Horn editionPreviously on /slop/: >>93667995 ▶ Thread Task: prompt a humanoid▶ It's been confirmed images are not saved on Microsoft's servers forever, only for 50 days. Make sure to save your images.▶ Generatorshttps://bing.com/images/create/https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creatorhttps://huggingface.co/spaces/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schnellhttps://huggingface.co/spaces/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-devhttps://fluxpro.art/https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/stable-cascadehttps://huggingface.co/spaces/google/sdxlhttps://clipdrop.co/stable-diffusionhttps://www.mage.space/▶ /slop/-approved styles, prompts and perspectiveshttps://www.rentry.org/tgslop▶ Videogame art styleshttps://www.imgur.com/a/0OQ2kQk▶ Useful linksColor identifiers -- https://www.htmlcolorcodes.com/List of art movements -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_art_movementsList of hair styles -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hairstylesWorld folk clothing -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_costumeWorld body armors -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_armorNames for general clothing styles (PDF) -- https://files.catbox.moe/3r0ux6.pdf
>TT: Megara is an engineered human, not pure strainThe meeting with Arx Skystone proved interesting. It was slightly before the rite of adulthood in the village, where the children would travel to the meeting place and put their "beads of childhood" on the stone there. What brought Meg to visit was the reports of the farmers having witnessed streaks of light falling from the sky. The crops had suffered shortly thereafter.
The ancient elven king was one with the very land he stewarded.
Is there a good tool that can redraw a landscape based on a picture I provide? I am trying to make some art for an upcoming session, and I have the general landscape down but I'm no artist. Basically I want the resulting imagine to keep the specific rock formation I have drawn, and preferably to even keep the general color pallet I have used, but to make it look like detailed rock instead of my amateur bullshit. Is there a good program for that, or am I shit out of luck?
>>93678745>Thread Task>Horune
Have a cute goth boy
>>93679268Would
TT
>>93679442Oh I really like that old rock king guy, really neat, makes me think of Legend of Mana.
>I seriously hope you guys don't add skulls to your collection before cleaning them thoroughly first.
>>93678745
>>93679492How do you prompt orc grills? i always get men
>>93679512I just said "female orc", no other adjectives. "Fantasy illustration of a" is what I start with, if that helps?
>>93679042I'm guessing what I asked about isn't a thing, then?
>>93679736I *think* there might be some generators that let you feed it an image, but the names escape me at the moment.
>>93679736It's called an image prompt and most advanced AI image generators can do it. Bing cannot, and that's what this thread is about.
>>93679539>female orcsometimes it gives me green elves,its odd
>>93651426NICEMan, seems that lot of slop posters fro start of the year are around.Did I miss any drow urchin posting over the past six months? I got quite too busy to slop.
Not what i expected
This might have been asked ad nauseum, but Im getting really sick of Bing blocking me whenever I try to feed it a prompt with the word "female" and it accuses me of making smut.Is there any cheeky way around this?God forbid people want to generate a female character.
>>93680192It's getting worse. I haven't posted in a few threads because it's been all but impossible to get an image that isn't sexualized by Bing.I just want cute and sexy and I was getting that until just a few days ago and now Bing won't stop being overtly sexual even when I'm trying to be as chaste as I can.I was going to be sarcastic at you and tell you to prompt a nun but in my own trials this is the only image it gave me in over a dozen attempts (plus a few dogs) thst didn't have her tits halfway out of her habit. And even then, it felt the need to put some skintight pleather or latex over them.
>>93680419Oh and forgot to mention, humanoid cat is still on thread topic.
>>93680192You already seem to know the problem - Bing makes every female character sexual and then blocks the final picture for being too sexy, so you need to describe them as wearing heavy armor or many layers of clothing.
>>93680445And if you're specifically looking for characters that DON'T look like they stepped out of an armory, then get good at an inpainting program.
>>93679053Nice hips and ass…
>>93678745>Horn editionThe Hooves – world's first Minotaur gang
>>93680521I rather like that one.
>>93679042https://huggingface.co/spaces/fffiloni/FLUX.1_dev_InstantX_ControlNet_CannyIs this what you're looking for? If not check other spaces, huggingface has lots of good ai shit
>In Nar'Velis, drow men were never granted the privilege of arcane training - and so male wizards were unheard of. However, on rare occasions, a powerful priestess would give birth to a son with the spark of magic, and these children, cursed from the moment they drew breath, were shackled in iron and had their mouths sealed with the binding of silence. Raised in chains, their untamed power festered within, growing wild and uncontrollable. The Matrons used these feral sorcerers as living bombs on the battlefield, unleashed in the hope that their explosive magic would destroy both themselves and the enemies of Nar'Velis in a single, devastating conflagration.
>>93679042I went here and used the advanced tabhttps://getimg.ai/text-to-imageIt let me upload your image along with a short prompt, which was>A distant rock formation, realistic and dramatic lighting, a stream flowing out of itGave me two imagesYou can probably come up with a better prompt. I had to log in with google though.
>>93680557This rifle very bothers me
I know it's old news, but the quality of Bing has really fallen off recently. It recognizes less and less styles, it's leaning harder and harder into it's baseline style which is very ugly, and seems increasingly more confused by complex prompts. Impressive how badly they've managed to run this (previously amazing) technology.
>>93682930I know. Even modifications to previously used prompts may result in setting style to its base pseudo photorealism. Adding three characters in fight, especially when it's two against one, slowly slips from its grasp, and the only things that turns out okay are those static ones. Soon, landscapefags would get what they want, because there will be no point of making pics with characters.
>>93682701This AI is certainly bothersome
Choose your fighter.
>>93680976Behold! A man!
>>93684377>Choose your fighter.I choose… this one.
>>93684449>WHAT IS A MAN?
>>93684461Why would you want a nightmare fuel creature whose kilt is melting into his own fur? Weirdo.
>>93684461How do you reliably get the neck like that?
>>93685476
>>93685708I love me some cars with teeth
>>93685665>neck like thatYou mean muscular? My prompts are never particularly reliable, but starting description with 'musclebound' and then dropping 'bodybuilder physique with exaggerated muscles and bulging veins' near beginning of prompt seems to do a truck.
>>93686103Retard, he either has a bicep on either side of his throat or he's got one of those swollen tumors that ferrets get a lot.
this tripfag is an annoying git lol
post treasure
>>93682930This is the dirty secret of AI: the very thing that makes it strong (that it learns) means that its impossible to keep quality consistent. Every interaction with the model changes the model in some tiny way, and that builds up over time.Bing didn't make the image generator worse. We did. Every single user made it worse, as a direct consequence of us using it. This is unavoidable, and everyone with a tech degree familiar with machine learning knew this was going to happen.
>>93687175>it's not them,it's usI hope this is bait
>>93687175> this model learns from the prompts people give it> model doesn't make pictures of naked elves yetPick ONE, retard
>>93687303It used to. But its handlers put stricter and stricter regulations on it to detect nipples to the point that you have to get very creative to get nipples past the dog filter.
>>93687175Is bing still scraping the internet adding new art to its models? That would be kind of retarded, but it makes sense if they're trying to gather data about a.i. itself. The main point of this big free open playtest is so that they can gather information about how people use it and how to censor it, and that's the real reason why it's gotten worse, the cycle of censorship and censor-evasion is itself a degenerate feedback loop.
>>93687319>>93687175Yes, because the change in performance is all down to the AI having different constraints and being fed a different set. They aren't feeding the AI the AI generated content.The reason AI will never take off (as anything other than a legal tool) is because nobody does good metadata management, which is why nothing has been done with AI that we can't do better with existing tools (and why the current implementation of AI is amongst the worst possible in conception, because nobody cares because it's not actually useful).
>>93687175>>93687319>>93687328>>93687345>T̶̝͋H̴̡̼̫̫͚̼̩̫͍̰̥̤̳͔͍̟̾̐́̀̑̔̍̓̈̇͑́̈́́͗̎̔̈̄̕͘͠Ȅ̵̼̤̐͑̌̂̽̈́ ̷̦̹̙̗̼̬̭̟̣̓̉͛̐͊̓̊̚͜͝B̴̹̞̓Ȩ̵̨͕͚̻̠̺̟͖̼̺̗̘͚͚̤͇͉̐͂͗̚͠ͅͅĀ̶̡̞̰̜̏̓̾̉̇͑̌̉͛̿̕̕̕͜͝S̶͔͖̺̯̹͌̓͑͌͂̕͠ͅT̵͓̎̍̍͆̀̍̑͛̆̎̈́̏̾͐̓͂̇͂̊̎͠ ̴̡͔̑̊̒͗̌̎̔͒̎̚͝͠ͅM̸͕̻̙̭͙̘̻̹̉́͑́́̄̑̂̑͒͝Ù̵̧̗̺̬̼̞̆̇͌̄́̏̎͐͜͝͠S̷̨̛͕̭͚͖̱̺̠͇̬͇͔̳͇͉͗̓̃̾́̓̈́́̋̂̃͛̂͘͝͠ͅT̸̨̧̧͖͍͈͇͈̥̗͍̟̣̭̫̬̹͉̊͊̌̓̃̂͊̚ͅ ̵̛̻̫̖̹̤̪̣͈̟̮̘̼̜͇̞̌̿̊̓̿͗͋̎͌̓́̇̽̍̾̿̋̃͝͠F̴̧̢̻͙̼̪̠͕̱̫̙̬̉̄̒Ȅ̵̬̟̆̀̌E̵̬̒͌͒͆̈̊̈́Ḑ̶̝̟̗̩͕͍̪̻͙͍̤̠̞̤̘̟͉̃̎̇͑͝
>>93687303>>93687345Incidentally, what are the current bets practices to get sexy elf thots from Bing?
>>93687493Dumb luck.
>>93687493I've stopped trying to get sexy elves. It's so inbred with itself that all attempts at elf girls, it tries to hard to sexualize them that it triggers its own filters.
I should try some of the older propmpts
>>93687493Beating the filter merely requires learning the trigger words then avoiding them entirely, being extremely creative with synonym usage to bypass what you can't outright say, and adding as many incidental details about the background to help distract it.
>>93686103Thanks. I've been trying with 'bulky, swollen, (etc) neck', and sometimes it gets there. 'Hunchback' or 'hunched over' rarely seem to help or do anything, but maybe that's me attempting to stuff 10lbs of prompts in a 5lbs llm.
>>93685665>>93687665Huh.
>>93687175You don't know what learning is, you overly-credulous hype-beast.
>>93687784Nice thongs.
>>93687846And I just noticed one of the sandals is a literal foot. Thanks for another quality image, Bing!
Why does this shit ai only prompts one picture?
>>93687889Fellow redhead cybernetic ballistic armor SD enjoyer!
>>93688181Would
>>93687615hahaha, I just found a prompt that goes through or gets content-warning blocked based on if I add coma at the end (had just one character left and trid to add "heavy rain" at end)
>>93688244and the come at the end is what gets it blocked, btw, not removing it
>>93688000It generates 4 normally. If it generates less it is usually due to dumb censorship.The censorship is two-pronged, it blocks words you use and censors the images generated.When images are missing it means that it generated something that triggered the inappropriate image detection, even if your prompt had nothing inappropriate on it, sometimes because the AI was trained on porn and just generates it, but other times because it sees nudity were there's none.
>>93688278I love that gun
>>93688278>dumb censorshipCrazy,it censored doll and mermaid words,but if i type male beforehand it prompts all pics,its as if it wants us to only prompt dudes
Someone here please gen Reimu Hakurei on Bing and post the prompt, thank you.
Someone here please make Reimu Hakurei on Bing and post the prompt, thank you.
>>93688305>>93688308Back to /jp/,anon
>>93688303BIGSTRONGMUSCULARDUDES
>>93688303Oh, you can get mostly-naked dudes incredibly easily. I don't even think the image filter is trained to recognize them as sexually-suggestive.
>>93688303>>93688409there's less porn of men than women across the internet, retards, that's the reason
This fucking AI seriously dogged me because of thick forest?Bravo microsoft
>>93688419Actually that's wrong, bigger retard. I just pointed out that the program can very easily make porn-esque pictures of men, so clearly there's more than enough of those sorts of pictures in the training data. The problem is that the secondary filter that scans the images for Inappropriateness doesn't register them as bad, because Microsoft and OpenAI are retards. Just like you.
>>93688445>more than enoughbut not nearly as much, so the composites are less likely to be porn-y statistically. you don't need to invent some made-up bullshit about the appropriateness scanner. unless you have some proof to show.
>>93688419It is an artificial bias, don't try to defend the megacorp, anon
>>93688514Thank you for proving you're spouting bullshit because you're angry at muh capitalism
>>93688521Man, you are reading too much into it and making assumptions. I just don't like how stupid censorship gets in the way and it is biased towards gay shit.
>>93687328If they use GANs in their models then the AI gens would work as discriminator input. Has anyone ever tried this? Or even tried their hands at coding up diffusion models? Most I ever got into were VAEs
>>93688553>reading too much into itNo, that would be the other guy. My position is just Occam's Razor. If there was an equal amount of male porn to female porn then he might have a point. But there isn't, so regardless of any biased coding, a composite female image will always be statistically more porn-y.
>>93688449Wow, you really are goddamn stupid. You keep talking about why the image creator might produce less porn-esque pictures of men, but that isn't true. It produces tons of it. Easily. The only difference between sexualized pictures of men and women, and that the pictures of men get past the second filter. I'm not making anything up, you just don't know what you're talking about. We've known about the two filters for a very long time, it's not new information. The discrepancy between the program allowing sexualized pictures of men vs. not allowing sexualized pictures of women is clearly a deliberate conscious choice by the developers in the name of censorship, safety, and de-beautification. Denying this doesn't make you interesting, it makes you stupid. Don't expect another response, your room temperature IQ isn't worth more of my time.
>>93688581That isn't porn, imbecile, they're just shirtless.
>Remember when people just posted neat slop instead of arguing?
Not biting. :)
>>93688586Don't worry, I'm done with the retard. Just wanted to dismantle his gaslighting attempt.
>>93688593Gaslighting is where you lie to people while pretending to know what DALL-E's code looks like.
Everyone just chill for a second. Have a wholesome gen
>>93688583>they're just shirtlessTry prompting shirtless women then
>>93688632So your gripe is with society, not Bing.
>>93688603My wholesome gunslinger blacksmith mage fairyWe're trying to get the game going for months but real life keeps getting in the way, we barely are able to play. It is fun to prompt images of the characters though.Our GM made a grim dark setting, after the big bad guy took over the world and the hero party was locked accidentally in a time bubble and woke up to a broken dark world. So naturally we made the whole party happy cute fairies to disrupt the grim dark.
>>93688603
>>93688675
>>93688603My undine platypus aquatic bloodline sorcerer ignores gaslighting trolls.
>>93688706
>>93688748
>Oh, /slop/. What hath the become?
>>93688720Nice beak bro!
>>93688776
>>93688791>>93688800I miss savage elf anon.
>>93688848
Well,who's gonna bake it?
>>93688920You have 10 minutes to bake a new thread or I'm making one with an elf in the OP.The only question is which elf will cause the most seethe?
>>93688920>>93688947I think I can get something up and running
>>93688962>>93688962>>93688962>>93688962
>>93688967Odd looking elf
>>93688970Yep. Always love reinventing the fantasy races
>>93688586Not really, no. Maybe like December
Can Bing recognize Bass from MegaMan?
>>93694204Would you kindly fuck off to /v/? Why do retarded tourists keep bumping a dead thread?
>>93694350Make me.
