should national team kits have sponsors?
>>153563543No.
>>153563599commie
>>153563543No
not even club kits should have sponsors
>>153563543no
>>153565063think of the shareholders :'(
>>153563543As long as they're a unique national export or something
>>153565063Cool it with the antisemitism.
its incredible how much better kits look without adverts graffitied all over themfuck rightoids
>>153563543No. And women footballers shouldn't be allowed to wear tops.
>>153565063this I hate how its starting to become normalized in our sport leagues
>>153563543>>153565063>>153566664
>>153563599Fpbp
>>153568835lmao
Should isn't the real question.It's inevitable. Should we have built those mills, employed peasants to work them paved roads and built apartment blocs near ports and factories? Should we have developed engines to run machines burning oil and coal to churn their products out? Should we have made machine guns or explosives? You cant's ask should, it's simply gonna happen.Savor for now, the sponsorless national kits. For they will only be here until market forces take ground.First it will be irrelevant nations in CAF and AFC just for their practice kits, then it will over a decade or so creep in. At first it will be agreeable national brands and that will minimize complaints "sure France now has a sponsor, but Ubisoft is a French Brand loved all over the world, the new Assassin's Creed is really good and set in Napoleonic France" or "Well, smart for National Grid to sponsor England, just reminding people to pay their bills" But after a few years Betting Sites, Foreign Airlines and Dodgy Finance Schemes based in Southeast Asia will take over, just as what happened in Club Football.
>>153569188imagine reading all that
>>153563543>that's a girl@Cock is this true?
>>153568835SOVL
>>153568835Finnish knockoff baseball can't be that expensive.
