[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (167 KB, 536x363)
167 KB
167 KB PNG
EA settled the debate
>>
>>150849162
Xavi was slightly better peak to peak
>>
>>150849162
If Iniesta and Xavi have 91/ 92 PAS, who has >=93?
>>
File: file.png (175 KB, 539x383)
175 KB
175 KB PNG
>>150849294
>>
>>150849203

Iniesta was the 2nd best player in the world between 2008 and 2016
>>
>>150849336
another debate settled
>>
Xavi better
>>
game would be so much better if they just ditched the ovr ratings, they dont make no sense anyway
>>
>>150849162
>iniesta 1 point ahead of dribbling stats
Proof that the ratings are a joke.
>>
>>150849162
2 unplayable cards
>>
The icon ratings and stats are all over the place, those cucks in canada haven't got a clue
>>
>>150851106
Who the fuck rates Pirlo above Zidane?
>>
>>150856683
Yeah pes 2009 had OVR iirc but, they were hidden so you actually had to look at the stat spread of the player to know if they'd fit into your team
>>
>>150849336
Zidane is crazy overrated. so many delusional people
>>
>>150849336
Zidane was nowhere near as good passer as xavi
>>
Iniesta should have 94 dribble

Xavi should have 94 pass
>>
>>150849336
>DRI 94
ok
>PAS 94
lol



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.