i mean, maybe? I don't get what all the hype about quantum is about desu, seems like people just nerding out, from a computer science perspective my understanding is there are very few theoretical reasons that a quantum computer would be better than a regular computer. Quantum computing has a certain nerd aura/glamour to it which i feel is unjustified.

>>16543419
You say nothing in a large number of werds.

>>16543422
fancy physics machine big waste of time

thats all just the cooling dumbass

>>16543416
>Shower thought
>>>/r/eddit

File: kumiko_01.png (3.93 MB, 1579x1800)

3.93 MB PNG

>>16543424
>fancy physics machine big waste of time

>>16543416
were the light bulb switch computers back then massive sink holes for research money with no real improvements over time?

>>16543529
it's essentially a scam in which they use the mystery and intrigue around quantum physics to siphon money for a pointless engineering project

>>16543416
>light bulb switch

>>16543529
We need ambient condition superconductors to get anywhere near productive. It's engineering that's waiting on matsci (ion trap is the real scam tbqh)

File: reality.jpg (107 KB, 746x795)

107 KB JPG

>>16543416
i`m sure it will eventually morph/smurf to Father Abraham

>>16543529
Let me guess, you want flying cars and to waste time on some math question that no living thing could ever test.

>>16543416
Shower thought: today's standard binary logic microprocessor based computers are already quantum.
The real step forward is analog logic using electromagnetic interference.

>>16544423
>are already quantum.

They very objectively and demonstrably are not