press F to pay respects for her wonderful world bringing science to americans
>>16475964The media's influence on the public is starting to wane. Time to get out of that grift and find a new one before the funding dries up.
>>16475964so this was the bitch that gutted SciAm?
>>16475964Another psychologist pretending to be a scientist and ruining the reputation of science.
>>16476259It's the way of business majors. Show up for four years, gut the system, put on your CV how much you've changed the system and get a new position. It works for chancellors and provosts as well. Fuck up a university. Take millions in salary. "Retire" meaning you stay salaried from university #1 and move on to another university pulling double salary while fuckin that one too and so on. It's a ponzi scheme at this point.
>>16475964My wife used to love magazines until exactly 10 years ago when they all went insane. Her vomit reflex has saved me thousands of dollars a year. The entire Conde Nast portfolio devolved into political garbage in the fall of 2015
>>16476621Correct.It was really bad.
>>16475964Retarded American>>16481060Goats are cool
>>16476621Look at that leaf. Literally the domain of God.
The only endurance race with a large enough sample size to conclude women are better at that particular sport is long distance swimming, where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge. The other sports are too niche to determine if there's a gender difference or individual difference. Males and females are built different, something understood by humanity until a few years ago when a small slice of it went insane. As long distance swimming shows, it is possible for an athletic competition to exist where the biology of females gives them an edge over males. But that's not what activists are pushing. They want everyone to believe that females are as good at basketball as males, which simply isn't the case. When you show that head to head males destroy females in such competitions, they claim that's because females aren't given the same resources as males instead of observing the obvious biological differences that give males a performance edge.It's weird that they keep pushing on things that are obviously untrue instead of focusing on creating athletic competitions that advantage female biology. Long distance swimming is one such competition. There are some like Netball that males rarely play so we don't know if females are better than males or not. We do know that in sports like football, males are better due to biology. It seems unlikely that long distance swimming is the only possibility for a female advantaged sport but activists don't like putting in hard work to create, they just want to wear the skinsuit of what others have created and call it their own.
>>16486784>natural upper body buoyancyor to use a technical term, booba
>>16486784>1.35 MB JPGThe only endurance race with a large enough sample size to conclude women are better at that particular sport is long distance swimming, where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge. The other sports are too niche to determine if there's a gender difference or individual difference.It's easy in tennis: if women and men were totally equal, then a female training against purely other females would be just as strong as a man training purely against other men. So for instance the velocity of the ball would be identical for this woman and this man.It turns out they are not.
National Geographic
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1860298705993085012BSM comes to the defense of crazy science lady.
>>16475964what if I just call her work gay and leave
>>16475964In her defense, SciAm has been a trash publication since at least the turn of the century. If you have any significant specialty knowledge of science then you noticed how shitty the publication was when it covered your field. However the overwhelming majority of people do not have such knowledge so most people don't recognize how shit it is, plus a lot of retards will read a terrible and misleading article about their own field and then get the Gell-Mann amnesia effect and presume that articles they lack background info on are accurate.
>>16511303>Gell-Mann amnesia effectI independently discovered that while reading Scientific American, it wasn't until years later that I found out Gell-Mann had already placed his name on the concept
>>16476259>guttedits been a trash publication for decades, popsci is always trash, its popularity is explained by the dunning kruger effect >i watched a 10 minute youtube video, now i understand this field of science as well as people who've been at it professionally for decades
>>16490724another trash tier publication which also falsely claims to be science oriented
>>16475964>makes scientists do free work for her>pay respectsacademic editors can fuck off
>>16515568Name a single good science oriented publication. protip: you can't
>>16486784>where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge.Hot
>>16475964translation: i've ran it into the ground and destroyed it's reputation and now that there is nothing left to destroy i'll move on elsewhere
>>16516462Scientific American is not a science journal, it's a popular science magazine.>>16517527Physics World
>>16475964Press S to science.
>>16518441video game journalism should be her next move
>>16519701I didn't realize she was trans
What did she mean by this?
>>16476592
>>16475964Scientific Amurican has been a liberal left political shit rag for decades
>>16486784>>16490464>>16517552not "upper body" it's the greater amount of fatpicrel is ultra-long distance champion swimmer
>>16521270Fat men exist.
>>16521270>>16521819Damn, she is like a human version of a manatee. Makes sense I guess.
>>16523203good magazine lol
>>16486784I like boob Sincerely, Anonymous PhD
>>16476592I work as an IT consultant and I see the workings of many different kinds of companies. By far the biggest and most common issue are incompetent and power-grabbing MBAs.
>>16524183wrong, the biggest problem is minorities and women
>>16521257
>>16526596There is a large body of evidence proving that Europeans were the original settlers of the Americas, its not just the genetic evidence that shows it.
>>16518458>Physics Worldsoislop
>>16476621>Her vomit reflex has saved me thousands of dollars a year.what is this supposed to mean, is this sexual?
>>16521264all mainstream 'science' publications are like this, just thinly disguised political propaganda
>>16534254Why is it that all of the mainstream publications that are "just thinly disguised political propaganda" are all propagandizing one set of views and one political agenda? If we lived in a truly free society wouldn't all sets of views and agendas have their own propaganda outlets?
>>16535270stop being so antisemitic
>>16535270It's a combination of several things. Because so much of science is reliant on government funding, "science" wants big government. There's also the quirk of religious people being more conservative than non-religious people while science is somewhat anti-religion, at least currently. Then you have that journalists for whatever reason tend to have lots of mental and substance abuse problems, both of which are more closely related to leftist ideology than to conservationism.
>>16535270All dying media goes left, all left media dies.Bad propaganda pushes out good readers.What percentage of American scientists read scientific American magazine in the 60s... maybe 50%? Maybe more? Now look at the nu-left SciAm subscriber numbers as a percentage of scientists, or a percentage of Americans.0.00609% of the worlds population reads that shitty dying magazine... The other 99.9939% of the planets population won't even pick up a copy to line a birdcage or wrap fish; it is a dying media, how could it not be ultra leftist?
>>16539349it would be more popular if it was printed on toilet paper
>>16526596If thats true then why did Europeans develop the most advanced technological society in all of human history while American indians were still living in the stone age before they were fortunate enough to have Whites gift them all the benefits of European knowledge?
>>16543262miscegenation
>>16475964F
>>16476570Science will never regain it's reputation until non-Christians are excluded. "The scientific method" is Christian theology.
>>16553182I was required to become well versed in the formally defined structure of the scientific method before I was allowed to purse a STEM degree.
>>16476621>Her vomit reflexYou have a smart wife anon.
>>16554782You must be old. That sort of knowledge will you b& from academia these days
>>16486784If women are better at long distance swimming than why do men have all the long distance world records and in almost all competitions they finish several hours faster? This seems like a myth.
