Verification Required EditionDuolicious is an online dating app, but based and true love-pilled.>Duolicious websitehttps://web.duolicious.app>Duolicious Githubhttps://github.com/duolicious>Server statushttps://thereisnosanity.com/duo/>Donate Linkhttps://ko-fi.com/duoliciousPrevious thread: >>33423908
>>33500095I used the wrong field again FUCK
Why do all my convos die after one week
>>33500095DELETE IT NOOOW
>>33500095Hey can older women please use the site more.I'm tired of sending silly bordering on nonsensical messages with best wishes for women that are far too young for me.I'd much rather prefer to send silly sometimes bordering on nonsensical messages laced with a deep longing for a mutual loving, loyal, lifelong relationship building towards a family to women closer to my age.
This app is dead outside of the US. My local profiles are 10 "verify to see this profile" and I can't clear them either. The one-two girls signing up for the app every two weeks are just trying to get paid 80% of the time and 15% of the time mentally challenged.So here is a short analysis I've written up from personal experience.The app started out with a good idea, but became what it wanted to replace - a tinder for the chronically online, but with way too many normies.>gender imbalance & low quality matchesThis cannot easily be fixed, therefore there needs to be a way to ease the issues it causes. Namely, giving women choice overload, resulting in them becoming apathic towards the men that try to chat them up. Since a questionnaire system is already in place, instead of letting people text others themselves, make them match automatically based on preferences and the questionnaire. 24 hour cooldown on a match, so people are forced to give their current match a genuine shot before moving on. This encourages conversation and discourages skipping somebody you might otherwise have a good shot with. Also nullifies the choice-overload for women.The only downside this has, is, that a lot of men will not be matched right away. It might even take weeks for them to match. But this is well worth it considering that the matches resulting will be a lot more high quality and that they get a fair shot with their match instead of having to compete with 80 thousand others for attention.>app deathThe original target audience of the app has mostly moved on from this app due to it being a badly designed, bug ridden mess. It has also fallen into obscurity over the past months and it's novelty has expired.Re-release the app with a grand promise of a better experience. Fix the match making, the bugs and properly advertise in the right places. Discourage normies from using or filter them out. The original target audience is vast and large enough to sustain an app like this.
>>33500095>donate linkobvious advertising thread, thanks for making it easy for me.
>>33500425there is a clear point where it started to go downhill and that's when they stopped allowing example.com without proper registration
>>33500576No it's when people started posting pictures of themselves
>>33500468How new?>>33500425^ this, people don’t do well with too many options, especially when both sides are socially retarded
>>33500468see you tomorrow
>got a message from someone telling me I was handsome on Monday>they were already unavailable by the time I got to itWas this another mass spam?
>>33500095This website is fucking shitEvery single woman is a massive whore flaunting slutty pics, and they're all way too hot to be remotely obtainable by the kind of guy this site is intended for. Majority of them aren't even interested in actually using this site, just laughing and making fun of the men and posting it on their social media as le quirky experiment. The only real people are ironically the ones with no pics, and they almost never reply anyway Bottom line, this site is fucking shit.You're not gonna find a gf this way. Stop donating to it.
>>33500898see you tomorrow
The early bird gets the worm for the women but any sign of aggression they will drop you at the drop of a hat.I can’t wait to see him in 6 months.Captcha WINM
>>33501139Lol no shit, better to fuck off early than be saddled with some developmentally stunted moron with anger issues because literally why are you weirdos being aggressive on a dating app. Safety-wise it's their best option to be flighty, and the women have a million options so it's no loss to err on the side of caution.Seriously, braindead fucks can't even conceive of this kek.
>>33501161>inb4 hurr they should lower their standardsBar is on the floor and you can't even manage to trip on it. Just rope and save everyone the trouble.
>>33501139>6 monthsdo men really wait for mediocre pussy for this long?
App really needs a last online status…
>>33501201We're both waiting as our lines of work dictate so. After being single for a year he's shown the best promise.
i have received 0 messages back. i thought this app was for losers, but evreryone there seems like a normie. is that just how it is or are any other actual 4chan users getting messages
>>33501725Same. Weird how I get so many adds on here from girls but none on there despite the overlap and ability to add multiple pics instead of just the 1 you can add posting on here. Honestly would probably just be better to have an official dating server or something done through a general here, something about the model doesn’t seem to work well as it is now but some people feel otherwise I guess given the donations
>>33501725I get replies back but the women are usually so boring that I'm the one who stops messaging.I've never gotten an intro though.It does seem like everyone on here is a normie from twitter or reddit or something.
What type of intro should I send to my favorite 30+ hag? I don't want to drop the ball on someone with over 1k answers
>>33500095What is the profile name on duo from your pic OP?
>>33501725It would not surprise me if most women on Duo are not 4channers. Like even the driest Discord conversations I've had from /soc/ anons are magnitudes more substantial than the interactions (if any) I've had on Duo, which is too bad because I would ideally like to find someone who doesn't use this site too much.
>>33502139Every "Verification Required" profile I see is just solid gray. OP probably made this pic up.
>>33500880At least you got a message. Girls have called me cute but none sent me a fucking MESSAGE
>>33500095Still no "Last Seen: X hours/weeks ago" huh?
>>33500425wouldnt have helped that it was shilled as a sugar daddy app on tiktok either so most of the women are just begging for gift cards and shit
>Make female account>All my intros from guys have been shitKek is this what the average girl has to go through?
>>33503428men aren't your entertainment. By expecting entertainment, you dehumanize people and the entire point of a "dating app" is lost. No front, you're not actually a girl, and it's mostly a design flaw, but it's fucked up if you think about it.
>>33503798Please, as if the majority of men don't view women as just something to fuck and get free household labor from.You know historically these loser ass men were never meant to fuck in the first place.
>>33500095I wish the women were more like aspie girl on here.I think the few of them were chased out by twittard invasion.
>>33504056historically, near every man got married with a woman. You were most probably born on a rural village and married someone from your village.Whether those people were also sex crazed objectifying maniacs or not, I can't say. But to say historically is a big stretch. Both sides are victim to a dying society and social media.
>>33504056Never met a woman that did housework, always been me and never met one that can cook. I wish I could encounter someone that can split stuff with me but alas they don’t exist around me. Just generic slop personalities
>>33504056>You know historically these loser ass men were never meant to fuck in the first place.I mean maybe but that goes both ways doesn’t it? Unless a girl turns lesbian and has a child through some surrogate situation or has some guy she likes well enough to knock her up that’s one woman who won’t reproduce or ever know love for every man in the same boat. Like the other Anon above said, no reason to hate on half the populace, especially when you need each other to survive in more ways than one. Unless you’re gay and okay with not continuing your bloodline like 2% of guys out there, that’s just natural selection and they can do them.
i'm so hideous that the verification ai either thinks i'm edited or not smiling. JFL
>>33504896Finally I'm not the only one.Wanted to kms because the AI thing told me, my picture was edited, and then told me I wasn't a real person.
>message girl>she coincidentally deletes her accountok
Suggestion: let me answer questions using arrow keys so I don't have to wave my mouse around
>>33505504It means she skipped you
>>33505561except I made a brand new account (couldn't change name) and they aren't there anymore
>>33500095Doesn't seem to allow "@mozmail.com"Why? Do you want to data mine and thus not accept redirects?
>>33505563are skips IP based or just on that specific account
It's been a bit since I've deleted my shitI doubt it, but any chance that things are better now?
>>33505561>>33505580can anyone confirm this
I'm less convinced they deleted but probably just removed themselves from being seen by strangers now.
>>33505605worse.
>>33504056and what do you have to offer to the table other than your piss flaps?
After setting preferences to women and only seeing a vast majority of fake 4chan irony anime pics/profiles I decided to test something and see what other guys were putting up.Surprisingly? A bunch of you actual have a real photos. We should ban having a fake anime picture
>>33506192a few of those accounts are probably me.
>>33506192>The 4chan dating app should ban having anime picturesKill yourself
>>33505605User count has plateaued, no new "features" have been implemented in a while, and people are continuing to donate for some reason. Make of that what you will.
>>33506192>We should ban having a fake anime pictureWhat would that accomplish?
I think we should all kill ourselves in a mass suicide. What do you think
>>33500095Can I find fren on it
>Is having sex once a week enough?Why do so many men answer yes to this?! >:(
>>33501725Most of the time I get one word replies or maybe two words. They are lazy lol
>>33507717The real answer is obviously no but men answer yes so they don't sound like horny bastards.
>>33505605worse, majority of the girls on it now heard about it through youtube or tiktok and mainly looking for simps to feed their egirl persona or farm you for lolcow content. So unless you're chad-lite don't expect too much from it and even if you're chad-lite. The amount of men messaging girls on here will bury your message and she will more than likely become overwhelmed or turned off and may not even see your message. A nice feature change would be the higher Q&A% you have with a girl the higher up your message or better yet if you're verified your message stays at the top. Also any girl that isnt a copy pasta of each other is more than likely flooded because after talking to the hundredeth "bedrotter" and "girlfailure" they're all the same and you wonder where the fuck is their free will.
>>33507833oh and forgot to mention if you're looking for anyone 25+ good luck. Majority of the girls are 21 and under who are all copy pasta versions of each other it's actually demoralizing.
>>33507717idk once you get older you just arent horny as much
>>33507717Depends on how good the sex is and how old or for you are in a relationship I guess. Usually holding off from cumming for a couple of days at least makes orgasms much more intense if you’re a guy, dunno how it works for women though.
>>33500095Are you going to pay for my therapy bills for all the mental anguish this app has caused me?
Is this app any worth to find gay androgynous males / femboys that are not "poly" or into hookup culture? All I want is a monogamous one for at least FWB.
>>33507717I'm a virgin so fuck yeah will once a week be more than enough for me.
>>33507833>>33507839>wondering where the fuck is their free will. Shit made me laugh way harder than it should have, so fucking true.
>>33507979Probably not but you can pay Duodaddy for the server bills.
>>33500425>outside of the usquite literally not our problem. you’re an on american site talking to americans all the time. expect americans to dominate all things that stem from this place.
I've been trying on this app. Everyone is a flake or has moved on already. Matching at 90%+ but barely a response. I feel like I'm not autistic enough for some of these bitches.
>>33507833i realized this months ago and dropped out of duolicious because of it. sad to see it’s all still true. it’s crazy to think i had better luck on tinder with a one word bio that read “incel” than i ever had on here.
>>33508009>not into hookup culture>gayUnlikely
>>33507717>Why do so many men answer yes to this?! >:(if we had super high sex drives we would have probably figured out how to be daywalkers, to get pussy, and wouldn't be on the weirdo app.wouldn't worry about to too much. if you were fucking one of those guys their drive would probably increase dramatically because it has an outlet.
>>33502139>>33502863Made up. When I made it I thought that's how it worked, because I remember the pictures being blurred instead of grey. Seems like that changed at some point>>33505570>>33507979I'm not duodaddy, just some dude>>33507717I'm at 0 times/week, so 1 sounds like enough, like a lot even>>33500425Your cooldown idea seems very reasonable. It's baffling that there's still no mechanism in place to reduce the intro overload for women. Seems like an easy thing to implement too.
>>33507717I've gone my whole life with 0 times per week you fucking whore
>>33500425>limit male signups to keep gender ratio somewhat normalShrimple as that
>>33507717They've spent their entire lives being told women hate men obsessed with sex, so they respond accordingly. Men lie about themselves all the time to try and be more appealing to women
Can I find fren on it
>>33513423>Men lie about themselves all the time to try and be more appealing to womenHmm yes and we know that women don't switch entire characters so they can appeal to and get fucked by a man they like
>>33513475I didn't say women don't also do it, I was explaining why men do it.
>>33513423>>33513489TRUTH NVKEWhich is why men who aren't ashamed to say they want to fuck like rabbits have an easy time getting sex.
this app is useless. there are hardly any women and the ones that do use it are just using it for attention or trying to find a paypig.i was only able to go on 1 date.
>>33514852how did the date go
>>33515327poorly. i lived in the middle of nowhere so there wasn't much to do,and she refused to go in my apartment when it was 90 degrees out.so all we could really do was go for a walk in shitty weather.she also refused to even hold hands or hug when greeting.when it was over i told her that i thought she was nice and that she was cuter in person.her opinion of me was "i was worried you would be a misogynist but you aren't" who tf says thatthen, she agreed to go on a date next weekend, but ghosted me the day of.
>>33515530Sounds more like you prompted her to do it rather than it happening naturally. Maybe you're too eager for physical contact. But then again, my date experience is nonexistent so disregard that I fellate wieners
>>33515653usually when you meet people you shake their hand or hug them or something
Talking to people on duolicious made me realise I don't need to get romantically involved with people as much as I thought, friends are enough and so is being "alone". Thanks for the experience I guess.
>>33515530>misogynist>willingly goes on a date with womanEl Em Ah Oh!
>>33515708she definitely had some sort of neurosis.in hindsight, it's probably for the best. you never stick your dick in crazy.however, being an incel sucks.
>>33500095Everyone has private location, shit sucks. Why would i want to talk to anyone like 6 hours away from me
>>33515718change the distance so you only see people who are close
>>33515719No matches found
>>33515725you’re shit out of luck. i’ve got the same problem except the only “females” in my city are ALL… “female”.
>>33515530i would’ve drove the fuck away the second she implies i cant touch her. that’s the most obvious sign somebody doesn’t want you. i’ve hugged random women i’ve never met before because they asked for it. if she goes on a date and acts like that, she’s not there because she wants to be. i wonder why she even left the house.
>>33515751I guess some people wouldn't mind driving for 6 hours to meet someone but I'd have to take a train and I don't even have the patience. I gave up with tinder, no progress in 4 years. I just don't think I'm boyfriend material, I'm too boring.
are people even active anymore? do they really receive a mail saying that they got an intro? because it doesn't seem like it
>>33515786never got an intro. are you supossed to get a mail?
>>33515765she came to me
>>33515793yes and in your profile you can choose your notifications settings
>>33515818damn
>>33515822exactly
>archived chat>delete account>remake it again>look for girl>she isnt there>she deleted her accountanother one bites the dust, I'm doing my part
not being near a major city makes this unusable. there are only 3 women within 100 miles.
>>33515944I don't care about distance, but it sucks that 90% of girls set their location to private. At least let me know if we are on the same continent.
>>33515958change the max distance
I am still vouching on the idea to kill ourselves. Anyone down for a double suicide? Maybe a few years down the line?
>>33515982Do I need to form mutual trust with you first?
>>33515958You can spend an extra 30 seconds messing around with the distance slowly increasing it to see who is in your province/state/county/country/continent.Even if they have their profile set to private location they still show up.>>33515781You're probably a flawed individual but truthfully not that bad or any worse than the average girl on there.Things are just really bad, and it doesn't get any easier even if you're genuine and sincere.
>>33515781The worst part about dating culture is having to perform acts you don't do on the regular just to get a gf. I enjoy going out doing something fun, but I also enjoy lounging around, and working on stuff at home. But for some reason the later gives girls the ick. But I'm more likely to do the later than the former to save money but most people love to live one emergency away from being broke struggling to get by.
>>33516229I could totally imagine there being a lot of shut in girls. Apparently though for dating platforms, programming at home and almost never going out to do stuff isn't very attractive.>>33516306This. For me it's just the lack of activities outside of my home, I do fine inside but with a partner that could change, so it kinda goes back and forth.
How do people expect to find interested parties if they only have pictures of cartoons? Are people really biting?
>>33515708Just because someone hates women doesn't mean he doesn't love women
>>33516711those accounts are there just to lurk around and occasionally chat or troll. they never have anything of substance going on. it’s like those empty social media accounts you see everywhere else. same thing here. block them. simple as. the only girl i’ve met with an account like that even told me herself she was just there to look. not there to make friends.
>>33516901inb4>she’s not interested broshe did. ended up asking for my contact info later. but i wouldn’t expect others to be the same.
>>33516711I'm not putting a photo of myself on a website full of angry incels that make multiple accounts to invade your dm once you've rejected themAnyway to answer your question I can usually tell if someone's fugly by their profile vibe alone, don't need to see their mug
>>33513409sorry, but this is utterly stupid. All you'll get this way is people botting/spam signing to ensure they get into the program and might even try to fight over how many of the limited spaces they can occupy (monopolizing the match system by using multiple accounts).Just let everyone sign up and ensure quality matches.
Anyone else having problems with their inbox? Mine just gets stuck on the loading screen. All other screens still work.
I found my redpilled love, thanks duodaddy. I slept without tears for once
>>33517943Deleted my acc too. Life’s good, keep striving anons
Why even make an account then? Why even take the risk if you're so worried?
>>33517918
>>33518096The risk/reward ratio for posting your face on Duo is not good enough to warrant doing it, from what I've seen in these threads. I've never seen anyone say "I changed my profile to include a pic of myself and my experience is way better!" The app is broken in other, more fundamental ways, in addition to the sketchy security history. There's nothing to do but casually dick around.
There's a literal hobo in my matches today. Kind of based desu.
>>33517657>Just let everyone sign up and ensure quality matches.Most of the men on the app shouldn't be on there to begin with though.
>>33518457So true! I am one of those men. But it was bound to get worse over time as the creator of the app abandoned his original base.
>>33516711I've been thinking of uploading a picture but it's so god damn hard remembering to when you actually look decent and not lying at home snoozing
i got step 1 verified but haven't done the photo verification cuz I can't get all 3 prompts for some reasonI'm also just not sure it's worth trying, some days I'm looking for the love of my life. other days I'm just looking for someone to sit on my face. Too bad there's not an app that let's me flip from one mood to the other
>>33518653I don't think people are really looking for all that much. Like it or not, mutual physical attraction is the basis for nearly all romantic relationships. I need to see that you're at least a real person and and check at least a couple boxes.But regardless, I think this app is a waste of time for everyone in its current form. Maybe it works for those who are just looking for friends.
>>33500095Fuck I fumbled idk wtf I was thinking. I text like a retard.
>>33518680she either wants you or she doesn’t. you can’t “fumble” anything if she’s really into you.
>>33518879I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a cope, but it's strange thinking and just wrong
>>33518879You totally can fumble it if she is in to you. But if she isn't you've basically got no chance of changing that.
>>33518457What do you mean, exactly? Sorry you have to spell it out to me. I'm not quite sure what sorta guys are on the app.
>>33519077>copeyou haven’t been around enough women. cope by calling the truth a “cope. the only way you can drive women away is by actively behaving uninterested for a long period of time.
>>33519658I bet you believe in cosmic soulmates too
>>33519417Talking about the guys who flood women’s inboxes and make it so they never check any other part of the app because they’re so overwhelmed. Gone about 4 months without a single message whatsoever and I know the site doesn’t have many (if any) 10/10s so outside of a handful of guys with pics who might be better looking than me, the only thing standing in my way is those fucks. Too weird for tinder, too weird for here, where else am I supposed to go? Half the girls who add me from /soc/ ghost immediately or ask if I’m a catfish (even though I wouldn’t say I’m beyond an 8.5/10 at best) and then ghost anyway when I assure them I’m not, despite knowing every other important detail about me ahead of time. I just want a weeb gf, is that too much to ask for?
>>33516075Yes sure why not
just got catfished. so now i'm 0-2 for successful duolicious dates.the women are either normies who hate incels or they self-sabotage.there really is no such thing as a femcel.
>>33519713:(
>>33519713I chase woman off the app you're not getting a weeb gf.Also every normalfaggot is a weeb now go outside to get one.
>>33519823Tell us more about your experience >>33516711Showing yourself off in the Internet when there's nothing to gain is just plain stupid. If the other party isn't a ghost or an uninterested e-thot then perhaps you both can exchange personal information and pictures
>>33520014This, weebery is at an all time high rn.
>>33520019pretty typical catfish experience. fat chick used pictures from when she was skinny.
>>33515530So a woman that was meeting a stranger didn't want to immediately physically touch him or go to his home and she's considered in the wrong here? Lol, lmao even
>>33520140she's wrong for leading me on about a second date.also humans greet each other by touching, what are you a fucking alien?holding hands on a walk with your date is as basic as it gets.and it takes two to tango. if she refuses to engage in whatever would make the date go well,the date will necessarily go poorly and there's nothing i can do about it.you can't really have a good date if you refuse to be open with a stranger.
>>33520157I don't know man... Holding hands is really lewd.
>>33520019So you think participation is pointless and potentially dangerous. Why are you all here when there are so many other avenues? By participating in this thread you are perpetuating and drawing further interest to it; condemning more lost souls to disappointment. Just let it die then.
>>33500095Can I change the email I use to login into Duolicious or do I need to make a new account?
>>33520687We ain't the ones throwing money at it hoss.
>>33521565Pretty much every minor mistake you make on this app warrants a complete do-over unless you just stop caring.
>>33521714You can throw as much money as you want at a service like this. It doesn't really matter as you are the product the service is offering. No products, no service.
>>33520687>Why are you all here when there are so many other avenues?such as?I'm just pointing out the obvious. The system is deeply flawed, and demanding the few people that still visit it to expose themselves won't solve those flaws
>>33521761Profound shit right there
>>33521793Oh come on man, do you really need an answer to that? I never demanded anything of anyone. Forgive me for asking why a service that appears to be primarily designed to connect people romantically is filled with profiles without any pictures. I literally found this thread last week, as I typically stay out of soc for good reason.
the demographic is so fucking cringe holy fuckit's mostly degen men who think they are special unique snowflakes for being racist and liking animehow can you lack this much self-awarenessand idc if you think it's ironic it's still retarded and you are unironically retarded just go on tinder with your basic ahh intro hi what do you like to do for funyou look cute what do you do for a livingchatgpt ahh clowns
>>33521905it was made for incels and you're complaining it has incels? wtf did you expect?if their intros are bad, why don't you start the conversation for a change?they're probably asking questions like that because you have a shitty empty profile,they don't know anything about you.
>>33521905>special unique snowflakes for liking animeLonely dudes are the main demographic for anime, what do you mean by this
>>33521905>ahhNigger
you people are so basic just go on 9gag lol>>33521969you're so cool for saying it online
>>33522036I would call you nigger irl and the moment you lay your hands on me you'd be on floor in a pool of blood
>>33522068yea except life isn't a chinese cartoon
>>33522073I'd call you a nigger and if you put your hands on me you'll be full of lead and body never found
>>33521905post your intro then big boy
>>33521905just letting you know that I've never had sex
>>33521905see you tomorrow
>>33501754>official dating serverDuolicious has a Discord server with 1500 people in ithttps://duolicious.app/discord>>33502863>Every "Verification Required" profile I see is just solid grayI think it's a bug. Sometimes I get grey and sometimes I see it blurred
>>33521905I get zero matches on tinder, presumably due to my profile pic. Here I can use a pretty anime boy.Why even mention racism? Doesn't seem relevant unless you're black.
>>33503414>it was shilled as a sugar daddy app on tiktokLink?>>33504072>historically, near every man got married with a womanWrong. Historically, near every male died as a child, or from infectious diseases, or food scarcity, or warThe "man" who spends all day in his goon cave while mommy cooks him tendies is a modern problem
>>33523309rented a place to cook my own tendies, didn't exactly help thingsthere needs to be a better way to meet women than just tinder and cold approaches
>>33523309>Historically, near every male died as a child, or from infectious diseases, or food scarcity, or warThis is what happens when you get your history knowledge from Tiktok and /soc/
Weird that it shows you "best match" while you do your questions. Feels like the Persona games, you pick the choice you think the other person wants to hear instead of what's true for you. Doesn't help that there's just one girl within 300miles.
>>33521905So ironic when someone calls something "cringe"
the discord is fucked, it's all normalniggers.i just got banned for arguing with someone that only used the app to get male attention.i didn't even really say anything that bad or break the rules,just that they were misusing the app and making it worse.of course they had full nitro and some faggot profile with their pronouns and other generic e-girl cornball shit.why are these people being catered to? they don't even use the app.what is the point of a dating app if none of the users are interested in dating?they really just shamelessly abandoned the original userbase for this app.
>>33523795>of course they had full nitro and some faggot profile with their pronouns and other generic e-girl cornball shit.kek
>discordholy fuck I just went there, it's fucking ridiculous>nitros>niggers>trannies>people getting banned for random shitwho are these admins and WHY DO THEY HAVE FUCKING PRONOUNS AND ARE """PANSEXUAL""" WHATEVER THE FUCK THAT MEANS.why cant we have not faggot things EVEN FROM HERE ANYMORE
>>33519713>Gone about 4 months without a single message whatsoeverI thought that was just me.
>>33505605It's utter trash tier
>>33520014I hate fake weebsThis trend needs to stopI only want a true weeb gf, not these stupid hussies who will be fawning over the next socially accepted medium in 6 months and dropping anime.I've been weeb since I was 5 and i'm in my mid 30s now. fake weebs OUT
>>33524595all they watch is the latest shonen jump dogshit, they make the entire medium worse with their presence.
>>33524595THIS! They all watched the same three anime, too.JJK, AOT and MHA. maybe sprinkle in some chobits and a fujoshi fanservice anime like ouran host club or black butler...
>>33523297>Duolicious has a Discord server with 1500 people in itMay as well just fish around in there, jesus christ
>>33525208Nevermind, I just read the rest of the thread.
someone recommended me this shit to find an average looking girl. so i hop on, make a profile and look at similar profiles. everyone is crazy femcels and no profile pic havers and im scared for my safety. am i going to be organ harvested by a bpdemon? any tips?
>>33525697blog update. most people who have pfps are way more attractive than me. i thought this was for autists. can you guys go to tinder or something im getting mogged here. thanks
final blog update. i think im going to delete my account and commit rope neck. goodbye
>>33525772Sad. I was enjoying the blog posts
I'm 99% sure that yume nikki Laura from Germany is a troon and Ayla, 24 is a catfish, just a heads up
>>33525772>>33526081True, it was just getting goodWhat a rollercoaster
Why are there so many men on this site with kids I thought yall are supposed to be incels???? How the fuck do you consider yourself an incel when you have 2 kids (Proof that you've fucked)?
Where the fuck do y'all live that there are enough people to interact with that you can even keep discussing this dogshit app? Where I live is by no means rural but unless I set my search range to damn near global there are at most 5 people to even try to talk to.
>>33519713And what do the girls on there bring to the table?
>>33526522We dont live in obscure countries.
Brace for another influx of normies. New video just droppedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G-kkOM6hyk
>>33526552Duoshill could nip this problem in the bud simply by not banning people for using racial slurs or referencing loli (as was the case for the first nine months before the first influx of normalfags)
>>33526534Nigga I am in New York
>>33525772see you tomorrow
>>33526516>you have 2 kids>Proof that you've fucked
>>33526516incel =/= virgin
>>33526522Dead app. We're here because we're here forever.
>>33526735there are hundreds of girls in new york... most of them don't actually live in new york tho and just put it as their city. i don't know how you are not seeing anyone maybe your match questionnaire is shit
>>33527038Because I live outside the city and the app is dead as fuck. I only get hits from CAN and NYC.
>>33527043>I set my search range to damn near global there are at most 5 people to even try to talk to.
>>33520041could be worse. i’ve talked to legit fucking ham planets that would hide everything below their chin. i didn’t know they were HUGE until i stalked them enough to find candid photos of them online elsewhere.
>>33526858just woke up and saw your reply. no I deleted my account. i think I'll just try to accept that im an ugly person that doesn't deserve love. sounds preferable to using that site
>>33527182ayy welcome back
>>33526952Involuntary Celibate implies that they are celibate due to them unable to get laid. You have fucked and reproduced. You at one point were routinely emptying your balls into a bitch's uterus and your swimmers fertilized one of her eggs so your disgusting sperm can grow into a full fledged human being that now has a parent who browses Duolicious in hopes of finding a 20 something year old based tradwife e girl to be your bang maid/nanny/housekeeper/etc. You are not an incel you are a victim of divorce court who bred with the first woman who love bombed you. >>33526927 Stop looking for a gf on Duolicious and tend to your kids.
>>33527426incel lost all it's meaning when normgroids overused it
I'm starting to believe a little less in love the more I talk to people
>>33527106that's better because you were able to find out.using old pictures from when she was skinny makes it impossible to know.
>>33526516I don't know I have no kids I don't like the label incel but I've been single for the vast majority of my adolescent to adult life and would enjoy someone to go on picnics with.Maybe you just give off a "I need a very sad single dad vibe"?>>33527590Most people actually aren't genuinely interested in finding love, they're more interested in satiating us or being entertained or validated.That especially goes for those who say they are interested in love, somehow all their actions go completely contrary to what they say they want.
Even on the Discord serb there's nothing to talk about.
>>33527043t. set his birthday to 1901imagine getting filtered by a dropdown menu
>>33500386Link your profile
>>33527950Just check your messages there's probably already something there, unless you advertise yourself as really mentally ill or intentionally come off as rude/mean.
>>33527628I hope not. I don't feel like raising another broad's kids. I have a theory that anyone who dates a single parent is a cuckold because you are letting someone else's spawn benefit from you. There is exceptions but generally the juice ain't worth the squeeze. Maybe men should stop busting in the first girl that love bombs him.
>>33529355In the more nature oriented and non-sexual fetish wise, yes they are quite literal cuckolds.If it makes you feel any better there is somehow vastly more single mothers than there are single fathers in the dating field.The reality of the situation is there's no immediate pressure to disincentivize the behavior, only long term especially financial ones.Most people when they're thinking with their genitals or their heart generally aren't focused on long-term repercussions.There's quite a few chronically single guys who absolutely never want to have children with a woman that doesn't want to be with him for the rest of their life, just keep trying.
>>33529466Lol I had a dude off here hide the fact that he had kids because he "wasnt expecting it to go anywhere" and acted shocked when I told him that he is setting up a shitty example for his daughters by purposely misleading people into thinking that they do not exist because it "puts a damper on his ability to date." He also hid the fact that he had a vasectomy done even though I let it be clear that I want kids. Mind you, I am aware vasectomies can be reversed but 1.) They arent 100% and 2.) its the whole picture in of itself (Lying about key details, having kids, etc..) >Baww the consequences of my actions is making it harder for me to get laid Too bad too sad your whole entire life isnt about you anymore its about your KIDS. Godspeed to his little daughters though they are gonna need it. >If it makes you feel any better there is somehow vastly more single mothers than there are single fathers in the dating field. They should know their place in the dating pool and fuck right off.
>>33529595yeah at least women put their kid in their profile pics on dating sites, people who hide them are shitty
>>33529595Hey it happens and it's massively shitty.I had a woman lie and lead me on for 4 months when she was diametrically opposed to what I very clearly laid out of what I wanted, none of it could be construed as indecent or unwholesome.Single parents probably should try to pair off and anyone that's being even slightly obtuse about their status as a parent to a potential partner is a scumbag.The very unfortunate truth is nowadays kids are an afterthought, when it comes to planning for them, when it comes to one's own personal priorities and goals.
>>33526104yes, Laura Germany is a troon lol
>see new profile>fits many things I'm looking for>check age>18Just kill me
>>33532059Younger the better, compadre>t. 30yo boomer sniping zoomettes
>>33532725I'm also 30 but I want a wife, I want to have a family, I don't want to waste time on another "message for 10 days and then it fades to nothing"
i’ve been thinking about remaking an account does a young teen girl have a chance at any good conversation on duo now or is it completely dead
>>33533059If by "young teen" you mean underageb& I would stay away, otherwise all I seem to see are zoomers running around
>>33533074im 19 going on 20 soon and thats unfortunate most of the good conversations I had were with older people
>>33533093Well there are at least two 30 y.o. there, myself and >>33532725If you add you're only looking for older people, I think it might get some attention
>>33533100time to make my 4th account then
I swear the accounts within the UK are D O O M E D
I'm talking to people but I'm not attracted to anything. Should I dip out or just keep going to see where it leads me?
>>33533188You can't leave.
>>33533597You are probably right.
>>33500425>The app started out with a good idea, but became what it wanted to replace - a tinder for the chronically online, but with way too many normies.so much for my interest in it, though i'm in the usa.
>>33526516you're on a redboard that feels like reddit-lite, it doesn't surprise me. the blue board i'm from, my fellow volcels and incels feel accurate. in fact i'm certain a few are like me and hold out for sex after marriage. the ones on reddit-lite boards ie /soc/ are typically just reddit tier males and females that are just edgy>>33527426>You at one point were routinely emptying your balls into a bitch's uterus and your swimmers fertilized one of her eggskek>Stop looking for a gf on Duolicious and tend to your kids.brutal you took him down
Shout out to the boring or ugly guys who write that they’re hung on their profiles
>>33534482Some people think all you need to do is tell a girl you've got a big willy to win her over.Also remember, on the internet every single guy adds an inch if not more to how long their todger actually is.
>make another Duo account because the threads are still active>set age range 19 to 60>400 km from my city (Toronto)>still the same 10 bitches from months ago regardless of what fake answers I put>uninstall againLet these fucking threads die already, this app is shit and the women are worse.
>>33527182<3
Can I find fren on itLike female just for fren
>>33534520Maybe those some people are right. When you don’t have the personality, humor, brains, or looks, the only thing you probably are good for is dick.
>>33534520>Also remember, on the internet every single guy adds an inch if not more to how long their todger actually is.Never felt the need to do that but it seems like guys only do it because women think 6 inchers are actually 7s or 8s when they see them in person so it makes them seem more normal to say that in advance
>>33535002Yep, just how they also think 5’9’’ guys are 6’1’’ when they see them in real life
>>33535002>>33535332Most women I've met are very bad when it comes to judging distance.I've had multiple women say they thought I was 6 ft + simply because I was an inch or two taller than them.Really it's only the internet when women start obsessing over the number of 6 ft, realistically they're just happy when a guy is a little taller than them.>>33533093Better than 18 but still too young.Would only send a mildly incoherent but generally positive with best wishes message/10
>>33534520i’ve never done thisstay humble, respect yourself and be realistic, anons. there’s always a bigger fish.
>>33526552There was no influx what happened?
>>33537828I've seen a few new ones stating they came from a YouTube video
I wish that dutch blonde hottie Puk didnt ghost meIts over for polish bros
>>33538309Fun factPuk means "knock" in polish and pukać means to knock (or fuck)
>>33537828Everybody's already tried it.
>>33538441Is it time for duofaggy to expand to real normies?
>>33526552>>33537828I just noticed the view count used to be 97k and now it's 48k. Jewgle is memory holeing Duolicious kek
>6'2>Big and strong>Ugly as shit so i have to censor my face on this app with bane maskIve had some horny chats and nudes exchanged, but everyone is so fucking far away anywayIm europe so theres like only couple of people in 200km radius, and not even active profiles
>>33500095When the site says>somebody already sent that introDoes that mean every intro has to be unique regardless who is the receiver or that person has already received intro like that?
>>33539166You have to send unique messages, that partially contributes to why most of mine are borderline nonsense.
>>33539617yes, but do they have unique to that person or something has never been sent to anyone on the site site?
Troll/scammer giving up at the first sign of skepticism, they don't make 'em like they used to.
>>33540356some context would make this feel less like a paraphrased version of a common conversation between two average members of the dull low-trust populace
The state of Duo in the U.K is DIRE
>>33540565That was the opening message. Her profile mentioned something about getting banned before and had a number. Then she either blocked me or deleted the account.
>>33540572Kimberly in Scotland was looking nice
>>33500095Looking for a girl I haven't seen since JuneUsed the name Ghoul on duolicious From New York >Looking for girl I haven't seen since June>I didn't log in for over a month and she was gone I sent her a message I don't know if she saw it
>>33539658I'm pretty sure it's site wide
This app fell off so hard, it's not even useable now.
>>33540749I, for one, welcome our new normie overlords
>>33540749What's the current state of duo? I never tried it out and really haven't heard much since the initial hype. I assume it's mostly younger users and feds so a guy in his 30's like me probably isn't gonna find much.
Well, for starters, if you're trying to make the app 'serious' on dating, you should apply some semblance of verification.Aside that, a feature that would have made it unique would be making chatrooms similar to 4chan (anime, gaming, etc) You already have clubs set up, may as well actually make it have some meaning. Shit like that is an incentive to use the app and your problem is not having people actively use it. If you're a donator, you get some more profile flair, doing shit similar to MySpace profiles way back.This is just an idea from a normie though
>>33500095>read 10 profiles>it's always the same>"I want bf, I'm not very active here, please join my discord channel, I'm way more active there"wtf? they are putting all their suitors to same discord channelIs the end goal just to use Duo advertise their discords channel so they can develop a simp fanbase?
>>33541557 I'm a guy in my 30s interested in at least long term. I feel like I have had bad luck on here so far. I get intros from girls, but they are always poorly written, short, and either didn't read any of my bio or just don't know what to say so I get things like "what you looking for?"Seems I am getting more lately, but its usually girls with either blank profiles or with pictures that put me off.Also, most of the girls listing ages in the mid to late 20s somehow look like they are in their mid 30s and it seems odd to me.I'm sure its partly my fault as well. I send very few intros because without seeing a girls face I don't usually want to send an intro, and the more memey spam intros with no info or the constant "I am a BPDEMON" as the only text put me off. I'm also at least a bit antisocial, so seeing a bunch of "heres my instagram/telegram/whatever" usually makes me assume they are more social than I really want, but that is honestly more likely to just be me looking for excuses.I'd like to say my standards aren't high (especially since I am overweight) but all I really want is someone younger than me without tattoos and with a nice face/hair. Being a little overweight would be fine if they are working on it. It would be great if they didn't have debt, but its really not a deal breaker. Id love to have kids in a few years and would prefer a housewife, I don't even have a problem if they are a neet (honestly its kind of preferable) as long as they pleasant and clever enough that I enjoy talking to them. I should probably have started looking a few years ago since I assume girls like that are younger and the age gap would probably be offputting, but I just didn't really care until recently.
>>33541557It feels like abandonware at this point. I'm about to be 30 and I filtered out every match 21 and below. Unsurprisingly, 5-6 matches who have been there for the past however many months is all that's left on my list (I also filter locally).
>>33541829Yeah
>>33541557just women who say "pls dm me if ur a woman otherwise heres my cashapp"
>>33541623Chat rooms on a dating site? I don't know man
>>33500095I think the entire draw of this app was being app for introverts, as opposed picture-based stuff like most apps.The simple issue with because the male-to-female ratio is so fucked women get exhausted after getting 1000 messages a day and leave the app.This is why there should active conversation limit maybe 5.I also think the filters should hide profiles whose active conversation limits are full.
>>33542312That would just brick the app, just copy the other shit that forces you to engage with it by swiping on people you actually have an interest in, as it is now women won't see your profile ever unless you message them because there's a limit to how many show up so anything below 85% match is cut off, and they have no reason to not just let dudes come to them, it shouldn't be possible to talk to someone without matching, most likely they won't respond if they don't like your profile anyway so it's just a waste of time for everyone.
>>33542312>I also think the filters should hide profiles whose active conversation limits are full.There are no active conversation limits. That's the problem. Duonigger should give women a quota on active conversations
>>33542339Most of the girls I have gotten intros from had a match% with me in the 50s. I've gotten 2 in the 40s as well.
>>33542344Absolutely. Think they have gotten so lazy that they don't even bother blocking unwanted conversations.I also think intros should have a character limit, like maybe 100 characters. Ideally it would encourage creativity and donciciness, and their briefness would actually encourage women to read them, because at this point I feel like most intros are not getting read, because there are so many of themWatching this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3lypVnJ0HMMade me realize, problems of duo are hardly unique
>>33542367It's not even possible, you can't see anyone under 50%
>>33542439I assume they sent me an intro before answering questions.
>>33538309>>33538313lol there is no way that girl is real right. way too hot for this app
Does duodaddy even read these threads anymore? I mean they're mostly more of the same, but he doesn't implement the most common suggestions against intro overload anyway, so that won't change.
>>33542537She has a boyfriend and is a literal whore
>>33542803have you seen her face? does she have any socials or an onlyfans or anything
I see a constant stream of attractive women and know they have 300+ unread intros, so why bother?
>>33543050Join the club by scatter shooting messages at all of them. At least one will take the bait. Welcome to dating in the 21st century; every guy doing the Boomhauer method
>>33542606a tee shirt with this >>33533004 design appeared on his merch shop so he's clearly reading the thread and just ignoring all the useful suggestions
>>33544507I was like 80% sure you were bullshitting me or a ChatGPT post, but there really is a Duo merch shop, never noticed that in all these months
>>33544507He was a hack back then and and he's a hack now. His best move was that Reddit post that scared all these idiots into consistently sending him money. Why bother working on anything when you can collect passive income from excess server donos every month?
>>33500095Considering every dating website has more men than women, it would interesting experiment to make a dating website where there are more women.Only solution would be limiting number of men that can register.
>>33544507>he's selling Non-Binary flagswtf
>>33546539It will never happen, woman won't commit to a website that will have more women than men. They love the constant stream of attention men give them on dating apps.
>>33546539you're still thinking inside of the boxthe idea shouldn't be "how to make a dating app that has more women" it should be "how could you make an app where more women sign up than men"dante must die: how do you design an app that does that and STAYS that wayonce men hear it's full of women they'll flock to it
>>33546831alternative solution:>castrate 80% men of Earth so they lose interest in women
>>33546893whoa whoa cool it with the anti-semitism
>>33542606>Does duodaddy even read these threads anymore?It's fun sometimes>>335465764chan has an /lgbt/ board for a reason. There's an association between being non-binary and posting on Nigerian basketweaving forums. About one in nine Duolicious users are non-binary
>>33544763>Why bother working on anything when you can collect passive income from excess server donos every month?I have just the shirt for you! Pic relatedFWIW, I'm still working on Duolicious. Check my contribution history on GitHub:https://github.com/duogenesisEveryone who's ever worked for Duolicious >did it for free, as explained on the donation FAQ:>Donations go entirely towards third-party providers. Nobody at Duolicious gets paid through donations>Donations exceeding our monthly requirement go into a fund specifically for Duolicious and roll over to the next monthSource: https://duolicious.app/donation-faq/Excess donations are why the countdown timer on the donation nag screen sometimes says that it'll take more than 30 days for Duolicious to shut down.(1/2)
Even though donations are more-than covering server costs right now, Duolicious is still threatened by its inability to promote itself through ads like big dating apps do. If Duolicious earned as much as Tinder does per user per month, Duolicious would be able to attract about 70,000 extra users each month. Without promotion, I predict Duolicious will eventually die due to a lack of users. But to earn as much as Tinder, Duolicious would need to sell subscriptions. Among other drawbacks, paywalling members and selling subscriptions makes a lot of users feel exploited. I don't want to make users feel exploited, hence my attempt to fund Duolicious through donations and merch. Duolicious definitely won't earn as much as Tinder that way, but it might be enough to promote Duolicious to a niche audience.What makes me second-guess if shirts and donations are the right capital-raising strategy is that I still often read online that people feel exploited anyway. For example, this >>33526552 video said it was exploitational for Duolicious to fund itself with donations. If people are going to feel exploited either way, maybe what's best for the average user is the capital-raising strategy that brings in the most new members, rather than my attempt to make Duolicious the not-for-profit/Wikipedia/NEET-dating-charity of dating apps. Though my own moral compass says donations and shirts are fine despite the critics, so I'm going to try that first.Also, thanks to the person who bought a shirt half an hour ago. That added $6.25 to Duolicious' piggy bank. Hopefully I can start running 4chan ads again soon(2/2)
>>33546997cool statistic however most duolicious users are not 4chan users
How the fuck do I get my ethnicity verified??? I'm an amerimutt who looks 50/50 lmfao. Not having verification locks me out of seeing the profiles of guys who have that option turned on :/ It verified my age, gender, photos first try
>>33547001wait you have a store? what is it called I want to browse your merch
>>33547008Don't listen to underage retards that think everything should be free. For all its shortcomings Duo is genuinely filling a niche that nothing else really does for online dating atm. The monetization thing is the same story as the people who were totally against any kind of verification. They were deeply unserious about actually using the app for its intended purpose. The exact same is true of anyone who's against any kind of monetization. There's a huge amount of people who just use the app to troll or roleplay as fucking anime characters or whatever. You gotta just shut these people out and ignore what they have to say, because they'll completely sink the app if you take their complaints seriously. Pretty sure you've came to these same conclusions for yourself but just want to reiterate it as a random user that is actually using the app to try and date. I would totally pay for dark mode or something if donations-only isn't sustainable long term. If you need money for promotion, and you need promotion for the app to survive, then I think the case is basically settled. You're for sure right that the Wikipedia / super altruistic angle probably won't work long term. But I know if that's the philosophy you started from and you go down the monetization road, it'll probably end up fine. You'll figure out a way to do it without raping everyone and turning the app into what every other dating app is, pay to win BS. But don't at all feel guilty about it. I guarantee the people who feel the most "exploited" are people who never pay for anything. While your biggest actual donors probbaly don't feel exploited at all. Funny how that works.
>>33547008If people will always feel exploited, then you shouldn't shift your strategies on the basis that one person does indeed feel exploited. I'm sure you're aware of that, but it bears repeating. Of course, my own personal preference would be for the website/app to remain focused on appealing to Internet weirdos rather than normies, since as an Internet weirdo, it's more fun to date people who "get it" than not.Since you're here, I would like to make a small request (though maybe someone will chime in an tell me I'm a retard and this already exists). I started using the website a little over a week ago, and I have sent out maybe a half dozen to a dozen intros. I understand that there are many reasons to not receive a response, but it would be nice to know if the intro has been read and/or the user has even been online. I have a relatively small pool of matches, and knowing that the most interesting ones (to me) aren't interested (vs. aren't active) would be nice.
> be me> normal person with normal job with normal life> the definition of normie> open duolicious> spot a cutie> read her profile> "Im a bpd misandrist attention starved femcel"> polar opposite of me> check her personality> its a one to one to my personality> thefuck.jpeg> check another cutie> "I have bpd so blah blah blah..."> check her personality> its a one to one to my personality> gettingworried.wav> go through most of the profiles in the app> all of the girls that mention having bpd have extremely similar personalities than mine> ohno.gifIs it over guys? do I have bpd? I don't want to have bpd
>>33548749Where are you on the attachment scales?
>get my first intro>it's an obvious botit's really fun being a male it really is
>chat with girl>she wants to move to discord>immediately calls and uses sob story to beg for money
>>33548749its fucking insane how many women have bpd on this app
>>33549224I'm getting the impression it's not just on Duo.
>>33549134yea most of the women on here are just catfish scammers
silly moid
>>33550556uuoohhh! hags!!!
Seems the app is losing people at a decent pace now.The question is has the quality of users gone up or down.
>>33551312I decided to sign up a couple days ago but it really doesn't need more men, lol. Also my best matches are in the UK and Australia so that's a bit rough. But hey, I always knew US women were bad for me.
>>33551312Honestly feels like shopping for girls with a mental illness, it's only a matter of pick your poison.
>>33551312I have not noticed a significant change in the quality of people. (it's still terrible)
>dream where I fucked a girl from duoI'm so fryed
>>33551312yeah it's on its way out, i made a profile a few months ago and was getting dozens of intros from people—made a new profile yesterday, only got two
Just looked at the competition. Holy shit guys, clean up your facial hair. So many of you look like shit because of it.
>check inbox>no messageThe jews did this
>>33553652check your archive
>>33551312It's the same users minus a few that were there the day before.
>>33553666Kek I missed all of them
No matter how many times I try it refuses to keep me as verified AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>33552884What does she look like?
So there's this girl that doesn't hate me and she's too far away uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
>>33551312>has the quality of users gone up or downThe m:f ratio has improved slightly. The percentage of verified users has increased for men and women too. This also happened during previous decreases in sign-ups.
>>33553811Black
I was just about to get back to her ;( I just didnt want to be the type of guy who gives multiple girls the feelings. Chat am i cooked? Kissless virgin btw. Its even in my Profil lol. Also please unskipp k?thx teehee:3
>>33554472You're playing the same game that men complain about with women: keeping her orbiting you as a backup. Extremely disrespectful. You've got no shot.
Little feature released 15 minutes ago: You can upload animated gifs to your profile.The feature's only on web right now. I'll push the update to the mobile apps in the next few days.Support for videos (e.g. webm/mp4) is coming soon. I may also add "last online", reply rate and account age statistics to people's profiles. What feature would people rather have first?
>>33548749I wouldn’t worry about it, I’m pretty normie myself and when I created an account and did the quizz, all my 94+ were Ted Kazcynski fangirls edgelords (edgeladies?)
>>33554790I get a bunch of BPDemons when I lower the age below 25 and get down to like <75% match. Thankfully most of my high matches are normal people, they just never respond.
>>33554472lmaoooo was that your second ever message to her? Either way, yeah you're cooked.
>>33552884I had a dream where I met the 1000 miles away girl. She tried to be scary for some reason, but I just didn't understand her language so that fell flat lol. We ended up wrestle-cuddling over a small disagreement, fun dream overall
>>33554790Glad it's not just me. I'm also fairly normal of a guy and pretty much all my matches are girls whose profiles just overflow with bpd and mental illness.
>>33554953I assume it's all just a larp. I see a ton of that or profiles with pretty much nothing on them. What the hell am I supposed to start a conversation with aside from how crazy someone is?
>>33554734okay i'll just ghost them next time. Thanks for the great advice man :DDD>>33554859yuh she just complimented me on my sigma arms and dipped, kinda sad rn. Idk thought it would be nice to be honest, guess thats wrong sigh
>>33554769Last online, reply rate and account age in that order. Other than that I think someone earlier in the thread suggested adding whether or not your intro was read as a feature.
>>33554985Imagine yourself reaching out to a girl and she immediately tells you that she's currently holding out for someone else. Hopefully you'd agree with me that it's not worth wasting your time on her. It's remarkable that your match in the screenshot even replied back to you at all.
>want to test duo again.>try to login>server is not sending me mails to log.
>>33554998ghost them, got it(again)
>>33553733Happens to me all the time. Seems like lots of girls delete their accounts very quickly.
>>33555016You don't have to ghost anybody, just get back to them on your own time without saying why if you really care.
>>33555021Honestly i hate that you are probably right but it still feels wrong for me to leave someones message unanswered. I just want to be as honest as possible while making everyone happy ;( And yeah i would probably get weirded out if a girls first message is that she is keeping me in a queue. Cant there be a setting so i can only have one active convo at once and while i have that convo i cant see anyone else and also cant be seen or messaged? I blame the game. Its not like im drowing in pussies either, like i said i have yet to hold hands ;((
>>33555030I think your real problem is that you're hung up on the idea that you can only message one person at a time. Keep in mind that pretty much every girl you talk to on Duo is almost certainly talking to multiple other guys simultaneously (if they're talking at all). It can take time to figure out for yourself, but it's important to not get too invested in people you barely know anything about. Shoot messages to people you're interested in and promptly clear the thoughts of your future together from your mind. She responded? Great. Repeat the process and eventually it may actually lead somewhere. She never responded? Oh well. It's no skin off your back because you're not excessively invested.
>>33555052>its important to not get to invested in a person you barely knowthis really sounds like great advice, and i thank you for that but i guess im just not built like that. Whenever i get complimented by a girl i just get too excited and i already fall in love. I should have thiccer skin by now but i just cant help it. I just put all my Eggs in one Basket and hope i get the same feelings back. Its just everyone who takes the time to talk to me is important. I will take your advice to heart tho and try to be less like a kid who never spoke to a female before. Also i wish all of you the best in your dating Journey ^^
>>33554769>You can upload animated gifs to your profile.hoo boy surely this won't cause any problems at allbut for reference, gif related doesn't work when i enlarge it on my profile.it works fine on the profile preview itself but if i click it it just disappears
>duonigger deleted my account again
Anyone else having the website lock up on them when they click on a profile with no pictures? I have to clear cookies to log myself out at that point because it just loads blank pages. Brave btw.
>>33555343I observed the exact same thing today (also Brave). Web version stopped showing anything but the mobile app is fine.
>>33554997Will add them to the web app, probably in the next 24 hours>>33555014One person contacted me once about a similar issue. Amazon, who sends Duolicious' emails, blacklists email addresses if they ever bounce. The person who contacted me was using a privacy address that he was enabling and disabling. He accidentally attempted to send an OTP once while the address was disabled and got locked out. If you contact support@duolicious.app, I can look into it and maybe remove your address from the blacklist.>>33555258>hoo boy surely this won't cause any problems at alllol yeah, I was worried too. Though it can't be much worse than allowing still images, right? And I can always roll the change back.>but for reference, gif related doesn't work when i enlarge it on my profile.Yeah, the enlarged view only shows the first frame. I think I should've disabled the enlarged view for gifs, because they're almost all low-res images.>>33555343>>33555461Sorry. I broke it when enabling gifs. Should be fixed now if you refresh
I wonder if this girl will message me back. She's actually local to me and seems really interesting. More interesting than me. She looks really pretty too. I was basically ready to write off dating for a while because I just got burned from some other girl on duo not local but I guess I'm a sucker for wanting companionship. I don't even know what it means to be "healed"
>>33507717>Why do so many men answer yes to this?! >:(Because something is better than fuckall
Damn these new stats are gonna be brutal.>I reply to anyone just give me time>Gives Replies to: 1% of intros
The last online feature is gonna be really useful to find dead accounts, although I hope a filter for it would come. And maybe instead of making it too specific leave it to today/last 3 days/last week/last two weeks/last month/more than a month ago. That's enough information.
>>33557207inactive accounts are supposed to automatically deactivate after a while anywayif the account is still up for months on end without change, it's probably still active
these stats are gonna crush my self esteem and make me even more obsessive desu
>>33557117>he thinks duopapa is gonna add anything that makes women look bad
>>33557405It's literally already there, right now. You can see how often people respond to intros. Some of them are literally single digits including several that are 1%.
Can't say I'm suprised most women only respond to ~10% of intros when the gender ratio is 8:1
>>33556812She responded! Just one response such far. Wish me luck bros. I see heaven in her eyes already.
Duonigger remove this antiwoman bullshit right now>>33557513Stop imagining life with random women you dumb fuck
Can someone with a female account tell the class what range of "gets replies to" men have?
>>33557526Honestly man it's the only thing keeping me going. I don't wanna to back to regular online dating.
>>33557568>I don't wanna to back to regular online dating.no one tell him
>>33557535Most have around 25-30%. Some more, some less
These stats are NOT it man.
>>33557526>antiwomanCould you explain why the feature feels antiwoman to you? So far the complaints I've heard seem to be from upset men. I'll admit that I didn't anticipate the possibility of that response, and I still don't understand it. So I'm not sure if those men are just a vocal minority and the feature is working fine for just about everyone. Maybe the upset men aren't drawing the inference that a reply rate of 1% means that the person got at least 100 intros and is too overwhelmed to reply to them all. Maybe those men feel entitled to a response anyway.>>33557473This is the response I expected from most users>>33557405Can you explain why it makes women look bad? Do you want women to reply to every man, even if just to say they're not interested?>>33557633Explain, please.A lot of people have been asking for this feature for a while, so I'm surprised by some of the complaints. Let's run some polls!>Should the "gives replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?https://strawpoll.com/GeZARBNWVyV>Should the "gets replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kNzvmgo
>>33557655>So I'm not sure if those men are just a vocal minority and the feature is working fine for just about everyone.always assume complaints are a vocal minority until you're certain they're not. we all literally just got these numbers so they're just objective facts. anyone complaining is the equivalent of an obese chick smashing a scale because it's "fat shaming"
>>33557655I thought people here only want to see when's the last time the other was online. Idk, I just felt like shit after months I'd sent countless intros and now seeing the actual number of how little actually respond to me. Don't make me more depressed. Other than my very fragile feelings, I can kinda understand the stats. Like I get it, it's maybe to weed out the undesirable from their high horse and highlight those who actually do reply to intros. But I just don't think it's necessary to add it to begin with since the users themselves should probably know naturally what kind of person they are sending their intros to just based on if they get a reply or not. You also add another numbers into the mix that can be manipulated by bad actors, if there's still any, so that they can convincingly do bad things more. Frankly I just don't know how or why you get this idea to begin with.
>>33557577>I don't wanna to back to regular online dating.>no one tell himDoesn't matter she's updated her profile and ignored my last message anyways. So its over. Honestly I've had way better conversations on this app than I have anywhere else.
>>33557678>I just felt like shit after months I'd sent countless intros and now seeing the actual number of how little actually respond to meDo you understand that the stats which appear on users' profiles describe how much those users respond to everyone, not just you? Maybe the UI needs some clarificationWould you be okay with the feature if Duolicious hid your own profile's stats from you but still let you see other users' stats?>>33557665>anyone complaining is the equivalent of an obese chick smashing a scale because it's "fat shaming"Even if I think they're being silly, if there's an easy way to avoid hurting users feelings, I'd like to do that
>girl sees male profile>sees 100% intro response rate>will assume he is desperate and immediately click off
>>33557655I don't really care about gives/gets replies to intros.That said, last online makes me slightly nervous and I imagine it's worse for the women of this app.Account age doesn't feel like a meaningful information, but may lead to old accounts being seen as shelf warmers/leftover people no one wants (full disclosure I have an old account)
>>33557693Idk if I'm stupid or not but, if we're using this >>33557523 as an example. >Gets replies to 0% intros means that she didn't get any replies to her intros that she'd sent right? Or is it something else? And the other one is how many percentage of people she did respond.>Would you be okay with the feature if Duolicious hid your own profile's stats from you but still let you see other users' stats?I think the whole concept itself is wack, but I'd prefer being able to see both my own stats and the others. If you want to remove it from being seen by the users' own account, you should also just straight up remove them entirely because again, I've no idea what your main goal is with these stats.
What's the best way to get a response to an intro? Obviously there's a lot of guessing to it -- people aren't machines -- but I feel like I should have gotten some sort of reply after the messages I've sent. However, I do tend to just ask women about something they mention on their profile. What should I be doing differently?
>>33557526>antiwomanEvery dating app should be antiwoman by default, this app more than just about any other proves that too much freedom of choice for women is part or what is destroying our society.
New update is basedFinally duodaddy gave something of valueDon't change it at all, this IS A GOOD CHANGENow you know who is serious and who isn't
I don't see shit that looks different -- screenshot?
>>33557843It's at the bottom of each profile
>>33557215I believe the inactivity threshold is one month.
>"Gets Replies To 0% of intros" unceremoniously plastered to the bottom of my profile.That is factually incorrect! My convo archive shows that I am 1 for 4!
>>33557873The figure is based on existing accounts and not deleted ones, sorry
>>33557944Good to know, at least.
>have been sent zero (0) introsIs my 'replied to' at 100% or 0%?
>>33558080Boo hoo, if they're getting that much action they should be arranging dates and then getting off the fucking site. Attention whores with no intention of actually going steady SHOULD get ran off the site. They're the cancer ruining both duo and dating sites in general. Farming for giney tingles should be a hangable offence.
>>33557709No keep trying you fuck. Don’t give up.
As far as I can tell, high give rates are at least one of these>seeing someone>not open to long distance>looking for friends
>>33557655You should change the last seen to something like telegram where it only says: recently, a long time ago etc.Making it so precise is useless and could lead to stalking
>Be late 30s wizard>Receive this messageSomehow this is the worst message I've received on duo. I'm even more annoyed I can't respond.
>no replies for days>every girl is last online within a few hours agoi have no idea why with some of them, like everything was going good and then suddenly nothing.is a 19% intro reply rate good? what do you guys get?
>>33558774What did she mean by this
>>33559228Idk man. Got ghosted after like a message. Anybody ever had good luck getting a convo that dies like that to revive? My gut tells me I'm cooked but I'd try it because not like I have any dignity anyways
>>33559688i've said "wow didn't think i'd scare you away with that" or something along those lines and they actually start replying again.
>>33558774She thought you were good lookin', bro. Take it as a compliment.
Holy shit my rates on this are ass
>>33559228>>33559688do NOT start thinking you did anything wrong or need to change anything about yourself because a woman was fickle and aloof. Never adjust anything about yourself to appease a woman. Even if your goal is to get women to like you it's the wrong thing to think about but worse than the fact that it's ineffective it's like getting upset because a chicken pecks the ground in one spot but somehow it would have meant you were more manly if they pecked another. They aren't picking and choosing what they like. They don't even know why they do most of what they do. And anything they say about why they do what they do is bullshit mostly to convince themselves about their own bullshit.
>>33559858most guys are at about 20% rate for replies, VERY few break 30%
>>33559898I must be a super chad then because I'm almost at 40
>>33559898Damn well that sucks especially since I try to keep a conversation going.
>>33559934or they expect you to have money
Reee give stats on mobile
Duo I'm fine with the stats. Particularly now I can see who is a 1-2% replier and know better than to bother messaging them. Seriously I see profiles with 0% reply rate. Why are you on this app?Another anon in here said to make the last online a little more vague and give a range rather than an exact time. I agree with that. Shows who is actually using the app even if they have not hit the pruning limit yet.Do men get intros at all? I admit I don't. If women are rational they won't read into a male profile's reply to intro rate since it is meaningless.>implying
>>33559879Thanks anon. I try not to. I know I have a lot of personal growth. I did just sorta date someone from here but she turned into a bitch. Gave me some long winded explanation on why she was breaking it off from me when the reality is she just fell for some other guy. I totally forgot the golden rule of dating which is that women are terrible but I guess I believed she was different. Oops first mistake. But still, would be nice just to meet a semi decent girl fun to talk to for a change
>>33560088they do actually exist in my opinion. They are just not only rare, but also quickly scooped up and married, and also inundated with people and media trying to convince them being good is just men taking advantage of them. Only the truly special ones maintain it against all that. If you manage to get one you should be willing to die for her.
>>33558485Today, this week, this month.
>>33557792That’s it dude there is nothing you can predict for a woman to bite.
Great new feature. Can you create a function to filter by reply rate? Like I don’t think there is much sense in having women with a 1% reply rate show up to me, that’s just probabilistically not in my favor, and knowing their reply rates, I’m not going to bother messaging unless it is 50% more anyways.
tfw finally skipping all the bitches with less than 10% reply ratethis shit is somewhat usable now.
>>33560366I think you’re expecting too much for women on that reply rate due to the shear numbers difference from men’s to women. 20% seems fair considering there are a 1000 men per woman. And you’re assuming each male messaging her is worth reply back to. Not only that many women have created accounts under the idea of getting money or as a means of getting simps for the OFs so higher reply rate should be a red flag too.
>>33560394I’m not expecting anything from women. It just isn’t really worth messaging if she has a reply rate below maybe 40%
>>33560398>1000 men to 1 woman>expecting 40% reply rate.
>>33560403sounds like hyperbole, not every man is messaging ever woman either, especially now that you can see if they never respond or are inactive
>>33560404>not realizing how pathetic men are>there is no algorithm in place to stop the desperate man that do message any and all women they are able to
>>33560407And? There are more women with decent reply rates than there are ones with 0-20% so I don't think any excuse you can come up with will work here, all this does is allow you to filter the ones that are just there to look at profiles and talk to no one.
>>33559858I'm at 11% so lol. But also, my best match within 7 years of my age is an 84%, followed by a 74%, so not a lot of possibilities.
>>33559858how do you see your own stats?
>>33560595you have to preview your profile, duh, I'm stupid
>>33555018or block you, the site shows them as the same.For whatever reason, every girl I add on discord (and continue talking to) blocks me on Duo after
What is it with girls who describe in detail their kinks yet claim to be virgins?
>>33500095Thought this shit died months ago but I only just got an email saying my profile went invisible today so I logged back in for the he'll of it.It doesn't look like the pool of Bachelorettes got any more talkative looking at the intro reply rate.
>>33554953Weird flex, not surprised there's gonna be people humble bragging about getting responses though
I haven't used this app in months, did not expect this general to still be up either. I'm guessing it hasn't gotten any better either from the looks of things, still full of BPD larping girls?
>>33560407>it's le men's fault!!!get fucked, low reply rate equals not worth the time >>33560377it's a great update you can tell who are the time wasters
>>33560403I don’t understand why you are so bothered by what I said. There are girls with reply rates at that or higher. I’m not going to waste my time messaging a girl who only replies to one in 10 messages or something. That’s pointless unless yo believe yourself to be in the top 10 percent of physical attractivenes
I've received replies from multiple women with under 30% reply rates but none of that matters when I act like an autist in conversations
>>33560407I'm sure there are plenty of men sending shitty messages but if I see a girl with a single digit reply rate, or even worse 1% reply rate then I'm just gonna avoid them. There is no way they've receives so many shitty messages only 1% were worth replying to.I saw one girl with a 6 month old account, verified pictures, a "teehee i reply to everyone give me time", a 1% response rate and a 0% responded to rate (she's never sent an intro). It's pretty obvious someone like this thinks way too highly of themselves and is looking for chad thundercock.Being able to see how often girls respond to intros is eye opening, not gonna lie.
Think this site can singlehandedly save the site.
>>33561081*think this feature
>>33561011lmao same. I don't know how to really save my shitty conversation skills
probably a stupid thing to ask for but as long as account ages are now public i'd like to be able to filter matches by newest accounts first
>>33561081idk now i feel like women are responding to my intro and then not responding at all afterwards
Ever since the new update rolled out duo lost nearly 2k people
Going on a block rampage because reply rates are public now. Rather than giving chances to people, I’ll just preemptively block them so it doesn’t make my reply rates look bad.
Am I the only one who prefers a girl with a shitty response rate? The ones with high response rates just want attention and talk to everyone. I'd rather talk to a girl who is more selective
>>33561357This is a good thing. It effectively pre-blocks men who otherwise would not have had a chance due to their looks, and keeps people segregated to their respective attractiveness pools. >>33561433You can prefer it if you have the physical attractiveness to be so choosy. Obviously for an average looking guy, there is no point in messaging a woman who only responds to 10% of men, since this means that he is attempting to punch above his weight class.
dating apps are retarded, and saying ''got nothing to lose'' is too as it is wrong, you lose time and sanity. I don't care how many texts you get online or how autistic you are, there is no reason to use such apps knowing that statistically its highly unlikely for anything to happen, downright comparable to gambling.
>>33561442>Obviously for an average looking guy, there is no point in messaging a woman who only responds to 10% of menYou're genuinely delusional if you don't think this applies to every woman on all dating apps. Especially on duo where pictures aren't even required- do you think women care about some profile filled with memes?
>>33561546yea im sick and tired of seeing all these copy paste bios with anime girls as their profile pic, at least describe urself
>>33561546I wonder what the ratio is for guys to girls with pictures of themselves in their profile... to be honest my saving grace might be my verified photo
>>33561297are you implying they replying just to intros just to keep the stats up?Personally, I don't they give a fuck fi their intro reply ratio is 1%
>has verified selfie>has a turn off for many people applied, and set to make friendsAs a woman, I win. No overflowing DM's, and I get to be completely honest. Those who still chat to me are kind and funny and great people.
>>33561357why not just say "a" and skip themdumb foid
>>33561546>do you think women care about some profile filled with memes?On a website that was supposed to be fully anonymous in the first place? It would be rather inadequate if they didn't.
>>33561593I think so. Honestly doesn't REALLY bother me either. Some of you guys need to stop acting like messaging a girl is taking a bunch of your brainpower. Churn through some girls, if they respond great have a good convo, if not move on and try again. It's not hard.
>>33561857>bruh jus message 800 more random thotsI'm gonna pass on that lol
>>33561869Do you really have that many thots to message? If you're spending that much time on a profile you're doing it wrong senpai
>>33561879I'm not messaging any of them. I barely message any anywhere, but definitely not on the honey pot site. I just think it's dumb trying to pretend any of what online dating has created is normal in any way at all
>>33561836>dating website>anonymous??anon do you really think girls would like you for your personality
Should I write a schizopost to my future wife at 6am or nah
>>33561546An average male unironically has a better chance on tinder than this app.You basically have to be chad to even get serious replies here
thoughts? (male)
>>33562366How so? Because.. Tinder guys actually have pictures of themselves on Tinder instead of chainsaw man images? Or 6 memes and a shit selfie of themselves making basedjack face?Excited to see how this change gives duo it's death blow. Men now thinking every woman won't even bother and not even trying. Women leaving due to the lack of privacy,Duodaddy clearly has no basic human understanding of how dating apps function and succeed.
>>3356258959% male here who deactivated for my profile showing my very dorky 100% response rate implying I'm a manwhore
>>33562788I thought 1 in 3 was okay odds for a man but I guess not
>>33562783White chad isn't looking for flips he's looking for ABGs and your not that.
Oh weird it shot up to 42% but my replies to others also went up to 96% so I look like a whoreThis is a bad change though I don't want people to know when I'm online and ignoring their messages
>>33562783>How soBecause the women here are pickier/have higher standards than tinder girls desu. This change is good for the app. It is GOOD that women who don’t reply don’t get messages.
>>33563102https://github.com/duolicious/duolicious-backend/pull/504
>>33563130Interesting. One thing I liked about your website is that it didn't show read receipts. Having an online status is basically the same as having a read receipt now.
>>33563140That's a fair point. There's three solutions I can think of:1. Hide the "last online" stat from anyone you're in a conversation with (but keep it visible to people who haven't messaged you)2. Add a privacy setting to hide the "last online" time from everyone3. Combine (1) and (2): A privacy setting to hide the "last online" time from anyone you're in a conversation withWhat would you prefer?Also,>your websiteHot take: I think matchmaking services should be socialized>>33561291https://github.com/duolicious/duolicious-backend/issues/507>>33560366https://github.com/duolicious/duolicious-backend/issues/506
>>33563168The option to hide last online is good.But leave the reply rates it literally filters out the time wasters same with account age.
>>33563168>>33563233I don’t understand hiding last online. If you don’t want to talk to someone, don’t talk to them. Why bother with trying to hide that you are ignoring someone?
Interesting idea: Do you think you could implement a dynamic reply probability calculator?Something that takes as variables:-Your overall rate of responses to you in all conversations at any given point in a conversation. (To illustrate this, suppose a person is is likely to respond to intros, but is less likely to respond over time. The probability of a response would decrease with messages sent)-The overall rate at whichthe other person replies to all conversations, done similarly -The number of active conversations each person has, with a greater number of conversations subtracting some from the likelihood of a response -If verified pictures are posted, an AI based attractiveness evaluation
>>33563341This is stupid because when you get along with someone the convo usually moves over to discord
>>33563341My guy you gotta go outside and touch some grass
>girls with low reply rates are deleting their accountsIt's so over...
>>33563168Keep last online. It saves people who just want to waste others time and farm validation from being able to deny they're a piece of shit who is too lazy for 1) Saying no thanks to convo2) using the block featureIf you want people to be time wasters where girls farm attention from desperate men, give them mercy. But it'll make everyone hate the place more cause it only gives power to those who misuse it. Make people face the consequences of choosing not to engage on a platform built to make people engage.
>>33561546this would make sense if all of the women on duolicious weren't incredibly mid themselves.if you want chads, you came to the wrong site.get back on tinder, normie.
>>33563168the only reason to hide last online is to enable female mindgames so they can pretend they just haven't used the app, thus keeping men in orbit.it only helps those who are dishonest.
please keep last online it's great!
>>33564077>>33564146I agree. We shouldn't support features that are used for malicious or dishonest purposes. That would be totally not true love pilled...
I just wish it was online in the last 24 hours everything else is fine.
>profile statisticshey this is probably too much information>got message back from a 33% replier and a 10% replierthis is fine actually>archived conversations count as non-replies so I have 40% rate of being replied towait wait I take it back
>>33563102Whore
I don't think you should be able to hide age. That's a weird feature.
Welp I gave it a few days and the quality of women and the conversation they want to give is just as bad. Tired of them thinking they can just sit back and let other people carry it, hope they all get the same apathetic response returned to them when they're interested in talking to someone.
>>33565376It's also a useless feature because it gets invalidated by age filters.
>>33563055duodaddy are you mad i never responded to you lul. make it more obvious
Daily reminder to vote>Should the "gives replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?https://strawpoll.com/GeZARBNWVyV>Should the "gets replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kNzvmgoThese polls have less than 10 responses each, versus 69 and 98 responses when I posted them on Twitter
>>33566398it's good that more people support this but i don't think you should be running an app based on votes.fundamentally, the only reason to hide these stats is to enable deceit.it would allow people to lie and say that "i just never check the app" when in reality they're terminally online.you need to add read receipts to the chat. people need to know if their messages have been read.and there shouldn't be message previews.there should be no ambiguity. this is the problem with texting as a form of communication,it's too easy to play mindgames.
>>33566398You should make sure that those stats aren't self-defeating. If someone has 0% or a very low reply rate, because maybe they only have received 1 message, then it essentially digs a hole they can't get out of. If someone happens to have a 0% reply rate but wants to reply to people, how would they get out of it? Maybe it should be a reply rate based on only a recent time period to make it fair. As in, reply rates from the last 7 or 30 days.
>>33564884I agree with this. The granularity of the last online feature as is seems kinda... creepy. Last online "today" or "x days ago" would be fine.
>>33500095You should make it so that when someone selects "looking for friends" a big wooden hammer comes out of the screen and hammers them flat like a penny
>>33566603why do dating apps even have this as an option? stop wasting everyone's time. it's just attention seeking.
>>33566333No white guy wants you otherwise you wouldve found someone by now. Enjoy your cats.
>>33566603I agree, this shouldn't even be an option. It's a dating app/site not some place for people in a relationship to get someone to third wheel for them.
>>33566939If you pick than you're not single your account should just be automatically deleted.
Aha
https://discord.gg/pyzNP7GTvzbetter duo server because the main admin of the og is a fucking predatorjoin up, we coolin
No one ever responds on duo, whats the point?
Man I'm not getting any responses at all, I didn't think I was that ugly lmaoAre the standards for duo women just through the roof or something?
>>33571140That was good timing, and I agree. This shit is just making me feel worse than I would on a normie app like Tinder at this point.
>>33571144Ive tried several dating apps, no responses except scammers on any of them. Starting to think should just give up
>>33571153Same here, I've had one girl on duo that I thought I could have a convo with but then she wanted to make me jump through hoops with her cryptic bio to have a way to talk to her outside the site and I really don't want to play games. I just wanna talk to someone :(
I have a date tomorrow. She's really cute, seems really smart and well versed, has been fun to get to know. Might go somewhere, might not. But I'm gonna do my best to put my best foot forward!
>>33571117Not sure about the others, but one of the mods/admins (I saw the moment I joined and just left lmao) is a person who added me once before. She's a glowie who self posts on duo "ironically". Claims she only uses it to "make fun of losers" because it's fun. But she would unironically sit on the duo discord all day and chat to strangers, which is so funny to me.Very obvious she's unhappy and has no friends, desperately looking for validation online and tries to feel less bad about herself by making fun of less fortunate people.Should say everything about the server if that person has perms.
>>33571200It's so funny how some girls will completely lose it at the thought of moving things to another app. If I see "no other socials" in a bio or they refuse to give out any, I just simply skip and move on. Those people aren't serious about the app or about meeting somebody.>B-But, actually, they get so many messages, their friend lists would explode if they added everyone! Sure, you're not supposed to add everyone. Be picky, and only add people you think are interesting. Some of these people will straight up just claim they don't have any other socials though, which beats the purpose of a dating app. Even if it's just to make friends.It's very obvious they're just tourists and/or attention seeking.
>>33571153Mind sharing your profile and what you open your messages with?
Am I retarded? I'm using the app for the first time and it's only showing me people close to me which I definitely don't want, is there a way to go international?
>>33571657You cant open with the same message as another person so every message is different. I usually ask about something in their profile. I had one person talk to me today and they ended up ghosting me after adding me on discord. I dont feel comfortable sharing my profile on here though sorry.
>>33571672Go to search - Search Filters - Furthest Distance
>>33571678Thanks anon. I'm trying to find other verified anons to talk to but haven't had much success. Sigh.
>>33571674App is just shit at this point desu. Really low quality people on there. When the app was coming up, there were a lot cooler people. Might just be that.
>girl has 15% response rate>send an intro>still at 15%d-damn...
I vote to remove the looking for friends option, it pollutes the pool with men and women that are already in a relationship or more clearly seeking validation by trying to get friendships only on a doomed dating app
>>33571645are you blood the pedo admin from Duolicious?
>>33571645people not liking you for being an obnoxious racist incel doesn't make them a glowie, and the literal admin of the official duolicious discord is a pedophile
>>33573287no>>33573309You got mad wifey and me made fun of you and started calling us incels (?) hahaha
>>33573710post cock
>>33571719maybe the app is working and that means all the good people are gone!
>>33573710>wifey>dating appwell that's just clearly not what happened
>>33571655>If I see "no other socials" in a bio or they refuse to give out any, I just simply skip and move on. Those people aren't serious about the app or about meeting somebody.You're retarded mate, it's completely normal to only give out your other socials to people you trust a little more. In fact it would be a bit weird to just put them out there because, as you mentioned, the number of requests and possibly bad people
>>33557709nigga, i did't receive any intros and it says 100%fuck this
>>33577272New Thread>>33577272New Thread>>33577272New Thread
