models keep repeatedly disprove, but I'll keep believing it because it would be very convenient for humanityit's basically the modern equivalent of a Philosopher Stone
>>16411692how the fuck did her channel grow so fast? I've been following her since the early 2010s and she went from arguing with Motl to having 1m subs in like 2 years. She wears the same unwashed pink long sleeve shirt, uses the same cheesy free sound effects, and is a general grifter who caters to whichever way the audience leans
>>16433692>general grifter who caters to whichever way the audience leansThat's why. The algorithm has changed to favour that
reminder that physicists have the highest IQ by major
What did she mean by this?
>>16411692she's such a sexy little chudette
>>16434173Going by the actual, biological, female women in /sci/, that I know irl(, but fortunately never had to work for):Making them do her work and in the end putting her own name all over it.Hossenfelder doesn't give me that impression - she appears to do the actual thinking and research herself -, but it wouldn't take me completely off-guard either.
Sabine has the same level of accomplishment as Neil DeGrasse Tyson. She is a popsci educator. Why should I listen to her opinions on the work of actual smart people?
>>16434590>https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NaQZcyYAAAAJ&hl=enGuess how I know you have never done science
>>16434605>Mostly Arxiv preprints and popsci articlesThanks for proving my point.
>>16434590Actual smart people like...
>>16434822The ones no one gives a shit about or even know?
>>16418605But that also means incels don't actually exist since there's always some pervert somewhere willing to fuck them.
>>16411692femchud phenotype.
>>16413681Show the children. Especially the children of color. This is what a scientist looks like.
What does /sci/ think of Angela Collier? How does she compare to other science and physics youtubers?(I could start a separate thread about her but there's a likelihood it gets a deletion and a ban)
>>16439123shes kinda funny and informative but imo her like cynical debunker schtick kinda gets old quick
>>16439123stupid ugly bitchkill all simps
>>16439745Your movement is good, but (you) can do better. And I say this to the mouf of you. Quit being a son(a San), and be a dad. That's all fags.
Since we're talking about women---where do I meet a smart GF now that I'm done with university.Back in university there was a really cute redhead in my complex analysis course but I never bothered to get to know her. No I regret it because I work as a computer programmer (yes I know) and the ability to meet smart women is literally 0.I do the normal social shit, parties etc but smart girls don't seem to attend these things. Feels like I lost my one chance to get a smart gf but not jumping on it while at university.Any of you know ways to meet smart women after university life is over?
>>16439123I'd drink pinot noir and make-out while i felt her up. Something tells me she has a clump o' fur in those panties....
>>16439808Let me phrase it like this: Any actually smart girl has found her man-for-life by graduation as she is very well aware of "the wall" and menopause.Also consider anything /sci/-related is an all-you-can-eat buffet for females that are into males.
>>16439123She needs to be sexually assaulted more
>>16411692How is she so cute?
even though "electric universe" is a meme, her criticism that it's all mathematical fiction was already said by those freaks over a decade ago. Any physics that's not experiment-backed is pretty much a fantasy.
>>16442037
>>16442051buy an ad
>>16433692why does she wear the same shirt in every video?
>>16411692three body problem is actually real and the aliens are fucking with our science to steal our planet
>>16411718I don't pay attention to circlejerks on /sci/ much but her "refutation" of panpsychicism is completely retarded and reductionist.
>>16443359I count six videos with a different shirt in your pic, but it's clearly part of the branding.Chances are, it's different shirts that look the same.
>>16444151She's known to do laundry everyday. Chances are it's the same shirt.
>>16442896Your positive reinforcement encourages me to propagate the opinion that Angie should be sexually assaulted more. Thank you.
>>16411877I consider beating off to her when she dresses to highlight her fat German knockers.
wtf I love sabine now
>>16418589>she doesn't even have a proper understanding of the most basic quantum principles>she doesn't even have a proper understanding of the most basic magick principles, bro!
>https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2024/>Over the past two months, perigee has been kept on the equator (argument of perigee kept near 180 degrees). That is a situation where during a perigee pass, there is the possibility to change the orbital inclination. So it is possible that near the end of the aerobraking sequence, the orbital inclination (currently 59 degrees) will be changed to a lower value, e.g. around 40 degrees as with previous X-37B missions in LEOHow? I mean, when the X-37B passes through the perigee, what is the relationship between it aerobraking a around 310 km and then doing the maneuver to change the inclination of the orbit? Aerobraking isn't sort of an equivalent to making an opposite intrack thrust?
>>16443359She's wearing a suit in D3
>>16446798>D3Which is that?>>16443359In one, she is wearing a catsuit. https://youtu.be/cox7481IE6o?feature=shared
>and yet another Hossengoblin spam thread.
>>16447812Super symmetry theoretician detected.
>>16446798That would be Elon.
>>16450327I'm the richest man in the multiverse. Elon is skittles in comparison. Fucking queer
>>16450327I mean, I have never seen Elon and Sabine in the same room together. Have you? And then "she" suddenly comes out and says "Elon" should win the Nobel prize? Kinda strange if you ask me.
>>16411692The Foundations of Physics will be saved once the Foundations of Mathematics are saved.
>>16451648>once the Foundations of Mathematics are savedOf which is still empirical in nature and susceptible to the Problem of Induction.Axioms will never be proven.
>>16433692the merchants at google promote what suits the elite
>>16451648>>16451773The only real trouble with Physics and Mathematics I see at the moment is that complete misalignment between reality and the "real" numbers.Other than that anything Mathematics appears also to be a thing in physical reality, which while being nothing but "anecdotal evidence" (at a ridiculously large scale) gives credibility to the axioms we use.
>>16411692Always has been.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g79_5OMns8
>>16451982The axioms are of course credible by virtue of empirical evidence so far; it's why deductions built upon them are useful in predicting the reality that we know right now.But when you are talking about "saving the Foundation" you are talking about somehow proving these axioms are more than just induced generalizations based on observations. It's about proving them to be eternal truths beyond reproach.That cannot be done.
>New Engineering>New Science>New FundamentalsWhat the Wright Brothers did was the first category (easiest). Splitting the atom was somewhere between the first and second categories.Explain to me how we're suppose to travel to other galaxies without the third.(build more accelerators)
there is no causality
>>16411875>current rate of stagnation in materials sciencematsci is like the one field that isn't stagnated rn>>16411692i think there are multiple elements of this. there's the overrecruitment of physicists, which leads to poor mentorship and overall student growth at the undergraduate level, which naturally leads to poorer performance in postgraduate work (which is already a small percentage of physics graduates relative to fields like bio or chem).there's also the fact that the best institutions hold the lion's share of (already qUaNTuM nonsense-focused, because our bureaucrats are retards) funding. however, in a field where every last thing is a bajillion dollars, this makes it impossible for any meaningful competition or collaboration on the level required to make nuke-tier breakthroughs.thus we turn to computational physics, where the most interesting/fruitful problems are those that supplement other fields (biophysics, comp chem, etc.) any distinct fields of physics then become abandoned because of market conditions.
>>16452656"Saving the Foundations" in my eyes means to ensure the axioms are consistent and generally give results that match observations in reality, which already appears to be the case with the Mathematics we are working with these days.They don't need to be able to make statements about fucking everything. If there are undecidable things, that's completely fine, as long as things usually work out nicely.There also doesn't need to be anything absolutely irreplaceable about the axioms. You could think up completely equivalently powerful systems of Mathematics.
>>16453570Mathematical abstraction implies that any singular mathematical explanation can have other explanations so long as they mimic their composition matches a given form.So, if the acceleration of a projectile is determined to be caused by gravity, the element that is acceleration can be broken down into many different formula that describe that constant acceleration. For example, the gravity equation between two masses replaces the typical acceleration constant. But it could be other things as well. A formula is insufficient to prove itself.
>>16411692Yes, just like all of "Modern Academia". There is no "profit" is pure science, on the contrary you can only lose money, and the more questions you answer definitively, the more "specialties" you make obsolete. They can't all be right, after all. She's one of the "smart" ones that realized that there is no "goal", or "purpose" to "Modern Physics". No one is actually trying to "solve problems", or "fix" things, they just want another "collider" to look at "muh particles n' seeeit". Pro Tip: there are no "particles" and there never were. Yet, we have "particle physicists" and "string theorists" all the same. Even they know they're full of shit. The issue is ego. "Smart" people can't possibly do "regular" jobs of the Proletariat, so they must be made glorified wards of the state, just like very "Dumb" people who also cannot exist without tax payer support. Once they're in the Welfare Industrial Complex, they know not to rock the boat, or it's all over, espeically if you're one of those ebil White Men. They're already looking for a way to get rid of your ass already, so you WILL shut-up and fall inline, or "you will no longer have a place in this department" ;) Stupid is, as stupid does and these "really smart" guys sure do act stupid ;)
>>16443359Lots of YT folks do this unironically because it's easier to edit vids that may have been shot at separate times/different outfits. If you have your "YT shirt(s)" it's very easy just throw it on for all your recordings, so you never have to go back and re-record to make two different outfits match. Crude, but effective.
>>16411692she hawt
>>16418028>Women are the reason physics is dying.No, this anon >>16418327 gets it.>>16434774>Mostly Arxiv preprintsNo.>and popsci articlesStill incomparable with NBC blackie.
>>16418327If you can design a better lawn mower please go ahead and do it. There are real problems in academia, but your post just reads like another crackpot that hasn't done the work to understand theoretical physics but still wants to be the next Einstein.
>>16423926It's 2024 chud, girls can wear glasses too
>>16423989She's just German bro
>>16453999see >>16418431
>>16411692Physics is dying because we let women try it.
>>16454622It's not "the women", it's "the humanities", which have taken over complete control of the academics and are killing it with "joy" in order to finally fucking end mankind. FOR JUSTICE! So if you disagree with them, you are a Nazi.
>>16411692this bitch is so clueless. she has a video complaining how germany is the worst country in the world because the trains are getting some delays. privileged bitch
she base
>>16454876If you aren't German, you wouldn't understand.The German railway system is the bane of the German people.Its performance is completely at odds with our stereotypical reputation and it hurts hard as fuck like you wouldn't believe.
>>16433682Physicists HATE the idea of FTL travel being impossible because that would mean we'll always be trapped in our small corner of the universe, and it would also explain why we will never encounter alien civilizations (we are too far away for spaceships or even communications to reach each other's spheres of influence).
>>16411692lol FAG
>>16455328I *THINK* there has to be a natural limit on the speed of information flow, because otherwise you'd necessarily end up with inconsistencies. And it would also ruin neat short-cuts allowing to skimp on computational effort in simulations.And that both sounds like something physicists would HATE even more than there being no means of FTL.If human FTL travel is possible, it wouldn't surprise me, if it lead to a split of continuities. The people doing FTL will be in a different world than the people that have not.Limited human interstellar travel at less than the speed of light most likely is going to happen in one way or the other - unless mankind erases itself before that -, but it's probably going to be a one-way trip for most riders.
>>16411692Physics was always kinda retarded.
>>16411877>8/10 womanYeah... in the physics department.
>>16439123Boring.
>>16411692>Is modern physics just a cashgrabbing circlejerk?Yes.Neither quantum nor gravity exists.They can't tell what REALLY exists, because you all need to think we are very short on energy and the oligarchs controlled energy - such as oil - will soon run out. So you need to pay crazy prices and be energy slave .However. As soon as you realize all this quantum and gravity is a circle jerk and is all wrong. You may be able immediatly find massive sources of energy all around you and all over the planet . And the oil monopolists and oligarchs really don't like that. >>16411715>the reasons physics has failed is that it uses cult techniques to market itself to normies No , it's what I said above. So that nobody randomly finds the real physics and basically massive storages of free energy everywhere.
>>16411877you are not European
