[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
discrete QM thought experiment 01/11/25(Sat)17:54:20 No.16543060
File: Screenshot (2).png (2.21 MB, 1524x1028)
2.21 MB
2.21 MB PNG
discrete QM thought experiment Anonymous 01/11/25(Sat)17:54:20 No.16543060 Archived
I remember finding a book a few years ago that used a thought experiment on a simple (discrete?) universe to show how QM cannot be interpreted in a classical way with hidden variables etc. I cannot remember the books title, but trying to find something similar to understand the basic argument
>>
Anonymous
01/12/25(Sun)00:13:33 No.16543390
Anonymous 01/12/25(Sun)00:13:33 No.16543390
>>16543060
"The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" by Roland Omnès
"Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics" by Nick Herbert
"The Fabric of Reality" by David Deutsch
"The Quantum World" by Kenneth Womack
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.