Discuss.
women are for show, not for peak performance
>>152708786Do you think she cares
>>152708786For what purpose did they do this? Like who benefited from this? Surely not women.
>>152709765Dubai benefitted, because they hosted (apparently)And both of them got a big paycheck, so they profited as wellAnd then you have to consider all the engagement, pitting men and women and retards of both genders against each other means hosts, sponsors and organizations profit as well because they get extra attentionThat's it, nothing else needed.
>>152709765Exhibition spectacle paid for by saudis who like to pay for bullshit like this. I am surprised Sabalenka's ego allowed her to accept the handicaps in addition to being matched with a busted and currently irrelevant former great. She had that smaller side of the court to compensate for women being weak and slow (official reason, determined to be 9%), and a special rule about only one serve allowed instead of the usual two serves. This essentially meant both sides had to use their second serve, a higher percentage slower serve to avoid double faulting, throughout. It was meant to again advantage Sabalenka and disadvantage Kyrgios. Neverthless, Kyrgios won fairly easily. >>152709332Yes, I do. Other girls wouldn't. Sabalenka does.
STOP LAUGHING AT ME YOU SLUTS I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU ALL WORTHLESS COALBURNERS DIE DIE DIE
>>152709765there was clearly public interest in seeing how wide the gap isso the public benefited, rather than having to deal with continual obfuscation and bullshitting for the sake of politeness
>>152708786Why is crew standing so close?
>>152716635The gap is roughly ballparked at #1 woman = #1000 man, give or take. Meaning a woman would not be able to consistently qualify for ATP main tour or make enough money to support her own career.
How did Kyrgios fall so far? He was top 50 within the past few years.
