[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Luna.jpg (2.14 MB, 2580x2452)
2.14 MB
2.14 MB JPG
What definition do you think makes the most sense? IAU definition or geophysical definition?
>>
>>16480868
anything that closely resembles the radius of your mom's ass.
>>
Planet is a stupid historic label.
We should use a metric system to identify space objects.

Like for example:
Class I - Mass ranging from 10^20 kg to 10^22 kg
Class II - Mass ranging from 10^22 kg to 10^24 kg
and so on
(placeholder names and numbers)
>>
>>16480879
>Let's make space more autistic.
>>
Moons aren't planets, they're moons.
>>
>>16481145
Uhmm actually some moons (such as the Earth's Moon) are Satellite Planets.
>>
>>16480868
They’re all arbitrary in a sense. Take Pluto. Its barycenter with Charon lies outside its radius. And, of course, astrophysicists will cope by saying it’s a “minor planet” or a “dwarf planet”. But it’s not inconceivable to have some anomalous star system with an Earth-sized planet having such a massive moon that their barycenter is outside their Roche limit.

Similarly, dwarf planets have more in common with rocky planets than gas giants. There is the same vagueness in definitions. What is Jupiter’s radius? Fuck if I know because there’s no clear solid boundary. But I can tell you Earth’s or Pluto’s average radius just fine despite them supposedly being in two different classes.

And then there are double and triple star systems where it all goes to hell. Is a rocky object orbiting a brown dwarf orbiting a star a planet or a moon? Really depends on whom you ask.
>>
>>16480868
IAU seems fine. Having enough mass to clear its orbit of objects or capture said objects sounds about right.
>>
the moon isn't a planet faggot, give it up
>>
>>16481435
Neither is Pluto
>>
>>16480868
IMO:::
Big enough to be round and with a rocky surface, it's a planet.
Big enough to be round but without a rocky surface, it's a gas "giant" (or whatever you want to call it; gas planet, gas sphere, gas ass)
Big enough to be round and glowing by way of nuclear furnace, it's a star

Everything else gets to keep the same designations. an asteroid is some shit that isn't big enough to be round (demos and phobos are thus satellite asteroids)
comet is used to clean your sink etc
>>
>>16480868
Was about to reply seriously, when I saw the filename.

(You)
>>
>>16481691
Explain
>>
>>16482024
He doesn't need to explain nuffin
>>
>>16480868
Any significant enough body of mass capable of unifying it's matter into a sphere like geometric shape, clear out its immediate orbital environment from any major material space debris through absorption and one that orbits not another body of rock or small gas but a star.
That would be a planet.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.