NFL Draft April 23A good mock https://walterfootball.com/draft2026.phpNFL to start training replacement officials in May amid refs labor dramaDOJ opens probe concerning television contractsBears seen as top landing spot for TyreekSF gives one-year deal to DE Samplehttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/h8wAy_p4-II
First for /ourguy/ Carson Beck
>>154169630My brain can't compute a permutation in which the Chiefs don't dominate that league for the foreseeable future. They've won in every scenario possible. They've won with bad defense, with no weapons, with a huge salary hit from Mahomes, during a rebuild years, with the most rookies, they've won on the road, while trailing by 10, and they've done it against superior rosters. Going into 2024 they have the youngest defense in the league which is already a top 3 defense. Please educate me on how my Chiefs are not going to dominate barring injury or Reid dying.>>139210904>Brady has both more rings and better stats than any QB.I've already explained to you why nobody cares about longevity stats. Why are you pretending like you've already forgotten. Would you rather have a QB who scores 4 TDs per game but only plays for 6 years or would you rather have a QB who scores 1 TD per game but plays for 30 years so he ends up having the most TDs of all time. Anyone can get longevity stats by being the last man standing.
>that's one of the biggest copes on this board.-Chiefs have won with Mahomes being a gunslinger on a team with no defense.-Chiefs have won on rebuild years after trading away their best weapon and with the youngest defense.-Chiefs have won on a team with no weapons with Mahomes playing as a checkdown merchant.-Chiefs have won on the road against the toughest strength of schedule in the history of the league.-Chiefs have won after paying Mahomes and being humbled by the salary cap.The only cope is you not recognizing the Chiefs are inevitable. They've won in all possible situations and are the 5th youngest roster. Until they miss the playoffs we should assume it's inevitable that they make it to an AFCCG or does Mahomes have to get to his 7th straight one before you wise the fuck up.
>>154169674>Love now falling out of the firstwhat does this anon know?
Penis Jr.
>>154169674I hate seeing the bears get that fat fuck d linemen who has fat fuck bust written all over his fat ass. Every mock has em picked by the bears and I know he's going to be shit.
>>154169679absolutely nothing
>"I hate the Denver Broncos"!
>>154170083
theres probably posters in this general who'd be more qualified to be a WR Coach than the guy the Chiefs just fired
why did they give up so much to trade up for a CB?
>mfw retards try to shill blo dix
i've seen it regurgitated here over and over, but is it true? is 7 really more than 3?
>>154171734Yabut 9 > 7 so....
>>154170997Everyone knows this is how you talk to your girl when you’re out at games.
>>154170624Because they listened to the media. The weird thing is also who is taking him before their pick at 5? Did they really need to trade up? If it was the Browns that called and said we’re taking him unless you don’t trade up with us, then essentially what we know now is it’s Mason Graham and their 2026 first for Hunter. I wouldn’t trade Graham by himself for that overrated CB.
>>154170624Everyone who knows ball said he was a better CB and would be a full-time CB with maybe a couple meme plays on offense here and there. Anyone who said he'd be a complete two-way player in the NFL should lose the right to share their opinions.
>>154171831I think the Pats would have taken him at 4
>>154171862But no straight corner ever cost that much draft capital, not even consensus elite ones like Woodson and Sanders>>154171881Hunter + Gonzo may have been enough to make up for Drake's shitting the bed to win them the owl
>>154171896>straight cornerwhat's their sexuality have to do with this?
>>154171881They needed OL so bad last year. They still do, but it was desperate then. I could see them moving Campbell to guard if they find a T they like.
>>154171896>no straight corner ever cost that much draft capitalYeah, I agree. Ball knowers also said this.
>>154171913It was a pretty weak OT draft. Kind of a waste to spend a top-5 pick on Campbell, who was absolutely not a sure thing.Also, just want to be clear, I'm not saying they SHOULD have taken Hunter, just that I think they probably would have if he had been there. Enough so that it makes sense the Jags would want to jump them.
I think one of the funniest things that could happen in this draft would be the Giants taking Jeremiyah Love at #5.Also, the Cowboys trading their firsts to move up and take Arvell Reese (Micah but worse).
