[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 248538.jpg (215 KB, 900x1219)
215 KB
215 KB JPG
Would you recommend it?
>>
>>94753238
It's not D&D 5e, so it basically has no player-base and is completely irrelevant. I hate that that's true, but it is.
>>
>>94753238
Aren't there two? I heard one of them is obscenely broken and there's no reason to play anything but a witch.
>>
>>94753238
I've only read the pdf, and it looks like a book-keepy, convoluted Interlock. I think it's worth buying or playing just for the content. Of course, it is still better than D&D 5e, though.
>>
>>94753238
No.
No.

>>94753790
>t. retard

>>94753921
That's the one from the OP, befitting a CP2020 with fantasy paint job. And because they didn't adjust shit, it means everyone wants to be Solo, because this is a Solo-only game.
Oh, sorry, I meant to say Witcher. Everyone wants to be one, because in the grim darkness of witcherverse, there are only cyberpunk mechanics for guns, except there are no guns.
The other one is in Polish and /tg/ translated rules around the time TW3 came out. It's decent. And by the virtue of being classless and making any character viable, it instantly mogs the Pondsmith's game
>>
>>94753790
If you really want to try it you just have to A) run the game yourself (instead of acting blike a spoiled lazy faggot) and B) propose the game to your (irl) friends or to an established gaming group you're already part of. If you expect to find someone else running whatever game for you of fucking course it will mostly be 5e, duh.
>>
>>94754098
>Things nobody asked for or even implied
>>
>>94754117
Then why are you lamenting the supposed "irrelevancy" of this game? It's not a factor in running the game, just lift your lazy ass and do it.
>>
>>94754182
I am not OP.
And you seriously need to work on your reading comprehension, because neither did OP complain about it.
You are literally bitching about shit nobody even suggested
>>
>>94754238
I didn't reply to op but to >>94753790 you fucking spastic, what part of
>It's not D&D 5e, so it basically has no player-base and is completely irrelevant. I hate that that's true, but it is.
...of that post did you miss? This is getting ridiculous.
>>
>>94753238
Just read it and see for yourself. ffs this hobby is about reading.
>>
>>94753238
I saw a bunch of episodes with friends while tore up with Lucy, Mary, and Molly. Decent enough show, it took me a few episodes for me to realize that Witcher's eyes (probably) weren't constantly glowing red because he was gonna choke someone out -- it was a very stable hallucination, if that's what it was. It was always the Witcher, his eyes going blazing red, because dumbasses. Then he'd try to smile off the morons... eventually there would be a fight.

TL;DR. OP is a massive faggot and you couldn't pay me to awkwardly grope him for a single minute of filming an 8mm pornographic movie.
>>
>>94753238
It's Cyberpunk Red, but fantasy iirc

>>94753790
Sad but true.
>>
>>94757007
NO it isnt, its about playing. Every game should have a one page quick reference sheet you can post so you can get past the reading ASAP.
>>94757385
>It's Cyberpunk Red, but fantasy iirc
grim, remember red being a bit disapointing. THouugh I think they came out with a 2077 addition that made a few things better. WHo knows, maybe if the system continues to get other settings it may become more popular.
>>
>>94754055
It's sort of bizarre to me that you wouldn't make a Witcher game specifically about being Witchers.

>But Witchers only work alone!

They work together all the fuckin' time in the games and you can come up with some ass pull reason to make it reasonable.
>>
>>94758031
I'm pretty sure the main reason Geralt mostly works alone is that there aren't a whole lot of Witchers left at that point.
>>
>>94754055
>No.
>No.
Can you go into detail what makes it bad, outside of the optimization? Does it do the setting ideal injustice?
>>
>>94754055
>Gigantic homo & top kek.
You are a shining credit to your race, the race of being a faget.
>>
>>94759193
Perfect. Set the rpg in an earlier era.

The concept lends itself so perfectly to roleplaying games. The different schools are your classes/archetypes/WoD style families. You are a being purpose built to go out on adventures to get paid. It maps so well it's stupid.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.