[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
11/18/24(Mon)09:13:37 No.16480710
Anonymous 11/18/24(Mon)09:13:37 No.16480710 Archived
Is there a formula or algorithm that can calculate the number of self-avoiding walks in any given lattice?
>>
Anonymous
11/18/24(Mon)09:21:49 No.16480718
Anonymous 11/18/24(Mon)09:21:49 No.16480718
>>16480710
You couldn't even make it through the Introduction in the Wikipedia page?!? Talk about low effort.
>>
Anonymous
11/18/24(Mon)17:56:04 No.16481388
Anonymous 11/18/24(Mon)17:56:04 No.16481388
>>16480710
>algorithm that can calculate the number of self-avoiding walks in any given lattice
try every possibility for smaller lattices and count them up then extrapolate
>>
Anonymous
11/18/24(Mon)20:06:48 No.16481529
Anonymous 11/18/24(Mon)20:06:48 No.16481529
>>16480710
https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~bisse101/Articles/schram12.pdf
>>
?????iguessthisishowitsdone???(...)
11/19/24(Tue)05:10:34 No.16482001
?????iguessthisishowitsdone????? 11/19/24(Tue)05:10:34 No.16482001
Now imagine that lattice being 256 and non-euclidean LOL
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.