why no good 17th century fantasy games/settings?
WFRP 4e
>>94807077Because you keep spamming those threads.Yes, you are at fault. People just spitefully aren't making those games and hide away existing ones, just to spite your ass
Lamentations of the Flame Princess takes place in the 17th century.
>>94807077I was literally about to ask for recommendations for settings like this. Get out of my head, Charles
>>94807077There is. Honor + Intrigue.
>>94807097LotFP is not good and is not 17th century flavored.>>94807089WFRP 2e or 4e work but they're broadly more 16th century.
>>94807077Heros and Hardship has a setting book 17th century Scotland
>>94807077there's a Solomon Kane setting for Savage Worlds.Savage Worlds is a good game, Solomon Kane's setting is 17th century.
I really, really wish /v/-style bait OP posts were a bannable offense.
>>94807161>Solomon Kane's setting is 17th century.which is weird when most of the historical events REH mentions Kane taking part in are in such as the execution of Sir Thomas Doughty in 1578 and the Battle of Flores in 1591 are in 16th century
>>94807415yeah, it's mostly 16th century with a bit of 17th, but still counts for this thread.https://www.pjfarmer.com/woldnewton/Solomon.htm
>>94807450this timeline seems to be the website owner's headcanon or based on third-party fan fiction rather than any concrete evidence from REHthe 1610 time period for Solomon Kane's Homecoming is based on the interpretation that the "Bess" in the Poem is meant for Queen Elizabeth the first for example and not much else
>>94807117>>94807415>>94807476>I'm gonna bitch and moan like a little cuntJust go play Dzikie Pola and fuck off, Paweł
>>94808110There are good suggestions in this thread. LotFP is simply not one of them. It's a bad system and the creator is a doofus.>>94807112This or WFRP. Savage Worlds does it okayish. I dunno if GURPS Swashbuckling was any good, never played it, but it exists and is 17th century.
I forgot when this one takes place in
>>94807117Why exactly do people hate the firecrotch gameI know the creator is cringe or something
>>94807077Lobsterpot28 looks neat, but I haven't played it.>>94807112OP's asking for fantasy, not historical.
>>94809091There is nothing keeping you from using H+I for fantasy.
>>94809076It's just b/x house rules, basically. A lot of people are butthurt from it's association with z*k, and Raggi is kind of cringe.
>>94809101OP asked fir a 17th century fantasy setting/game, not a historical setting he'd have to rework into fantasy. I know you probably think you're being helpful, but you're just being obtuse.
>>94807476Meh, other chronologies and Wikipedia also include stuff from early 17th century.Anyway you're being an utter faggot so I hope you don't get to play any game so that other players can be spared form your faggotry.
>>94809110I repeat: there is nothing stopping you from using H+I for fantasy. It even has an entire sourcebook for it, if you're too dense to use the main rulebook alone.
>>94809116Fag.
>>94809134
>>94810345Back in your containment thread, AI Slop faggot.
>>94810345>AIjeet
>>94807089>>94807097shit>>94809110yes
isnt the empire from warhammer fantasy basically this?
>>94809110I mean, there's always Vampire - Wild West & Werewolf - Wild West.
>>94811859no lolalso fuck grimderp
>>94811859No that’s 16th century at it’s technological peak (ignoring fantasy steam tech)
Oh look, it's the standard bitchfest thread about "muh pike and shotte 17th century fantasy game" and then when people list those games, OP throws a temper tantrum.Fuck off and die in a ditch already, you useless cunt. Why do you keep remaking this thread is beyond me. But what's absolutely incomprehensible is that people still try to reply to you, after three years straight of this shit.
>>94814733Some cheese to go with you since you wanna whine.
>>94807117>LotFP is not good can't argue with that>and is not 17th century flavored.the most popular module is set during the 30 years war
>>94815292another module explicitly takes place in a pioneer village in America in 1630
>>94815336plus the one in the english civil war
>>94815347another in 17th century amsterdam
>>94815292>>LotFP is not good >can't argue with thatisn't is mostly just B/X?that's a pretty functional system
>>94815368it has a couple undeniable improvements (slot based encumbrance, d6 thief skills, cleric spells at level 1, fighter attack bonus increases every level)it also has some setbacks like the lack of the monster and treasure tables, which removes a ton of the utility that the basic/expert set providedits lunch has been eaten in the decade since release. people who want a faithful retroclone can pick up OSE, while people who want classic D&D with quality of life improvements have dozens of games to choose frombesides people turning against the dev for personal reasons the ecosystem around it has slowed down because he can no longer provide the extremely generous freelance rates that originally motivated creators to write for the system
>>94807077Clockwork & Chivalry is a BRP game set during the English Civil War with some alt-history clockwork on the Cromwell side and magic on the Royalists. Being a BRP system game, it would be relatively simple to ignore those elements if you didn't like them and pull in more traditional fantasy elements from another BRP title if you so chose. (It's a damned shame the authors never finished their "official" campaign. It was pretty good.)Colonial Gothic is a supernatural game set in the 18th century that could very easily be taken a century to fit what you are looking for.
>>94811810your mom is shit
>>94807077Helveczia?
In Spanisch:https://www.nosolorol.com/es/161-villa-y-corteI think it is a variant of aquelarre 3rd edition, so probably good, but I have not played nor read it.
