[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>>
File: IMG_1462.jpg (125 KB, 750x960)
125 KB JPG
>>154762321
Thank god the evil germans didn’t win WW2.
>>
>>154762321
kek how long were british people hiding this from us? they love shitting on our sports stadium for being funded by tax payers but nothing like this ever happens here.
>>
>>154762321
Lmao paki mayor
>>
>>154762370
it was a deal boris johnson made
99 years deal for west ham to rent the stadium, they paid 4.4 mil per year if they are in the prem and half if they went down
it is chicago's parking deal level of stupidity
>>
File: 1761183842557465.png (819 KB, 976x549)
819 KB PNG
Does West Ham even need a big stadium like that? Basically forced to move into the white elephant. Pic unrelated, it got gentrified kek
>>
>>154762400
they are a decent size team, that stadium is probably too small for them but they are not big and rich enough to build their own so they have to rent
>>
>>154762321
Isn't that place kinda shit for footy compared to nearly all the other stadiums in London?
>>
>>154762370
The Raiders have a deal with Las Vegas where they are reimbursed with local taxpayer money if the hotel tax doesn't pay X amount of dollars each year for the stadium's loans
>>
File: r2lfmp92a0t91.jpg (1.94 MB, 4032x3024)
1.94 MB JPG
>>154762498
It's a half arsed compromised bowl that is fit for no-one because of the running track design. They are supposed to retain this (and cover it with retractable seating) as the stadium should also be usable for major athletics events.
London wants to bid for 2029 World Athletics Championships but West Ham are refusing to move out the stadium for a fortnight in September because season would be under way.
So basically it's also useless for the same reason that makes it useless for football. And what Sadiq here isn't making clear, these £2.5m losses are *additional* if (when..) they are relegated. It already loses money on West Hams £4.4m (which would be halved by relegation) per year rent on a 99 year lease, a sum which doesn't cover the basic operating costs. A farcical situation which as noted above Boris Johnston signed off on, inclusive such genius foresight as no-one having thought to charge more if West Ham qualify for Europe and the stadium then had to be used more often, which happened. And the taxpayer carries all of these costs, not that piece of shit club.
>>
>>154762400
Their games are constantly sold out.
>>
>>154763663
>Premier league team
>sell out big stadium
>sold own ground
then TaxpayerFC have no excuse for not building a proper ground, instead of squatting in London Stadium at public cost because their jizzmag emperor and alleged raypist owner was cushy with that corrupt idiot Boris.
>>
>>154763787
Maybe you shouldn't have voted for Boris then :^)
>>
>>154762321
Can't be any British taxpayers left in London right?
>>
>>154762321
2.5 million is nothing compared to what the city of London will be wasting elsewhere. Sure, small shit adds up as well, but it cannot be catastrophic. The stadium deal already was trash before
What’s really weird is that West Ham nearly sell out every game. 62,340 average at a capacity of 62,500? That’s the 2nd-highest attendance, after United. How come? Are these all tourists? West Ham doesn’t seem that popular and relevant to me, I didn’t perceive the club as having that much of a presence in London either.
Tottenham, Liverpool, and Arsenal all have worse total attendance and worse attendance rates, with smaller stadiums. Surely it must be about pricing as well, but it’s just weird. And if West Ham are this popular, they should be able to afford their own stadium in the long run. An even larger one
>>
>>154764317
I don’t have an actual answer but West Ham are popular with the working class and are strongly associated with their locale of East London. They’re a big London club, if that makes sense
>>
>>154763942
The deal is from when he was mayor of London, only Londoners could vote for him.
>>
>>154764334
I don’t want to disagree, as I recognize you must be more knowledgeable about this than me, but I spent a week in London last summer, and I specifically stayed in what would be considered core West Ham territory. I was astounded by the lack of presence the club had, both there and all over London. I saw one West Ham pub and one guy with a West Ham shirt all week. No comparison to Arsenal, Chelsea, even Spurs and goddamn Millwall. It was just my eye test, or course. No great study. But I remember being a bit surprised. When we got near the Arsenal neighborhood, you could see a certain shift at least
Newham and the surrounding area definitely was working class, but there were so few British people that my personal explanation for the lack of West Ham presence is that all people there only think of Bangladeshi cricket or something
>>
>>154762356
The children were also immigrants



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.