[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/sp/ - Sports
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
Why are they at the WC? No.154764044
File: OIP-216995375.jpg (21 KB, 474x474)
21 KB JPG
Why are they at the WC?  No.154764044 Archived
As a Brit living in The Swamplands I wonder…
Why are The Swampland even at the World Cup?

Dutch club football is a joke.
How did the National team qualify for the World Cup.

Why did FIFA even allow them to participate?
They are only known for ugly, boring murder ball.

My prediction they will end bottom of the group.
Which is a good thing as teams with actual talent, skill and class ar what fans want to see.
>>
Anonymous
No.154764050
 No.154764050
>>154764044
How white is the team?
>>
Anonymous
No.154764137
 No.154764137
>>154764044
Reactive football is effective. Moreso in NT football. They'll get out of the group. Tunisia is one of the worst teams, Sweden suck and have done so for years. Japan has been hit by injuries and their best player is out. Netherlands will run out of luck at some point but with yet another soft path might reach quarters o algo.
>>
Anonymous
No.154764336
 No.154764336
>>154764137
Every pundit has Morocco knocking out The Swamplands in the round of 32.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.