Going forward is simple, just travel at relativistic speed for awhile. But why is it only possible to go in one direction in the 4th dimension?
>>16535861Its easy to do in consciousness, but the material which made up the past existence is no longer in the past, so you end up only interacting with the consciousness of the past.
>>16535861>>>16535861its weirder than you thinkits impossible because time is not a dimensiondimension 1: widthit does not determine how long it takes to travel axis into two possible directionsdimension 2 : heightit does not determine how long it takes to travel axis into two possible directionsdimension 3 : depthit does not determine how long it takes to travel axis into two possible directionstherefore, dimensions do not possess the qualities of time = time is not a dimensionso what are the qualities of time?there is only one, how much does it take time to accomplish somethingthere is no direction for its movementgoing backwards in time would violate rule of entropyentropy must always reach its highest, not lowestgoing backwards in time does go into lower entropy and its not possible in our universe
>>16535883Time is a property of matter and a spatial dimension as einstein said, time dilation proves this. If you can travel at 90% lightspeed for 10 years and arrive back on earth 300 years in the future how do you do the opposite?
>>16535888>If you can travel at 90% lightspeed for 10 years and arrive back on earth 300 years in the future how do you do the opposite?The opposite cannot be accomplished.What einstein did not take into account, is that everything is about thermodynamics.Thermodynamics is the reason you cannot go against entropy.
>>16535899>even videogames use X,Y,Z and Wwouldnt you want to elaborate further how these 4 dimensions show in a video game?lets say Doom 2016?
>>16535906so far our observations would indicate thermodynamics effectively functions as a law you cant go againstat least we havent seen yet anything that shows otherwise
>>16535861Because there is no backwards or forwards in time, there are events which are preceded and succeeded by other events, to go ""back"" in time you would have to reverse this order and put effect before cause, which is physically not possible
>>16535888>If you can travel at 90% lightspeed for 10 years and arrive back on earth 300 years in the futureThat's not what would happen
>>16535932>>16535914if you know of something, a phenomenon where theory of entropy can be reversed, within our universe, please tell about it
>>16535934If you know of something that demonstrates entropy is 100% absolute, please show.You cannot deny the question because you haven't seen anything that counters the framework yet. That's the antithesis of science. The correct answer is "our models function correctly under the assumption", because that is all we have.
>>16535888Just travel minus speeds in the other direction.
there's no 4th dimension you retard
>>16535861Because God keeps an ultimate ledger of every single thing that's happened in the past, and if you try to go back God gets mad
>>16535934>a phenomenon where theory of entropy can be reversedentropy gets reversed all the time, wtf are you on about
>>16536300Negentropy is reverse entropy. It means things becoming more in order. Here 'order' means organisation, structure and function: the opposite of randomness or chaos. Example is life.As a general rule, everything in the universe tends towards entropy. Star systems eventually become dead. All energy has gone, and everything in the system is at the temperature of the surrounding space. The opposite of entropy is negentropy. It is a temporary condition in which certain things are hotter and more highly organised than the surrounding space. This is the second law of thermodynamics:The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system always increases over time.Life is considered to be negentropic because it converts things which have some order, such as food, into things with more order, such as cells in the body, tissues, and organs. In doing so, it gives off heat. Another example of negentropic things are societies, or social systems, because they take disorderly things such as communications, and make them more orderly and useful.
>>16535861It's not, I'm doing it right now. (I'm on my way to go fuck your mom.)
>>16535903Why did matrix normalization in video games get deleted? 3d vectors in affine space need W for calculating perspective in projected space. It's essentially the imposed scalor metric for distance. Without W you would need to calculate every object vertex but with w you basically place the object than warp the projected space...giving it perspective.
>>16535914Thermodynamics isn't the law of the universe. It models what we think we know about the laws of the universe. The model isn't the phenomenon.Depending on who you believe some of the laws of thermodynamics have been experimentally violated. I would also love to hear your theory as to how beta negative decay doesn't violate thermodynamics.
>>16535903https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y53UNskR-zUalso just quaternions
>>16536153Higher dimensional beings want you to believe this.
>>16536848Higher dimensional beings should be disregarded.
>>16535861because time doesnt exist, the past is obviously not here, the future is also non existent, leaving only the presentthe past only exists in your mind, its a form of "memory", "this is how things were some arbitrary amount of time measures ago"even if time was real, time travel back would not be possible because of the second law of thermodynamics, if an object was sent back in time to where it was say 5 seconds agothen it would go in an infinite loop, it goes back in time, it repeats its action that it did for those 5 seconds, then goes back in time, then repeats this process forever because nothing can break it from this loopthis means that this object would exist forever, which would mean infinite energy, and infinite entropy, something that is not possiblesci fi gets away from that, by introducing alternate timelines, where if you go back in time you dont go back to where you were, but you instead get sent to another timeline/dimension, and go from there.not sure how that counts as time travel in my opinion, youre just traveling to another world where things havent progressed as much, real time travel wouldnt have any timelines or alternate universesanyway time traveling forward is also impossible, because you need to travel faster than light, which is not possiblethe only things that can reach light speed is objects that are 0 grams (only photons), no object including humans in the universe can get close to 0 grams, let alone negative weight to go faster than lighttime travel is a theoretical idea in the minds of humans, not something that could ever exist,
>>16535888einstein is a jew and a retard who stole all his theories from other men
>>16536848>theres no 3d beings in 2d dimensions, but there are 4d beings in 3d dimensionlow iq tards want you to believe this
>>16535929his numbers are wrong, it would take closer to 99.7% lightspeed for 10 years to take 300 years, but that's how it worksWhat I want to know is if you can stop all your motion relative to space, canceling out your vector from the earth spinning, from orbiting the sun, from the solar system orbiting the center of the galaxy, and finally from the galaxy itself traveling through space, how much faster would you age?
>>16536866Cope. You probably have weak, girly tranny wrists too.
>>16537002>the post>the board
>>16535928Time dilation allows you to time travel into the future though
>>16535861Backwards travelling happens all the time in quantum world. But there's cosmic censorship principle to make sure it stays hidden until time "catches up".
>>16536864>einstein is* WAS, retard
>>16538416Backwards time travel is perfectly allowed, so long as the event that caused it is able to catch the reverse event.Since it would all happen superluminally, there would be no mechanism to intercept the paradox event, and it would stay self-contained.
>>16535861because theory of relativty suggests and seems in fact that as you get closer to a planet time doesnt bend. So if it had some margin of error it would allow you to travel in the future by 2 seconds or whatever it is theoretically. if you had to time travel you should need to make a synthetic planet or space in space then time travel.
>>16536864Based Lorentz enjoyer
>>16536864this is assuming he existed lol
>>16538457Einstein was a hack and relatively isn't a unified theory.
>>16538439>Spellcheck >I'm so smart Not them but people like you need to go back.
>>16537560You are already travelling into the future, time dilation is not magic
What you mean you can't travel to future? Drink enough, and that's exactly where you will land in :PJokes aside, >>16536311, what about reverse rankine cycle? If entrophy can be reduced in this process used by something like refrigerator, why same can't apply to universe, if it is an isolated system.Or am I completely retarded?
