Genuine question is there a single recorded example of a women's sports team beating a men's/boy's team of any age?https://thepostmillennial.com/middle-school-boys-soccer-squad-trounces-university-of-washington-womens-team
>>154630929Why do they keep agreeing to this? I doubt it's a fetish thing because they're all carpet munchers
>>154630955we all know why
>>154630955They know it is good training. These boys are already faster and stronger than they are used to with female opponents, so it's a nice way to prepare for a rather physical opponent in particular. I'm sure quite many of these women are relatively embarrassed to lose to boys regardless>>154630929I'm sure there are quite many instances. But it will often be ridiculous stuff like a genuine top team beating some literal who club's U14 side rather narrowly
>>154630963Why didn't they groom me?
>>154631014they're still women, they want Brad from the school football team, not lil chuddy
they can keep trying all they want. biology hasn't changed. testosterone > estrogen.
you guys are such a group of fucking retards. do any of these events show that a womens team thinks they can beat a similar mens team? the fact that a womens college team is scheduling a u14 boys team shows that they know they cant compete with similar men or even teenage boys. they are fully aware of the huge disadvantage they have compared to men which is why their scrimmage is against young kids.what is this gotcha supposed to be? are you trying to compare this to tranny men competing in womens sports?faggots.
>>154633303they're not reading this bro. lol.
>>154633628dont care about that im just trying to understand why this is some "gotcha" thing. college women scrimmage against 13 year old boys cause they know thats the only age group they can realistically compete against and they get shit on for it. and like you said here >>154631250>biology hasn't changed. testosterone > estrogen.which they are literally showing by scheduling against 13 year olds, not equally aged boys teams.
>>154630963noice
>>154633806>thats the only age group they can realistically compete against or you know... they could compete against other womens teams...
>women know they can't compete with men over the age of 13>women vote for politicians that want to let men in women's sportsmake it make sense
>>154633806>they get shit on for itNo, they don't get shit on for losing to boys, they get shit on for demanding equal pay to the men, despite their sport being much less popular than the men's sport, despite their skill and athleticism being much worse than the men. No one would care that women lose to boys in football if they didn't whine about equal pay to men's football.
>>154630929There were, you have several Battle of the Sexes games in tennis and they keep being brought up in that context.At least the ones where the woman won against a retired player, not the one where the Williams sisters lost to a low-ranking guy who showed up drunk and took ciragette breaks during the game.Curiously enough, that one has been swept under the rug. No idea why.
