>>16555449
what other powerful groups blocked what other types of science for whatever other reasons I wonder

>>16555449
because the testosterone content of science is in freefall and testosterone correlates directly with a willingness to speak the truth instead of internaising it.

>>16555449
>What are they trying to hide?
Everything. Those who say that academia was established by the catholic church are almost right. Catholic Church was established by academia, which existed at least since Plato and always was a political circle of fucking commie pederasts.

>>16555473
>Catholic Church was established by academia, which existed at least since Plato and always was a political circle of fucking commie pederasts.
This sounds insane and retarded but it's somewhat agrees with my findings, it's just a bunch of bureacrat types trying to use mysticism to earn money and power.

>>16555480
It does sound insane. And though it started as trolling of my own beliefs, it seems to be extremely accurate the more I look into this possibility:
Academia is the name Plato named his cult.
Christians destroyed all the classical work, but for whatever reason spared work of Plato's lineage.
Plato is infamous for plotting to burn down all works by Democritus (the predecessor of quantum physics) and not a single work of that great mind survived.
Socrates, the teacher of Plato, the guy of whom we know from Plato was teaching monotheism and pederasty (was sentenced to death for corrupting the youth, you were taught a special interpretation of that sentence, an interpretation making zero sense since Greece was valuing intellectual freedoms like nothing else.
What else is there.. oh, there's a lot actually. Allow this hypothesis and you shall start noticing the tiny detail of this interpretation of reality yourself.

>>16555493
Kind of a sind point but do you know anything of the medieval forger I think his name was something like plotinus who forged a lot of supposedly historical works such as those attributed to Plato?

>>16555510
No, I only know Plotinus the philosopher.
And my sources were nothing esoteric. The story about Plato dreaming of destroying the legacy of Democritus comes from Diogenes Laertius.

>>16555516
I think it was something I came across on unz., they were talking about the worls of men like gunnar heinsohn who found that most of the historic timeline of the first millenium is fake and that the scribes duplicated events to make it fit. remarkably one example they split st paul into 3 entirely separate groups all in the same area of antioch but separated aross several centuries. they push events they didn't like deeper into history
which brings up sumer/chaldea

my research led me to sumer and the legacy of debt jubilees.
my thoughts were that what jesus was was a guy promoting a debt jubilee to undo all the problems rome was having with their debt problem.
I suspect the cult of rome took it over.and redirected it but I've not properly followed that up, part of it is [robably because it started in places like alexandria so rome wanted to monopolise control.
and then there's the really weird parts about britain and the great cataclysm that left traces of black earth all across europe and north africa from london toe memphis

>>16555527
>gunnar heinsohn who found that most of the historic timeline of the first millenium is fake and that the scribes duplicated events to make it fit.
It is a very popular theory today. But I am sceptical about it. It could be the truth, sure, but I think we should wait a little longer, so that ai is going to make science of its own. So far it can only parrot the consensus, thus it is on par with regular academicians.

>>16555449
Yes, hello. I would like one McNutt, hold the salt.

It's because you have one political class largely made up of actors who just want what they want. I was always racist growing up, but I always wanted to address any racial shortcomings through genetic engineering and social conditioning. These people in the meanwhile believe that any evidence contrary to their world view is just people out to wrongly target others. We're both bigoted, but how we approach these things is different. Like how a lot of dead scientists truly believed in God but didn't want to pervert the truth of their discoveries because they believed it would be profane because God made it, and now you get a lot of types that just lie because they don't believe there is significant oversight to punish them.

>>16555536
>It is a very popular theory today.
I can see it, I try to stick to the more legitimate inconsustencies highlighted by the archaeology not the wild speculators. It definitely makes a few things more logical timeline wise.
A weakness I see is heinsohn's affinity with jewish organisations and warmongerers and that soviet russian guy running speculative estimates off of astrological movements

>>16555510
>>16555527
>>16555559
Did you curved the conversation manifesting a sophisticated form of censorship?