Scientists predicted a massive SoCal earthquake (98% probability according to their models) and they failed magnificently. How come they're unable to accurately predict something as commonplace as an earthquake accurately? They have massive amounts of data to work with, tons of instrumentation and readings to go off of and decades of well measured previous tectonic activity to study. Yet given all that plus enormous budgets to work with and they are still no better at predicting earthquakes than a tarot card reader.
>>16554343you can never have 100% certainty on anything and any result is valid. in this case you collapsed in the 2%. this reality is weird like that
>>16554343Why can't YOU predict earthquakes?
>>16554343Why don't you tell me how they're supposed to do that
>>16554343>Scientists[citation needed]
>>16554343The earthquake did happen though. Hello?
