She's a believer. You would think she would hate theories like this.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqIjhcEb-MU>hates simulation theory>I Believe The Universe Might Be Able To Think
>>16543848>Might
Well I'm part of the universe and I'm able to think, so that's just factually accurate. Not sure why she'd hedge with "I believe" though.
I found it strange she talked about locality when it was proven the universe isn't locally real. It's something that supports the theory. Quantum information travels instantly so distances don't matter.
>>16543848My brain is in the universe, therefore it can think
>>16543916she believes in superdeterminismdesu that means every particle since the dawn of time has been engaged in a secret conspiracy to generate nonsensical experimental results, so actually "the Universe can think" is arguably the less ridiculous claim
0.999... = 1the earth is roundgalactic filaments are not brain cellsthere is no integer between 6 and 7angular momentum is conservedmixed race people are not steriledevils tower is not a tree stumpberenstain was always spelled that way5g is not a secret assassination weaponyour vortex theory with no equations will not revolutionize physicsyou are too unimportant to gangstalk
>>16544369>0.999... = 1Then numeration has no meaning and is purely hypothetical conjectures outside of defined reality.>the earth is roundOblate spheroid.>galactic filaments are not brain cells1≠.9...yet you correlated a god of the gaps to fill in the differences while adhering to the similarities.>there is no integer between 6 and 7Integers do not exist in reality, also see #1.>angular momentum is conservedMandlbaur.>mixed race people are not sterileRh- and Rh+ can cause rejection of baby and death.>devils tower is not a tree stumpDefine how carbon in a tree and carbon on the moon are different, then do the rest of the elements in the tree.>berenstain was always spelled that way"the misspelling of his father's name had plagued Stan since elementary school"Science is aboit consensus, his name has been peer reviewed as "False".>5g is not a secret assassination weaponLoading the air with ElectroMagnetic energy makes inducing energy in devices, and people, easier, requiring less energy to do so.>your vortex theory with no equations will not revolutionize physicsUsing binary will never measure dynamic, and vice versa, as Uni-Versities teach specific measure theories that the rest of their science is founded on, thus, using your understanding of the Uni-Verse in binaric terms will never translate to dynamic. This is why "Theories of Everything" are difficult for even professors to digest; they have to dump all previous known knowledge and rebuild it in theory to measure the theory.>you are too unimportant to gangstalkThen why would the government flood the internet with bots to interact with everyone? Because everyone is important.
>>16543848personally I believe any quantity of matter you pick has a consciousness, but the lack of ability of said quantity to have a memory and processing makes it impossible for it to "know" it is conscioushowever, the quantity we call humans can "know"and I believe that if we could link two human's memories (long and short term) together, they would have the impression of being the same person at the same time, with latency, although we ourselves, are multiple thinking things linked together, with latency, so it would just feel like now, with statistically significantly more processes so you'd be aware of it
>>16544369>your vortex theory with no equations will not revolutionize physicsThat's the part where you're wrong though kiddo
Sabine isn't well.
>>16544369this post is glowing brighter than the sun
>>16543848>can the universe thinkYes, it's called a lifeform, usually comes with a brain, but God must've forgotten when making Sabine
Sooo... absence of observation not ruling out string theory is bad science, but absence of observation not ruling out brain universe is somehow ok because she's afraid of becoming an old sclerotic theoretician?bakaAlso, the structure of the Universe is foam-like, not neural-net-like.
She's not wrong. There isn't really a coherent theory of consciousness yet. All we know if that its somehow related to our brains acting like an organic computer. But we know that computing itself is an abstract concept and that computers can theoretically take many forms. So its easy to imagine that computers capable of consiousness could arise outside organic contexts, even if we don't yet know them. And she mentions the need for evolution, but imo that's an unnecessary constraint. Humans evolved, but that doesn't mean other things have to. There may be innate biases in physical laws that tend toward producing computing structures. Or it could just be something that happens randomly. Like in a sufficiently large universe, shouldn't random chemistry interactions eventually make a RTX 5090 just by accident?
>>16545367I tend along those same lines, although a little different. I think there is probably a consciousness field that extends through space, and what your brain is doing is acting as antenna that lets your body interact with that field. Other living things are doing this also, they just have worse antennas.
>>16543848She is literally a schizophrenic worse than most of this board
>>16544433Cult, you skitzo retard, get off this board
>>16545969I'm doubtful about that, there would be no evolutionary benefit towards using consciousness antennas.Consciousness being a cheap given every bit of matter has makes more sense to me
>>16545969>consciousness fieldholy fucking shit you are all fucking retarded
>>16543848>social media scientist>says whatever will get clickspass
>>16545997have you ever even watched 2 of her videos
>>16546414no because it reveals his bullshit and he doesn't like how that feels
She is a post menopause crystal lady at heart, of course she's into this shit.
>>16543848She's a grifter. I would think she'll happily blabber about any topic that gets views on (you)tube.
>>16546437>She is a post menopause crystal ladyWhy are women like this?
>>16543848She started grifting after she saw how her anti-science videos blew up.Where there's money, there's dishonesty. She probably doesn't believe in that crap herself.
>>16546896A girl's brain stops evolving at age 15--20 when the girl discovers by first hand experience that no matter how stupid or smart, beautiful or ugly, nice or evil she is, she will get dozens of cumbrain orbiters free of charge giving her free attention, free sex, free money and solving her daily problems.
>>16546414No because she is a woman therefore she cannot have anything smart or interesting to say.
>hates pseudoscience>presents pseudoscience>doesn't provide any good logical reasons for itIn her case this is no different than if she said she believes God exists. Her pseudoscience is better because it's not a popular theory made by a man. She would probably support simulation theory if it was made by a woman. She knows simulation theory is right and she's pissed she didn't think of it first.
>Proving God exists? No, simulation theory suck because it doesn't solve climate change.>Btw buy my book where I talk about how the universe has a consciousness.>But Sabine, that doesn't solve climate change.>SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT UP!
it's funny how women always view themselves as above the cliché of being glorified petulant children, and yet due to their lack of critical thinking they always sink (if they start higher) to this level and they don't even realize it.
There are actually good reasons to think universe has a consciousness. It pisses me off she isn't smart enough to list just one. Her reasoning is that consciousness is connected to the exchange of information and that's something that happens in the universe, like wtf reasoning is that?
>>16543848I think she is pretty based and her thoughts here might be true.simulation theory to me is just to much space-time. not for us but for the ones simulating us.there might be a lot out there but thinking about a 'bigger' world that contains a simulation we are running on would mean space-time is also fundamental for the bigger world and Im not willing to believe that because why then why shouldnt we get a glimpse of that.
