Why is /sp/ taking their return so poorly?
>>151468771I'm old enough to remember when manure finishing 3rd was considered a catastrophic failure
>>151469300In the meantime a whole smorgasbord of foreign billionaires decided to invest in the Premier League. Other clubs got ambitious oligarchs from Russia and the Middle East, United got a couple of Wall St kikes who wanted an additional source of revenue to pay off their own debts.
>>151471278To be fair the Glazers are better owners than most. They even copped out and paid Brady to win an Owl for Tampa. United has always been one of the biggest spenders, just because now they have to deal with some Sheiks and Oligarchs doesn't mean they're still not big investors. Jimmy Rat is the one who started cutting corners.
Nice goal diff lads
>>151468771Rumours of our demise have been greatly exaggerated
>>151471434>United has always been one of the biggest spendersAccording to official books. In reality City probably spent 10x what United has since 2009 or so with shady club “sponsorships” and under the table payments to family members etc.Or do you seriously think they paid £50m for Haaland?
>>151468771Fret not mugbros, well be back
>>151471434>the Glazers are better owners than most.perhaps you should learn about a topic before commenting on it
>>151472466Both Jim Rat and Glazer did shady financial moves in the past. If someone doing payment under the table its them.
