I don't doubt some are born more mentally gifted than others but I doubt that IQ is an accurate measure of intelligence.What exactly is intelligence? Is it learning speed? Is it the quantity of how much you memorize? Is it the ability to concentrate? Is it reaction time? What makes you think a paper with a number score can accurately measure something as complex as intelligence? How do you describe the fact that many supposed geniuses can believe obvious lies and supposed idiots that are able to see through these obvious lies? There are some gifted with incredible memory where they can literally describe everyday of their life with such detail, or have incredible photographic memory where they can be at a helicopter, see the city once, then able to draw that city. IQ tests are psuedoscience with no confirmed merit of truth unless proven otherwise.
IQ scores correlate with intelligence but don't measure it. A better measure of intelligence would be how effectively someone can manipulate their environment. How would you quantify that? I don't fucking know, ask someone else
>>16535892>ncredible photographic memory where they can be at a helicopter, see the city once, then able to draw that city.That shit is so fucking dumb. He picks up landmarks and then scribbles in the rest that's just gibberish. There is no such thing as a photographic memory. If that were true then he would be able to do perfect still lives as well or draw a horse from memory. I'm a professional artist with 15 years of experience, 8 years of figure drawing and I still need reference to fill in the details I don't remember perfectly. I'm considered a master artist by my peers and have been featured in magazines and artbooks (like masters of anatomy).When photography became big, pictures of horses were very popular. Which in turn, made artists go back to their old paintings that included horses and fix all their mistakes they made because they didn't have all the details originally. If you look at paintings of horses before photography they are fucking hilarious looking.
>>16535944Are you sure you're not just coping by denying the existence of photographic memory all because someone may naturally be a better artist than you?
>>16535944You can actually measure the heuristical oversight of the photographic memory or even eidetic memory sequencer within the fallacious super tautological cognitive theoretical model that infers the presuppositions of yours that photopgraphic memory is not measurable. This is possible through digit span or visual memory heuristics called the epistemic fallacy of the 21st century. I've concluded you have a low to average working memory index. Maybe this isnt for you after all
>>16535904Retard take.
>>16536026ok chatcpt.>>16535958you're retarded. Even an artist like kim jung gi who is pretty famous for just "winging it" and getting his anatomy and perspective pretty accurate without any physical guide lines still uses guide lines, he just does it in his head. He builds characters just like every other figure artist does.The guy OP is talking about gets like 3 landmarks down and then just makes up shit for hours on end. I could do that. It's far from photographic memory. That guy has probably seen a thousand bicycles, but ask him to draw one and I would bet you a million dollars he would get it wrong.
>>16535892Let me guess, you took an IQ test and got butthurt over the result.Seethe harder, retard.
>>16536066This, I got 100 FSIQ on the wais and im content
>>16535892there's an underdiscussed value of applying wisdom to the patterns you decide to recognizeIQ is like the strength of a bulletwisdom is the accuracytoo many people focus on IQ while ignoring the practical value of their pursuitscomoputer science is a perfect example of thishard working 140+ IQ tech wizards devoting their lives to frontend web development because it's a comfortable and lucrative careerabsolute waste
intelligence is just one behavioural trait, personality is another, if one has a high intelligence but lacks the personality to properly apply it then someone with lower intelligence but better personality traits will succeed better
>>16536065ill take that as a compliment, thats my innate reasoning
>>16535904An even better measure of intelligence would be how intelligent someone is. Does that sound a little meaningless and circular? That's because it is, just like your silly proposition.
>>16535892>great photographic memory == intelligencenot really. he doesn't really do anything with the info except replicate it. nor, iirc, does the building get committed to long-term memory. he has a lot of RAM whereas high intelligence (which IQ diagnoses by way of g-factor) is akin to a powerful CPU. even hyperthymestics (people with anomalously strong long-term memory) tend to score only alright on IQ tests.arguing for the validity of IQ tests, the fact that there exists a bell curve that's resistant to practice or other, only tangentially related mental skills implies that those who score well have *some* cognitive advantage, however inexact. working memory testing is a part of a comprehensive IQ test, but the main batteries consist of using it to make predictions rather than purely for storage and retrieval. >>16535958photographic memory has not been measured to exist in any appreciable capacity.
>>16535904Electrogravitronics are probably highest IQ stuff ever.
>>16535892I think I’m smarter than my friend who is better than me at video games. I can’t beat him no matter how hard I try. He thinks he’s smarter because he’s better than me at video games. I think if I beat him in chess he would have to concede.
Intelligence is the ability to find beneficial patterns and sanity is the ability to ignore unbeneficial patterns.
>>16536272Some people just have better situational awareness than others. They know what the enemy is going to do before they do it. This differs from game to game, like counterstrike is much more linear than a game like battlefield, so the players choices are more limited.For an example when I use to play BF2 hardcore I was absolutely unstoppable. Easily 100-0 a match. One of the most obvious tactics was if you run into someone around a corner of a building. Naturally, most people will wait for the enemy to come to them thinking they have the advantage but this is far from the truth. In reality, if you know where the other player is (aka around the corner) if you take the initiative and rush them you 1: know exactly where they are and 2: can react faster because of this. You will win 100% of the time rather than waiting for the player to come to you.Another game where I would easily get extremely high kill/death ratios was planetside 2. I would fly a reaper and if an enemy mosquito or whatever would tail me, I would just fly behind a tower so they lose sight of me, and then do an immediate 180 and rise above the obstruction and obliterate them. Most pilots get stuck in what I call a death spiral, where they just circle each other over and over again until a wingman comes in an changes things.Your friend probably just has better reflexes than you. Even a strategy game like starcraft while admittedly takes some chess level thinking, your clicks per minute and resource management (using it as fast as possible) is a physical limit to how good you are at the game.
>>16535892ask yourself would you rather have an IQ of 80 or 120 if you dont know meet an 80 IQ person theyre usually black and dysgenic as fuck lmfao GL
>>16535892IQ is specialized. There are no Tony Starks or Rick Sanchezs in real life.
>>16535892>I got a score on my IQ test that I'm unhappy about, so it must be the test that's stupid.We hear this a lot.
What would you guys guess is the max increase one can get from the practice effect? >I mean practice as in repeating the question.>Thinking what the possible answer can be.>Not guessing the answer or even researching the answers>Then doing subsequent tests which don't have the same questions but apply similar testing strategies.Let's also assume the scores of (40 - 140) of the SB5.
I sat in a astrophysics lecture once Who cares what semantics capture intelligence outside of wisdom?
Gotta watch the dopamine, i get addicted to hunting inefficiencies mispriced market better than pussy?Yea, not really. Better yet it's getting me pussy. Fuck mods the latticework model God's can cus
>>16535892All I can say is you know it when you see it.In the broad category of mental exercises yeah some people are just clearly superior. It's not one thing it's all the things.Learn faster, solve problems better, recognize more complex patterns, consider more details, think in more creative ways and see things other people just can't. That's the best way I can describe it. A higher level of intelligence just sees what you can't.You really can't fake intelligence. You can fake competency. Anybody can get really good at just one hyper specialized thing. But the smartest person is by nature a generalist. They can do whatever they want. Everything is like an open book. Intelligence is the secret ingredient to breaking the limitations and making something new.
>>16540668Blackpill.
>>16535904>Arsonist are the most intelligent people on the planet.
