What's up with their recent articles about Salah? the idea that they might be getting paid to carry out an agenda against him might not be so far fetched after all with the utter nonsense they're putting out. I'm not even going to discuss the validity of the penalty, but even if you don't think it wasn't a penalty there's definitely something to it and to claim otherwise is absurd. is it even normal for a publication of this size to be commenting about penalty decisions in AFCON? absolutely absurd.
So touching someone's eyes isn't a penalty?
>>152682900a muslim is upset and wants to exit fc liverpoolthe entire UK reputation is at stake hereif he leaves the world will think they are heckin racistso it's important he stays otherwise he will get bullied into oblivionif it was Macalister or Szlobozslay nobody would care
>>152683035stop it thomas already, you've been rambling about that eyepoke for month now
